Conducting Educational Research
Caroll
Caroll
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTRODUCTION OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH<br />
is generally undertaken by individuals for their own, personal purpose—as opposed<br />
to educational researchers in college, universities or think tanks. Teachers and<br />
school administrators look at a problem in their own classroom/school/district to<br />
be able to gather information and make an informed “action plan.” The purpose is<br />
generally to improve one’s teaching or address a specific, local concern. Is the new<br />
tardy policy working? Is implementing judicious discipline in my history class<br />
helping students learn more deeply about democratic principles? Is using the<br />
student response system a more effective way of formative assessment than using<br />
non-technological means? Action research is not undertaken to have the findings<br />
apply to any situation except the one that is studied.<br />
Mills (2007) categorizes action research into two main types: practical action<br />
research and participatory action research. Practical action research is research<br />
that addresses specific questions in a classroom, school, or district. The purpose<br />
is to improve teaching and learning or provide necessary information to help in<br />
decision making. Participatory action research differs from practical action research<br />
in that it involves a group of people focusing on the same problem (e.g., teachers,<br />
administrators, board members). This group of stakeholders collectively formulates<br />
the research problem, which leads to this type of action research also being dubbed<br />
collaborative action research. Additionally, participation action research attempts<br />
to “improve social practice by changing it” (McTaggart, 1989, Tenet 1). It is an<br />
iterative process of planning, implementing, observing the effects of the implementation,<br />
reflecting on the effects, and revising the action plan.<br />
While there are entire books written just on action research (e.g., Mills, 2007),<br />
the basic research guidelines needed in conducting such a project parallel those<br />
outlined in this text. Depending on your question, you would follow the guidelines<br />
for conducting a qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods study. Once you are<br />
done with your data analysis, action research requires that you take one additional<br />
step. The implications section would be your action plan. Now that you have studied<br />
the issue, what do you propose be done in response to the problem?<br />
A main drawback to conducting action research is that the researcher is an<br />
inherent part of the process, making it harder to maintain objectivity. The major<br />
advantage is action research focuses on self-reflection; and, because you are studying<br />
something that is relevant to your immediate professional practice, it is easy to<br />
keep focused on and enthused about the research question. You will be taking a<br />
systematic and critical look at an issue that will ultimately improve your effectiveness<br />
as a professional. Those of you who will be examining your own teaching practices<br />
or classroom policies may be conducting a study very similar to action research.<br />
NEXT STEPS<br />
Now that you are armed with a basic understanding of why you should know how<br />
research is conducted, why you should learn about designing and conducting your<br />
own research project, and the basic schools of research methodologies, the next<br />
logical step is to begin thinking about your own research project. It’s time to start<br />
drawing on the empowerment that you will get from becoming an educational<br />
researcher.<br />
17