06.09.2013 Views

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 DE DREU AND GELFAND<br />

levels, discuss what might be universal versus culture-specific in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>conflict</strong> in organizations, <strong>and</strong> highlight new frontiers <strong>of</strong> research.<br />

sourCes <strong>of</strong> WorKPlaCe ConfliCt aCross levels <strong>of</strong> analysis<br />

Adopting a perspective that includes multiple levels <strong>of</strong> analysis neither<br />

clarifies the origins <strong>of</strong> <strong>conflict</strong> at work nor reveals whether <strong>and</strong> in what<br />

form these origins exist at each level. To explore these questions we discuss<br />

three broad classes <strong>of</strong> origins or sources <strong>of</strong> workplace <strong>conflict</strong> that<br />

can be found across levels. Acknowledging that there are myriad factors<br />

that affect <strong>conflict</strong> at different levels, we provide some parsimony <strong>of</strong> antecedents<br />

by examining three leading theoretical perspectives that can be,<br />

but to date have not been, applied to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>conflict</strong> at the individual,<br />

group, <strong>and</strong> organization levels <strong>of</strong> analysis. We then conclude this section<br />

with a discussion <strong>of</strong> how national culture affects sources <strong>of</strong> workplace<br />

<strong>conflict</strong>, <strong>and</strong> whether the sources discussed at other levels may or may not<br />

be applicable across national cultures.<br />

In the sections that follow, we distinguish three root causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>conflict</strong><br />

that are present across levels: (a) scarce resources, (b) a search for maintaining<br />

<strong>and</strong> promoting a positive view <strong>of</strong> the self, <strong>and</strong> (c) a desire to hold<br />

consensually shared <strong>and</strong> socially validated opinions <strong>and</strong> beliefs. Consecutively,<br />

we discuss the mixed-motive nature <strong>of</strong> social interdependencies in<br />

organizations that give rise to resource <strong>conflict</strong>s (sometimes referred to as<br />

<strong>conflict</strong>s <strong>of</strong> interest, or <strong>conflict</strong>s over outcomes) at different levels; the need<br />

to maintain <strong>and</strong> develop a positive view <strong>of</strong> oneself <strong>and</strong> the group to which<br />

one belongs, which gives rise to ideological <strong>and</strong> value <strong>conflict</strong>s (sometimes<br />

referred to as relationship, or affective <strong>conflict</strong>) at different levels; <strong>and</strong> the<br />

desire to hold a socially validated <strong>and</strong> consensually shared underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world <strong>and</strong> the tasks that need to be done, which may give rise to<br />

socio-cognitive <strong>conflict</strong> <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing (sometimes referred to as cognitive,<br />

or task-related <strong>conflict</strong>) at different levels (for similar taxonomies, see e.g.,<br />

Coombs, 1987; De Dreu et al., 1999; Rapoport, 1960; Thibaut & Kelley, 1959;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Thomas, 1992).<br />

Source #1: Scarce Resources <strong>and</strong> Conflicts <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

Resources within organizations are scarce <strong>and</strong> finite, <strong>and</strong> the access<br />

to—as well as the availability <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong>—scarce resources constitutes<br />

one major cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>conflict</strong> at all levels <strong>of</strong> analysis. Individuals<br />

within a team negotiate time <strong>of</strong>f-task, employees dem<strong>and</strong> a greater share<br />

<strong>of</strong> the team bonus because they perceive their inputs exceed those <strong>of</strong> some<br />

colleagues, organizations negotiate access to new markets, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />

To appreciate <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> resource <strong>conflict</strong>s, it is useful to use as a<br />

starting point Interdependence <strong>The</strong>ory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978; Rusbult &

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!