Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
General Discussion 219 mediating this protection is increasingly appreciated [31]. Indeed, also in humans, repeated low grade blood stage infections can induce protection against Pf malaria in the absence of detectable antibodies [32]. In addition, multifunctional T-cell responses were identified following human AMA1 vaccination [33] and T-cell memory responses to T-cell epitopes from the AMA1 protein were detected in clinically immune subjects, although no clear-cut association with parasitemia was found [34, 35]. To conclude, AMA1-specific Tcells contribute to building an effective humoral response in mice [36-38], but antibodies are generally still thought to be the most critical effector for blood stage parasite inhibition [38, 39]. Apparently, not just the quantity of antibodies but possibly also the quality and the interplay between cellular and humoral responses play a role in building a protective immune response to AMA1. In order to understand the mechanism by which AMA1 directed immune responses effectuate parasite growth inhibition, more basic understanding of the function of AMA1 is essential. AMA1 is expressed in merozoites and is thought to help reorienting the merozoite when aligning with the erythrocyte membrane and subsequently attaching with erythrocyte membrane proteins [1]. More recent mechanistic in vitro studies, however, also highlight a possible role of AMA1 in parasite invasion into hepatocytes, showing expression of AMA1 in sporozoites and inhibition of AMA1 antibodies with invasion of hepatocytes [40]. The possible clinical relevance of this function was confirmed by two controlled malaria infection (CHMI) studies with human volunteers [18, 26], in which no clinically relevant effect on prepatency or blood stage parasite inhibition could be found in AMA1 immunized volunteers challenged by mosquito bite [26] or blood stage parasites[18], but possible reduction of liver load parasites could be detected by Q-PCR analysis of parasitemia in the former trial [26]. The versatility of AMA1 expression complicates the dissection of AMA1-induced inhibiting and enhancing immune responses. The induction of exactly the right quality and quantity immune responses, however, may be the key to AMA1 success in humans. Adjuvants are a very heterogenic group of pharmacological or immunological agents that are co-administered with vaccines in order to potentiate and/or direct immune responses in humans. Particularly in malaria research adjuvants have proven to play a critical role: GlaxoSmithKline’s proprietary adjuvant AS01/2 was found crucial for enhancing responses to RTS,S to protective levels [41]. We found that adjuvants are also important determinants of cellular and humoral immune responses when combined with
220 Chapter 11 the PfAMA1[25-545] FVO vaccine (Chapters 2, 3). Our work on AMA1 antibody avidity illustrates that the AS02A adjuvant directs the balance of antibody quantity and quality towards high titre antibody of lower avidity when compared to a conventional adjuvant such as Alhydrogel (Chapter 4). Recent advances in adjuvant research have led to the availability of many new adjuvants [42]. With the increased understanding of host/pathogen interactions new classes of adjuvants follow more rational design, such as Toll-like receptor agonists or cytokines. In addition, delivery platforms have been developed to ensure a specific presentation of the antigen to the immune system. For example, viral platforms are designed to direct the immune response from a classical humoral response following protein immunization to CD4+ or CD8+ responses induced by, for example, adenovirus, fowlpox or modified vaccinia viruses [43]. Also bacterium-like particles or nanoparticles have shown to provide benefit as carriers to potential malaria vaccines [44, 45]. Heterologous prime-boost strategies utilizing two different adjuvants with one antigen is another recent development that has shown to increase efficacy [46]. In addition to adjuvants and delivery platforms, which are co-administrated with the vaccine and designed to boost or direct the immune response, research has focussed on the development of especially designed delivery systems, aimed at the specific delivery of an antigen at a certain anatomical site. Nasal delivery, needle free jet devices and intrabuccal delivery systems are examples of the most recent developments (for example [47, 48]). Their specific advantages are yet to be investigated. Also AMA1 has been subjected to the addition of new adjuvants in an attempt to increase immunogenicity [49]. Thorough adjuvant research will be required in order to delineate the properties and optimal combination of antigen, adjuvant, delivery platform and delivery system, a complex task requiring huge effort and funds [42]. Direct comparisons of different adjuvants with one antigen, as we have described (Chapter 2), will prove to be instrumental to these developments. Unfortunately, the limited availability of newly developed adjuvants in the public domain has restricted the number of comparative trials so far. In conclusion, in vitro and animal studies have raised high hopes for AMA1 vaccines, which could not be met in human efficacy trials. In addition, the phase III clinical development of RTS,S has set high standards for the development of any malaria vaccine, a challenge that also AMA1 has to face. The versatility of
- Page 170 and 171: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 172: Section 3 Whole parasite inoculatio
- Page 175 and 176: 174 Chapter 9 Abstract An effective
- Page 177 and 178: 176 Chapter 9 Figure 1. Study desig
- Page 179 and 180: 178 Chapter 9 followed by five iden
- Page 181 and 182: 180 Chapter 9 Figure 2. Parasitemia
- Page 183 and 184: 182 Chapter 9 Test Day I-1 Day C-1
- Page 185 and 186: 184 Chapter 9 strain P. falciparum-
- Page 187 and 188: 186 Chapter 9 protective role in ot
- Page 189 and 190: 188 Chapter 9 References 1. Greenwo
- Page 191 and 192: 190 Chapter 9 27. Orjih AU. Acute m
- Page 193 and 194: 192 Chapter 9 medium A (Caltag Labo
- Page 195 and 196: 194 Chapter 10 Abstract Induction o
- Page 197 and 198: 196 Chapter 10 Pre-erythrocytic sta
- Page 199 and 200: 198 Chapter 10 procedures described
- Page 201 and 202: 200 Chapter 10 by hand-dissection.
- Page 203 and 204: 202 Chapter 10 Figure 3. Mean numbe
- Page 205 and 206: 204 Chapter 10 Figure 4. Number of
- Page 207 and 208: 206 Chapter 10 temperature (Pearson
- Page 209 and 210: 208 Chapter 10 immune modulating ef
- Page 211 and 212: 210 Chapter 10 cytokine measurement
- Page 213 and 214: 212 Chapter 10 14. Hermsen CC, Telg
- Page 216 and 217: Chapter 11 General Discussion
- Page 218 and 219: General Discussion 217 occurrence o
- Page 222 and 223: General Discussion 221 AMA1 express
- Page 224 and 225: General Discussion 223 troponins ca
- Page 226 and 227: General Discussion 225 and between
- Page 228 and 229: General Discussion 227 immunologica
- Page 230 and 231: General Discussion 229 to induce pr
- Page 232 and 233: General Discussion 231 Conclusions
- Page 234 and 235: General Discussion 233 References 1
- Page 236 and 237: General Discussion 235 polymorphonu
- Page 238 and 239: General Discussion 237 57. Church L
- Page 240 and 241: General Discussion 239 85. Beier JC
- Page 242 and 243: General Discussion 241 118. Mueller
- Page 244: Chapter 12 Summary Samenvatting Lis
- Page 247 and 248: 246 Chapter 12 Controlled human mal
- Page 250 and 251: Summary, Samenvatting, List of publ
- Page 252: Summary, Samenvatting, List of publ
- Page 255 and 256: 254 Chapter 12 Roestenberg M, Teirl
- Page 258 and 259: Summary, Samenvatting, List of publ
- Page 260 and 261: Summary, Samenvatting, List of publ
- Page 262: Summary, Samenvatting, List of publ
General Discussion 219<br />
mediating this <strong>protection</strong> is increasingly appreciated [31]. Indeed, also in<br />
humans, repeated low grade blood stage <strong>infection</strong>s can induce <strong>protection</strong><br />
<strong>against</strong> Pf malaria in the absence of detectable antibodies [32]. In addition,<br />
multifunctional T-cell responses were identified following human AMA1<br />
vaccination [33] <strong>and</strong> T-cell memory responses to T-cell epitopes from the AMA1<br />
protein were detected in clinically immune subjects, although no clear-cut<br />
association with parasitemia was found [34, 35]. To conclude, AMA1-specific Tcells<br />
contribute to building an effective humoral response in mice [36-38], but<br />
antibodies are generally still thought to be the most critical effector for blood<br />
stage parasite inhibition [38, 39]. Apparently, not just the quantity of antibodies<br />
but possibly also the quality <strong>and</strong> the interplay between cellular <strong>and</strong> humoral<br />
responses play a role in building a protective immune response to AMA1.<br />
In order to underst<strong>and</strong> the mechanism by which AMA1 directed immune<br />
responses effectuate parasite growth inhibition, more basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />
the function of AMA1 is essential. AMA1 is expressed in merozoites <strong>and</strong> is<br />
thought to help reorienting the merozoite when aligning with the erythrocyte<br />
membrane <strong>and</strong> subsequently attaching with erythrocyte membrane proteins [1].<br />
More recent mechanistic in vitro studies, however, also highlight a possible role<br />
of AMA1 in parasite invasion into hepatocytes, showing expression of AMA1 in<br />
sporozoites <strong>and</strong> inhibition of AMA1 antibodies with invasion of hepatocytes [40].<br />
The possible clinical relevance of this function was confirmed by two controlled<br />
malaria <strong>infection</strong> (CHMI) studies with human volunteers [18, 26], in which no<br />
clinically relevant effect on prepatency or blood stage parasite inhibition could<br />
be found in AMA1 immunized volunteers challenged by mosquito bite [26] or<br />
blood stage parasites[18], but possible reduction of liver load parasites could be<br />
detected by Q-PCR analysis of parasitemia in the former trial [26].<br />
The versatility of AMA1 expression complicates the dissection of AMA1-induced<br />
inhibiting <strong>and</strong> enhancing immune responses. The induction of exactly the right<br />
quality <strong>and</strong> quantity immune responses, however, may be the key to AMA1<br />
success in humans. Adjuvants are a very heterogenic group of pharmacological<br />
or immunological agents that are co-administered with vaccines in order to<br />
potentiate <strong>and</strong>/or direct immune responses in humans. Particularly in malaria<br />
research adjuvants have proven to play a critical role: GlaxoSmithKline’s<br />
proprietary adjuvant AS01/2 was found crucial for enhancing responses to RTS,S<br />
to protective levels [41]. We found that adjuvants are also important<br />
determinants of cellular <strong>and</strong> humoral immune responses when combined with