view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health
view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health
view - Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
References<br />
CHAPTER 3.3<br />
Arunvipas P., VanLeeuwen J.A., Dohoo I.R., Keefe G.P. 2003. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the reliability <strong>and</strong><br />
repeatability <strong>of</strong> automated milk urea nitrogen testing. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Veterinary<br />
Research 67:60-63.<br />
Barth A.D., Oko R.J. 1989. Abnormal morphology <strong>of</strong> bovine spermatozoa. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State<br />
University Press.<br />
Bartoov B., Kalay D., Mayevsky A. 1981. Sperm motility analyzer (SMA), a practical tool <strong>of</strong> motility<br />
<strong>and</strong> cell concentration determinations in artificial insemination centers. Theriogenology<br />
15:173-182.<br />
Bl<strong>and</strong> J.M., Altman D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods <strong>of</strong><br />
clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310.<br />
Davis R.O., Katz D.F. 1993. Operational st<strong>and</strong>ards for CASA instruments. Journal <strong>of</strong> Andrology 14:385-<br />
394.<br />
H<strong>of</strong>lack G., Rijsselaere T., Maes D., Dewulf J., Opsomer G., de Kruif A., Van Soom A. 2005. Validation<br />
<strong>and</strong> usefulness <strong>of</strong> the sperm quality analyzer (SQA II-C) for bull semen analysis. <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />
in Domestic Animals 40:237-244.<br />
Hoogewijs M., Govaere J., Rijsselaere T., De Schauwer C., Vanhaesebrouck E., de Kruif A., De Vliegher<br />
S. 2009. Influence <strong>of</strong> technical settings on CASA motility parameters <strong>of</strong> frozen thawed stallion<br />
semen. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 55 th annual convention <strong>of</strong> the American Association <strong>of</strong> Equine<br />
Practitioners – Las Vegas 55:333-337.<br />
Hoogewijs M., Rijsselaere T., De Vliegher S., Vanhaesebrouck E., De Schauwer C., Govaere J., Thys M.,<br />
H<strong>of</strong>lack G., Van Soom A., de Kruif A. 2010. Influence <strong>of</strong> different centrifugation protocols on<br />
equine semen preservation. Theriogenology 74:118-126.<br />
Matson P.L. 1995. External quality assessment for semen analysis <strong>and</strong> sperm antibody detection:<br />
results <strong>of</strong> a pilot scheme. Human <strong>Reproduction</strong> 10:620-625.<br />
Perreault S.D. 2009. Special section on challenging assumptions about the meaning <strong>of</strong> sperm<br />
concentration <strong>and</strong> sperm counts. Journal <strong>of</strong> Andrology 30:621-622.<br />
Varner D.D. 2008. Developments in stallion semen evaluation. Theriogenology 70:448-462.<br />
Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onclin K. 2002 Computer assisted semen analyzers in <strong>and</strong>rology<br />
research <strong>and</strong> veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57:149-179.<br />
World <strong>Health</strong> Organization (WHO). 2010. laboratory manual for the examination <strong>and</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
human semen. 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, WHO Press.<br />
121