23.10.2012 Views

Functional Evaluation of Flail Hip Joint after Periacetabular ...

Functional Evaluation of Flail Hip Joint after Periacetabular ...

Functional Evaluation of Flail Hip Joint after Periacetabular ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MASATSUGU TAKAMI, et al.<br />

constrained total hip arthroplasty [3J, use <strong>of</strong> saddle prosthesis [4J, allografting [5J ,<br />

and covering with s<strong>of</strong>t tissue only (flail hip) [6J, have been applied. We have been<br />

performing a non-reconstructive procedure, referred to as flail hip joint. In this<br />

report, we present our finding that relatively good function <strong>of</strong> operated legs can be<br />

obtained with the flail hip joint as well as with a variety <strong>of</strong> methods <strong>of</strong> reconstruc­<br />

tion.<br />

Subjects<br />

Subjects and Methods<br />

The subjects were 5 patients who had primary bone tumors <strong>of</strong> the pelvis and who<br />

had undergone pelvic resection including the acetabulum as limbsparing surgery. By<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> resection type [7J by the original site <strong>of</strong> tumor, two patients were<br />

classified as Type II/Ill, one as Type II II, one as Type II, and one as Type l/II/Ill<br />

(Table 1). The period <strong>of</strong> postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 year and 2 months<br />

to 8 years and 2 months, with an average <strong>of</strong> 3 years and 10 months. Case 1, who<br />

had local recurrence, and Case 3, who had pulmonary metastasis at the time <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first examination, have died. The remaining 3 patients have thusfar remained<br />

continuously disease-free.<br />

Methods<br />

During the follow-up period, each patient was questioned concerning degree <strong>of</strong><br />

pain, use <strong>of</strong> a cane or crutches, walking ability and emotional acceptance. On<br />

physical examination, leg-length discrepancy, range <strong>of</strong> hip motion and muscle power<br />

were measured. X-P films were taken at neutral standing position, standing on the<br />

operated leg and on the uninvolved leg. The function <strong>of</strong> the operated leg was<br />

evaluated using the method <strong>of</strong> Enneking [8J.<br />

Leg-length discrepancy<br />

Results<br />

The range <strong>of</strong> leg-length discrepancy was 4-7 em. The discrepancy <strong>after</strong> Type<br />

IIII/Ill and Type IIII resections was large, and averaged 7 em (Table 1).<br />

Postoperative wound-healing time<br />

A range <strong>of</strong> 2.5-11 weeks was required for wound healing. In Cases 1-4, primary<br />

healing was observed, but in Case 5, deep wound infection occurred and continuous<br />

irrigation was continued for about one month. Since this patient had preoperative<br />

radiotherapy (61 Gy), this treatment appeared to exert bad influence on wound<br />

-174-


Eunctional <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flail</strong> <strong>Hip</strong> <strong>Joint</strong><br />

healing. Not including this case, the mean wound-healing time for the remaining 4<br />

patients was 4.9 weeks.<br />

Radiographic findings<br />

Of the 3 patients classified as Type II/Ill or II, who had an iliac wing left in<br />

place, two patients developed a new hip joint ro<strong>of</strong> evolved from the posterior surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> the remaining iliac wing (Cases 2 and 3). In the other patient, the head <strong>of</strong> femur<br />

moved to the front <strong>of</strong> sciatic notch and weight bearing appeared to be between the<br />

upper surface <strong>of</strong> the femoral neck and iliac wing (Case 5). Of the 2 patients who<br />

were Type I/II or I/II/III, attachment <strong>of</strong> the femoral head to the lateral side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sacrum was found in one (Case 1), and weight-bearing by s<strong>of</strong>t tissues only was found<br />

in the other (Case 4).<br />

<strong>Functional</strong> evaluation (Table 2)<br />

Using the revised method <strong>of</strong> functional evaluation for legs, SlX items i.e., pam,<br />

function, emotional acceptance, supports, walking ability and gait, were each numer­<br />

ically scored as 1, 3 or 5 points. Scores <strong>of</strong> 2 or 4 points can also be assigned based<br />

on the judgement <strong>of</strong> the examiner. The function <strong>of</strong> each patient was evaluated as<br />

the rating in percentage the expected normal functional score for the patient [8J.<br />

Complaints <strong>of</strong> pain were rare. Regarding function, minor disability was<br />

observed. In evaluation <strong>of</strong> emotional acceptance, every patient was found to be<br />

satisfied (3 points) or better. Two patients did not require supports, and 3 patients<br />

used crutches or a cane. Various types <strong>of</strong> disorders were found in walking ability<br />

and gait. In percentage rating, 2 patients exhibited good function <strong>of</strong> the operated<br />

leg, with more than 80% (93% and 87%), 1 patient had a rating <strong>of</strong> 70% and 2<br />

patients exhibited about half <strong>of</strong> normal function, with ratings <strong>of</strong> 57 % and 53 %.<br />

These ratings were compared with radiographic findings. Cases 2 and 5, who ex­<br />

hibited good function <strong>of</strong> the operated leg, had a thick portion <strong>of</strong> the supraacetabular<br />

pelvic neck left in place. Among Cases 1, 3 and 4, who exhibited slightly inferior<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the operated leg, Case 1 had undergone hemiresection <strong>of</strong> the pelvis, Case 4<br />

had undergone total resection <strong>of</strong> the ilium and Case 3 had undergone left iliac ala<br />

but with a thin portion only left in place.<br />

Case review<br />

Case 1: 26-year-old woman<br />

From about October 1975, pain in the left inguinal region and limping developed.<br />

After open biopsy, the left superior pubic ramus was resected, but local recurrence<br />

occurred. In October 1977, resection <strong>of</strong> the left half <strong>of</strong> the pelvis was performed.<br />

At 2 years and 4 months <strong>after</strong> operation, a radiograph was obtained with the patient<br />

standing on the operated leg, and revealed marked sacrum tilt suggestive <strong>of</strong> partial<br />

-177-


MASATSUGU TAKAMI, et al.<br />

weight-bearing from the sacrum to the femoral head (Fig. 1 a, b). Standing on the<br />

operated leg alone was possible for about 1 minute. Using a pair <strong>of</strong> clutches, the<br />

patient could walk with almost the same speed as a normal person does. She subseq<br />

uently died from local recurrence in the sacral region.<br />

Case 2: 29-year-old man<br />

Cl-a)<br />

Cl-b)<br />

Figure la: Chondrosarcoma <strong>of</strong> left superior pubic ramus<br />

Ib: Radiograph <strong>after</strong> excision <strong>of</strong> left half <strong>of</strong> the pelvis taken with patient<br />

standing on the operated side, revealing marked sacral tilt and<br />

suggestive <strong>of</strong> partial weight-bearing from sacrum to femoral head.<br />

-178-


Eunctional <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flail</strong> <strong>Hip</strong> <strong>Joint</strong><br />

From about February 1982, the patient experienced pain lD the left inguinal<br />

regIOn. Since the pain was increasing in severity, he visited this department in July<br />

1985. A large tumor extending from the left ischium to the acetabulum was found.<br />

After open biopsy, the tumor was resected in September 1985. The lateral part <strong>of</strong><br />

the acetabulum was left in place, but the femoral head was unstable and remained<br />

dislocated on the posterior side <strong>of</strong> the iliac wing. At 2 years and 7 months <strong>after</strong><br />

operation, a radiograph revealed that the head <strong>of</strong> the femur was facing the iliac<br />

wing in the posterior region <strong>of</strong> the acetabulum (Fig. 2 a, b, c). Leg-discrepancy is 4<br />

em, and 3cm <strong>of</strong> heel lift is used. The patient feels no pain even on playing a round<br />

C2-a)<br />

C2-b)<br />

-179-


<strong>of</strong> golf.<br />

MASATSUGU TAKAMI, et al.<br />

C2-c)<br />

Figure 2a: Giant cell tumor <strong>of</strong> left ischium and acetabulum<br />

2b: Radiograph <strong>after</strong> excision <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />

2c: Computed tomography scan demonstrating the head <strong>of</strong> femur placed<br />

behind the iliac wing<br />

Case 5: 20-year-old man<br />

In August 1993, the patient fell while driving a motorcycle, and pain subsequently<br />

developed in the left inguinal region. Since the pain continued, he was examined in<br />

this department. After open biopsy, preoperative radiotherapy (61 Gy) and<br />

chemotherapy were performed. In February 1994, the tumor was resected. At 1<br />

C3-a)<br />

-180-


Eunctional <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flail</strong> <strong>Hip</strong> <strong>Joint</strong><br />

C3-b)<br />

C3-c)<br />

Figure 3a: Ewing's sarcoma <strong>of</strong> left pubis and acetabulum<br />

3b: Radiograph <strong>after</strong> excision <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />

3c: Computed tomography scan demonstrating the head <strong>of</strong> femur placed<br />

in front <strong>of</strong> the sciatic notch<br />

year and 6 months <strong>after</strong> operation, the head <strong>of</strong> the femur was placed in front <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sciatic notch, and weight-bearing appeared to be between the upper side <strong>of</strong> the neck<br />

<strong>of</strong> the femur and the iliac wing. Although he has 2 cm heel lift, he can walk for<br />

300 m without the use <strong>of</strong> a cane (Fig. 3 a, b, c).<br />

-181-


MASATSUGU TAKAMI, et al.<br />

Discussion<br />

When we treat patients with tumors that require sacrificing the pelvis involving<br />

acetabular region, we have been performing a flail hip joint procedure rather than<br />

reconstructive surgery. When the ilium, and particularly the thick portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

supraacetabular pelvic neck, is left in place, the weight load was delivered and the<br />

operated legs functioned well regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the head <strong>of</strong> the femur was placed<br />

anterior (Case 5) or posterior (Case 2) to the iliac wing. However, when only a<br />

thin portion <strong>of</strong> the upper iliac wing remained in place, the load was not delivered<br />

well and the function <strong>of</strong> the operated leg was not good (Case 3). Following total<br />

resection <strong>of</strong> the ilium including the acetabular region (Case 4) or hemiresection <strong>of</strong><br />

the pelvis (Case 1), the weight load was delivered primarily via the s<strong>of</strong>t tissue, and<br />

the function <strong>of</strong> the operated leg was poor. However, little pain was felt even in<br />

these cases. Although cane or crutches were required by these two patients, walking<br />

ability was retained, and thus much better function seems to be retained than <strong>after</strong><br />

hindquarter amputation.<br />

The disadvantage <strong>of</strong> the flail hip method is that a larger leg-length discrepancy<br />

results than with other methods. However, when the femoral head rises upward,<br />

the dead space decreases in size and the operative wound will heal more easily. In<br />

a study by O'Conner and Sim [9J, for 60 patients with pelvic tumor, debridement­<br />

requiring infection occurred in 14 legs (23%). In the present study, infection was<br />

observed in 1 <strong>of</strong> 5 cases, but the patient who developed had undergone preoperative<br />

radiotherapy. In the other 4 cases, the operative wound healed without problem.<br />

When the flail hip joint is used, no internal fixation devices or spica cast is required,<br />

unlike arthrodesis or pseudarthrosis. According to Enneking et al. [2J, the function<br />

<strong>of</strong> the operated leg is decreased in order <strong>of</strong> arthrodesis, pseudarthrosis and flail hip.<br />

However, if one places clinical priority on hip joint motion, one or the other <strong>of</strong> the<br />

last two methods should be chosen. Postoperative pain in patients with pseudar­<br />

throsis is said to be unpredictable [7J. Therefore, the flail hip joint is the simplest<br />

method and should be considered treating in women or sedentary patients.<br />

References<br />

1. Cappana R., Guernelli N., Ruggieri P., Biagini R., Toni, A., Picci, P., and Campanacci,<br />

M.: <strong>Periacetabular</strong> pelvic resections. In Limb salvage in musculoskeletal<br />

oncology, Enneking, W.F., Churchill Livingstone, New York 141-146 (1987)<br />

2. Enneking W.F. and Menendez, L.R.: <strong>Functional</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> various reconstructions<br />

<strong>after</strong> periacetabular resection <strong>of</strong> iliac lesions. In Limb salvage in musculoskeletal<br />

oncology, Enneking, W.F., Churchill Livingstone, New York 117-135 (1987)<br />

-182-


Eunctional <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flail</strong> <strong>Hip</strong> <strong>Joint</strong><br />

3. Uchida, A., Hamada, H., Yoshikawa, H., Aoki, Y., Ebara, S. and Ono, K.: Surgical<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> bone tumors arising from pelvic ring. In New developments for<br />

limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumors, Yamamuro, T., Springer-Verlag, Tokyo<br />

451-458 (1989)<br />

4. Van der Lei, B., Hoekstra, H.J., Veth, R.P.H., Ham, S.J., Oldh<strong>of</strong>f, J. and Koops,<br />

H.S.: The use <strong>of</strong> the saddle prosthesis for reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the hip joint <strong>after</strong> tumor<br />

resection <strong>of</strong> the pelvis. J. Surg. Oncol. 50: 216-219 (1992)<br />

5. Mankin, H.J., Doppelt, S.H, Sullivan, T.B. and Tomford, W.W.: Osteoarticular<br />

and intercalary allograft transplantation in the management <strong>of</strong> malignant tumors<br />

<strong>of</strong> bone. Cancer 50: 613-630 (1982)<br />

6. Steel, H.H.: Partial or complete resection <strong>of</strong> the hemipelvis. J. Bone and <strong>Joint</strong>Surg.<br />

[Am.] 60: 719-730 (1978)<br />

7. Enneking, W.F. and Dunham, W.K.: Resection and reconstruction for primary<br />

neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J. Bone and <strong>Joint</strong> Surg. [Am.] 60: 731-7<br />

46 (1978)<br />

8. Enneking, W.F., Dunham, W., Gebhardt, M.C. and Pritchard, D.J.: A system for<br />

the functional evaluation <strong>of</strong> reconstructive procedures <strong>after</strong> surgical treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

tumors <strong>of</strong> the musculoskeletal system. Clin. Ortho. 286: 241-246 (1993)<br />

9. O'Conner, M.l. and Sim, F.H.: Salvage <strong>of</strong> the limb in the treatment <strong>of</strong> malignant<br />

pelvic tumors. J. Bone and <strong>Joint</strong> Surg. [Am.] 71: 481-494 (1989)<br />

Received May 26, 1997<br />

-183-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!