06.09.2013 Views

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The Psychology of conflict and conflict ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9. <strong>CONFLICT</strong>, HEALTH, AND WELL-BEING 279<br />

reported sources <strong>of</strong> stress. Liu (2002) found that Chinese faculty reported<br />

experiencing significantly more overall interpersonal <strong>conflict</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>conflict</strong><br />

with supervisors than American faculty did. Furthermore, the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

interpersonal <strong>conflict</strong> among university support staff in the two countries<br />

did not differ, providing evidence for the presence <strong>of</strong> this stressor across<br />

cultures (Liu, 2002). Consistent with these findings, Spector, Sanchez, Siu,<br />

Salgado, <strong>and</strong> Ma (2004) found that Chinese in Hong Kong <strong>and</strong> People’s<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> China reported more <strong>conflict</strong> than Americans did.<br />

ConfliCt anD soCial reGulation<br />

Although interpersonal <strong>conflict</strong> has been shown to have negative effects<br />

on health <strong>and</strong> well-being, there can be circumstances in which behaviors<br />

that lead to short-term <strong>conflict</strong> can be useful in the longer term.<br />

Bies, Tripp, <strong>and</strong> Kramer (1997) discussed how revenge (e.g., striking back<br />

against someone who has done something perceived as harmful) could<br />

have a social regulatory function. If an individual is treated in an unkind<br />

way, that individual might strike back, thus producing a <strong>conflict</strong> with the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fending individual. <strong>The</strong> other individual might be careful in the future<br />

to avoid further acts <strong>of</strong> revenge, <strong>and</strong> thus future <strong>conflict</strong>s could be avoided.<br />

Of course, there can be instances in which an act <strong>of</strong> revenge produces an<br />

equivalent response, thus prolonging the <strong>conflict</strong> over time.<br />

the iMPaCt <strong>of</strong> ConfliCt on orGanizational<br />

effeCtiveness: PraCtiCal iMPliCations<br />

<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> interpersonal <strong>conflict</strong> at work are not limited to employee<br />

health <strong>and</strong> well-being; they also affect organizational effectiveness<br />

through direct bottom line costs <strong>and</strong> by means <strong>of</strong> organizationally relevant<br />

variables. For example, it is estimated that organizations spend over<br />

$200 billion on work stress issues, including turnover, health care costs,<br />

<strong>and</strong> productivity (DeFrank & Ivancevich, 1998). Longitudinal research<br />

has also shown that from 60% to 90% <strong>of</strong> health care provider visits are,<br />

in some part, due to stress (Cooper & Payne, 1988). This <strong>and</strong> other studies<br />

point to the fact that the mental <strong>and</strong> physical health <strong>of</strong> employees can<br />

heavily affect the health care costs <strong>of</strong> organizations. <strong>The</strong> Health Enhancement<br />

Research Organization (HERO; 2004) reported that employees<br />

reporting persistent depression had health care costs 70% greater than<br />

their nondepressed counterparts did ( 8). <strong>The</strong>se findings are even more<br />

dramatic for males for whom the increase in costs was 91% more than for<br />

men not at risk. Given the strong support for the relationship between<br />

<strong>conflict</strong> in organizations <strong>and</strong> employee depression, these findings are<br />

quite alarming. Furthermore, HERO findings also indicated an increase<br />

in health care expenditures <strong>of</strong> 46% for employees reporting uncontrolled<br />

stress over those not at risk.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!