Annual Inspection Report - Florida's Turnpike

September 7, 2012
Ms. Diane Gutierrez-Scacetti
Executive Director and
Chief Executive Officer
Florida Turnpike Enterprise
Florida’s Turnpike, Milepost 263
Bldg 5315, Turkey Lake Service Plaza
Ocoee, Florida 34761
C:\Users\6907\Inspections\Turnpike\Report\2012 Report\FTE FY12 Annual Inspection Cover Letter.doc
General Consultants
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise
Florida Department of Transportation
SUBJECT: Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System FY 2012 Annual Inspection Report
Dear Ms Gutierrez-Scacetti:
As general consultants to Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, and in accordance with Section 5.13 of the Bond
Resolution, ATKINS and HNTB are pleased to submit to you the FY 2012 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise
System Annual Inspection Report.
The results of this year’s inspection are indicative of the Turnpike’s ongoing efforts to maintain aggressive
and comprehensive maintenance and renewal and replacement programs. The overall condition of the
Turnpike System is excellent. Based on the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) maintenance
rating program, the overall condition of the Turnpike’s roadways is rated at 91, which is consistent with
previous year’s scores.
The FY 2012 Annual Inspection does reveal that some facilities are in less than fair condition. These
conditions do not pose any immediate risks, and Turnpike Maintenance continues to do an excellent job of
ensuring these facilities are routinely repaired. The Turnpike has currently programmed over $64 million as
part of the renewal and replacement program for FY 2012 and over $34 million as part of the routine
maintenance program. The Turnpike continues to demonstrate the value of strategically identifying periodic
and routine maintenance, using proven asset management techniques, and focusing efforts on identifying and
committing the funding required to preserve the Turnpike System. If you have any questions, please contact
us.
Very truly yours,
ATKINS HNTB Corporation
Matthew T. Lamb, P.E. Jeffery S. Dailey, P.E.
Program Director Program Director
Attachment
cc: N. Liquori/J. Olson/B. Dietrich/P. Wai/J. Quintana/S. Alvarez/B. Sanchez
File: 07-560.G.6.10

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Annual Inspection Report
for the fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012
Description Page
List of Tables ................................................................................................................... 3
List of Figures .................................................................................................................. 5
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 6
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8
1.1 General Description and Procedure of Inspection ................................................. 8
1.2 Description of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System and Inspection Zones .......... 9
2. FY 2012 Maintenance Inspection Results ............................................................ 11
2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 11
2.2 Roadways ........................................................................................................... 11
2.3 Structures ............................................................................................................ 19
2.3.1 Bridges ................................................................................................................ 19
2.3.2 Overhead/Cantilever Signs ................................................................................. 22
2.3.3 High Mast Light Towers (HMLTs) ....................................................................... 23
2.3.4 Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQCs ) ........................................................... 24
2.4 Buildings .............................................................................................................. 25
2.4.1 Buildings .............................................................................................................. 25
2.4.1.1 Toll Plaza Administrative Buildings and Canopies .............................................. 26
2.4.1.2 Administration and Miscellaneous Buildings ....................................................... 26
2.4.1.3 Communication Tower Buildings ......................................................................... 26
2.4.1.4 Water/Wastewater Treatment Plants .................................................................. 29
2.4.1.5 Service Plaza Restaurants and Service Stations ................................................ 29
2.4.2 Tollbooths, Mechanical, and Electrical ................................................................ 30
2.4.3 Inspection Rating Procedures for Building Catagories and Components ........... 30
3. Summary of Findings ............................................................................................. 40
3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 40
3.2 Roadways ............................................................................................................ 40
3.2.1 Roadway .............................................................................................................. 42
3.2.2 Roadside .............................................................................................................. 42
3.2.3 Traffic Services .................................................................................................... 42
2012 Annual Inspection Page 1
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
3.2.4 Drainage ............................................................................................................... 43
3.2.5 Vegetation/Aesthetics ........................................................................................... 43
3.3 Structures .............................................................................................................. 44
3.3.1 Bridges .................................................................................................................. 44
3.3.2 Overhead/Cantilever Signs ................................................................................... 46
3.3.3 High Mast Light Towers (HMLTs) ......................................................................... 46
3.3.4 Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQCs ) ........................................................... 47
3.4 Buildings ................................................................................................................ 48
3.4.1 Buildings ................................................................................................................ 50
3.4.2 Tollbooths .............................................................................................................. 50
3.4.3 Mechanical ............................................................................................................ 51
3.4.4 Electrical ................................................................................................................ 51
4. Program Status, Commitments, and Recommendations ................................... 52
4.1 Maintenance Rating Program Status ..................................................................... 52
4.2 Programmed Commitments ................................................................................... 52
4.3 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 54
Appx. A Maps of System components and Inspection Zones ........................................ A
Appx. B Inspection Rating Procedures for Roadways, Structures, and Buildings ........... B
Appx. C Selected Photographs of Existing Conditions .................................................... C
2012 Annual Inspection Page 2
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
LIST OF TABLES
1 – Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System Components – FY 2012 ................................. 9
2 – Maintenance Inspection Zones – FY 2012 .............................................................. 10
3 – Turnpike Enterprise Roadway Inspection Rating Scale ........................................... 12
4 – Zone I Condition of Roadway Elements – Turnpike System (Mainline 0-100) .................. 14
5 – Zone II Condition of Roadway Elements – Turnpike System (Mainline 100-200)… .......... 15
6 – Zone III Condition of Roadway Elements – Turnpike System (ML 200-309, Beeline, Sou Conn)…16
7 – Zone IV – Condition of Roadway Elements – Turnpike System (Polk Pkwy Veterans, Suncoast) 17
8 – All Zones – Condition of Roadway Elements – Turnpike System (All Zones) ......... 18
9 – Quantities of Major Structures 2012 ........................................................................ 19
10 – Bridge Structures Deficiencies ............................................................................. 20
11 – Condition of Overhead or Large Sign Stuctures FY 2012 ..................................... 22
12 – Condition of High Mast Light Towers (HMLT) ....................................................... 23
13 – Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQCs ) Deficiencies ....................................... 24
14 – Building Quantities ................................................................................................ 25
15 – Condition of Buildings – HEFT .............................................................................. 31
16 – Condition of Buildings – South Mainline and Sawgrass ........................................ 32
17 – Condition of Buildings – Central ............................................................................ 33
18 – Condition of Buildings – North Mainline and South Conn Ext ................................ 34
19 – Condition of Buildings – Seminole ......................................................................... 35
20 – Condition of Buildings – Veterans ......................................................................... 36
21 – Condition of Buildings – Polk ................................................................................. 37
22 – Condition of Buildings – Suncoast ......................................................................... 38
23 – 2012 Condition of Buildings – Turnpike System (All Zones) .................................. 39
24 – Number of Roadway Contracts in Effect or Advertised During FY 2012 ............... 42
25 – Number of Bridge Contracts in Effect or Advertised During FY 2012 .................... 44
26 – Bridge Structures Deficiencies .............................................................................. 45
27- LNQC Structures Deficiencies – FY 2012…………………………………………...…47
28 – Number of Facilities and Communications Contract in Effect or Advertised… ...... 50
29 – Roadways MRP Rating Comparison – FY 2008 Through FY 2012 ....................... 52
30 – Program Commitments – FY 2012 Through FY 2016 ($ Millions) ......................... 53
31 – High Priority Improvements, Current Funding Status, and Recommendations ..... 54
2012 Annual Inspection Page 3
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
LIST OF TABLES – Con’t
A-1 Roadway Components ...................................................................................... B-1
A-2 Turnpike Enterprise Roadway Inspection Rating Scale ..................................... B-2
B-1 Bridge Components ........................................................................................... B-2
B-2 Bridge Inspection Rating Scale .......................................................................... B-3
B-3 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Components ............................................................ B-3
B-4 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Inspection Rating Scale ........................................... B-4
B-5 High Mast Light Tower Components ................................................................. B-4
B-6 Weathering Steel High Mast Light Tower Inspection Rating Scale… ................ B-4
C-1 Building Categories and Components ............................................................... B-5
C-2 Building Inspections Rating Scale ..................................................................... B-6
2012 Annual Inspection Page 4
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
LIST OF FIGURES
1 – Major System Elements ............................................................................. ………..13
2 – Communications Building ....................................................................... …………..26
3 – Major Toll Plaza Elements ...................................................................... …………..27
4 – AET All Electronic Toll Plaza … .................................................................. ………….28
5 – Renovation of Snapper Creek Service Plaza … ........................................... ……….29
6 – Typical Roadway Section ……………………………………………………………......41
7 – Highway Sign… ................................................................................................ ……43
8 – Bridge over SR 429 …………………………………………………………………...….45
9 – Cantilever Sign………………………………………………………………………….....46
10 – Regional Toll Office ……………………………………………………………………..48
11 – Operations Bldg –Turkey Lake … ......................................................... …………..49
12 – Toll Booths at Ramp Plaza … ............................................................... …………..51
13 – Generator… .......................................................................................... …………..51
2012 Annual Inspection Page 5
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

Executive Summary
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
As General Consultants to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Florida’s
Turnpike Enterprise and in accordance with Section 5.13 of the Turnpike Enterprise
Bond Resolution, ATKINS and HNTB are pleased to submit the Florida’s Turnpike
System Annual Inspection Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012. The
findings contained in this report are based upon the assessment of inspection data
compiled for the roadway, buildings, and structures components; coordination with the
Turnpike Maintenance and Finance Offices; and ATKINS / HNTB’s general knowledge
of the condition of Turnpike System facilities.
The results of this year’s inspection confirm the success of the Turnpike Enterprise’s
ongoing efforts to maintain aggressive and comprehensive Maintenance and Renewal
and Replacement programs. The overall condition of the Turnpike System is very
good. The system’s primary feature, its 456 miles of roadway, reported no roadway
items were rated over 20% deficient.
The FY 2012 annual inspection did reveal that a number of facilities (buildings) have
minor deficiencies, but are in good condition overall. The majorities of the deficiencies
found are cosmetic in nature and pose no structural concerns. Structures composed of
bridges; large non qualifying culverts ( LNQCs ); high mast light towers (HMLT); and
overhead, over lane, and cantilever signs, are inspected on a biennial basis. Bridges,
inspected FY 2012, are reported in good condition and are included in this report. The
LNQCs, HMLTs, and overhead, overlane, and cantilever signs inspected in FY 2012
and are also included in this report.
The Turnpike Enterprise has programmed over $53 million for periodic and routine
maintenance in FY 2012. These funds are being used for maintenance of all highway
and structure assets, building routine maintenance, roof replacement/restoration,
building renovation, toll plaza tunnel sealing, drainage improvements, and other safety
related upgrades. The Turnpike has also programmed over $64 million in FY 2012 for
roadway resurfacing; roadway, bridge, and facility construction; toll equipment
enhancement; and bridge repair work, all these as part of its Renewal and
Replacement Program.
In addition to the analysis of inspection results, this report presents the current status
of the Turnpike System with respect to the FDOT’s Maintenance Rating Program and
includes programmed maintenance funding level commitments through 2016 Also,
based on the prioritization of specific deficiencies identified by the Turnpike
Maintenance Office and coordination of funding related issues with the Turnpike
Finance Office, recommendations are made for the initiation of conceptual studies and
funding for several high-priority improvement projects.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 6
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The Turnpike’s commitment to system improvement and preservation is obvious based
on the emphasis placed on its Maintenance and Renewal and Replacement programs.
By continually monitoring system conditions and ensuring that its facilities are
maintained in top condition, the Turnpike Enterprise is better able to provide for the
safety and convenience of its patrons while maintaining a safe investment for
bondholders.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 7
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Introduction
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System – 2012 Annual Inspection

1. Introduction
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
1.1 General Description and Procedure of Inspection
The Turnpike Enterprise’s annual inspection is conducted based on three major
categories of system facilities: roadways, structures, and buildings, some of which
are accomplished through the services of independent consultants. The roadway
inspection is divided into five general categories of roadway elements: roadway,
roadside, traffic services, drainage, and vegetation/aesthetics. The building
inspection is divided into four main categories: buildings, tollbooths, and mechanical
and electrical components. ATKINS and HNTB, the Turnpike Enterprise’s General
Engineering Consultants inspected all roadway and facilities. This report reflects the
findings of the roadways and buildings inspections that were accomplished in 2012.
The structures inspection is conducted on a biennial basis by two independent
consultants (TranSystem Consultants for the southern contract and Infrastructure
Engineers Consultants for the northern contract), which were brought under contract
with the Turnpike Enterprise in mid August 2011 for the North and the South. The
structures inspection includes bridges, overhead/cantilever signs, Large Non
Qualifying Culverts (LNQCs), and High Mast Light Towers (HMLTs), and is typically
conducted in phases, beginning with bridges and ending with the HMLTs. This report
reflects the findings of the bridge structures inspections, the overhead/cantilever sign
inspection, LNQCs inspections, and the HMLTs inspections.
The Turnpike Enterprise and ATKINS developed a roadway rating procedure (RRP)
based on Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT’s) Maintenance Rating
Program (MRP) to assess the Turnpike Enterprise’s assets. The MRP uses a
statistical sample of the system to determine an overall system rating based on a
100-point scale. The RRP includes all 46 of the original roadway elements required
by the MRP; however, the entire system, including ramps, are inspected and the
rating is based on a ten-point scale rather than the “meets or fails to meet” standard
used in the MRP.
The MRP rating, which generally supports the findings of the annual inspection,
allows a comparison of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System roadway conditions to
the statewide standard. The ratings assigned by the Turnpike Enterprise can be
used to make general recommendations on system components needing
improvement. A summary of the MRP is described in more detail and the scores are
included in the Roadway section of this report. The rating system utilized by Florida’s
Turnpike Enterprise System is defined in detail in Section 2, FY 2012 Maintenance
Inspection Results, Subsection 2.2, Roadways.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 8
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
All inspections are conducted in accordance with standard procedures developed by
the Federal Highway Administration and/or FDOT and involve an extensive visual
examination of all elements relative to the category of inspection. A detailed
tabulation of the conditions observed on the date of the field inspection is prepared
in the form of inspection worksheets. The worksheets are spot-checked in the field to
verify accuracy and consistency and the results are reviewed and summarized for
presentation in this report.
Due to the time duration between field inspection activities and publication of this
report, many of the deficiencies identified in this report may have already been
corrected through ongoing maintenance and construction activities. These
improvements are typically funded through the Turnpike Enterprise’s Maintenance
Program, in periodic or routine maintenance contracts, or through the Turnpike’s
Renewal and Replacement Program. Serious conditions, demanding immediate
attention, are reported to the appropriate office the same day they are found.
1.2 Description of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System and Inspection Zones
For FY 2012, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System was comprised of ten main
components, all of which are multi-lane, limited access toll facilities. Contributing 456
miles to Florida’s Intrastate Highway System, these ten components include 701
bridges, 158 toll plazas, 475 buildings, and 8 service plazas. The system’s mainline
roadway segments are summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Florida's Turnpike System Components - FY 2012
Component
Mi.
Length
km
Florida's Turnpike 264.7 426
Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT) 47.6 77
Sawgrass Expressway 21.8 35
Beach Line West Expressway 8.4 14
Seminole Expressway 17.4 28
Veterans Expressway 18.3 30
Southern Connector Extension 5.1 8
Polk Parkway 24.4 39
Suncoast 37.6 61
Western Beltway 9.9 16
E / W Western Beltway 0.8 1
Total 456 734
2012 Annual Inspection Page 9
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The Turnpike Enterprise’s annual inspection is conducted based on the location of
system components within geographic zones. The roadway and structures
inspection is based on four zones and the buildings inspection is based on eight
zones. These zones were established to describe the main system components
relative to the southern, central, and western regions of the state. The system
components, or portions thereof, included in each of the inspection zones are
described in Table 2 and illustrated in Appendix A.
ZONE I
Table 2
Maintenance Inspection Zones - FY 2012
Roadways and Structures
Florida's Turnpike - Milepost 0X through 100
Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT)
Sawgrass Expressway
ZONE II Florida's Turnpike - Milepost 100 through 200
ZONE III
ZONE IV
Florida's Turnpike - Milepost 200 through 309
Beeline West Expressway
Florida's Turnpike Connection to East-West Expressway
Southern Connector Extension
Seminole Expressway
Western Beltway
Veterans Expressway
Polk Parkway
Suncoast Parkway
Facilities and Communications
HEFT Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT)
Southern Florida's Turnpike - Milepost 0X through 88, and Sawgrass Expressway
Central Florida's Turnpike - Milepost 88 through 236
Northern
Florida's Turnpike - Milepost 236 through 309
Beeline West Expressway
Florida's Turnpike Connection to East-West Expressway
Southern Connector Extension
Western Beltway
Seminole Seminole Expressway
Veterans Veterans Expressway
Polk Polk Parkway
Suncoast Suncoast Parkway
2012 Annual Inspection Page 10
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
FY 2012
Maintenance Inspection Results
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System – 2012 Annual Inspection

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2. FY 2012 Maintenance Inspection Results
2.1 Introduction
The findings included in this report are based on an extensive evaluation of the
roadway, structures, and building inspection worksheets prepared by the inspection
consultants. This report summarizes the data included in the worksheets, which
reflect the condition of the features at the time of inspection.
Complete listings of the elements typically inspected in each of the three major
categories of facilities are included in Appendix B.
2.2 Roadways
The roadway inspection is divided into five general categories of roadway elements:
roadway, roadside, traffic services, drainage, and vegetation/aesthetics. The total
quantities of the major elements with respect to each of the four maintenance zones
are shown in Tables 4 through 8. The quantities shown include all major categories
of Turnpike Enterprise roadway facilities: mainline roadways, ramps and
interchanges, and service plazas.
The condition of the roadway elements for each of the maintenance zones is also
summarized in Tables 4 through 8. A sketch identifying the major elements of a
typical roadway is included as Figure 1. Each table contains only the elements listed
in Appendix B that are present and inventoried in the particular zone. A rating of 4 or
below on the field inspection worksheets indicates that the portion of the element is
in less than fair condition and is reported as deficient.
The Turnpike Enterprise and ATKINS developed an RRP based on FDOT’s MRP
using the original 46 roadway elements. The ratings and descriptions of the
numerical grading system are shown in Table 3. Ratings for each of the roadway
components are assigned based on visual inspection of each component. The
ratings, deficiencies, and recommendations are entered directly into a database, via
laptop computers carried into the field, at the time the inspections are conducted.
The database is maintained throughout the duration of the inspection process and
provides for easy report generation for each roadway. Inspection results are
separated by roadway/ramp segment and lane direction.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 11
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The FDOT MRP uses a different rating scale. The Roadway and Roadside
Procedure states that “each district is to achieve and maintain an annual
maintenance rating of 80, all elements (roadway, roadside, traffic, drainage, and
vegetation/aesthetics) shall have a rating of 75 or above, and each characteristic
shall meet the desired conditions 70 percent of the time.” When applicable, element
deficiencies of 20 percent or more are emphasized in the tables to draw attention to
elements that may affect the desired MRP rating of 80 for each RRP category. Each
of these “deficient” elements is discussed in the Summary of Findings. It should be
noted that the annual inspection results reported in these tables and the MRP
Ratings detailed in table 29 are derived from different inspection and reporting
methods and are, therefore, not interchangeable. However, the results of each
should be comparable.
Table 3
Turnpike Enterprise Roadway Inspection Rating Scale
Grade Rating Description
10 Excellent No deficiencies noted. Feature is in like new condition
8-9 Good
5-7 Degraded
2-4 Unsatisfactory
1 Emergency
No maintenance is necessary. Feature appearance and
functionality/operability are good.
Maintenance is required to protect public or system. Feature
appearance and functionality/operability are below average.
Immediate repair is required to protect public or system. Feature
appearance and functionality/operability are substandard.
Immediate maintenance is required to protect public or system.
Feature appearance and functionality/operability are
unacceptable.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 12
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Figure 1 – Major System Elements
2012 Annual Inspection Page 13
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 4
Zone 1 - Condition of Roadway Elements - Turnpike System
(Mainline 0-100) - FY 2012
Category Element
Roadway
Roadside
Traffic
Services
Drainage
Vegetation/
Aesthetics
Quantity
Inspected
2012 Annual Inspection Page 14
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Units
Quantity Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent
Deficient
Pothole 1,018 Lane Miles 0 0.01%
Joint 1,018 Lane Miles 10 0.99%
Pavement Void 1,018 Lane Miles 3 0.34%
Edge Ravel 712 Edge Miles 3 0.40%
Rutting 1,018 Lane Miles 0 0.02%
Cracking 1,018 Lane Miles 46 4.49%
Depression 1,018 Lane Miles 0 0.03%
Stripping 1,018 Lane Miles 2 0.15%
Shoving 1,018 Lane Miles 0 0.01%
Paved Shoulder 631 Miles 5 0.83%
Soil Shoulder 235 Miles 4 1.60%
Front Slope 232 Miles 0 0.04%
Rip Rap 52,457 SY 0 0.00%
Slope Protection 102,049 SY 0 0.00%
Fencing 204 Miles 1 0.61%
Pavement Marker 116,569 Lane Miles 2 0.00%
Striping 1,188 Miles 2 0.20%
Pavement Symbol 444,786 SF 6 0.00%
Guardrail 257 Miles 2 0.71%
Attenuator 289 Each 3 1.04%
Barrier Wall 100 Miles 2 1.50%
Signs Less Than 30 SF 4,973 Each 5 0.10%
Signs Greater Than 30 SF 6,096 Each 18 0.30%
Object Marker 11,156 Each 92 0.82%
Sign Light 1,199 Each 8 0.67%
Highway Light 7,328 Each 129 1.76%
Cross Drain 1,970 Each 3 0.15%
Roadside Ditch 254 Miles 1 0.04%
Median Ditch 0 Miles 0 0.00%
Outfall Ditch 11,417 Feet 0 0.00%
Curb Inlet 2,867 Each 1 0.03%
Other Inlet 1,028 Each 6 0.58%
Misc. Drain 275 Each 5 1.82%
Roadway Sweep 631 Miles 0 0.03%
Roadway Mowing 2,641 Acres 0 0.00%
Slope Mowing 446 Acres 1 0.22%
Landscaping 35 Acres 1 2.86%
Tree Trim 204 Miles 0 0.20%
Litter Removal 204 Miles 2 1.18%
Turf Condition 204 Miles 3 1.26%

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 5
Zone II - Condition of Roadway Elements - Turnpike System
(Mainline 100-200, Sawgrass) - FY 2012
Category Element
Roadway
Roadside
Traffic
Services
Drainage
Vegetation/
Aesthetics
Quantity
Inspected
2012 Annual Inspection Page 15
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Units
Quantity Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent
Deficient
Pothole 475 Lane Miles 0 0.06%
Joint 475 Lane Miles 5 1.14%
Pavement Void 475 Lane Miles 0 0.06%
Edge Ravel 441 Edge Miles 4 0.85%
Rutting 475 Lane Miles 0 0.02%
Cracking 475 Lane Miles 18 3.70%
Depression 475 Lane Miles 0 0.04%
Stripping 475 Lane Miles 0 0.00%
Shoving 475 Lane Miles 0 0.00%
Paved Shoulder 424 Miles 5 1.08%
Soil Shoulder 154 Miles 6 4.01%
Front Slope 154 Miles 4 2.57%
Rip Rap 9,598 SY 0 0.00%
Slope Protection 14,130 SY 0 0.00%
Fencing 189 Miles 1 0.68%
Pavement Marker 41,817 Lane Miles 1 0.00%
Striping 660 Miles 0 0.02%
Pavement Symbol 107,562 SF 0 0.00%
Guardrail 225 Miles 1 0.40%
Attenuator 151 Each 0 0.00%
Barrier Wall 53 Miles 1 2.77%
Signs Less Than 30 SF 2,006 Each 2 0.10%
Signs Greater Than 30 SF 1,524 Each 10 0.66%
Object Marker 7,755 Each 50 0.64%
Sign Light 177 Each 2 1.13%
Highway Light 1,045 Each 12 1.15%
Cross Drain 603 Each 19 3.15%
Roadside Ditch 211 Miles 9 4.44%
Median Ditch 0 Miles 0 0.00%
Outfall Ditch 6,232 Feet 0 0.00%
Curb Inlet 758 Each 0 0.00%
Other Inlet 279 Each 1 0.36%
Misc. Drain 87 Each 0 0.00%
Roadway Sweep 424 Miles 0 0.00%
Roadway Mowing 1,798 Acres 0 0.00%
Slope Mowing 178 Acres 1 0.56%
Landscaping 9 Acres 0 0.00%
Tree Trim 189 Miles 0 0.08%
Litter Removal 189 Miles 2 0.80%
Turf Condition 189 Miles 6 3.23%

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 6
ZONE III - Condition of Roadway Elements - Turnpike System
(ML 200-309, Bee Line, Seminole, SoConnExt, Western Beltway) - FY 2012
Category Element
Roadway
Roadside
Traffic
Services
Drainage
Vegetation/
Aesthetics
Quantity
Inspected
2012 Annual Inspection Page 16
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Units
Quantity Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent
Deficient
Pothole 852 Lane Miles 1 0.06%
Joint 852 Lane Miles 2 0.24%
Pavement Void 852 Lane Miles 1 0.16%
Edge Ravel 755 Edge Miles 4 0.49%
Rutting 852 Lane Miles 1 0.08%
Cracking 852 Lane Miles 18 2.16%
Depression 852 Lane Miles 0 0.04%
Stripping 852 Lane Miles 1 0.11%
Shoving 852 Lane Miles 0 0.02%
Paved Shoulder 697 Miles 2 0.23%
Soil Shoulder 308 Miles 9 2.91%
Front Slope 308 Miles 4 1.30%
Rip Rap 16,415 SY 0 0.00%
Slope Protection 51,338 SY 0 0.00%
Fencing 294 Miles 1 0.43%
Pavement Marker 87,144 Lane Miles 8 0.01%
Striping 1,120 Miles 4 0.36%
Pavement Symbol 268,065 SF 13 0.00%
Guardrail 352 Miles 2 0.44%
Attenuator 194 Each 0 0.00%
Barrier Wall 37 Miles 0 0.27%
Signs Less Than 30 SF 3,575 Each 29 0.81%
Signs Greater Than 30 SF 5,022 Each 44 0.88%
Object Marker 11,000 Each 144 1.31%
Sign Light 629 Each 4 0.64%
Highway Light 4,626 Each 13 0.28%
Cross Drain 1,913 Each 62 3.24%
Roadside Ditch 343 Miles 38 11.19%
Median Ditch 0 Miles 0 0.00%
Outfall Ditch 10,429 Feet 0 0.00%
Curb Inlet 2,334 Each 0 0.00%
Other Inlet 884 Each 4 0.45%
Misc. Drain 177 Each 5 2.82%
Roadway Sweep 697 Miles 2 0.33%
Roadway Mowing 3,362 Acres 6 0.18%
Slope Mowing 500 Acres 28 5.60%
Landscaping 95 Acres 3 3.17%
Tree Trim 294 Miles 3 1.05%
Litter Removal 294 Miles 14 4.68%
Turf Condition 294 Miles 7 2.36%

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 7
Zone IV - Condition of Roadway Elements - Turnpike System
(Veterans, Polk & Suncoast) - FY 2012
Category Element
Roadway
Roadside
Traffic
Services
Drainage
Vegetation/
Aesthetics
Quantity
Inspected
2012 Annual Inspection Page 17
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Units
Quantity Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent
Deficient
Pothole 457 Lane Miles 0 0.02%
Joint 457 Lane Miles 0 0.02%
Pavement Void 457 Lane Miles 0 0.00%
Edge Ravel 426 Edge Miles 4 0.96%
Rutting 457 Lane Miles 2 0.55%
Cracking 457 Lane Miles 42 9.23%
Depression 457 Lane Miles 0 0.09%
Stripping 457 Lane Miles 6 1.40%
Shoving 457 Lane Miles 0 0.10%
Paved Shoulder 388 Miles 2 0.39%
Soil Shoulder 190 Miles 10 5.00%
Front Slope 190 Miles 6 2.94%
Rip Rap 4,745 SY 0 0.00%
Slope Protection 28,894 SY 0 0.00%
Fencing 174 Miles 0 0.12%
Pavement Marker 54,291 Lane Miles 4 0.01%
Striping 584 Miles 1 0.23%
Pavement Symbol 240,354 SF 4 0.00%
Guardrail 102 Miles 0 0.10%
Attenuator 174 Each 0 0.00%
Barrier Wall 19 Miles 1 3.52%
Signs Less Than 30 SF 2,786 Each 4 0.14%
Signs Greater Than 30 SF 4,103 Each 13 0.32%
Object Marker 5,577 Each 110 1.97%
Sign Light 777 Each 1 0.13%
Highway Light 4,243 Each 10 0.24%
Cross Drain 1,848 Each 7 0.38%
Roadside Ditch 201 Miles 1 0.5%
Median Ditch 0 Miles 0 0.00%
Outfall Ditch 7,414 Feet 0 0.00%
Curb Inlet 1,102 Each 0 0.00%
Other Inlet 858 Each 2 0.23%
Misc. Drain 58 Each 0 0.00%
Roadway Sweep 388 Miles 0 0.12%
Roadway Mowing 1,930 Acres 2 0.10%
Slope Mowing 348 Acres 9 2.59%
Landscaping 68 Acres 1 1.48%
Tree Trim 174 Miles 4 2.07%
Litter Removal 174 Miles 2 1.41%
Turf Condition 174 Miles 16 8.99%

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 8
All Zones - Condition of Roadway Elements - Turnpike System
(All Zones) - FY 2012
Category Element
Roadway
Roadside
Traffic
Services
Drainage
Vegetation/
Aesthetics
Quantity
Inspected
2012 Annual Inspection Page 18
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Units
Quantity Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent
Deficient
Pothole 2,802 Lane Miles 1 0.04%
Joint 2,802 Lane Miles 18 0.63%
Pavement Void 2,802 Lane Miles 5 0.18%
Edge Ravel 2,334 Edge Miles 14 0.62%
Rutting 2,802 Lane Miles 3 0.12%
Cracking 2,802 Lane Miles 124 4.42%
Depression 2,802 Lane Miles 1 0.04%
Stripping 2,802 Lane Miles 9 0.32%
Shoving 2,802 Lane Miles 1 0.03%
Paved Shoulder 2,139 Miles 13 0.60%
Soil Shoulder 887 Miles 28 3.20%
Front Slope 885 Miles 14 1.54%
Rip Rap 83,215 SY 0 0.00%
Slope Protection 196,411 SY 0 0.00%
Fencing 861 Miles 4 0.46%
Pavement Marker 299,821 Lane Miles 15 0.01%
Striping 3,552 Miles 8 0.22%
Pavement Symbol 1,060,766 SF 23 0.00%
Guardrail 936 Miles 4 0.47%
Attenuator 808 Each 3 0.37%
Barrier Wall 209 Miles 4 1.79%
Signs Less Than 30 SF 13,340 Each 40 0.30%
Signs Greater Than 30 SF 16,745 Each 85 0.51%
Object Marker 35,488 Each 396 1.12%
Sign Light 2,782 Each 15 0.54%
Highway Light 17,242 Each 164 0.95%
Cross Drain 6,334 Each 91 1.44%
Roadside Ditch 1009 Miles 49 4.84%
Median Ditch 0 Miles 0 0.00%
Outfall Ditch 35,492 Feet 0 0.00%
Curb Inlet 7,061 Each 1 0.01%
Other Inlet 3,049 Each 13 0.43%
Misc. Drain 597 Each 10 1.68%
Roadway Sweep 2,139 Miles 3 0.14%
Roadway Mowing 9,731 Acres 8 0.08%
Slope Mowing 1,473 Acres 39 2.65%
Landscaping 206 Acres 5 2.43%
Tree Trim 861 Miles 7 0.84%
Litter Removal 861 Miles 20 2.34%
Turf Condition 861 Miles 31 3.63%

2.3 Structures
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The biennial structures inspection is based on four categories of major structures:
bridges, overhead/cantilever signs, LNQCs, and HMLTs. The system includes over
2,200 individual structures. The total quantities of all structures with respect to each
of the four maintenance zones are shown in Table 9.
2.3.1 Bridges
Table 9
Quantities of Major Structures - FY 2012
Category Zone I Zone II Zone III Zone IV TOTALS
Bridges 238 80 224 159 701
Overhead/ Cantilever
Signs
399 63 160 166 788
High-Mast Light Towers 242 23 158 89 512
Large Non-Qualifying
Culverts
14 77 91 25 207
Totals 893 243 633 439 2208
The bridge components and subcomponents noted as being in less than fair
condition are shown by zone and bridge number in Table 10. It should also be noted
that none of the noted deficiencies pose an unsafe condition to users of Florida’s
Turnpike Enterprise System, however, 47 bridges are rated functionally obsolete as
of the latest inspection in FY 2012. The general reason given for this rating is the
bridge not having the correct width, or no distress lanes. A complete listing of the 3
components, 93 elements, and 117 sub-elements included in the bridge inspection,
along with the corresponding rating procedure, is included in Appendix B.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 19
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

Zone 1
302
396
Zone 2
107
301
Zone 3
241
301
302
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 10
Bridge Structures Deficiencies - FY 2012
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Deck Joints -
Compression Joint Seal
Other Substructure
Elements Other Material -
Abutment Slope
Protection
860561
860180
State 3 - 302 - Major adhesion failures may be present. The gland
possibly has failed from abrasion or tearing. Signs or observance of
leakage along the joint may be present. Major spalls may be
present in the deck and/or header adjacent to the joint. If joint is
armored, the anchorage has failed.
State 4 - 396 - Major deterioration, splitting, cracking or settlement
of materials may be affecting the structural capacity of the element.
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Painted Steel
Superstructure - Open
Girder/Beam
Deck Joints - Pourable
Joint Seal
890068
920057
State 5 - 107 - Corrosion has caused section loss and is sufficient
to warrant structural review to ascertain the impact on the ultimate
strength and/or serviceability of either the element or the bridge.
State 3 - 301 - Major adhesion and/or cohesion failures may be
present. Signs or observance of leakage along the joint may be
present. Joint may be heavily impacted with debris and/or stones.
Major spalls may be present in the deck and/or header adjacent to
the joint.
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Concrete Culvert (along
length of barrel)
Deck Joints - Pourable
Joint Seal
Deck Joints -
Compression Joint Seal
920080
110033, 110037,
180025, 750087,
750089, 750090,
750094, 750180,
750264, 750389,
750474, 750625,
750626, 750627,
770050, 770054,
770055, 770056,
770057, 770608,
770609, 770617,
920042, 920078,
920134, 920153
110032, 110074,
180007, 750061,
750263, 750387,
770604, 770605,
920067, 920074,
920131, 920140
310 Elasomeric Bearings 920609, 920610
State 4 - 241 - Major deterioration, abrasion, spalling,
cracking, major distortion, deflection
settlement, or misalignment of the barrel may be
in evidence. Major separation of joints may
have occurred. Holes may exist in floors and walls.
State 3 - 301 - Major adhesion and/or cohesion failures may be
present. Signs or observance of leakage along the joint may be
present. Joint may be heavily impacted with debris and/or stones.
Major spalls may be present in the deck and/or header adjacent to
the joint.
State 3 - 302 - Major adhesion failures may be present. The gland
possibly has failed from abrasion or tearing. Signs or observance of
leakage along the joint may be present. Major spalls may be
present in the deck and/or header adjacent to the joint. If joint is
armored, the anchorage has failed.
State 3 - 310 - Deterioration is advanced. Shear deformations may
be excessive. Top and bottom surfaces may no longer be parallel.
Loss of bearing may be imminent.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 20
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

Zone 3 - continued
398
Zone 4
301
302
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 10 – Con’t
Bridge Structures Deficiencies - FY 2012
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Drainage System Other
Material
770067 - 770068
State 4 - 398 - Major deterioration or cracking. Drainage system is
leaking or completely blocked not functioning.
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Deck Joints - Pourable
Joint Seal
Deck Joints -
Compression Joint Seal
100512, 140089,
140090, 160242,
160254, 160259
160258, 160274,
164508
333 Bridge Railing Other 164508
State 3 - 301 - Major adhesion and/or cohesion failures may be
present. Signs or observance of leakage along the joint may be
present. Joint may be heavily impacted with debris and/or stones.
Major spalls may be present in the deck and/or header adjacent to
the joint.
State 3 - 302 - Major adhesion failures may be present. The gland
possibly has failed from abrasion or tearing. Signs or observance of
leakage along the joint may be present. Major spalls may be
present in the deck and/or header adjacent to the joint. If joint is
armored, the anchorage has failed.
State 3 - 333 - Deterioration is advanced. Corrosion, decay or loss
of section is sufficient to warrant review to ascertain the impact on
the serviceability strength of the element.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 21
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

2.3.2 Overhead/Cantilever Signs
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
No overhead/cantilever sign deficiencies were noted in this inspection period. The
biennial inspection of the Turnpike Enterprise’s 806 overhead/cantilever signs is
based on the visual inspection of three individual sign elements. These elements,
along with the sign rating scale, are listed in Appendix B. The FY 2012 condition of
the overhead/cantilever signs for each maintenance inspection zone showed no
deficiencies for this reporting period.
Table 11
Condition of Overhead or Large Sign Structures - FY 2012
Zone Component
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
TOTALS
TOTALS
TOTALS
487 - Overlane Sign Structure Horizontal
Member
488 - Overlane Sign Structure Vertical
Member
489 - Overlane Sign Structure
Foundation
487 - Overlane Sign Structure Horizontal
Member
488 - Overlane Sign Structure Vertical
Member
489 - Overlane Sign Structure
Foundation
487 - Overlane Sign Structure Horizontal
Member
488 - Overlane Sign Structure Vertical
Member
489 - Overlane Sign Structure
Foundation
487 - Overlane Sign Structure Horizontal
Member
488 - Overlane Sign Structure Vertical
Member
489 - Overlane Sign Structure
Foundation
487 - Overlane Sign Structure Horizontal
Member
488 - Overlane Sign Structure Vertical
Member
489 - Overlane Sign Structure
Foundation
Number
Inspected
Number Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent
Deficient
399 0 0.00%
399 0 0.00%
399 0 0.00%
63 0 0.00%
63 0 0.00%
63 0 0.00%
159 0 0.00%
159 0 0.00%
158 0 0.00%
185 0 0.00%
185 0 0.00%
185 0 0.00%
806 0 0.00%
806 0 0.00%
805 0 0.00%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 22
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

2.3.3 High Mast Light Towers (HMLTs)
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System consists of 512 HMLTs and is summarized
below in Table 12. No deficiencies were noted during inspection of the HMLTs.
The HMLT rating and corresponding rating scale are summarized and located in
Appendix B.
Zone Component
Table 12
Condition of High Mast Light Towers (HMLT) - FY 2012
Number
Inspected
Number Rated
Less Than Fair
Percent Deficient
1 495 - Unpainted HMLT 67 0 0.00%
1 496 - Painted HMLT 15 0 0.00%
1 497 - Galvanized HMLT 160 0 0.00%
1 499 - Foundations HMLT 242 0 0.00%
2 495 - Unpainted HMLT 0 0 0.00%
2 496 - Painted HMLT 0 0 0.00%
2 497 - Galvanized HMLT 23 0 0.00%
2 499 - Foundations HMLT 23 0 0.00%
3 495 - Unpainted HMLT 9 0 0.00%
3 496 - Painted HMLT 9 0 0.00%
3 497 - Galvanized HMLT 140 0 0.00%
3 499 - Foundations HMLT 158 0 0.00%
4 495 - Unpainted HMLT 0 0 0.00%
4 496 - Painted HMLT 37 0 0.00%
4 497 - Galvanized HMLT 52 0 0.00%
4 499 - Foundations HMLT 89 0 0.00%
TOTALS 495 - Unpainted HMLT 76 0 0.00%
TOTALS 496 - Painted HMLT 61 0 0.00%
TOTALS 497 - Galvanized HMLT 375 0 0.00%
TOTALS 499 - Foundations HMLT 512 0 0.00%
GRAND TOTAL 512
2012 Annual Inspection Page 23
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2.3.4 Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQC’s )
A total of 207 Large Non Qualifying Structures (LNQCs) are inspected once every
six years ( 1/3 per cycle ) throughout the Florida’s Turnpike System. The majority of
LNCQs (168) are located in Zones II and III of the four roadway and structure
inspection zones. The LNQCs are summarized in Table 9 and deficiencies listed in
Table 13.
Zone 1
241
Table 13
Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQCs ) Deficiencies - FY 2012
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Concrete Culvert
(along length of
barrel)
86Q001, 86Q003
290 Channel 86Q011
475
Zone 2
241
474
475
Other Substructure
Elements Reinforced
od Plain Concrete -
Wingwall/Retaining
Wall
87Q005
State 4 - 241 - Major deterioration, abrasion, spalling, cracking,
major distortion, deflection settlement, or misalignment of the barrel
may be in evidence. Major separation of joints may have occurred.
Holes may exist in floors and walls.
State 4 - 290 - Bank protection has failed. River control devices
have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or
lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the
bridge and/ or approach roadway.
State 4 - 475 - Advanced deterioration. Corrosion of
reinforcement and/or loss of concrete section
and/or settlement is sufficient to warrant review
to ascertain the impact on the strength and/or
serviceability of either the element or the
bridge.
Bridge Element Bridge Number Reported Condition/Comments
Concrete Culvert
(along length of
barrel)
Other Substructure
Elements Metal
Uncoated -
Wingwall/Retaining
Wall
Other Substructure
Elements Reinforced
od Plain Concrete -
Wingwall/Retaining
Wall
89Q002, 89Q003,
89Q008, 89Q011,
89Q012, 93Q003,
93Q010, 93Q011,
94Q001, 94Q008,
94Q010, 94Q011
94Q019
94Q010, 94Q016
State 4 - 241 - Major deterioration, abrasion, spalling,
cracking, major distortion, deflection
settlement, or misalignment of the barrel may be
in evidence. Major separation of joints may
have occurred. Holes may exist in floors and
walls.
State 4 - 474 - Corrosion is advanced. Oxide film has a larninar
texture with thin sheets of corrosion. Section
loss is sufficient to warrant structural review to
ascertain the impact on the ultimate strength
and/or serviceability of either the element or the
bridge.
State 4 - 475 - Advanced deterioration. Corrosion of
reinforcement and/or loss of concrete section
and/or settlement is sufficient to warrant review
to ascertain the impact on the strength and/or
serviceability of either the element or the
bridge.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 24
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

2.4 Buildings
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The annual maintenance inspection of the Turnpike Enterprise’s building facilities is
based on four general categories of inspection: buildings, tollbooths, mechanical,
and electrical. As part of the inspection process, all relevant structural components
and associated mechanical and electrical systems for all buildings are visually
inspected and ratings are assigned based on the conditions observed. A complete
list of all the building, tollbooth, mechanical, and electrical subcomponents is
included in Appendix B, along with the Turnpike Enterprise’s Buildings Inspection
Rating Scale.
2.4.1 Buildings
The building facilities inspection is based on five general building types: toll plaza
administration buildings and canopies, administration and miscellaneous buildings,
communication tower buildings, water/wastewater treatment plants, and service
plaza restaurants and service stations. A total of 475 buildings are located within the
eight maintenance inspection zones. The major characteristics of each building type
are described below. Building quantities are listed in Table 14.
Category and type
Table 14
Building Quantities - FY 2012
HEFT
Southern Coin
and Sawgrass
Central Ticket
Mainline Toll Plazas / AET 0 4 2 2 1 2 3 3 17
Off-Line Ramp Plazas /
AET
2012 Annual Inspection Page 25
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Northern Coin
Seminole I & II
Veterans
Polk
Suncoast
Totals
28 27 11 32 13 8 16 6 141
Other 72 76 64 60 15 7 10 13 317
Totals 100 107 77 94 29 17 29 22 475

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2.4.1.1 Toll Plaza Administrative Buildings and Canopies
The toll plaza administration buildings and canopies are located either as part of a
mainline toll plaza or off-line ramp toll plaza facility. The canopies typically extend
from the administration buildings outward, over the tollbooths or toll collection
equipment located between the travel lanes. The administration buildings may also
be connected to the toll collection booths/equipment by means of an underground
tunnel, which facilitates the transport of personnel, toll collection data, and supplies.
Some Toll Plaza Buildings have been replaced with All Electronic Toll Plazas ( AET )
and consist of toll equipment buildings, generators, and fuel tanks. These are mainly
on the HEFT section, but also appear at “ Sunpass Only “ lanes along the mainline
sections of the Turnpike.
2.4.1.2 Administration and Miscellaneous Buildings
The Turnpike Enterprise’s 34 administrative buildings are used by a variety of FDOT
functional areas as well as other Florida agencies, including: the Florida Highway
Patrol, Troop K, Troop L, MCCO; the Turnpike Enterprise’s Office of Toll Operations;
FDOT Districts 4 and 6; and the Turnpike Enterprise’s Operations and Concession
Management and Marketing Offices.
2.4.1.3 Communication Tower Buildings
The communication tower buildings are typically constructed of concrete and block
and are usually small, relative to the size of the buildings included in the other four
categories. These structures house the electronic circuitry and equipment that
support the microwave radio communications system, which is heavily relied upon
by the Florida Highway Patrol, Troop K and the Turnpike Enterprise Operations
Offices.
Figure 2 - Communications Building
2012 Annual Inspection Page 26
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Figure 3 – Major Toll Plaza Elements (Non-AET, Staffed)
2012 Annual Inspection Page 27
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Figure 4 – AET All Electronic Toll Plaza (Typical Unstaffed Site)
2012 Annual Inspection Page 28
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

2.4.1.4 Water/Wastewater Treatment Plants
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The water/wastewater treatment plants furnish water to and receive wastewater from
the service plaza restaurants, common areas, and service stations. There is
currently one plant located at the Fort Drum Service plaza, which is currently being
removed and replaced with a new treatment plant and effluent pond under the Areas
USA, Inc. contract. The Canoe Creek Wastewater Treatment (WWT) Plant has
been disconnected and replaced with a municipal connection.
2.4.1.5 Service Plaza Restaurants and Service Stations
The Turnpike Enterprise’s eight service plaza restaurant buildings, like the one
shown in Figure 5, are leased to Areas USA, Inc., who are renovating, operating and
maintaining these facilities. Renovation work continues at six of the service plazas:
Turkey Lake, Canoe Creek, Fort Drum, West Palm Beach, Pompano and Snapper
Creek. Renovation of the Okahumpka Plaza will begin February 2013, and the Fort
Pierce service plaza will begin in October 2012.
The Snapper Creek Service Plaza has two facilities that are maintained by the
Turnpike Enterprise, and are currently being used for FDOT/FTE administrative
construction / maintenance office spaces, FHP Troop K offices, and for the Sunpass
Customer Service Center.
The leased facilities also include eight service stations that are leased to Areas USA,
Inc., and operated by Florida Turnpike Services ( FTS ). The Snapper Creek Service
Station renovations by Areas USA, Inc. for the new 1500 SF Restroom facility is
complete. FTS is currently funding and adding a new Dunkin Donuts addition on the
north side of the Shell Gas station. The addition is not part of the Areas USA Inc.
work. The Dunkin Donuts is expected to be open in October 2012.
Figure 5 – Renovation of Snapper Creek Facilities
2012 Annual Inspection Page 29
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2.4.2 Tollbooths, Mechanical, and Electrical
The tollbooth, mechanical, and electrical categories of inspection includes a total of
24 subcomponents. The condition of the elements and the corresponding
deficiencies for each of these categories is also summarized in Tables 15 through
22, with a system-wide summary shown in Table 23. These deficiencies are
discussed in the Summary of Findings.
2.4.3 Inspection Rating Procedures for Building Categories and Components
An in-depth evaluation of the condition of the 22 elements of the buildings category
was performed in the field and ratings were assigned based on the scale shown in
Appendix B. A summary of the results for each of the maintenance zones is
contained in Tables 15 through 22, and a system-wide summary is shown in Table
23.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 30
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 15
Condition of Buildings - HEFT - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 9 0 0.00%
Walks And Curbs 107 3 2.80%
Area Lights 113 5 4.42%
Site Grounds 27 5 18.52%
Irrigation System 21 0 0.00%
Exterior Walls 302 4 1.32%
Exterior Trim 7 0 0.00%
Exterior Windows 95 5 5.26%
Exterior Doors 117 5 4.27%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 1269 25 1.97%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
6
348
0
9
0.00%
2.59%
Interior Flooring 448 23 5.13%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 238 35 14.71%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 3 0 0.00%
Bath Accessories 11 1 9.09%
Lockers 20 0 0.00%
Interior Signs 103 3 2.91%
Roofs 45 1 2.22%
Air Conditioners 968 81 8.37%
Tunnel 26 2 7.69%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 3 0 0.00%
Exterior Booth 7 0 0.00%
Interior Booth 18 1 5.56%
Toll Doors 9 0 0.00%
Window 9 0 0.00%
Counter/Drawer 141 6 4.26%
Toll Light 21 0 0.00%
Toll A/C 16 0 0.00%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
11
28
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
Area Lights 0 0 0.00%
Signs 127 1 0.79%
Concrete Pavement 199 12 6.03%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 22 0 0.00%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 44 1 2.27%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 18 0 0.00%
Plumbing Fixtures 215 17 7.91%
Sewer / Septic Lines 24 2 8.33%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 1562 137 8.77%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 4 0 0.00%
Generators 109 3 2.75%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 31
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 16
Condition of Buildings - South Mainline & Sawgrass - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 2 0 0.00%
Walks And Curbs 125 5 4.00%
Area Lights 135 19 14.07%
Site Grounds 65 2 3.08%
Irrigation System 38 4 10.53%
Exterior Walls 446 6 1.35%
Exterior Trim 24 0 0.00%
Exterior Windows 114 4 3.51%
Exterior Doors 174 7 4.02%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 1289 24 1.86%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
21
382
2
6
9.52%
1.57%
Interior Flooring 478 9 1.88%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 347 34 9.80%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 3 0 0.00%
Bath Accessories 21 2 9.52%
Lockers 35 3 8.57%
Interior Signs 344 35 10.17%
Roofs 86 1 1.16%
Air Conditioners 1162 97 8.35%
Tunnel 71 4 5.63%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 18 2 11.11%
Exterior Booth 114 1 0.88%
Interior Booth 166 2 1.20%
Toll Doors 123 1 0.81%
Window 89 0 0.00%
Counter/Drawer 184 2 1.09%
Toll Light 134 16 11.94%
Toll A/C 149 3 2.01%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
39
46
0
6
0.00%
13.04%
Area Lights 1 0 0.00%
Signs 104 7 6.73%
Concrete Pavement 417 19 4.56%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 98 4 4.08%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 98 2 2.04%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 132 1 0.76%
Plumbing Fixtures 163 5 3.07%
Sewer / Septic Lines 27 0 0.00%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 1808 175 9.68%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 6 0 0.00%
Generators 104 5 4.81%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 32
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 17
Condition of Buildings - Central - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 1 0 0.00%
Walks And Curbs 69 3 4.35%
Area Lights 54 5 9.26%
Site Grounds 64 10 15.63%
Irrigation System 19 2 10.53%
Exterior Walls 284 12 4.23%
Exterior Trim 11 1 9.09%
Exterior Windows 71 3 4.23%
Exterior Doors 80 2 2.50%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 778 45 5.78%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
11
227
2
22
18.18%
9.69%
Interior Flooring 268 30 11.19%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 190 26 13.68%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 8 1 12.50%
Bath Accessories 17 2 11.76%
Lockers 19 0 0.00%
Interior Signs 159 18 11.32%
Roofs 39 0 0.00%
Air Conditioners 755 55 7.28%
Tunnel 5 1 20.00%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 2 0 0.00%
Exterior Booth 60 0 0.00%
Interior Booth 114 0 0.00%
Toll Doors 81 6 7.41%
Window 53 0 0.00%
Counter/Drawer 111 1 0.90%
Toll Light 76 9 11.84%
Toll A/C 121 3 2.48%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
13
17
0
1
0.00%
5.88%
Area Lights 1 0 0.00%
Signs 64 3 4.69%
Concrete Pavement 189 3 1.59%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 64 0 0.00%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 59 2 3.39%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 63 1 1.59%
Plumbing Fixtures 141 16 11.35%
Sewer / Septic Lines 16 0 0.00%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 1206 152 12.60%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 2 0 0.00%
Generators 67 3 4.48%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 33
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 18
Condition of Buildings - North SR 91, SR 528, SR 429, & SR 417 - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 16 3 18.75%
Walks And Curbs 111 6 5.41%
Area Lights 66 12 18.18%
Site Grounds 70 10 14.29%
Irrigation System 37 2 5.41%
Exterior Walls 315 14 4.44%
Exterior Trim 26 1 3.85%
Exterior Windows 97 3 3.09%
Exterior Doors 86 5 5.81%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 1036 33 3.19%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
8
253
1
12
12.50%
4.74%
Interior Flooring 257 12 4.67%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 234 40 17.09%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 12 2 16.67%
Bath Accessories 65 8 12.31%
Lockers 15 2 13.33%
Interior Signs 153 15 9.80%
Roofs 21 0 0.00%
Air Conditioners 929 94 10.12%
Tunnel 40 3 7.50%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 13 1 7.69%
Exterior Booth 73 2 2.74%
Interior Booth 129 5 3.88%
Toll Doors 85 15 17.65%
Window 66 3 4.55%
Counter/Drawer 137 5 3.65%
Toll Light 83 6 7.23%
Toll A/C 112 7 6.25%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
27
39
2
0
7.41%
0.00%
Area Lights 3 0 0.00%
Signs 99 3 3.03%
Concrete Pavement 197 31 15.74%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 126 1 0.79%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 99 5 5.05%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 76 5 6.58%
Plumbing Fixtures 224 16 7.14%
Sewer / Septic Lines 23 1 4.35%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 1695 211 12.45%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 11 0 0.00%
Generators 72 4 5.56%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 34
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 19
Condition of Buildings - Seminole - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 6 2 33.33%
Walks And Curbs 36 2 5.56%
Area Lights 22 2 9.09%
Site Grounds 13 4 30.77%
Irrigation System 18 0 0.00%
Exterior Walls 99 10 10.10%
Exterior Trim 15 0 0.00%
Exterior Windows 36 5 13.89%
Exterior Doors 22 3 13.64%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 299 24 8.03%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
0
73
0
10
0.00%
13.70%
Interior Flooring 72 8 11.11%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 43 9 20.93%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 2 0 0.00%
Bath Accessories 7 2 28.57%
Lockers 2 0 0.00%
Interior Signs 46 8 17.39%
Roofs 15 0 0.00%
Air Conditioners 265 46 17.36%
Tunnel 7 1 14.29%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 1 0 0.00%
Exterior Booth 33 5 15.15%
Interior Booth 39 10 25.64%
Toll Doors 31 6 19.35%
Window 22 3 13.64%
Counter/Drawer 56 3 5.36%
Toll Light 33 6 18.18%
Toll A/C 33 2 6.06%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
15
15
1
0
6.67%
0.00%
Area Lights 1 0 0.00%
Signs 50 6 12.00%
Concrete Pavement 85 12 14.12%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 32 4 12.50%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 29 4 13.79%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 23 4 17.39%
Plumbing Fixtures 74 4 5.41%
Sewer / Septic Lines 5 0 0.00%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 509 91 17.88%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 5 0 0.00%
Generators 26 2 7.69%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 35
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 20
Condition of Buildings - Veterans - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 0 0 0.00%
Walks And Curbs 31 3 9.68%
Area Lights 16 0 0.00%
Site Grounds 6 0 0.00%
Irrigation System 6 0 0.00%
Exterior Walls 56 4 7.14%
Exterior Trim 13 0 0.00%
Exterior Windows 34 4 11.76%
Exterior Doors 14 1 7.14%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 251 13 5.18%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
0
64
0
7
0.00%
10.94%
Interior Flooring 68 11 16.18%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 71 12 16.90%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 5 0 0.00%
Bath Accessories 10 1 10.00%
Lockers 1 0 0.00%
Interior Signs 59 5 8.47%
Roofs 7 0 0.00%
Air Conditioners 226 28 12.39%
Tunnel 13 2 15.38%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 2 0 0.00%
Exterior Booth 31 0 0.00%
Interior Booth 71 8 11.27%
Toll Doors 52 12 23.08%
Window 36 1 2.78%
Counter/Drawer 59 3 5.08%
Toll Light 43 5 11.63%
Toll A/C 58 6 10.34%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
16
13
3
0
18.75%
0.00%
Area Lights 5 1 20.00%
Signs 40 1 2.50%
Concrete Pavement 89 4 4.49%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 42 0 0.00%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 39 0 0.00%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 43 1 2.33%
Plumbing Fixtures 45 7 15.56%
Sewer / Septic Lines 8 0 0.00%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 467 79 16.92%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 5 0 0.00%
Generators 22 2 9.09%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 36
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 21
Condition of Buildings - Polk - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 0 0 0.00%
Walks And Curbs 48 4 8.33%
Area Lights 29 5 17.24%
Site Grounds 18 2 11.11%
Irrigation System 21 1 4.76%
Exterior Walls 111 5 4.50%
Exterior Trim 18 2 11.11%
Exterior Windows 44 7 15.91%
Exterior Doors 27 1 3.70%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 422 23 5.45%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
0
107
0
10
0.00%
9.35%
Interior Flooring 99 4 4.04%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 108 29 26.85%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 5 0 0.00%
Bath Accessories 24 3 12.50%
Lockers 2 0 0.00%
Interior Signs 58 0 0.00%
Roofs 15 0 0.00%
Air Conditioners 413 36 8.72%
Tunnel 10 1 10.00%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 2 0 0.00%
Exterior Booth 37 5 13.51%
Interior Booth 74 8 10.81%
Toll Doors 48 9 18.75%
Window 34 2 5.88%
Counter/Drawer 72 3 4.17%
Toll Light 41 4 9.76%
Toll A/C 52 4 7.69%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
17
17
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
Area Lights 1 0 0.00%
Signs 60 4 6.67%
Concrete Pavement 104 5 4.81%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 64 2 3.13%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 31 1 3.23%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 33 6 18.18%
Plumbing Fixtures 84 4 4.76%
Sewer / Septic Lines 11 2 18.18%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 641 94 14.66%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 2 0 0.00%
Generators 28 1 3.57%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 37
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 22
Condition of Buildings - Suncoast - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 0 0 0.00%
Walks And Curbs 34 3 8.82%
Area Lights 21 0 0.00%
Site Grounds 24 6 25.00%
Irrigation System 7 1 14.29%
Exterior Walls 83 3 3.61%
Exterior Trim 12 0 0.00%
Exterior Windows 32 0 0.00%
Exterior Doors 18 0 0.00%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 327 9 2.75%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
1
82
0
3
0.00%
3.66%
Interior Flooring 81 3 3.70%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 77 14 18.18%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 5 0 0.00%
Bath Accessories 8 1 12.50%
Lockers 1 0 0.00%
Interior Signs 51 4 7.84%
Roofs 11 0 0.00%
Air Conditioners 310 60 19.35%
Tunnel 23 3 13.04%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 3 0 0.00%
Exterior Booth 41 3 7.32%
Interior Booth 73 10 13.70%
Toll Doors 42 4 9.52%
Window 32 0 0.00%
Counter/Drawer 62 6 9.68%
Toll Light 43 4 9.30%
Toll A/C 63 6 9.52%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
13
11
3
0
23.08%
0.00%
Area Lights 0 0 0.00%
Signs 37 0 0.00%
Concrete Pavement 84 5 5.95%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 35 0 0.00%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 30 1 3.33%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 35 0 0.00%
Plumbing Fixtures 85 9 10.59%
Sewer / Septic Lines 15 0 0.00%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 525 64 12.19%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 0 0 0.00%
Generators 25 4 16.00%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 38
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 23
Condition of Buildings - Turnpike System (All Zones) - FY 2012
Category Element
Number
Inspected
Number Rated Less
Than Fair
Percent
Difference
Parking Area & Drive Pvm't 34 5 14.71%
Walks And Curbs 561 29 5.17%
Area Lights 456 48 10.53%
Site Grounds 287 39 13.59%
Irrigation System 167 10 5.99%
Exterior Walls 1696 58 3.42%
Exterior Trim 126 4 3.17%
Exterior Windows 523 31 5.93%
Exterior Doors 538 24 4.46%
Interior Walls & Ceilings 5671 196 3.46%
Buildings
Interior Windows & Sills
Interior Doors
47
1536
5
79
10.64%
5.14%
Interior Flooring 1771 100 5.65%
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets 1308 199 15.21%
Toilet Partitions & Screens 43 3 6.98%
Bath Accessories 163 20 12.27%
Lockers 95 5 5.26%
Interior Signs 973 88 9.04%
Roofs 239 2 0.84%
Air Conditioners 5028 497 9.88%
Tunnel 195 17 8.72%
Elevators, Dumbwaiters 44 3 6.82%
Exterior Booth 396 16 4.04%
Interior Booth 684 44 6.43%
Toll Doors 471 53 11.25%
Window 341 9 2.64%
Counter/Drawer 822 29 3.53%
Toll Light 474 50 10.55%
Toll A/C 604 31 5.13%
Toll Booths
Underside Of Roof
Traffic Lights
151
186
9
7
5.96%
3.76%
Area Lights 12 1 8.33%
Signs 581 25 4.30%
Concrete Pavement 1364 91 6.67%
Nose Flashers (In Gator Heads) 483 11 2.28%
Concrete Bumpers (Parking Stops) 429 16 3.73%
Traffic Signal 0 0 0.00%
Toll Indicator 423 18 4.26%
Plumbing Fixtures 1031 78 7.57%
Sewer / Septic Lines 129 5 3.88%
Mechanical Well / Water Lines 0 0 0.00%
Chlorination / Purification 0 0 0.00%
Water / Wastewater Plants 0 0 0.00%
Building Electrical Fixtures 8413 1003 11.92%
Electrical Mechanical Message Signs 35 0 0.00%
Generators 453 24 5.30%
2012 Annual Inspection Page 39
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Summary of Findings
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System – 2012 Annual Inspection

3. Summary of Findings
3.1 Introduction
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The findings of the FY 2012 Annual Inspection of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise
System roadways, structures, and building facilities are outlined in the following
paragraphs. The FDOT MRP ratings assigned to the various roadway elements are
presented, along with a general description of the condition of the system’s
structures and building facilities.
The major deficiencies found in each of the three categories of inspection are
identified, calling attention to those elements that were rated as being at least 20
percent in “less than fair” condition. The inspection did not exclude deficient
elements which may have had planned improvements underway. It should be noted
that none of the deficiencies observed pose a safety concern to users of Florida’s
Turnpike Enterprise System. The number of construction and maintenance contracts
for each category that were either in effect or advertised during the fiscal year are
summarized in some of the following tables in order to give some indication of work
effort already in place. It should be noted that many of the contracts would likely
extend over several fiscal years.
Also, the inspection does not take into account the criticality of the elements in
relationship to each other. When reviewing deficiencies, one should remember that
the desired level of service is influenced by a number of considerations. These
include safety, protection of private and public investment, comfort, economics,
environmental impact, aesthetics, and money constraints. A deficient pavement void,
for example, would receive priority over a deficiency in litter removal because it may
have an immediate impact on the safety of the patron. The standard procedures for
rating system facilities are explained in Appendix B.
3.2 Roadways
The Turnpike Enterprise and ATKINS developed an RRP based on the FDOT’s
MRP using the original 46 roadway elements from FDOT. The ratings and
descriptions of the numerical grading system are based on a ten-point system and
are an expanded version of the FDOT’s MRP. RRP inspections of roadways are
accomplished in one mile increments in which each component is visually inspected
and assigned a rating based on this ten-point scale. This information is entered
directly into a database located on laptop computers in the field for later compilation
and reporting for each roadway. Inspection results are separated by roadway/ramp
segment and lane direction. The results of these inspections are compared to the
results of the FDOT’s inspection and corresponding MRP rankings.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 40
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The FDOT’s MRP system is a computer-based system that randomly selects
specific points along the roadway mainlines, called samples that are 528 feet in
length. A total of 270 sample areas are generated for Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise
System. The inspections are based on five major categories, comprised of 36
individual elements and are detailed in Appendix B. After the inspection of a sample
area is completed, the raw data is entered into the DOTNET computer system. A
numerical score is generated for each group, each feature, and the element as a
whole. According to state guidelines, “each district is to achieve and maintain an
annual maintenance rating of 80, all elements (roadway, roadside, traffic, drainage,
and vegetation/aesthetics) shall have a rating of 75 or above, and each
characteristic shall meet the desired conditions 70 percent of the time.” A perfect
score is 100. It should be noted that the MRP samples are located on the mainline
roadway only, and no ramp roadways are included, while the RRP includes all
mainline and ramp roadways.
The results of this year’s annual inspection indicate that the Turnpike Enterprise’s
roadway facilities are being maintained in an overall excellent condition. According
to the MRP, the roadway components received an overall rating of 91, which is well
over the state’s goal of 80. These results indicate that the Turnpike Enterprise’s
aggressive and comprehensive Maintenance and Renewal and Replacement
programs continue to be effective in exceeding established guidelines and
procedures.
No major roadway deficiencies were identified by the Turnpike Enterprise’s annual
inspection. Many of the minor deficiencies identified have already been addressed
through the execution of several periodic or routine maintenance contracts or as part
of renewal and replacement efforts. The MRP ratings and minor deficiencies for
each of the five general categories of roadway elements are discussed in the
following.
Figure 6 – Typical Ramp Section
2012 Annual Inspection Page 41
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

3.2.1 Roadway
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The roadway category has achieved an overall MRP rating of 98, which is 23 points
above the satisfaction grade of 75 set by the FDOT Maintenance Office. There were
no characteristics that rated lower than 70. The lowest, flexible paved shoulder, was
rated at 91 in the MRP. By contrast, flexible paved shoulder was rated 99.4 in the
RRP. There were no major deficiencies in any of the maintenance zones reported by
the annual inspection. These positive ratings are indicative of the Turnpike
Enterprise’s ongoing resurfacing efforts along several portions of the system, as well
as an active preventive maintenance program. Table 24 represents construction
and maintenance contracts let during FY 2012.
Table 24
Number of Roadway Contracts in Effect or Advertised During FY 2012
Type Zone I Zone II Zone III* Zone IV* Totals
Construction 15 2 8 6 31
Dollar Amount $258,888,468 $6,495,941 $110,063,475 $60,863,864 $436,311,748
Maintenance 21 15 3 2 41
Dollar Amount $7,459,355 $3,906,868 $8,790,101 $4,273,116 $24,429,439
Total Contracts 36 17 11 8 72
Total Dollar Amount $266,347,823 $10,402,809 $118,853,576 $65,136,980 $460,741,187
*Zones III & IV Maintenance Contracts each have Routine Maintenance Asset Contracts.
3.2.2 Roadside
The determination of an MRP rating for roadside features is generally based upon
the consideration of all grading, shoulder, slopes, and other elements located
outside of the paved travel way (Figure 1). The roadside category has achieved an
overall MRP rating of 88, a decrease of two points from FY 2011. There were no
characteristics, which rated lower than 70. The lowest was soil shoulder rated at 86
in the MRP. By contrast, soil shoulder was rated 96.8 in the RRP. The annual
inspection identified soil shoulders with a deficiency rate of 3.20.
3.2.3 Traffic Services
The Traffic Services category is rated based on the condition of all features that
guide, protect, and assist the patron while traveling the Turnpike Enterprise’s
roadways, interchanges, and service areas. An MRP rating of 89 was achieved in
this category, which was the same in 2011. There were no characteristics, which
rated lower than 70. The lowest was Guardrail rated at 78. By contrast, Guardrail
was rated 99.5 in the RRP. The annual inspection indicates a well-maintained
program with no characteristics being more than 4 percent deficient or less overall.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 42
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

3.2.4 Drainage
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The ratings for this category of roadway elements is based on the overall condition
of all structures that collect, treat, and convey storm water run-off. Reflecting the
overall excellent condition of these facilities, an MRP rating of 94 was achieved in
this category, which is a 1-point decrease in the MRP rating from 2011. No major
deficiencies were noted in this category and there were no characteristics that rated
lower than 70. The lowest, miscellaneous drains, was rated at 86. Supporting this
rating, miscellaneous drains was rated 98.3 in the RRP. The annual inspection found
that seven of the eight elements inspected were found to be less than 2 percent
defective.
3.2.5 Vegetation/Aesthetics
Figure 7 – Highway Sign
The MRP rating for the Vegetation/Aesthetics category is based on the overall
condition of turf, landscape, trees, and their general appearance. According to its
comprehensive Turf Management Plan, the Turnpike Enterprise continually monitors
the condition of vegetation and the need for mowing, trimming, re-landscaping, and
litter removal. An MRP rating of 87 was reported in this category in FY 2012
inspection. The lowest rated item was litter and was rated at 64 in the MRP. In
contrast, litter was rated 97.7 in the RRP in this category. The highest deficiency
rating overall was Turf condition, which was rated at 3.63% deficient.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 43
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

3.3 Structures
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The biennial structures inspection consisted of bridges, overhead/cantilever signs,
LNQCs, and HMLTs. The major deficiencies in each of the categories are
summarized in the following section. It should be noted that none of the deficiencies
observed pose a safety concern to users of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System.
The structures categories do not receive the standard MRP ratings as shown for the
roadway categories but rather use modified standards as reflected in Appendix B,
Section B.
3.3.1 Bridges
During FY 2012, one construction project is underway or advertised for bridge
renovation, replacement, or repair. Two consultant bridge inspection contracts and
one routine maintenance contract were also in effect or advertised, as indicated in
Table 25.
Table 25
Number of Bridge Contracts in Effect or Advertised During FY 2012
Type Zone I Zone II Zone III Zone IV Totals
Construction 0 1 0 0 1
Dollar Amount $0 $4,701,943 $0 $0 $4,701,943
Maintenance 2 0 1 0 3
Dollar Amount $2,400,731 $0 $1,498,387 $0 $3,899,118
Total Contracts 2 1 1 0 4
Total Dollar Amount $2,400,731 $4,701,943 $1,498,387 $0 $8,601,061
As a result of the 2012 biennial structures inspection, it was determined that 57
structural type deficiencies were coded at 56 bridges, some of which have been
corrected since the last inspection. These deficiencies are summarized in Table 26.
Additionally, Turnpike Enterprise Maintenance directed a portion of its periodic and
routine maintenance funding in FY 2012 to rehabilitation and repair projects.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 44
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 26
Bridge Structures Deficiencies - FY 2012
Bridge Element
Figure 8 – Bridge over SR 429
Reported
Condition/Comments
107 Open Girder/Beam 1
241 Concrete Culvert (along length of barrel) 1
301 Deck Joints - Pourable Joint Seal 33
302 Compression Joint Seal 16
310 Elasomeric Bearings 2
333 Bridge Railing Other 1
396 Abutment Slope Protection 1
398 Drainage System Other Material 2
Totals 57
Total Number of Deficient Bridges 56
2012 Annual Inspection Page 45
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

3.3.2 Overhead/Cantilever Signs
FLORIDA TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Overhead and cantilever signs, are inspected separately from those signs in the
roadway category due to the fact that they are suspended above the travel way by
large support structures, such as the one pictured in Figure 9. These signs provide
critical directional information, guiding the patron throughout Florida’s Turnpike
Enterprise System. No components or subcomponents were noted as being in less
than fair condition for overhead / cantilever signs during the 2012 inspection period.
Overhead / cantilever signs are shown by location in Table 11.
3.3.3 High Mast Light Towers (HMLTs)
Figure 9 - Cantilever Sign
Similiar to overhead/cantilever signs, HMLTs are included in the structures
inspection. These structures provide illumination for improved nighttime visibility at
various locations along the Turnpike Enterprise, such as interchanges, service
plazas, and toll facilities. No deficiencies were noted during the FY 2012 inspection
period.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 46
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 27
Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQCs ) Deficiencies - FY 2012
Reported
Bridge Element
Condition/Comments
241 Concrete Culvert (along length of barrel) 14
290 Channel 1
474
475
Other Substructure Elements Metal Uncoated
- Wingwall/Retaining Wall
Other Substructure Elements Reinforced od
Plain Concrete - Wingwall/Retaining Wall
Totals 19
Total Number of Deficient LNQCs 18
3.3.4 Large Non Qualifying Culverts ( LNQCs )
A LNQCs is a structure that does not meet the statutory definition of a bridge.
LNQCs is defined as a circular, elliptical arch, or box type of culvert with a height
greater than four ( 4 ) feet, or clear span of 10 feet or greater, but less than 20 feet.
Similar to the others Structures, Bridges, Signs, and High Mast Light Towers,
LNQCs are included in the structures inspection. The LNQCs are inspected once
every six years. Each cycle is a 2 year period with 1/3 of the total LNQCs inspected
during the cycle. It takes 3 cycles for the entire LNQC inventory to be inspected.
The LNQCs are in good condition with Minor repairs on-going as part of the routine
maintenance contracts. There have been no deficiencies noted by the structures
inspections that pose a safety or structural concern.
As a result of the 2012 ( LNQCs ) structures inspection, it was determined that 19
structural (LNQCs ) deficiencies were coded at 18 culverts ( LNQCs ), some of
which have been corrected since the last inspection. These deficiencies are
summarized in Table 27. Additionally, Turnpike Enterprise Maintenance directed a
portion of its periodic and routine maintenance funding in FY 2012 to rehabilitation
and repair projects.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 47
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
1
3

3.4 Buildings
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The annual inspection of the Turnpike Enterprise’s facilities is based on a visual
inspection and rating of the condition of 475 buildings. Overall 38,983 comments
were made of building asset items inspected, of which, 2,982 were rated as being
less than fair condition, for a deficiency rate of 7.65 percent. However, it should be
pointed out that, in many cases, these deficiencies represented an aesthetics
problem and not structural or safety issues.
Figure 10 – Regional Tolls Office
2012 Annual Inspection Page 48
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Figure 11 - Operations Bldg –Turkey Lake
Further, the Turnpike Enterprise’s facilities are more susceptible to deterioration due
to time, weather, and other elements than are its roadways. A majority of the
deficiencies were reported in the buildings and tollbooth inspections, as indicated in
Table 23.
During FY 2012, five building construction projects were underway or completed on
two different types of work, including toll building renovation and plaza renovation.
Also, there were 36 facility routine maintenance contracts in effect or advertised, as
indicated in Table 28.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 49
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

Roadway
Name
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table 28
Number of Facilities and Communications Contracts in Effect or Advertised
During FY 2012
No. of
Projects
Construction Maintenance
Dollar
Amount
No. of
Projects
Dollar Amount
Total
Contracts
Total Dollar
Amount
HEFT 1 $52,522 4 $760,220 5 $812,742
Southern 0 $0 4 $802,739 4 $802,739
Central 1 $25,000 5 $1,297,363 6 $1,322,363
Northern 1 $52,522 8 $1,227,532 9 $1,280,054
Veterans 0 $0 5 $766,907 5 $766,907
Seminole 1 $52,522 1 343,409 2 $395,931
Polk 1 $52,522 2 379,249 3 $431,771
Suncoast 0 $0 2 376,093 2 $376,093
3.4.1 Buildings
Totals 5 $235,086 31 $5,953,513 36 $6,188,599
The Turnpike Enterprise’s toll plaza administration buildings, canopies, and adjacent
areas, which include parking and drainage areas, are generally in good condition.
Other administrative buildings, canopies, and communication tower buildings were
also found to be in relatively good condition.
System-wide, of the twenty-two elements inspected in the building category, no
elements were reported to be more than 20% deficient. The Central Mainline
facilities had one element, Tunnel at 20.0 %. The Northern Mainline and Southern
Connector Extension had no elements greater than 19%. The annual assessment of
the Seminole Expressway had four elements: Parking Area at 33.33%, Site grounds
at 30.77%, Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets at 20.93%, and Bath Accessories at 28.57
% . The Polk Parkway had one element; Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets at 26.85%.
The Suncoast Parkway had one element: Site grounds at 25%.
3.4.2 Tollbooths
Overall, in the tollbooth category, no elements were reported to be more than 20%
deficient. The Seminole Expressway had one deficiency, Interior Booth at 25.64%
and the Veterans had two elements, Toll Doors at 23.08%, and Toll area lights at
20% . The Suncoast had one element: The Underside of Roof at 23.08 % deficient.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 50
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

3.4.3 Mechanical
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Figure 12 – Toll Booths at Ramp Plaza
Overall, no items were rated over 20 percent deficient. Plumbing fixtures received
the most comments and had an overall deficiency of only 7.57 percent. With the
exception of the Sewer and Septic Lines, few other deficiencies were reported of the
mechanical elements inspected, indicating an optimal operational and maintenance
level.
3.4.4 Electrical
Overall, of the three elements in the electrical category, building electrical fixtures
had the highest number of deficiencies reported in this year’s annual inspection. This
element overall was rated 11.92 percent deficient, the majority of elements found
deficient were GFI type receptacles not working and interior lights out or missing.
Figure 13 - Generator
2012 Annual Inspection Page 51
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
4. Program Status, Commitments, and Recommendations
4.1 Maintenance Rating Program Status
Based on FDOT’s MRP, the overall condition of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise
System roadway facilities is consistently rated above the statewide goals. The
roadway MRP ratings recorded over the past five years are shown in Table 29.
Overall, the average MRP rating of 91 for FY 2012 has decreased by one point from
92 in 2011. The overall condition of the roadside category of 88 for 2012 has
decreased by 2.0 points. The Drainage decreased by one point, roadway increased
by one point, traffic services remained the same and vegetation and aesthetics had
a five point drop from 92 in 2011 to 87 for 2012. Variation should be expected from
year to year, as MRP ratings, by procedure, are considered accurate only within 3
percent.
Table 29
Roadways MRP Rating Comparison - FY 2007 through FY 2012
Category FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 AVERAGE
Roadway 97 97 97 97 98 97.2
Roadside 85 88 86 90 88 87.4
Traffic Services 90 88 94 89 89 88.8
Drainage 94 95 88 95 94 94.4
Vegetation/
Aesthetics
90 93 92 92 87 90.8
Overall Rating 91 92 91 92 91 91.4
4.2 Programmed Commitments
The condition of the Turnpike Enterprise System is maintained at an optimal level
due to the effective management of the Turnpike Enterprise’s Renewal and
Replacement, Periodic, and Routine Maintenance programs. The funds committed
to these programs are shown in Table 30. It should be noted that the figures shown
represent amounts programmed for physical improvements only. For instance,
Periodic and Routine Maintenance funds specifically exclude administrative costs for
inspections. In addition, the Renewal and Replacement figures represent
construction contract dollars only, excluding administrative costs such as design and
construction engineering management.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 52
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Recommendations
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System – 2012 Annual Inspection

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The total programmed commitments for FY 2012 represent a continued commitment
to Renewal and Replacement, and Periodic Maintenance funds and an average
commitment for Routine Maintenance funds over the 5-year period of $39,548 per
year. Programmed commitments between FY 2012 and FY 2016 range from 10.82
percent to 19.28 percent of gross revenue, with the upper limit of this range
occurring in FY 2012.
New construction and improvement projects included in the $64.27 million for
renewal and replacement work in FY 2012 are roadway resurfacing; bridge, roadway
and facility construction; toll equipment enhancement, and bridge repair.
The $53 million programmed for periodic and routine maintenance work in FY 2012
includes maintenance of all highway assets, building maintenance, building
renovation, building demolition, roof replacement, toll plaza tunnel sealing, drainage
improvements, and safety upgrades.
Fiscal
Year
Table 30
Program Commitments - FY 2012 through FY 2016 ($ millions)
Renewal &
Replacement
Contracts
*(1)
Periodic
Maintenance
*(2)
Routine
Maintenance
*(3)
2012 Annual Inspection Page 53
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
Total
Gross
Revenue
*(4)
Percentage of
Gross Revenue
2012 64.271 18.274 34.749 117.294 608.512 19.28%
2013 51.318 9.600 37.496 98.414 704.923 13.96%
2014 29.066 10.278 41.762 81.106 726.622 11.16%
2015 33.000 7.512 39.343 79.855 738.106 10.82%
2016 44.231 5.781 44.399 94.411 755.257 12.50%
*(1) Renewal and Replacement data captures all projects/phases using PKYR funding, excluding those PKYR projects that are in the Periodic
Maintenance category. *(2) Periodic Maintenance data captures all projects/phases using Item Group PEMT. *(3) Routine Maintenance data
captures all phase 7x projects. *(4) Gross Revenue data was taken from the Traffic Engineer’s Annual Report, Executive Summary, Table 5
(Summary of Florida’s Turnpike System Toll Revenue Forecast ($000) FY 2012 through FY 2021).

4.3 Recommendations
.
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
While Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System has been rated as being in an overall
excellent condition, the deficiencies noted in this report must be addressed to extend
this rating to be inclusive of all system components. The deficiencies, which were
confirmed by the FY 2012 annual inspection, were assigned a priority level of 1, 2, or
3, with 1 indicating that the need for improvement was a high priority, and 3 a low
priority. Based on the coordination-of-funding-related issues with the Turnpike
Enterprise’s maintenance, finance, and production offices, recommendations are
made for addressing the specific deficiencies with assigned priority levels of 1 and 2.
The recommended high priority improvements, the respective funding source (P/R:
Periodic and Routine Maintenance, R&R: Renewal and Replacement – PKYR), and
status and recommendations for the roadways, structures, and buildings categories
of system facilities are presented in Table 31. Several of the improvements listed in
table 31 below are being addressed and the funding status is based on the current
availability of funds from the respective source. Refer to the notes that accompany
Table 31 for further information.
Table 31 (1)
2012 High Priority Improvements, Current Funding Status, and Recommendations
No. Description (2)
Highway Operations
1.
2.
3.
4.
Under Deck Lighting Fixture
Relocation / Removal / Retrofit
System wide (85 Bridges and 313
Lighting Fixtures)
Wet Pavement / High Incident
Location – Mainline MP 83 to MP 85
ITS Renewal and Replacement
Program Box
Consultant Support One Way
Evacuation Plan
Funding
Request
Source (3)
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
Priority
Level (4)
Current Funding Status and
Recommendations (5)
2012 Annual Inspection Page 54
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
TO-1
TO-2
TO-3
TO-4
Request
2014 $750,000
FPID 432456-1
2014 $2,400,000
Request
2014 $2,950,000
2015 $3,250,000
2016 $5,525,000
2017 $4,825,000
2018 $2,375,000
Request
2014 $35,000
2015 $35,000
2016 $35,000
2017 $35,000
2018 $35,000

Highway Operations - Continued
5. SR 76 Emergency Vehicle Access
6. Sawgrass Canal Revetment (Phase 2)
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Access Gates on Noise Walls Every ½
Mile
Improve/Reconstruct HEFT Bridge
Transitions (HEFT MP 34 to MP 37)
Microwave Towers Guyed
Foundations Replacement (9 Mainline
Locations)
Dynamic Message Signs (8 Mainline
Locations Between MP 140 and MP
220)
Painting of Sign Structures on
Suncoast Parkway (SR 589)
Painting of Turnpike Bridges Program
Box
Painting of Concrete Structures
Program Box (System-wide Noise
Walls and Bridges)
Program Box for Toll Plaza Safety
Items
15. Painting of Polk Parkway Bridges
16.
17.
18.
19.
Towing & Roadside Repair Funds
Replacement
Shoulder Stabilization and
Rehabilitation
Permanent Heavy Truck Turn Around
Crossovers at Mainline MP 216
Microwave Towers Structural
Modifications and Maintenance
Repairs
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYR
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYR
2012 Annual Inspection Page 55
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
TO-5
TO-6
TO-7
TO-8
TO-9
TO-10
TO-11
TO-12
TO-13
AF-1
AF-2
AF-3
AF-4
AF-5
AF-6
FPID 432458-1
2013 $213,055
FPID 428154 1
2013 $2,800,000
Request
2014 $8,000,000
Request
2014 $588,000
Included in 431100-1
2014 $1,150,000
FPID 431987 1
2013 $1,200,000
Request
2014 $2,000,000
Request
2015 $1,000,000
Request
2017 $4,150,000
Request
2015 $500,000
2016 $500,000
2017 $500,000
2018 $500,000
FPID 428012 1
2013 $150,000
2014 $150,000
FPID 427325 1
2013 $786,128
Existing
2013 $355,000
Existing
2013 $203,000
FPID 429352-1
2013 $1,403,044
FPID 431987-1
2013 $1,200,000

Planning and Production
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Table 31 Notes:
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
NW 41st St. Ramp / Intersection
Improvements
( HEFT MP 29)
Sunrise Blvd. Intersection
Improvements
( Sawgrass Xway MP 1A )
Sample Road Intersection
Improvements
( Turnpike Mainline MP 69 )
Coconut Creek Pkwy Intersection
Improvements ( Turnpike Mainline MP
67 )
Ramp Widening / SB Turnpike to
Sawgrass Expressway ( Turnpike
Mainline MP 71 )
HEFT / NW 57th Avenue (Red Rd)
Interchange Improvements (HEFT MP
43)
S.R. 836 NB On-Ramp Shoulder
( HEFT MP 26 )
Widen Shoulder /SB Off-Ramp to S.R.
836
( Heft MP 26 )
SB Off-Ramp to Caribbean Blvd. /
Right-Turn Signal ( HEFT MP 12 )
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
(P/R)
PKYI
2012 Annual Inspection Page 56
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012
E – 1
E – 2
E – 3
E – 4
E – 5
E – 6
S – 3
S – 4
S – 6
Existing
2016 $ $4,496,156
Added to AET 5B
2015 $ $695,181
Existing
2015 $ $984,769
Existing
2017 $ $3,129,114
Added to AET 5B
2015 $ $1,956,627
FPID 423371-2
2015 $ $1,477,325
Existing
2015 $ $794,122
Existing
2015 $ $510,542
Existing
2015 $ $421,600
(1) Source of current funding status: Turnpike District Tentative Work Program as of October 31, 2012.
(2) Unfunded projects require execution of design contract(s) and/or work program adjustments
(3) PKM1: Routine Maintenance; PKYR: Renewal and Replacement; PKBD: Bonded Project; PKYI:
Improvement Project
(4) Source of prioritized improvements and requested costs: Turnpike Tour Field Review – April 2012
(5) It is assumed that the PKYR funding levels in FY 11/12 and beyond will be adjusted to accommodate the
funding required for the recommended improvements listed
While it is recommended that funds are appropriated for the high priority improvements
identified in Table 31, the requirements for other projects funded through the Renewal
and Replacement Program should be evaluated with particular emphasis on the need to
resurface the system mainline and ramp facilities. In addition to pavement resurfacing,
the Renewal and Replacement Program includes other Turnpike Enterprise System
assets like bridges, buildings and communications facilities; toll equipment; and utilities.
Given the magnitude to which these assets affect overall Turnpike Enterprise System
operations, a significant level of emphasis should continue to be placed on the Turnpike
Enterprise’s Renewal and Replacement Program and related funding levels.

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The Turnpike Enterprise Asset Management System (TEAMS) was used to assist in
evaluating and identifying renewal and replacement needs for this fiscal year. The
functional component of this system is a comprehensive inventory of the Turnpike
Enterprise’s assets; the condition of the assets that are based on the annual inspection
condition ratings as reported in this document; and forecasting these condition values
and identifying their respective replacement values which are programmed as renewal
and replacement monies.
The system allows the Turnpike Enterprise to evaluate each asset based on life
expectancy and replacement value. With this information available, more accurate
renewal and replacement forecasts are generated and the actual maintenance monies
programmed are based on the annual condition assessment. When combined with
routine inspections, a total asset management system is created, which has provided the
Turnpike Enterprise with the tools necessary to minimize expenses while maximizing
service to the Turnpike Enterprise patron, thus maximizing their overall bond rating.
2012 Annual Inspection Page 57
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
APPENDIX A
Maps of System Components and Inspection Zones
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix A
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
APPENDIX B
Inspection Rating Procedures for Roadways, Structures, and
Buildings
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

A. ROADWAY RATING PROCEDURES
Maintenance Rating Program
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The Maintenance Rating Program (MRP) was developed by FDOT. The computer-based
system randomly selects specific points along the roadway mainlines, called samples, that
are 528 (1/10 th mile) feet in length. A total of 180 samples areas are generated for the
Turnpike system. The inspection is based on five major categories, comprised of 36
individual elements as per Table A-1 below:
Table A-1
Roadway Components
Roadway Traffic Services Drainage
Flexible Pot Hole Raised Pavement Marker Side/Cross Drain
Flexible Edge Raveling Striping Roadside/Median Ditch
Flexible Shoving Pavement Symbol Outfall Ditch
Flexible Depression/Bump Guardrail Inlet
Flexible Paved Shoulder/
Turnout
Attenuator Misc. Drainage
Rigid Pothole Signs less than or equal to 30 SF Roadway Sweep
Rigid Depression/Bump Signs greater than 30 SF
Rigid Joint/Crack Object Marker & Delineator
Rigid Paved Shoulder/
Crack
Lighting
Roadside Vegetation/Aesthetics
Soil Shoulder Roadway Mowing
Front Slope Slope Mowing
Slope Pavement Landscaping
Sidewalk Tree Trim
Fence Curb/Sidewalk Edge
Litter Removal
Turf Condition
After the inspection of a sample area is completed, the raw data is entered into the DOTNET
computer system. A numerical score is generated for each group, each feature, and the
element as a whole. According to state guidelines, a score of 75 is considered satisfactory
for each of the 5 elements, while each characteristic shall have a score of 70 or above. A
perfect score is 100.
The Turnpike Enterprise and ATKINS developed a Roadway Rating Procedure based on the
original FDOT MRP using the original 46 elements. The ratings and descriptions of the
numerical grading system are shown in Table A-2. This information is entered directly into a
database located on laptop computers in the field for later compilation and reporting for each
roadway. Inspection results are separated by roadway / ramp segment and lane direction.
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

Grade Rating
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table A-2
Roadway Inspection Rating Scale
Description
10 Excellent No deficiencies noted. Feature is in like new condition
8-9 Adequate
5-7 Degraded
2-4 Unsatisfactory
1 Emergency
B. STRUCTURES RATING PROCEDURES
No maintenance is necessary. Feature appearance and
functionality / operability are good.
Maintenance is required to protect public or system. Feature
appearance and functionality / operability are below average.
Repair Immediately to protect public or system. Feature
appearance and functionality / operability are Substandard.
Immediate maintenance is required to protect public or system.
Feature appearance and functionality / operability are
unacceptable.
The structures inspection is performed on a biennial basis and is subdivided into three major
categories: bridges, overhead/cantilever signs, and weathering steel high mast light towers.
The standard procedures utilized in rating the condition of each element included in each of
the three categories are described below:
Bridge Rating Procedure:
The Bridge Inspection Reports were reviewed, and the results are summarized and included
in the Annual Inspection Report. The biennial inspection is based on three main
components, comprised of a total of 93 elements, and 117 sub elements, for fixed bridges
only. A numerical score is generated for each component based on the rating scale shown
in Table B-2. The bridge components and major elements are listed in Table B-1 below:
Table B-1
Bridge Components
Deck Substructure Superstructure
Concrete Deck /Slab Column or Pile Closed/Open Girders
Deck Joints Hollow Core Pile Stringer
Approach Slabs Pier Wall Thru Truss
Bridge Railing Abutment Deck Truss
Pile Cap/Footing Arch
Pile Jacket Floor Beams
Cap Culvert
Abutment Slope Protection Bearings
Bulkhead/Seawall Unpainted Steel Superstructure
Fender/Dolphin System Painted Steel Superstructure
Wingwall/Retaining Wall
Prestressed Concrete
Superstructure
Mechanical Stabilized Earth Wall Reinforced Conc Superstructure
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

Grade Rating
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table B-2
Bridge Inspection Rating Scale , LNQCs
Description
9 Excellent All elements are in excellent condition.
8 Very Good There were no problems noted.
7 Good
6 Satisfactory
Element has some minor problems. Minor maintenance may be
needed.
Element shows some minor deterioration. Maintenance may be
needed.
5 Fair Element is sound, but may have minor section loss. Minor
rehabilitation may be needed.
4 Poor Element exhibits advanced section loss. Major rehabilitation may be
needed.
3 Serious Element has loss of section that has seriously affected the structure.
Repair of rehabilitation is required immediately.
2 Critical Element shows advanced deterioration. It may be necessary to close
the bridge until corrective action is taken.
1 Imminent Failure Bridge is closed to traffic. Corrective action may permit light service.
0 Failed Bridge is out of service and beyond corrective action.
Overhead/Cantilever Sign Rating Procedure:
The condition of overhead/cantilever signs is determined based on the biennial inspection of
the two components listed in Table B-3 below. The standard rating scale is shown in Table
B-4.
Table B-3
Overhead/Cantilever Sign Components
Overlane Sign Structure Foundation Overlane Sign Structure Horizontal Member
Overlane Sign Structure Vertical Member
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table B-4
Overhead/Cantilever Signs Inspection Rating Scale
Grade Rating Description
8-10
Good to
Excellent
Performs intended function with high degree of reliability and/or
effectiveness.
5-7 Fair Performs intended function with small reduction in reliability and/or
effectiveness.
3-4 Poor Performs intended function with significant reduction in reliability
and/or effectiveness. Repair or replacement may be required.
1-2 Critical Does not perform intended function in an acceptable level of reliability
and/or effectiveness. Repair or replacement is required.
Weathering Steel High Mast Light Tower Rating Procedure:
The condition of high mast light towers is determined based on the biennial inspection of the
two components listed in Table B-5 below. The standard rating scale is shown in Table B-6.
Table B-5
High Mast Light Tower Components
High Mast Light Pole Foundation High Mast Light Poles
Table B-6
Weathering Steel High Mast Light Tower Inspection Rating Scale
Grade Rating Description
8-10 Good Performs intended function with high degree of reliability and/or
effectiveness.
5-7 Fair Performs intended function with small reduction in reliability and/or
effectiveness.
3-4 Marginal Performs intended function with significant reduction in reliability
and/or effectiveness. Repair or replacement may be required.
1-2 Inadequate Does not perform intended function at an acceptable level of
reliability and/or effectiveness. Repair or replacement is required.
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

C. BUILDING RATING PROCEDURE
FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
The Annual Building Inspection is based on four general categories of inspection: buildings,
toll booths, mechanical, and electrical. A total of 45 subcomponents are included in the
buildings category of inspection. The building type dictates the specific report form that is
used in the field inspection. The four general categories and their respective
subcomponents are listed in Table C-1 below. The standard Building Inspection Rating
Scale is shown in Table C-2.
Table C-1
Building Categories and Components
Buildings Toll Booths Mechanical
Parking Area & Drive Pavement Booth Exterior Plumbing Fixture
Walks and Curbs Booth Interior Sewer/Septic Lines
Area Lights Booth Doors Well/Water Lines
Site Drainage Booth Windows Chlorination/Purification
Irrigation System Booth Counters & Drawers Water/Wastewater Plants
Building Exterior Walls Booth Lighting Fixtures
Building Exterior Trim Booth Air Conditioners
Building Exterior Windows Canopy Underside of Roof Electrical
Building Exterior Doors Canopy Traffic Lights Building Electrical Fixtures
Building Interior Walls & Ceilings Canopy Area Lights Mechanical Message Signs
Canopy Signs Bug Zappers
Building Interior Windows & Sills Concrete Pavement Generators
Building Interior Doors
Building Interior Flooring
Nose Flashers (in Gator
Heads)
Concrete Bumpers (Parking
Stops)
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets Traffic Signals
Toilet Partitions & Screens Toll Indicator
Bath Accessories
Lockers
Interior Signs
Tunnel
Elevators, Dumbwaiters
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Table C-2
Buildings Inspection Rating Scale
Grade Rating/Description
10 Excellent Condition - No action necessary
9 Very Good Condition - No deficiencies noted.
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Good Condition - Some minor deficiencies noted and minor maintenance may
be required
Satisfactory Condition - Feature shows some minor deterioration, and
maintenance is required
Fair Condition - Feature is sound, but may have minor loss of function. Minor
rehabilitation may be required
Poor Condition - Feature exhibits advanced function loss. Major rehabilitation
may be required.
Serious Condition - Loss of function has seriously affected this feature. Repair
or rehabilitation is required immediately
Critical Condition - Advanced loss of function of this feature is present. Unless
closely monitored, it may be necessary to stop the function until corrective
action can be taken
Imminent Failure Condition - Feature is not functioning, but immediate
corrective action may forestall the complete failure
1 Failed Condition - The feature is out of service and beyond corrective action
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix B
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
APPENDIX C
Selected Photographs of Existing Conditions
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix C
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Excellent Roadway and Guardrail Condition
Exposed Guardrail Post Base and Asphalt Deterioration
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix C
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Desired Bridge Joint Condition
Undesirable Bridge Joint Condition
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix C
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Desired Headwall Drainage Structure Condition with Object Marker
Vegetation in front of Drainage Type Unit
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix C
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Excellent Asphalt Section
Deteriorated Asphalt Condition
2011 Annual Inspection Appendix C
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise System
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011