31.08.2013 Views

Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Protection <strong>against</strong> a Malaria Challenge by Sporozoite Inoculation 177<br />

the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (CMO 2006/207).<br />

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00442377.<br />

Protocol<br />

Volunteers were r<strong>and</strong>omized double blind into two groups (Figure 1), 10 vera<br />

<strong>and</strong> 5 controls. Chloroquine(CQ) was provided to all volunteers in a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

prophylactic regimen of 300mg base weekly, starting with 600mg in two days,<br />

for a total duration of 13 weeks. Whilst under CQ prophylaxis, vera were<br />

exposed on three occasions, at four-weekly intervals, to bites of 12-15 P.<br />

falciparum-infected mosquitoes per session, for a total exposure of 36-45<br />

infected mosquitoes per volunteer. Controls received bites from an equal<br />

number of uninfected mosquitoes on the same occasions. Anopheles stephensi<br />

mosquitoes were reared according to st<strong>and</strong>ard procedures at our insectary.<br />

Infected mosquitoes were obtained by feeding on gametocytes of NF54, a<br />

chloroquine sensitive strain of P. falciparum, as described previously [13]. NF54<br />

is genetically homogeneous, but has not been formally cloned. Only the<br />

insectary technicians preparing the mosquitoes were aware of the infectivity<br />

status of the mosquitoes allocated to the volunteers. Blood-engorged<br />

mosquitoes were dissected to confirm the presence of sporozoites. If necessary,<br />

feeding sessions were repeated until precisely the predefined number of<br />

infected mosquitoes had fed. However, a single feeding session was sufficient in<br />

49/60 of all instances of immunization or challenge, whereas a second session<br />

was required in just 10 instances <strong>and</strong> a third session in only 1 instance.<br />

From day 6-10 after each mosquito exposure, all volunteers were followed on an<br />

outpatient basis <strong>and</strong> blood was drawn for st<strong>and</strong>ard whole blood counts <strong>and</strong> daily<br />

thick smears. Any signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms were recorded by the attending physician<br />

as follows: mild (easily tolerated), moderate (interferes with normal activity), or<br />

severe (prevents normal activity).<br />

Eight weeks after the last immunization dose <strong>and</strong> 4 weeks after discontinuation<br />

of CQ prophylaxis, all 15 volunteers were challenged by exposure to the bites of<br />

five homologous NF54 strain P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes. This period was<br />

considered to be sufficient for CQ levels to drop below levels which might be<br />

inhibitory to parasite multiplication [14]. Volunteers were checked daily on an<br />

outpatient basis from day 5 to day 21 for symptoms <strong>and</strong> signs of malaria,<br />

haematological parameters <strong>and</strong> thick smears.<br />

As soon as thick smear positive, volunteers were treated with a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

curative regimen of artemether/lumefantrine (starting dose of 80/480 mg,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!