Accepted Papers - 3.pdf - UNESCO
Accepted Papers - 3.pdf - UNESCO
Accepted Papers - 3.pdf - UNESCO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
chase food self sufficiency as a goal seem to occupy<br />
a more commanding position, politically and<br />
economically. Thus, the threat of use of food as a<br />
weapon may not be a deterrent to them. After<br />
consideration of these aspects, most decision makers<br />
feel that food self sufficiency should be an explicit<br />
objective of interlinking of rivers.<br />
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS<br />
OF INTER-LINKING OF RIVERS<br />
In India, the planners are familiar with the social<br />
and environmental concerns caused by small, medium<br />
and large in-basin projects. Few NGOs have<br />
expressed that inter-basin transfers may cause socioeconomic<br />
and environmental impacts much different<br />
from those caused by in-basin developments. The<br />
social and environmental concerns associated with<br />
these inter-basin transfers would mainly on account<br />
of the largeness of the totality of the measures in<br />
the region in which the system of links passes. Each<br />
individual storage dam such as the Ichampally, the<br />
Polavaram, the Manibhadra/ Tikarpara etc involved<br />
in the peninsular links would not be much different<br />
in its storage or in its displacement from the large<br />
reservoirs like Gandhisagar, Sardar Sarovar,<br />
Srisailam, Nagarjunasagar etc which are existing.<br />
Similarly, we already have experienced about large<br />
canals exceeding discharge capacities of 1000<br />
cumec and the link canals would be not of much<br />
larger magnitude through these would be of much<br />
larger links. The existing inter-basin transfers in India<br />
do not seem to have experienced any such problem.<br />
CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE<br />
DEVELOPMENT AS APPLIED TO WATER<br />
RESOURCES<br />
Short vs. long term considerations:- There are<br />
some fundamental dichotomies on the time<br />
framework for sustainability of water resources<br />
projects for practical application. For example, the<br />
life period of a small check dam, run-off river barrage<br />
and a large multi-purpose dam can not be considered<br />
to be similar. Accordingly, there should be<br />
considerable flexibility in terms of the type of projects<br />
being considered while applying the fundamental<br />
assumption behind the concept of sustainable<br />
development that it would be viable over the long<br />
term. Many times, sustainable development is<br />
referred vaguely to several generations. Further, we<br />
have to reconcile the short term expectations of the<br />
main users (farmers in an irrigation project) with the<br />
long term needs of the society.<br />
497<br />
Externalities : In most of the projects, the private<br />
costs or benefits do not equal to social costs or<br />
benefits. The internalisation of such costs has not<br />
been easy through taxes, subsidies and regulations<br />
due to main reasons of difficulties in calculations of<br />
precise value of externalities, forceful difference of<br />
considerable private advantages by powerful<br />
individuals and organisations, time gap between<br />
realisation of such costs and regulations to control<br />
such externalities in the developing countries.<br />
Risks and uncertainties : The water resources<br />
development is confronted with large scale risks and<br />
uncertainties due to highly complex environmental<br />
system. The existing knowledge and data base is<br />
inadequate to identify the parameters that could<br />
indicate the passage from sustainable to<br />
unsustainable stage. Further if, on already complex<br />
issues, additional factors such as potential climatic<br />
changes are superimposed; the degree of<br />
uncertainties increases tremendously in terms of<br />
detecting or predicting the transition process.<br />
Above concepts should be systematically<br />
analysed by multi-disciplinary experts for their<br />
scientific application in real life. Commonly used<br />
words ‘holistic approach’ and ‘sustainable’ are<br />
difficult to be understood in specific sense.<br />
TIRADE BY NON-PROFESSIONALS AND<br />
SELF SYLED ENVIRONMENTAL<br />
ACTIVISTS<br />
Even a layman can appreciate that in the<br />
situation of monsoonic weather in our country,<br />
storage of river flows during floods is unavoidable<br />
not only to meet the basic needs of bulging population<br />
for diverse uses but also to moderate the floods,<br />
droughts and poverty. Most of the people associated<br />
with environmental activism and press reporting in<br />
India have very little understanding of the complex<br />
multi-disciplinary environmental processes. Most of<br />
the personnel associated with the tirade against water<br />
storage projects have very little understanding of the<br />
‘dose-response functions’ of the complex<br />
environmental processes and are ignorant of intricate<br />
multi-disciplinary techniques of water resources<br />
development. An overview of the environmental<br />
impacts of the water resources development in India<br />
is of particular interest at the present stage of<br />
development. It is evident that large water storage<br />
projects are surely better alternatives wherever<br />
the parameters such as the volume of water flow,<br />
geological and topographical considerations and