02.09.2013 Views

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4.1<br />

4.1.2. Introduction<br />

140<br />

Numerous studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> diluting raw semen with an<br />

appropriate extender. As such, the negative influence <strong>of</strong> seminal plasma (SP) on the preservation <strong>of</strong><br />

equine sperm can be reduced. Centrifugation <strong>of</strong> diluted equine semen <strong>and</strong> subsequent resuspension<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sperm pellet in fresh extender can even further reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> SP in stored samples. A<br />

small proportion <strong>of</strong> SP in semen improves sperm motility after cooling <strong>and</strong> storage (Jasko et al.,<br />

1991).<br />

However, centrifugation itself may act like a double edged sword exerting both beneficial<br />

<strong>and</strong> deleterious effects on sperm motility (Martin et al., 1979). Although the number <strong>of</strong> sperm cells<br />

can be maximized by increasing centrifugation time <strong>and</strong> force, physical damage is exerted on the<br />

sperm cells at the same time. The direct negative outcome <strong>of</strong> centrifugation on semen quality is<br />

demonstrated by the decrease in motility <strong>and</strong> velocity in contrast to uncentrifuged controls (Jasko et<br />

al., 1991) which indicates that the centrifugation protocol (CP) may play an important role in the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the inseminate. After 24h <strong>of</strong> cooled storage the harmful effect <strong>of</strong> centrifugation is no<br />

longer present (Jasko et al., 1991).<br />

A CP <strong>of</strong> 600 × g for 10 min is commonly used for equine semen (Ecot et al., 2005; Knop et al.,<br />

2005; Vidament et al., 2000; Weiss et al., 2004). In literature, data on the amount <strong>of</strong> sperm loss after<br />

using this protocol are contradictory <strong>and</strong> vary from 1.9% (Weiss et al., 2004) to 25% (Ecot et al., 2005;<br />

Knop et al., 2005). Nowadays, it is generally accepted that sperm losses will vary around 25% when<br />

diluted semen is centrifuged at 400-600 × g for 10-15 min (Aurich, 2008; Loomis, 2006).<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> an appropriate CP has been clearly demonstrated for human sperm. The<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> centrifugation was shown to be more important than the centrifugation force for causing<br />

iatrogenic sperm membrane injuries which resulted in an increased formation <strong>of</strong> reactive oxygen<br />

species (Shekarriz et al., 1995). In boars, similar findings were described: a CP with a high g-force for<br />

a short time (2400 × g for 3 min) was used without detrimental effects on sperm yield compared to<br />

the st<strong>and</strong>ard regime (800 × g for 10 min) (Carvajal et al., 2004). Additionally, a positive effect on<br />

semen quality after cryopreservation was detected when using high g-forces for a shorter period <strong>of</strong><br />

time (Carvajal et al., 2004). Experiments with equine semen have been performed where semen was<br />

centrifuged at 400 × g for an increasing period <strong>of</strong> time. Sperm loss was approximately 20%, if<br />

samples were centrifuged for 10 min or longer, while no adverse effects on motility immediately<br />

after centrifugation were present, unless semen was centrifuged for 20 min. However, effects on<br />

preserved by cooling or freezing were not determined (Heitl<strong>and</strong> et al., 1996). A high g-force for a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!