02.09.2013 Views

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5.2<br />

5.2.2. Selection <strong>of</strong> spermatozoa<br />

192<br />

The possibility to perform sperm selection using a single layer centrifugation (Morrell et al.,<br />

2008) <strong>and</strong> the adaptation to scale up the volume per centrifugation tube (Morrell et al., 2009)<br />

extends its practical use in equine <strong>and</strong>rology. This technique was used to select a superior sperm<br />

population prior to cryopreservation <strong>and</strong> obtained post-thaw samples with increased overall sperm<br />

quality (Chapter 4.2). The sole intention <strong>of</strong> the cryopreservation protocol we used was to analyze the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> cryopreservation <strong>of</strong> a superior sperm population. It is not surprising to find an overall<br />

increased sperm quality after cryopreservation. Dead, damaged, or spermatozoa with a dysfunctional<br />

motility are very unlikely to survive the freeze-thaw cycle, or to have a sufficient post-thaw quality.<br />

Until recently, it was accepted that reactive oxygen species (ROS) in (human) semen were<br />

almost exclusively produced by leucocytes. This is true for fertile men, although in oligozoospermic<br />

patients the spermatozoa themselves were identified as a second major source <strong>of</strong> ROS (Aitken et al.,<br />

1992). Equine semen is normally devoid <strong>of</strong> leucocytes in contrast to human semen, but equine<br />

spermatozoa are equally capable <strong>of</strong> generating ROS, since damaged spermatozoa or morphological<br />

abnormal spermatozoa generated significantly greater amounts <strong>of</strong> ROS than live, morphologically<br />

normal spermatozoa (Ball et al., 2001). The presence <strong>of</strong> ROS impairs in vitro motility <strong>of</strong> equine<br />

spermatozoa (Baumber et al., 2002) <strong>and</strong> promotes DNA fragmentation <strong>of</strong> equine spermatozoa<br />

( Baumber et al., 2003).<br />

We hypothesize that the increased post-thaw sperm quality we have noticed following pre-<br />

freeze SLC selection could perhaps also be partially attributed to reduced levels <strong>of</strong> ROS. The use <strong>of</strong><br />

Androcoll-E might remedy these ROS related problems by working on two levels. First, due to the<br />

selection procedure, the few leucocytes that are present are being held back from the sperm pellet.<br />

Second, fewer abnormal spermatozoa (dead spermatozoa or with excess residual cytoplasm) are<br />

present in the sperm pellet. As such the ROS content in the selected subpopulation <strong>of</strong> spermatozoa<br />

should be lower than in the “full” sperm pellet, reducing the ROS related sperm damage.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> sperm selection prior to cryopreservation could even be further increased if<br />

stallion-adapted cryopreservation protocols would be used, fitting specific needs . Additionally,<br />

sperm selection using Androcoll-E <strong>and</strong> subsequent washing <strong>of</strong> the sperm pellet removes all seminal<br />

plasma. In our study seminal plasma from the same stallion <strong>and</strong> the same ejaculate was added back<br />

to rule out any possible effect <strong>of</strong> presence or absence <strong>of</strong> seminal plasma on the post-thaw results.<br />

Seminal plasma from stallions with poor freezing sperm was shown to play an important role in the<br />

poor freezability (Aurich et al., 1996). The use <strong>of</strong> seminal plasma <strong>of</strong> stallions with good freezability<br />

improved the post-thaw quality <strong>of</strong> stallions with poor freezability (Aurich et al., 1996). The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!