Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A saturation of antibody avidity <strong>and</strong> concentration induced by malaria vaccine<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idate Apical Membrane Antigen 1<br />
thus establish an equilibrium depending on their competition for common<br />
resources, of which antigen is only one [17]. The availability of other resources,<br />
such as growth factors, interleukins <strong>and</strong> the presence of adhesion molecules<br />
may provide critical advantage preserving diversity <strong>and</strong> preventing dominance of<br />
one B-cell pool [18]. This is an interesting hypothesis, because it suggests that<br />
possible addition of resources to the antigen (such as cytokine adjuvants) would<br />
offer an opportunity to increase the specific B-cell population beyond the<br />
current maximum.<br />
Few sera did not reach the saturated level, particularly in the Alhydrogel®<br />
adjuvanted group. We hypothesize that the antibody response in these sera may<br />
not have undergone full maturation <strong>and</strong> have not (yet) reached a maximum<br />
fraction of bound antigen. Similarly, allergen-specific IgE from atopic children<br />
also lacked a negative relationship between concentration <strong>and</strong> avidity [19],<br />
whereas this was apparent for the more matured antibody responses in adults<br />
[16].<br />
These data are particularly relevant for vaccine development, since the avidity of<br />
antibodies may determine susceptibility to diseases such as the Respiratory<br />
Syncytial virus or meningococcal disease [20-22]. For AMA1 antibodies, we<br />
found a relation between in vitro parasite growth inhibition <strong>and</strong> antibody<br />
concentration, but not avidity. Caution should be taken, however, when<br />
concluding that the functionality of AMA1 antibodies in vitro seems to be<br />
governed primarily by concentration of antibodies, as epitope functionality has<br />
not been taken into account in this study. Particularly PfAMA1 domain I <strong>and</strong><br />
domain II antibodies are thought to harbour the major targets for inhibitory<br />
responses [7]. Moreover, the results of in vitro growth inhibition so far do not<br />
correlate with in vivo susceptibility [23].<br />
In conclusion, our data illustrate an inverse relation between concentration <strong>and</strong><br />
avidity, that becomes saturated at a maximum, constant capacity to bind<br />
antigen. Any increase in antibody concentration at this saturated level will be<br />
balanced by a decrease in antibody avidity. The appreciation of a saturated<br />
antibody response may be crucial for the future development of PfAMA1<br />
vaccine, since it provides guidance to the search for more effective antigens,<br />
adjuvants or delivery platforms.<br />
91