Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Chapter 5 Comparison of clinical and parasitological data from experimental human malaria challenge trials Meta Roestenberg 1 , Geraldine A. O’Hara 2 , Christopher J.A. Duncan 2 , Judith E. Epstein 4 , Nick J. Edwards 2 , Anja Scholzen 1 , André J.A.M. van der Ven 3 , Cornelus C. Hermsen 1 , Adrian V.S. Hill 2 , Robert W. Sauerwein 1 1 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine and Jenner Institute, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford. 3Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of General Internal Medicine, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4Naval Medical Research Centre, US Military Malaria Vaccine Program, Maryland, United States PLoS ONE, 2012;7(6):e38434
Chapter 5 98 Abstract Exposing healthy human volunteers to Plasmodium falciparum-infected mosquitoes is an accepted tool to evaluate preliminary efficacy of malaria vaccines. To accommodate the demand of the malaria vaccine pipeline, controlled infections are carried out in an increasing number of centres worldwide. We assessed their safety and reproducibility. We reviewed safety and parasitological data from 128 malaria-naïve subjects participating in controlled malaria infection trials conducted at the University of Oxford, UK, and the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Results were compared to a report from the US Military Malaria Vaccine Program. We show that controlled human malaria infection trials are safe and demonstrate a consistent safety profile with minor differences in the frequencies of arthralgia, fatigue, chills and fever between institutions. But prepatent periods show significant variation. Detailed analysis of Q-PCR data reveals highly synchronous blood stage parasite growth and multiplication rates. Procedural differences can lead to some variation in safety profile and parasite kinetics between institutions. Further harmonization and standardization of protocols will be useful for wider adoption of these cost-effective small-scale efficacy trials. Nevertheless, parasite growth rates are highly reproducible, illustrating the robustness of controlled infections as a valid tool for malaria vaccine development.
- Page 46 and 47: Safety and Immunogenicity of a Reco
- Page 48 and 49: Safety and Immunogenicity of a Reco
- Page 50 and 51: Safety and Immunogenicity of a Reco
- Page 52 and 53: Safety and Immunogenicity of a Reco
- Page 54 and 55: Safety and Immunogenicity of a Reco
- Page 56 and 57: Safety and Immunogenicity of a Reco
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 3 Humoral immune responses
- Page 60 and 61: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 62 and 63: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 64 and 65: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 66 and 67: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 68 and 69: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 70 and 71: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 72 and 73: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 74 and 75: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 76 and 77: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 78 and 79: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 80: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4 82 Abstract The functiona
- Page 85 and 86: 84 Chapter 4 Figure 1. Schematic re
- Page 87 and 88: 86 Chapter 4 Concentration (mg/ml,
- Page 89 and 90: 88 Chapter 4 Figure 4: Correlation
- Page 91 and 92: 90 Chapter 4 positively correlated
- Page 93 and 94: 92 Chapter 4 Acknowledgements The a
- Page 95 and 96: 94 Chapter 4 determinant of subsequ
- Page 100 and 101: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 102 and 103: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 104 and 105: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 106 and 107: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 108 and 109: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 110 and 111: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 112 and 113: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 114 and 115: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 116 and 117: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 118 and 119: Chapter 6 Efficacy of pre-erythrocy
- Page 120 and 121: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 122 and 123: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 124 and 125: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 126 and 127: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 128 and 129: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 7 NF135.C10: a new Plasmodi
- Page 132 and 133: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 134 and 135: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 136 and 137: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 138 and 139: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 140 and 141: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 142 and 143: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 144 and 145: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 146 and 147: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
Chapter 5 98<br />
Abstract<br />
Exposing healthy human volunteers to Plasmodium falciparum-infected<br />
mosquitoes is an accepted tool to evaluate preliminary efficacy of malaria<br />
vaccines. To accommodate the dem<strong>and</strong> of the malaria vaccine pipeline,<br />
controlled <strong>infection</strong>s are carried out in an increasing number of centres<br />
worldwide. We assessed their safety <strong>and</strong> reproducibility.<br />
We reviewed safety <strong>and</strong> parasitological data from 128 malaria-naïve subjects<br />
participating in controlled malaria <strong>infection</strong> trials conducted at the University of<br />
Oxford, UK, <strong>and</strong> the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The<br />
Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. Results were compared to a report from the US Military Malaria<br />
Vaccine Program.<br />
We show that controlled human malaria <strong>infection</strong> trials are safe <strong>and</strong><br />
demonstrate a consistent safety profile with minor differences in the<br />
frequencies of arthralgia, fatigue, chills <strong>and</strong> fever between institutions. But<br />
prepatent periods show significant variation. Detailed analysis of Q-PCR data<br />
reveals highly synchronous blood stage parasite growth <strong>and</strong> multiplication rates.<br />
Procedural differences can lead to some variation in safety profile <strong>and</strong> parasite<br />
kinetics between institutions. Further harmonization <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardization of<br />
protocols will be useful for wider adoption of these cost-effective small-scale<br />
efficacy trials. Nevertheless, parasite growth rates are highly reproducible,<br />
illustrating the robustness of controlled <strong>infection</strong>s as a valid tool for malaria<br />
vaccine development.