Structured Query Language (SQL) - Cultural View of Technology

SQL 8
• It is also possible to misconstruct a WHERE on an update or delete, thereby affecting more rows in a table than
desired. (A work-around is to use transactions or habitually type in the WHERE clause first, then fill in the rest
later.)
• The grammar of SQL is perhaps unnecessarily complex, borrowing a COBOL-like keyword approach, when a
function-influenced syntax could result in more re-use of fewer grammar and syntax rules.
Cross-vendor portability
Popular implementations of SQL commonly omit support for basic features of Standard SQL, such as the DATE or
TIME data types. As a result, SQL code can rarely be ported between database systems without modifications.
There are several reasons for this lack of portability between database systems:
• The complexity and size of the SQL standard means that most implementors do not support the entire standard.
• The standard does not specify database behavior in several important areas (e.g., indexes, file storage...), leaving
implementations to decide how to behave.
• The SQL standard precisely specifies the syntax that a conforming database system must implement. However,
the standard's specification of the semantics of language constructs is less well-defined, leading to ambiguity.
• Many database vendors have large existing customer bases; where the SQL standard conflicts with the prior
behavior of the vendor's database, the vendor may be unwilling to break backward compatibility.
• Software vendors often desire to create incompatibilities with other products, as it provides a strong incentive for
their existing users to remain loyal (see vendor lock-in).
Standardization
SQL was adopted as a standard by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1986 as SQL-86 [19] and
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1987. The original SQL standard declared that the official
pronunciation for SQL is "es queue el". [2] Many English-speaking database professionals still use the nonstandard [20]
pronunciation /ˈsiːkwəl/ (like the word "sequel").
Until 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) data management standards program certified
SQL DBMS compliance with the SQL standard. Vendors now self-certify the compliance of their products. [21]
The SQL standard has gone through a number of revisions, as shown below:
Year Name Alias Comments
1986 SQL-86 SQL-87 First formalized by ANSI.
1989 SQL-89 FIPS
127-1
1992 SQL-92 SQL2,
FIPS
127-2
Minor revision, adopted as FIPS 127-1.
Major revision (ISO 9075), Entry Level SQL-92 adopted as FIPS 127-2.
1999 SQL:1999 SQL3 Added regular expression matching, recursive queries, triggers, support for procedural and control-of-flow
statements, non-scalar types, and some object-oriented features.
2003 SQL:2003 Introduced XML-related features, window functions, standardized sequences, and columns with auto-generated
values (including identity-columns).
2006 SQL:2006 ISO/IEC 9075-14:2006 defines ways in which SQL can be used in conjunction with XML. It defines ways of
importing and storing XML data in an SQL database, manipulating it within the database and publishing both XML
and conventional SQL-data in XML form. In addition, it enables applications to integrate into their SQL code the
use of XQuery, the XML Query Language published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), to concurrently
access ordinary SQL-data and XML documents.