Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma

31.08.2013 Views

Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and blood-stage malaria vaccines can be assessed in small sporozoite challenge trials in human volunteers Introduction The development of an effective vaccine against malaria has public health priority. With an increasing number of candidate Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) vaccines and only a limited number of field trial sites available, human sporozoite challenges are used to assess preliminary vaccine efficacy before proceeding to phase IIb trials [1]. In such phase IIa challenge trials malaria-naïve volunteers are immunized with a candidate vaccine and subsequently exposed to the bites of laboratory-reared Pf-infected mosquitoes. Traditionally, a comparison of the prepatent period (time from challenge until positive bloodslide) between controls and vaccinees provides an efficacy estimate. The development of molecular techniques (Q-PCR) allow for a detailed analysis of blood-stage parasite growth [2]. Sporozoite challenge trials are thought suitable for testing pre-erythrocytic (liver stage) vaccines, because of the natural route of exposure (mosquito bite) and the full pre-erythrocytic development of Pf parasites in volunteers. To date, 30 reports of combined phaseI/IIa sporozoite challenge trials are available, of which three pre-erythrocytic vaccine candidates induced full protection [1]. One of the three candidates is currently in phase III clinical development [3], whereas disappointing preliminary efficacy data have halted the clinical development of others [4, 5]. This illustrates the importance of challenge trials in the clinical development path of pre-erythrocytic vaccines. Preliminary efficacy testing of asexual erythrocytic (blood-stage) stage vaccines is more complex, since vaccine efficacy can only be obtained by evaluating blood-stage parasite growth over a sufficient lengthy period of time. However, blood-stage parasitemia is terminated by curative anti-malarial treatment at 0.0001% infected erythrocytes, limiting parasitemia to an interval of one to six days only (mean 1.7 multiplication cycles) [6]. Immunological effects have to exert significant parasite inhibition in this short period in order to ensure detectable vaccine efficacy, making the use of challenge trials for erythrocytic vaccine candidates controversial. To date, only two erythrocytic malaria vaccine candidates have been subjected to sporozoite challenge (Apical Membrane Antigen 1 and Merozoite Surface Protein 1) [7, 8]. Analysis of parasitological data from two of these trials revealed an apparent pre-erythrocytic inhibiting effect, but could not show blood-stage inhibition (S.H. Sheehy pers. comm.) [7]. 119

120 Chapter 6 It is thus unclear whether blood-stage parasite growth inhibition can be determined with sufficient precision after sporozoite challenge. The advent of molecular techniques allows for quantification of submicroscopic parasitemia [2]. In addition to the number of protected volunteers, Q-PCR allows for estimations of liver stage parasite load (for pre-erythrocytic vaccines) or blood-stage multiplication rate (for erythrocytic vaccines), which may be particularly useful in vaccines that do not induce full protection, e.g. “leaky vaccines” [9]. Here we use Q-PCR data from 11 years of experience of sporozoite challenge trials at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) to determine inter-individual variation in parasite kinetics and calculate the power of sporozoite challenge trials for both pre-erythrocytic and asexual erythrocytic vaccines. Methods Data and study population Data were available from 48 volunteers participating in seven different sporozoite challenge trials at the RUNMC from 1999 to 2010. The data set included subjects from immunological studies (N=20), infectivity controls from immunisation trials (N=16) and subjects from a malaria vaccine trial not showing any protection (N= 12). All volunteers were challenged by the bites of four to seven infected mosquitoes for ten minutes. Mosquitoes were laboratory-reared and infected with the NF54 strain of Pf [10]. Presence of sporozoites in mosquitoes was confirmed by salivary gland dissection. Trial subjects were followed two to three times daily from day five after challenge until three days after start of antimalarial treatment. At every visit, blood samples were collected and assessed for presence of parasites by microscopy (threshold 4 Pf/µl) and quantified by Q-PCR (threshold 20-100 Pf/ml) [2]. Antimalarial treatment was provided as soon parasites were detected by microscopy. Ethical approval was obtained for each trial separately (Review board numbers: 0011-0262, 2001/203, 2002/170, 2004/129, 2006/207, NL14715.000.06, NL24193.091.09). Statistical analysis Analyses were performed using log-transformed data. We calculated geometric mean parasitemia for every cycle in individual volunteers as well as group geometric mean and standard deviation (SD). We determined individual parasite multiplication rate by division of parasite densities of two subsequent cycles and

120 Chapter 6<br />

It is thus unclear whether blood-stage parasite growth inhibition can be<br />

determined with sufficient precision after sporozoite challenge.<br />

The advent of molecular techniques allows for quantification of submicroscopic<br />

parasitemia [2]. In addition to the number of protected volunteers, Q-PCR allows<br />

for estimations of liver stage parasite load (for pre-erythrocytic vaccines) or<br />

blood-stage multiplication rate (for erythrocytic vaccines), which may be<br />

particularly useful in vaccines that do not induce full <strong>protection</strong>, e.g. “leaky<br />

vaccines” [9]. Here we use Q-PCR data from 11 years of experience of sporozoite<br />

challenge trials at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) to<br />

determine inter-individual variation in parasite kinetics <strong>and</strong> calculate the power<br />

of sporozoite challenge trials for both pre-erythrocytic <strong>and</strong> asexual erythrocytic<br />

vaccines.<br />

Methods<br />

Data <strong>and</strong> study population<br />

Data were available from 48 volunteers participating in seven different<br />

sporozoite challenge trials at the RUNMC from 1999 to 2010. The data set<br />

included subjects from immunological studies (N=20), infectivity controls from<br />

immunisation trials (N=16) <strong>and</strong> subjects from a malaria vaccine trial not showing<br />

any <strong>protection</strong> (N= 12). All volunteers were challenged by the bites of four to<br />

seven infected mosquitoes for ten minutes. Mosquitoes were laboratory-reared<br />

<strong>and</strong> infected with the NF54 strain of Pf [10]. Presence of sporozoites in<br />

mosquitoes was confirmed by salivary gl<strong>and</strong> dissection. Trial subjects were<br />

followed two to three times daily from day five after challenge until three days<br />

after start of antimalarial treatment. At every visit, blood samples were collected<br />

<strong>and</strong> assessed for presence of parasites by microscopy (threshold 4 Pf/µl) <strong>and</strong><br />

quantified by Q-PCR (threshold 20-100 Pf/ml) [2]. Antimalarial treatment was<br />

provided as soon parasites were detected by microscopy. Ethical approval was<br />

obtained for each trial separately (Review board numbers: 0011-0262,<br />

2001/203, 2002/170, 2004/129, 2006/207, NL14715.000.06, NL24193.091.09).<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Analyses were performed using log-transformed data. We calculated geometric<br />

mean parasitemia for every cycle in individual volunteers as well as group<br />

geometric mean <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation (SD). We determined individual parasite<br />

multiplication rate by division of parasite densities of two subsequent cycles <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!