06.09.2013 Views

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

420 SMITH-CROWE, BRIEF, AND UMPHRESS<br />

mational faultlines will experience high levels <strong>of</strong> intragroup task <strong>conflict</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> low levels <strong>of</strong> intragroup relations <strong>and</strong> process <strong>conflict</strong>s. <strong>The</strong>se propositions<br />

provide an explanation for inconsistent findings evident in the literature<br />

<strong>and</strong> alert organizational scholars not to construe diversity in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> categories like race <strong>and</strong> sex as being conceptually equivalent to those<br />

based on characteristics like functional background or organizational tenure.<br />

We are dealing with apples <strong>and</strong> oranges; bravo to Jehn et al. for recognizing<br />

the difference. Too <strong>of</strong>ten, in our judgment, diversity researchers<br />

have ignored these differences, theoretically equating, for example, being<br />

Black <strong>and</strong> being an accountant.<br />

When MiGht Diversity-Driven ConfliCt leaD to Positive outCoMes?<br />

Schulz-Hardt, Mojzisch, <strong>and</strong> Vogelgesang (this volume) argued that <strong>conflict</strong><br />

sometimes promotes creativity <strong>and</strong> performance, providing empirical<br />

evidence from several studies supporting their claim. If <strong>conflict</strong> can be functional,<br />

then when might diversity-driven <strong>conflict</strong> lead to positive outcomes?<br />

Schulz-Hardt et al. <strong>of</strong>fered “activation” as one explanation for the positive<br />

effects—when dissent is voiced, increased cognitive processing <strong>and</strong> group<br />

discussion takes place. Indeed, Antonio et al. (2004) found increases in complex<br />

thinking due to the presence <strong>of</strong> a racial minority in a group. We wonder,<br />

however, about the boundary conditions that might curtail the positive<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> diversity in groups. One <strong>of</strong> these conditions might be the extent<br />

to which a dissenting opinion is diversity relevant. For example, a female<br />

group member holding a dissenting opinion that the group should be less<br />

task focused <strong>and</strong> more relationship focused might choose to keep this opinion<br />

to herself for fear <strong>of</strong> confirming negative stereotypes about women in<br />

the workplace. Alternatively, should she choose to share this dissenting<br />

opinion rather than stimulating cognition <strong>and</strong> discussion, it may very well<br />

be dismissed by the men <strong>and</strong> even other women in her group as being a<br />

stereotypical female concern <strong>and</strong> not a legitimate business issue.<br />

hoW MiGht Diversity-Driven ConfliCts Best Be resolveD?<br />

Assuming that diversity-driven <strong>conflict</strong>s are likely to emerge in organizations<br />

(cf. Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), our final question concerned their<br />

resolution. In our search for answers, we turned to Terry <strong>and</strong> Amoit’s (this<br />

volume) contribution in which they discussed the implications <strong>of</strong> status<br />

for mergers. <strong>The</strong>y provided the following bit <strong>of</strong> advice: Managers <strong>and</strong><br />

decision makers should<br />

ensure that mechanisms are put in place so that employees from the lowstatus<br />

premerger group do not feel threatened by the merger but rather,<br />

feel that they bring specific, unique, <strong>and</strong> valued contributions to a greater

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!