23.10.2012 Views

SYMPOSIA

SYMPOSIA

SYMPOSIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Vol: 21, Supplement: 2, 2011 - www.psikofarmakoloji.org<br />

Poster Presentations<br />

as a disorder founded in real biochemical disturbances (1,2). Although the effects of the menstrual cycle on emotional state and<br />

cognitive function have been only recently systematically studied, they have long been recognized. Previously published studies yielded<br />

inconsistent data in terms of cognitive tests throughout the cycle phases (1, 3, 4).<br />

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of cyclic reproductive hormonal changes on cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function<br />

in childbearing age female patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and those with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD).<br />

Method: One of psychiatric samples was a group of PMDD (n = 42), and the other was a group of GAD patients (n = 36), who had 20 and<br />

higher on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score. An age matched healthy control group (n = 40) was also included in the study. The<br />

psychiatric rating scales were applied twice according to the menstrual phases. The frontal assessment battery, Stroop test, and Weschler<br />

verbal memory tests were applied for the evaluation of neurocognitive changes with respect to follicular and late luteal phases.<br />

Results: There was a significant increase in dysphoric mood during the luteal phase in women with PMDD compared to their follicular phase<br />

and compared to the GAD women and the control group. Taken together with the repeated measures and the data analysis, the GAD group<br />

had significantly worse performance regarding overall neurocognitive functions in their luteal phase (particularly memory skills, attention,<br />

and psychomotor function) as compared to the PMDD group, whereas the control group had significantly better performance overall.<br />

Conclusions: Even though neurocognitive impairments seen in the women with PMDD were partly due to the dysphoric mood during<br />

the late luteal phase, it seems to be related to the physiological and psychoneurological processes in which female reproductive<br />

hormones may have a central role.<br />

Key words: Neurocognitive functions, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, female reproductive hormones<br />

References:<br />

1. Farage MA, Osborn Thomas W, MacLean AB. Cognitive, sensory, and emotional changes associated with menstrual cycle: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008; 278: 299- 307.<br />

2. Reed SC, Levin FR, Evans SM. Changes in mood, cognitive performance and appetite in the late luteal and follicular phases of the menstrual cycle in women with<br />

and without PMDD (Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder). Horm Behav. 2008; 54: 185- 193.<br />

3. Morgan M, Rapkin A. Cognitive flexibility, reaction time, and attention in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder. J Gend Specif Med. 2002; 5: 28- 36.<br />

4. Morgan M, Rapkin AJ, D’Elia L, Reading A, Goldman L. Cognitive functioning in premenstrual syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 961- 966.<br />

5. Resnick A, Perry W, Parry B, Mostofi N, Udell C. Neuropsychological performance across the menstrual cycle in women with and without premenstrual dysphoric<br />

disorder. Psychiatry Research 1998; 77:147- 158.<br />

Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology 2011;21(Suppl. 2):S192-3<br />

[PP-115] Ref. No: 259<br />

Evaluation of olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume in major depressive disorder<br />

Meral Akbıyık, Oğuz Karamustafalıoğlu<br />

Şişli Etfal Research and Teaching Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, İstanbul, Turkey<br />

akbiyikmeral@gmail.com<br />

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume in patients with major depressive<br />

disorder (MDD) in comparison to normal subjects.<br />

Method: Twenty treatment-free premenopausal, 25-45 year-old women diagnosed with long-term, severe MDD at the Şişli Etfal Research<br />

and Teaching Hospital psychiatric outpatient clinics and 20 healthy women matched by age, education, smoking behavior, and frequency<br />

of upper respiratory tract infection participated in this study.<br />

Odor threshold, discrimination, and identification functions were assessed by Sniffin’ sticks. Olfactory bulb volumes were calculated by<br />

manual segmentation of acquired T2-weighted coronal slices according to a standardized protocol.<br />

Results: When OB volumes of patients and controls were analyzed with a two-way Analysis of Covariance, with age and education as the<br />

covariate and group as a factor, the patients had significantly larger OBs than the controls (right p=0.011; left p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!