towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 5<br />
by sub‐G1 levels in the absence and presence of 17‐AAG in A549 and H460 cells (Fig. 4C<br />
and D). Inhibition of caspase‐8 by the synthetic inhibitor z‐IETD‐FMK (20 µM) also<br />
prevented synergistic apoptosis activation by TRAIL and 17‐AAG in both cell lines.<br />
However, the caspase‐9 inhibitor, z‐LEHD‐FMK (20 µM) decreased sub‐G1 levels after<br />
TRAIL/ 17‐AAG exposure only in H460 cells and not in the A549 cell line. Overall, these<br />
findings are in line with the caspase cleavage patterns observed in the Western blots.<br />
Effects of 17‐AAG and TRAIL on client proteins of Hsp90<br />
Hsp90 stabilizes multiple oncoproteins such as EGFR, Her‐2, NF‐κB, and Akt. In addition,<br />
RIP1 has also been found to be a target of Hsp90 inhibitors [18;19]. We evaluated the<br />
expression and phosphorylation status of a number of client proteins that could be<br />
involved in mediating the synergistic effect of 17‐AAG and TRAIL. RIP1 is part of the<br />
secondary signaling complex known to be involved in pro‐survival signaling by TRAIL [20].<br />
The TRAIL/17‐AAG combination decreased the expression of RIP1 in A549 cells in<br />
particular after 6 h incubation, which was accompanied with an increase in RIP1 cleavage.<br />
After 24 h incubation this effect on RIP1 was reduced. H460 cells treated with TRAIL<br />
resulted in RIP1 cleavage that was not clearly enhanced by addition of 17‐AAG. However,<br />
as shown previously silencing of RIP1 expression with a short hairpin RNA did not sensitize<br />
the resistant A549 cells <strong>for</strong> TRAIL‐induced apoptosis, making a role of RIP1 in 17‐AAG‐<br />
dependent sensitization unlikely [21]. Activation of ERK, Akt and NF‐κB can negatively<br />
regulate TRAIL‐induced apoptosis and activation of these pathways has been correlated<br />
with TRAIL resistance in NSCLC cells as we and others have previously shown [10;11;21].<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, we extended our study to examine the effect of 17‐AAG on Akt, ERK and<br />
IĸB/NF‐κB. We observed TRAIL‐induced Akt and ERK phosphorylation in the resistant A549<br />
cells and levels were attenuated by 17‐AAG to different extents (Fig. 5A). In H460 cells, p‐<br />
ERK levels were decreased after 17‐AAG exposure <strong>for</strong> 6 and 24 h. TRAIL treatment had no<br />
effect on p‐ERK levels in these sensitive cells. TRAIL treatment <strong>for</strong> 1 h induced IκBα<br />
phosphorylation only in A549 cells, but co‐incubation with 17‐AAG did not abrogate the<br />
phosphorylation of this kinase.<br />
Next, we examined the expression of survivin in NSCLC cells. Survivin is a member of the<br />
Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) protein family and regulates apoptosis by inhibiting effector‐<br />
caspases. Survivin, which interacts with Hsp90 [22], has been identified to play an<br />
important role in the sensitizing effect of 17‐AAG in TRAIL‐induced apoptosis in malignant<br />
gliomas, as 17‐AAG downregulated the expression of this protein [23].<br />
‐ 92 ‐