01.09.2013 Views

Report - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

Report - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

Report - DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ã<br />

The emission of NOX, CO, TSP, lead, selenium, and zinc from production of<br />

container glass is measured yearly from 1997 to 2009 (TSP from 2000 to 2009)<br />

(Ardagh Glass Holmegaard, 2011). PM10 and PM2.5 are estimated from the<br />

distribution between TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 from CEPMEIP (2003). For 1990 to<br />

1996, emissions of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury and nickel<br />

are estimated from standard emission factors and activity data. For 1997 to<br />

2010, the energy related emissions are estimated from emission factors and<br />

the actual energy consumption. This change in methodol<strong>og</strong>y results in inconsistency<br />

in the emission trend that cannot be explained by natural factors.<br />

Emission factors <strong>for</strong> lead, selenium, and zinc from 1990 to 1996 are estimated<br />

by interpolation from the 1990 and 1997 figures (Illerup et al., 1999).<br />

The emission of NH3 and TSP from the production of glass wool has been<br />

measured yearly from 1996 to 2010 (TSP from 2000 to 2010) (Saint-Gobain<br />

Isover, 2011). PM10 and PM2.5 are estimated from the distribution between<br />

TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 from CEPMEIP (2003). The activity has varied between<br />

33 600 and 41 318 tonnes glass wool from 1996 to 2008 and, with a significant<br />

decrease in 2010 to 24 899 tonnes due to the financial crises. During the same<br />

period, the emission decreased from approximately 300 to 108 tonne NH3.<br />

The emissions from asphalt roofing and road paving have been estimated<br />

from production statistics compiled by Statistics Denmark and default emission<br />

factors presented by IPCC/Corinair. The default emission factors are<br />

presented in Table 4.3.<br />

ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ<br />

ÃÃ ÃÃÃ<br />

Ã<br />

ÃÃ Ã ÃÃ Ã Ã<br />

à Ãà à à Ã<br />

à Ãà à à Ã<br />

Ã<br />

ÃÃ<br />

ÃÃ Ã ÃÃ Ã<br />

ÃÃÃ Æ Ã Ã Ã<br />

6ODFSUBJOUJFT BOE UJNF TFSJFT DPOTJTUFODZ<br />

The time series are presented in Table 4.2. The methodol<strong>og</strong>ies applied <strong>for</strong> the<br />

different sources within 0LQHUDO SURGXFWV are considered to be consistent either<br />

as measurements or emission factors based on the measurements. However,<br />

not all the sources are considered to be complete regarding pollutants<br />

and these are expected to be completed in the next inventory, either by use<br />

of company-specific in<strong>for</strong>mation or by application of general emission factors.<br />

The time series <strong>for</strong> emissions from production of cement are based on measurements<br />

combined with emissions factors based on the measurements.<br />

4PVSDF TQFDJGJD 2" 2$ BOE WFSJGJDBUJPO<br />

The emission factors have been verified and the order of magnitude confirmed<br />

by comparison with standard emission factors (EMEP/-CORINAIR,<br />

2007; CEPMEIP, 2003). Detailed discussion of QA/QC can be found in Nielsen<br />

et al. (2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!