24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Loading/time relationships 77<br />

overpressure. The variations in C d are partly influenced by the proximity <strong>of</strong><br />

the ground surface to the boundary layer. Blast loading on arches was<br />

investigated by F.E.Anderson <strong>of</strong> the US Defense Atomic Support Agency in<br />

1958, <strong>and</strong> his work was used by Newmark <strong>and</strong> others in drawing up the<br />

figures.<br />

Anderson also investigated domes, <strong>and</strong> the results for 45° domes are given<br />

in Figure 4.2 when the peak incident overpressure, p 0, is less than 25 psi. The<br />

variation <strong>of</strong> C d along the line <strong>of</strong> symmetry <strong>of</strong> the dome shows that C d=0 when<br />

the angle a is about 70°. Along a transverse line <strong>of</strong> a 60° cylindrical arch<br />

under similar loading functions C d is zero when a is about 55°.<br />

In the discussion on the loading <strong>of</strong> a semi-circular cylinder it was assumed<br />

that the shock front was travelling in a direction normal to the longitudinal<br />

axis <strong>of</strong> the cylinder. If, however, the shock travels in the same direction as this<br />

axis <strong>and</strong> first impinges on the flat end <strong>of</strong> the structure, the values <strong>of</strong> pressure<br />

ratio <strong>and</strong> drag coefficient will be similar to those for a rectangular box structure.<br />

All the above loading analyses resulted from research in connection with<br />

the design <strong>of</strong> structures to resist nuclear weapons effects, so it was presented,<br />

with revisions, during the period 1950 to 1980. However, earlier assessments<br />

Figure 4.2 Blast wave meeting 45° dome (from Newmark et al., ref. 4.2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!