02.09.2013 Views

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3.4<br />

The averages obtained at T1 with CASA <strong>and</strong> SQA-Ve differed significantly (Table 2). The TM<br />

<strong>and</strong> PM obtained with CASA <strong>and</strong> SQA-Ve were not significantly correlated (Table 2). The scatter plot<br />

<strong>and</strong> corresponding Bl<strong>and</strong>-Altman plots showed a very poor agreement between CASA <strong>and</strong> the SQA-<br />

Ve (Fig. 3).<br />

The categorized data for CASA <strong>and</strong> SQA-Ve (1.00.43) are summarized in table 3. The<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> values ≤30% <strong>and</strong> >30% between the two devices did not differ significantly (p=0.20).<br />

Table 1. Averages <strong>of</strong> total (TM) <strong>and</strong> progressive motility (PM) obtained from frozen-thawed equine<br />

semen following analysis with CASA <strong>and</strong> with the SQA-Ve (version 1.00.43) at time 1 (T1)<br />

<strong>and</strong> time 2 (T2), the correlation coefficient (CC) between the values at T1 <strong>and</strong> T2, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

mean coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation (details see text), to assess repeatability <strong>of</strong> measurements.<br />

CASA SQA-Ve<br />

T1 T2 CC† CV T1 T2 CC‡ CV<br />

TM (%) 39.3 38.1 0.92 6.4 56.1 59.4 0.41 16.9<br />

PM (%) 22.8 22.4 0.95 8.2 45.5 48.8 0.40 16.9<br />

Pearson’s correlation coefficients at a level <strong>of</strong> † p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!