02.09.2013 Views

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4.2<br />

resulted in an improvement <strong>of</strong> sperm motility for up to 24 hours after thawing (Sharma <strong>and</strong> Agarwal,<br />

1996).<br />

160<br />

Different sperm selection techniques were compared such as the swim-up procedure <strong>and</strong><br />

the Percoll density gradient centrifugation which could process only limited volumes <strong>of</strong> semen,<br />

whereas glass wool Sephadex filtration (GWS) <strong>and</strong> Leucosorb ® filtration (LF) allowed filtration <strong>of</strong><br />

larger volumes (Sieme et al., 2003). The latter two were evaluated when used prior to<br />

cryopreservation. An increased post-thaw progressive motility (PM) for the GWS <strong>and</strong> LF treated<br />

samples was reported, but since Percoll centrifugation could only be used to process small volumes<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1 mL, the effect <strong>of</strong> density gradient centrifugation prior to cryopreservation was not evaluated. In<br />

another study, glass beads column separation resulted in an increased post-thaw sperm quality<br />

compared to unselected samples (Klinc et al., 2003). However, this technique requires specific<br />

material not readily available.<br />

The main drawbacks <strong>of</strong> gradient centrifugation can now be remedied since the technique<br />

has been simplified to a single layer centrifugation (SLC) protocol using Androcoll-E with comparable<br />

results for sperm yield <strong>and</strong> quality as for gradient centrifugation (Morrell et al., 2009a). Moreover, a<br />

technique using Androcoll-E-Large allows processing <strong>of</strong> 15 mL <strong>of</strong> extended semen per centrifugation<br />

tube (Morrell et al., 2009b), hence the problem <strong>of</strong> small volumes has been solved as well.<br />

Not all stallions produce semen that can be cryopreserved with good results. In a large<br />

French field study freezability <strong>of</strong> stallion semen was calculated by the ratio <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />

selected ejaculates (PM>35%) over the total number <strong>of</strong> ejaculates frozen (Vidament et al., 1997).<br />

Over a total <strong>of</strong> 427 stallions, it was found that about 50% <strong>of</strong> the stallions were non freezable or poor<br />

freezers , about 25% were intermediate freezers <strong>and</strong> 25% were good freezers. The implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Androcoll-E in the freezing protocol might be a solution to improve sperm processing <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

freezing stallion semen.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate equine sperm selection using Androcoll-E-Large in a<br />

SLC prior to cryopreservation, by comparing this method with a cushioned centrifugation freezing<br />

protocol. The latter has consistently yielded the best results for freezing equine semen to date,<br />

making it an obvious point <strong>of</strong> comparison. In addition, it was evaluated whether the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treatment (Androcoll-E-Large versus cushioned centrifugation) was modified by the freezability <strong>of</strong><br />

the stallion as determined by number <strong>of</strong> ejaculates with post-thaw PM ≥30%.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!