Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma Experimental infection and protection against ... - TI Pharma
Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and blood-stage malaria vaccines can be assessed in small sporozoite challenge trials in human volunteers Introduction The development of an effective vaccine against malaria has public health priority. With an increasing number of candidate Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) vaccines and only a limited number of field trial sites available, human sporozoite challenges are used to assess preliminary vaccine efficacy before proceeding to phase IIb trials [1]. In such phase IIa challenge trials malaria-naïve volunteers are immunized with a candidate vaccine and subsequently exposed to the bites of laboratory-reared Pf-infected mosquitoes. Traditionally, a comparison of the prepatent period (time from challenge until positive bloodslide) between controls and vaccinees provides an efficacy estimate. The development of molecular techniques (Q-PCR) allow for a detailed analysis of blood-stage parasite growth [2]. Sporozoite challenge trials are thought suitable for testing pre-erythrocytic (liver stage) vaccines, because of the natural route of exposure (mosquito bite) and the full pre-erythrocytic development of Pf parasites in volunteers. To date, 30 reports of combined phaseI/IIa sporozoite challenge trials are available, of which three pre-erythrocytic vaccine candidates induced full protection [1]. One of the three candidates is currently in phase III clinical development [3], whereas disappointing preliminary efficacy data have halted the clinical development of others [4, 5]. This illustrates the importance of challenge trials in the clinical development path of pre-erythrocytic vaccines. Preliminary efficacy testing of asexual erythrocytic (blood-stage) stage vaccines is more complex, since vaccine efficacy can only be obtained by evaluating blood-stage parasite growth over a sufficient lengthy period of time. However, blood-stage parasitemia is terminated by curative anti-malarial treatment at 0.0001% infected erythrocytes, limiting parasitemia to an interval of one to six days only (mean 1.7 multiplication cycles) [6]. Immunological effects have to exert significant parasite inhibition in this short period in order to ensure detectable vaccine efficacy, making the use of challenge trials for erythrocytic vaccine candidates controversial. To date, only two erythrocytic malaria vaccine candidates have been subjected to sporozoite challenge (Apical Membrane Antigen 1 and Merozoite Surface Protein 1) [7, 8]. Analysis of parasitological data from two of these trials revealed an apparent pre-erythrocytic inhibiting effect, but could not show blood-stage inhibition (S.H. Sheehy pers. comm.) [7]. 119
120 Chapter 6 It is thus unclear whether blood-stage parasite growth inhibition can be determined with sufficient precision after sporozoite challenge. The advent of molecular techniques allows for quantification of submicroscopic parasitemia [2]. In addition to the number of protected volunteers, Q-PCR allows for estimations of liver stage parasite load (for pre-erythrocytic vaccines) or blood-stage multiplication rate (for erythrocytic vaccines), which may be particularly useful in vaccines that do not induce full protection, e.g. “leaky vaccines” [9]. Here we use Q-PCR data from 11 years of experience of sporozoite challenge trials at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) to determine inter-individual variation in parasite kinetics and calculate the power of sporozoite challenge trials for both pre-erythrocytic and asexual erythrocytic vaccines. Methods Data and study population Data were available from 48 volunteers participating in seven different sporozoite challenge trials at the RUNMC from 1999 to 2010. The data set included subjects from immunological studies (N=20), infectivity controls from immunisation trials (N=16) and subjects from a malaria vaccine trial not showing any protection (N= 12). All volunteers were challenged by the bites of four to seven infected mosquitoes for ten minutes. Mosquitoes were laboratory-reared and infected with the NF54 strain of Pf [10]. Presence of sporozoites in mosquitoes was confirmed by salivary gland dissection. Trial subjects were followed two to three times daily from day five after challenge until three days after start of antimalarial treatment. At every visit, blood samples were collected and assessed for presence of parasites by microscopy (threshold 4 Pf/µl) and quantified by Q-PCR (threshold 20-100 Pf/ml) [2]. Antimalarial treatment was provided as soon parasites were detected by microscopy. Ethical approval was obtained for each trial separately (Review board numbers: 0011-0262, 2001/203, 2002/170, 2004/129, 2006/207, NL14715.000.06, NL24193.091.09). Statistical analysis Analyses were performed using log-transformed data. We calculated geometric mean parasitemia for every cycle in individual volunteers as well as group geometric mean and standard deviation (SD). We determined individual parasite multiplication rate by division of parasite densities of two subsequent cycles and
- Page 70 and 71: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 72 and 73: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 74 and 75: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 76 and 77: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 78 and 79: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 80: Humoral immune responses to a singl
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4 82 Abstract The functiona
- Page 85 and 86: 84 Chapter 4 Figure 1. Schematic re
- Page 87 and 88: 86 Chapter 4 Concentration (mg/ml,
- Page 89 and 90: 88 Chapter 4 Figure 4: Correlation
- Page 91 and 92: 90 Chapter 4 positively correlated
- Page 93 and 94: 92 Chapter 4 Acknowledgements The a
- Page 95 and 96: 94 Chapter 4 determinant of subsequ
- Page 98 and 99: Chapter 5 Comparison of clinical an
- Page 100 and 101: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 102 and 103: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 104 and 105: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 106 and 107: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 108 and 109: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 110 and 111: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 112 and 113: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 114 and 115: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 116 and 117: Comparison of clinical and parasito
- Page 118 and 119: Chapter 6 Efficacy of pre-erythrocy
- Page 122 and 123: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 124 and 125: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 126 and 127: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 128 and 129: Efficacy of pre-erythrocytic and bl
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 7 NF135.C10: a new Plasmodi
- Page 132 and 133: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 134 and 135: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 136 and 137: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 138 and 139: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 140 and 141: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 142 and 143: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 144 and 145: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 146 and 147: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 148 and 149: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 150 and 151: NF135.C10: a new Plasmodium falcipa
- Page 152 and 153: Chapter 8 Induction of malaria in v
- Page 154 and 155: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 156 and 157: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 158 and 159: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 160 and 161: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 162 and 163: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 164 and 165: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 166 and 167: Induction of malaria in volunteers
- Page 168 and 169: Induction of malaria in volunteers
120 Chapter 6<br />
It is thus unclear whether blood-stage parasite growth inhibition can be<br />
determined with sufficient precision after sporozoite challenge.<br />
The advent of molecular techniques allows for quantification of submicroscopic<br />
parasitemia [2]. In addition to the number of protected volunteers, Q-PCR allows<br />
for estimations of liver stage parasite load (for pre-erythrocytic vaccines) or<br />
blood-stage multiplication rate (for erythrocytic vaccines), which may be<br />
particularly useful in vaccines that do not induce full <strong>protection</strong>, e.g. “leaky<br />
vaccines” [9]. Here we use Q-PCR data from 11 years of experience of sporozoite<br />
challenge trials at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) to<br />
determine inter-individual variation in parasite kinetics <strong>and</strong> calculate the power<br />
of sporozoite challenge trials for both pre-erythrocytic <strong>and</strong> asexual erythrocytic<br />
vaccines.<br />
Methods<br />
Data <strong>and</strong> study population<br />
Data were available from 48 volunteers participating in seven different<br />
sporozoite challenge trials at the RUNMC from 1999 to 2010. The data set<br />
included subjects from immunological studies (N=20), infectivity controls from<br />
immunisation trials (N=16) <strong>and</strong> subjects from a malaria vaccine trial not showing<br />
any <strong>protection</strong> (N= 12). All volunteers were challenged by the bites of four to<br />
seven infected mosquitoes for ten minutes. Mosquitoes were laboratory-reared<br />
<strong>and</strong> infected with the NF54 strain of Pf [10]. Presence of sporozoites in<br />
mosquitoes was confirmed by salivary gl<strong>and</strong> dissection. Trial subjects were<br />
followed two to three times daily from day five after challenge until three days<br />
after start of antimalarial treatment. At every visit, blood samples were collected<br />
<strong>and</strong> assessed for presence of parasites by microscopy (threshold 4 Pf/µl) <strong>and</strong><br />
quantified by Q-PCR (threshold 20-100 Pf/ml) [2]. Antimalarial treatment was<br />
provided as soon parasites were detected by microscopy. Ethical approval was<br />
obtained for each trial separately (Review board numbers: 0011-0262,<br />
2001/203, 2002/170, 2004/129, 2006/207, NL14715.000.06, NL24193.091.09).<br />
Statistical analysis<br />
Analyses were performed using log-transformed data. We calculated geometric<br />
mean parasitemia for every cycle in individual volunteers as well as group<br />
geometric mean <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation (SD). We determined individual parasite<br />
multiplication rate by division of parasite densities of two subsequent cycles <strong>and</strong>