02.09.2013 Views

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorter<br />

CHAPTER 1.1<br />

A fluorescent activated cell sorter (FACS) has been evaluated to determine the concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> boar semen. The FACS showed a very good correlation <strong>and</strong> the highest repeatability (Hansen et al.,<br />

2006). This is not surprising since this flow cytometric technique uses an internal st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong><br />

fluorescent beads with every analysis.<br />

Haemocytometer<br />

Since the accurate <strong>and</strong> precise devices (NucleoCounter SP-100 <strong>and</strong> FACS) are all rather<br />

expensive, it is not useful to propose them as the “gold st<strong>and</strong>ard”. Therefore, the haemocytometer is<br />

most likely the best alternative as st<strong>and</strong>ard for concentration determination, in concordance with<br />

human <strong>and</strong>rology. The counting chamber type is known to have a major influence on the outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

sperm concentration. In shallow chambers, loaded with capillarity, the SS effect has an influence on<br />

concentration (Douglas-Hamilton et al., 2005a, 2005b). In the Makler chamber (Fig. 2a), a reusable<br />

chamber with a 10 µm depth, the cover glass is placed upon the loaded area, the time interval<br />

between loading <strong>and</strong> applying the cover glass is a major factor influencing the obtained<br />

concentration (Matson et al., 1999). The Makler chamber has been documented as having a low<br />

precision (Christensen et al., 2005), <strong>and</strong> the time interval before applying the cover slide might<br />

attribute to this imprecision (Makler, 2000). Different haemocytometers result in different outcomes,<br />

especially when chambers with different depths are used. Therefore, it might be advisable to<br />

recommend the use <strong>of</strong> a st<strong>and</strong>ard counting chamber. In accordance with the WHO, the improved<br />

Neubauer haemocytometer (Fig. 2b) could be the chamber <strong>of</strong> preference. This chamber was also<br />

described for use in horses (V<strong>and</strong>erwall, 2008). Alternatively, a Bürker haemocytometer can be used<br />

as well (Kuisma et al., 2006). Before filling a haemocytometer, correct placement <strong>of</strong> the cover slip can<br />

be verified by looking for the presence <strong>of</strong> iridescence (multiple Newton’s rings) between the two<br />

glass surfaces (WHO, 2010). Following a 1:100 dilution (V<strong>and</strong>erwall, 2008) <strong>of</strong> the semen with a<br />

fixative to immobilize the spermatozoa, the well mixed sample is loaded into the chamber. The filled<br />

chamber should be allowed to rest horizontally (>4 min) at room temperature in a humified chamber<br />

to prevent evaporation. The immobilized cells will sediment onto the grid <strong>and</strong> this will facilitate<br />

counting. When assessing concentration using a haemocytometer, it is advised to fill <strong>and</strong> count<br />

duplicate chambers to reduce the variation (Freund <strong>and</strong> Carol, 1964). For assessing concentration<br />

using a haemocytometer the use <strong>of</strong> cover slips with a thickness <strong>of</strong> 400 µm is advised (WHO, 2010).<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!