02.09.2013 Views

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4.2<br />

The aforementioned “Treatment” effect was comparable for poor <strong>and</strong> good freezers except<br />

for pre-freeze PM <strong>and</strong> yield as visualized by the significant interaction terms between “Treatment”<br />

<strong>and</strong> “Freezability” in Table 1.. For pre-freeze PM, poor-freezing stallions benefitted more from<br />

Androcoll-E treatment than good-freezing stallions. The yield for poor-freezing stallions was more<br />

reduced following Androcoll-E treatment in comparison to good freezing stallions (Fig. 2).<br />

4.2.3.1. Accepted straws <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> AI doses<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> freezable ejaculates, the number <strong>of</strong> accepted straws <strong>and</strong> the AI doses for<br />

good <strong>and</strong> poor-freezing stallions are presented in Table 2. The effect <strong>of</strong> “Treatment” on number <strong>of</strong><br />

straws accepted (from ejaculates with post-thaw PM ≥30%) was different for good freezers vs. poor<br />

freezers (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!