13.09.2013 Views

THE SHE KING; OR, THE BOOK OF ANCIENT POETRY

THE SHE KING; OR, THE BOOK OF ANCIENT POETRY

THE SHE KING; OR, THE BOOK OF ANCIENT POETRY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 <strong>THE</strong> SOURCES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> ODES AS A COLLECTION.<br />

States; of the Books of the three August [rulers] and of<br />

the five emperors. They communicated to all parts of<br />

the kingdom the writings [in their charge] "l For want<br />

of fuller information it is not easy to give a thoroughly<br />

satisfactory account of the Histories and the Books refer<br />

red to in these brief sentences; but I quote them merely<br />

to establish the fact that, according to the constitution of<br />

the kingdom under the dynasty of Chow, not only were<br />

the literary monuments of the feudal States collected for<br />

the satisfaction of the kings, but they were again sent<br />

forth to the courts of the different princes, and became<br />

the common possession of the cultivated classes through<br />

out the whole country. The documentary evidence of<br />

the fact is scanty, owing to the imperfect condition in<br />

which the Books of Chow were recovered during the Ilan<br />

dynasty, and so we have no special mention made of the<br />

odes in the passages of the " Official Book/' which I have<br />

adduced; but that they, as well as the other writings<br />

which are vaguely specified, were made known to Loo,<br />

Tsfe, Tsin, and all the other States, seems to have the<br />

evidence of analogy in its favour, and to be necessary to<br />

account for the general familiarity witli them which, we<br />

know, prevailed.<br />

G. But if the poems produced in the several States<br />

were thus collected in the capital, and thence again dis<br />

seminated throughout the kingdom, we might conclude<br />

that the collection would have been far more extensive<br />

and complete than we have it now. The smallness of it<br />

now the coi- is to be accounted for by the disorder and<br />

Email" aid to- confusion into which the kingdom fell after<br />

complete. t}ie lapse of a few reigns from king Woo.<br />

lloyal progresses ceased when royal government fell into<br />

1 These Histories, it is held, related to everything about the feudal<br />

States, and the outlying barbarous tribes, the history of their princes and<br />

chiefs, their origin and boundaries, their tributes*, their ceremonies, music,<br />

customs, &c. We try in vain to discover what the Books of the three<br />

August ones were. The second sentence is the most important for my<br />

argument. I cannot accept the interpretation of " the writings," in which<br />

many acquiesce, as simply = the names of the written characters. Biot<br />

gives fcr the whole : " Us sont charges (le propafter les noms ecrits, o il,<br />

IPS signes de 1'ccriture, dans les quatre parties de 1'empire." I believe<br />

that I have given the sense correctly.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> SOURCES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> ODES AS A COLLECTION. 17<br />

decay, and then the odes were no longer collected.1 We<br />

Lave no account of any progress of the kings during the<br />

period of the Ch'un Ts'ew. But, before that period,<br />

there is a long gap of 143 years between kings Ch'ing<br />

and E, covering the reigns of K'ang, Ch'aou, Muh, and<br />

Kung, of which we have no poetic memorials, if we ex<br />

cept two doubtful pieces among the sacrificial odes of<br />

Chow. The reign of He'aou who succeeded to B is simi<br />

larly uncommemorated, and the latest odes are of the time<br />

of Tiug, when a hundred years of the Ch'un Tsfe\v had<br />

still to run their course. I cannot suppose but that many<br />

odes were made and collected during the 143 years after<br />

king Ch'ing. The probability is that they perished<br />

during the feeble and disturbed reigns of B, Heaou, B,<br />

and Le. Of the reign of the first of these we have only<br />

five pieces, of all of whioh Choo considers the date to be<br />

uncertain ; of that of the second, as has been observed '<br />

above, we have no memorials at all ; of that of the third<br />

we have only one piece, which Choo, for apparently good<br />

reasons, would assign to a considerably later date. Then<br />

follow four pieces, the date of which is quite uncertain,<br />

I and eleven, assigned to the reign of Le, some of them<br />

with evident error. To Le's succeeded the long and<br />

vigorous reign of Seuen (B.C. 828 781), when we may<br />

suppose that the ancient custom of collecting the poems<br />

was revived. Subsequently to him, all was in the main<br />

decadence and disorder. It was probably in the latter<br />

part of his reign that Ch'ing-k caou-foO, an ancestor of<br />

Confucius, obtained from the Grand music-master of the<br />

conrt of Chow twelve of the sacrificial odes of the previous<br />

dynasty, with which he returned to Sung which was held<br />

by representatives of the House of Shang. They were<br />

used there in sacrificing to the old kings of Shang, and<br />

were probably taken with them to Loo when the Kfung<br />

family subsequently sought refuge in that State. Yet of<br />

the twelve odes seven were lost by the time of Confucius.<br />

The general conclusion to which we come is, that the<br />

existing Book of Poetry is the fragment of various col<br />

lections made during the early reigns of the kings of<br />

Chow, and added to at intervals, especially on the oc-<br />

TOL. m.<br />

See Mencius, IV. ii. XXI.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!