Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

31.08.2013 Views

General Discussion 219 mediating this protection is increasingly appreciated [31]. Indeed, also in humans, repeated low grade blood stage infections can induce protection against Pf malaria in the absence of detectable antibodies [32]. In addition, multifunctional T-cell responses were identified following human AMA1 vaccination [33] and T-cell memory responses to T-cell epitopes from the AMA1 protein were detected in clinically immune subjects, although no clear-cut association with parasitemia was found [34, 35]. To conclude, AMA1-specific Tcells contribute to building an effective humoral response in mice [36-38], but antibodies are generally still thought to be the most critical effector for blood stage parasite inhibition [38, 39]. Apparently, not just the quantity of antibodies but possibly also the quality and the interplay between cellular and humoral responses play a role in building a protective immune response to AMA1. In order to understand the mechanism by which AMA1 directed immune responses effectuate parasite growth inhibition, more basic understanding of the function of AMA1 is essential. AMA1 is expressed in merozoites and is thought to help reorienting the merozoite when aligning with the erythrocyte membrane and subsequently attaching with erythrocyte membrane proteins [1]. More recent mechanistic in vitro studies, however, also highlight a possible role of AMA1 in parasite invasion into hepatocytes, showing expression of AMA1 in sporozoites and inhibition of AMA1 antibodies with invasion of hepatocytes [40]. The possible clinical relevance of this function was confirmed by two controlled malaria infection (CHMI) studies with human volunteers [18, 26], in which no clinically relevant effect on prepatency or blood stage parasite inhibition could be found in AMA1 immunized volunteers challenged by mosquito bite [26] or blood stage parasites[18], but possible reduction of liver load parasites could be detected by Q-PCR analysis of parasitemia in the former trial [26]. The versatility of AMA1 expression complicates the dissection of AMA1-induced inhibiting and enhancing immune responses. The induction of exactly the right quality and quantity immune responses, however, may be the key to AMA1 success in humans. Adjuvants are a very heterogenic group of pharmacological or immunological agents that are co-administered with vaccines in order to potentiate and/or direct immune responses in humans. Particularly in malaria research adjuvants have proven to play a critical role: GlaxoSmithKline’s proprietary adjuvant AS01/2 was found crucial for enhancing responses to RTS,S to protective levels [41]. We found that adjuvants are also important determinants of cellular and humoral immune responses when combined with

220 Chapter 11 the PfAMA1[25-545] FVO vaccine (Chapters 2, 3). Our work on AMA1 antibody avidity illustrates that the AS02A adjuvant directs the balance of antibody quantity and quality towards high titre antibody of lower avidity when compared to a conventional adjuvant such as Alhydrogel (Chapter 4). Recent advances in adjuvant research have led to the availability of many new adjuvants [42]. With the increased understanding of host/pathogen interactions new classes of adjuvants follow more rational design, such as Toll-like receptor agonists or cytokines. In addition, delivery platforms have been developed to ensure a specific presentation of the antigen to the immune system. For example, viral platforms are designed to direct the immune response from a classical humoral response following protein immunization to CD4+ or CD8+ responses induced by, for example, adenovirus, fowlpox or modified vaccinia viruses [43]. Also bacterium-like particles or nanoparticles have shown to provide benefit as carriers to potential malaria vaccines [44, 45]. Heterologous prime-boost strategies utilizing two different adjuvants with one antigen is another recent development that has shown to increase efficacy [46]. In addition to adjuvants and delivery platforms, which are co-administrated with the vaccine and designed to boost or direct the immune response, research has focussed on the development of especially designed delivery systems, aimed at the specific delivery of an antigen at a certain anatomical site. Nasal delivery, needle free jet devices and intrabuccal delivery systems are examples of the most recent developments (for example [47, 48]). Their specific advantages are yet to be investigated. Also AMA1 has been subjected to the addition of new adjuvants in an attempt to increase immunogenicity [49]. Thorough adjuvant research will be required in order to delineate the properties and optimal combination of antigen, adjuvant, delivery platform and delivery system, a complex task requiring huge effort and funds [42]. Direct comparisons of different adjuvants with one antigen, as we have described (Chapter 2), will prove to be instrumental to these developments. Unfortunately, the limited availability of newly developed adjuvants in the public domain has restricted the number of comparative trials so far. In conclusion, in vitro and animal studies have raised high hopes for AMA1 vaccines, which could not be met in human efficacy trials. In addition, the phase III clinical development of RTS,S has set high standards for the development of any malaria vaccine, a challenge that also AMA1 has to face. The versatility of

General Discussion 219<br />

mediating this <strong>protection</strong> is increasingly appreciated [31]. Indeed, also in<br />

humans, repeated low grade blood stage <strong>infection</strong>s can induce <strong>protection</strong><br />

<strong>against</strong> Pf malaria in the absence of detectable antibodies [32]. In addition,<br />

multifunctional T-cell responses were identified following human AMA1<br />

vaccination [33] <strong>and</strong> T-cell memory responses to T-cell epitopes from the AMA1<br />

protein were detected in clinically immune subjects, although no clear-cut<br />

association with parasitemia was found [34, 35]. To conclude, AMA1-specific Tcells<br />

contribute to building an effective humoral response in mice [36-38], but<br />

antibodies are generally still thought to be the most critical effector for blood<br />

stage parasite inhibition [38, 39]. Apparently, not just the quantity of antibodies<br />

but possibly also the quality <strong>and</strong> the interplay between cellular <strong>and</strong> humoral<br />

responses play a role in building a protective immune response to AMA1.<br />

In order to underst<strong>and</strong> the mechanism by which AMA1 directed immune<br />

responses effectuate parasite growth inhibition, more basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

the function of AMA1 is essential. AMA1 is expressed in merozoites <strong>and</strong> is<br />

thought to help reorienting the merozoite when aligning with the erythrocyte<br />

membrane <strong>and</strong> subsequently attaching with erythrocyte membrane proteins [1].<br />

More recent mechanistic in vitro studies, however, also highlight a possible role<br />

of AMA1 in parasite invasion into hepatocytes, showing expression of AMA1 in<br />

sporozoites <strong>and</strong> inhibition of AMA1 antibodies with invasion of hepatocytes [40].<br />

The possible clinical relevance of this function was confirmed by two controlled<br />

malaria <strong>infection</strong> (CHMI) studies with human volunteers [18, 26], in which no<br />

clinically relevant effect on prepatency or blood stage parasite inhibition could<br />

be found in AMA1 immunized volunteers challenged by mosquito bite [26] or<br />

blood stage parasites[18], but possible reduction of liver load parasites could be<br />

detected by Q-PCR analysis of parasitemia in the former trial [26].<br />

The versatility of AMA1 expression complicates the dissection of AMA1-induced<br />

inhibiting <strong>and</strong> enhancing immune responses. The induction of exactly the right<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> quantity immune responses, however, may be the key to AMA1<br />

success in humans. Adjuvants are a very heterogenic group of pharmacological<br />

or immunological agents that are co-administered with vaccines in order to<br />

potentiate <strong>and</strong>/or direct immune responses in humans. Particularly in malaria<br />

research adjuvants have proven to play a critical role: GlaxoSmithKline’s<br />

proprietary adjuvant AS01/2 was found crucial for enhancing responses to RTS,S<br />

to protective levels [41]. We found that adjuvants are also important<br />

determinants of cellular <strong>and</strong> humoral immune responses when combined with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!