04.09.2013 Views

nomination by the Government of Australia - Sydney Opera House

nomination by the Government of Australia - Sydney Opera House

nomination by the Government of Australia - Sydney Opera House

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

Part 2. Description<br />

2.23<br />

International design competition 1956<br />

A major cultural centre for <strong>Sydney</strong> and its siting at<br />

Bennelong Point had been discussed since <strong>the</strong> 1940s.<br />

Eugene Goossens, <strong>the</strong> British-born conductor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Sydney</strong> Symphony Orchestra, fi rst proposed this site<br />

in 1948, a recommendation that was later accepted <strong>by</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> New South Wales Premier, John Joseph Cahill. In<br />

1956 <strong>the</strong> New South Wales <strong>Government</strong> called an openended<br />

international design competition and appointed<br />

an independent jury, ra<strong>the</strong>r than commissioning a<br />

local fi rm. The competition brief provided broad<br />

specifi cations to attract <strong>the</strong> best design talent in <strong>the</strong><br />

world. Open to all architects from around <strong>the</strong> globe, it<br />

did not specify design parameters or set a cost limit.<br />

The main requirement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> competition brief was a<br />

design for a dual function building with two performance<br />

halls. The competition generated enormous interest<br />

in <strong>Australia</strong> and overseas: 933 architects registered <strong>of</strong><br />

whom 233 (mostly from overseas) submitted a design<br />

on a strictly anonymous basis (Messent 1997: 60–99).<br />

2.24<br />

The New South Wales <strong>Government</strong>’s decision<br />

to commission Utzon as <strong>the</strong> sole architect was<br />

unexpected, bold and visionary. There was scepticism<br />

as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> structure could be built given Utzon’s<br />

limited experience, <strong>the</strong> rudimentary and unique design<br />

concept and <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any engineering advice.<br />

The competition drawings were largely diagrammatic,<br />

<strong>the</strong> design had not been fully costed and nei<strong>the</strong>r Utzon<br />

nor <strong>the</strong> jury had consulted a structural engineer (Murray<br />

2004: 13).<br />

Utzon’s design concept included unprecedented<br />

architectural forms and demanded solutions that<br />

required new technologies and materials. Utzon was<br />

only 38 years old and while he was starting to gain<br />

a reputation as an innovative designer he had just a<br />

handful <strong>of</strong> small-scale works to his credit. This was<br />

quite young for an architect to tackle such a large and<br />

complex building, particularly given <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> several<br />

talented but inexperienced winners <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r international<br />

competitions (Weston 2002: 119). The New South<br />

Wales <strong>Government</strong> also faced public pressure to select<br />

an <strong>Australia</strong>n architect.<br />

Figure 2.23 One <strong>of</strong> Utzon’s original competition drawings, 1956<br />

Figure 2.24 The competition judges with <strong>the</strong> design, from left to<br />

right: renowned English architect Leslie Martin; Cobden Parkes (NSW<br />

<strong>Government</strong> Architect); eminent American-based Finnish architect<br />

Eero Saarinen, and H Ingham Ashworth, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Architecture,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sydney</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!