towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
TRAIL‐induced migration and invasion The migratory and invasive effects of TRAIL are mediated by RIP1 and involves activation of Src We next examined the role of RIP1 kinase in signaling pathways that mediate migration and invasion. RIP1, part of the non‐apoptotic signaling complex, is known to be involved in TRAIL‐induced kinase activation although its precise role is not well understood [8;24]. RIP1 was silenced using a selective shRNA in A549 and H460 cells and knockdown was confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 5A). Figure 5. TRAIL‐induced migration and invasion, and Src‐STAT3 activation is RIP1 dependent. (A) expression of RIP1 was effectively silenced by a specific shRNA in H460 and A549 cells as determined by Western blotting. (B) TRAIL‐dependent cell migration was determined in wound healing assays, and (C) invasion in matrigel‐transwell assays. (D) effect of RIP1 knockdown on TRAIL‐induced apoptosis in A549 and H460 cells. (E) Western blots showing the effect of RIP1 knockdown on TRAIL‐dependent kinase activation (50 ng/ml TRAIL for 15 min) in A549 cells and (F) in H460 cells. The averages of experimental triplicates ±s.d. are shown. *p
Chapter 4 A549‐shRIP1 cells clearly showed a decrease in TRAIL‐dependent migration in wound healing assays (Fig. 5B). The invasive effect of TRAIL was also abrogated in the absence of RIP1 (Fig. 5C). In contrast, there were no differences in TRAIL‐dependent migration and invasion in H460‐shRIP1 cells compared to control cells. RIP1 knockdown in A549 cells did not result in a detectable increase in TRAIL sensitivity (Fig. 5D). The involvement of RIP1 in TRAIL‐induced kinases activation was examined in more detail. As depicted in Fig. 5E, TRAIL‐induced Src and STAT3 phosphorylation is abrogated in A549‐shRIP1 cells. However, RIP1 depletion did not affect the phosphorylaton of Akt, ERK, and FAK following TRAIL treatment. In H460 cells phosphorylation of Src, Akt and ERK was not significantly altered (Fig. 5F). The abrogation of TRAIL‐induced migration/ invasion in A549‐shRIP1 cells together with a lack of Src and STAT3 activation is suggestive of a role of these kinases in controlling the metastasis‐prone events. TRAIL‐dependent activation of a RIP1‐Src‐STAT3 cascade mediates invasive behavior To further investigate the role of Src in mediating TRAIL‐induced migration/invasion, Src expression was silenced with shRNA in A549 cells. In these cells TRAIL‐induced migration and invasion was completely inhibited (Fig. 6A and 6B). Knockdown of Src did not result in an increase in cell death after TRAIL treatment when compared to the empty vector control (Fig. 6C). Thus, the observed decrease in migration and invasion was not a consequence of apoptosis induction. Furthermore, three different Src inhibitors, PP2, dasatinib, and saracatinib were employed at concentrations reported to be optimal for selective inhibition of Src as described previously by others [25;26]. As shown in Fig. 6D and E, migration and invasion by TRAIL was completely repressed with each of the Src inhibitors. In addition, these inhibitors particularly when applied at a higher concentration did to some extent enhance TRAIL‐induced apoptosis in A549 cells, most notably dasatinib (Fig. 6F). In SW1573 cells, Src inhibition by PP2 also repressed the migratory and invasive effects of TRAIL without significantly affecting apoptosis (Fig. 6G, H and I). ‐ 72 ‐
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2 In preclinical studies, a
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2 Table 1| Summary of the k
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 proliferation could be pr
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2 Figure 2. Canonical and n
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2 associated with TRAIL res
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2 adhesion molecules [109].
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2 Reference List 1. Ashkena
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2 37. Tolcher AW, Mita M, M
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 2 melanoma cells from TRAIL
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 2 and ERK pathways. Circula
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3 ABSTRACT Tumor necrosis f
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3 inhibitors and TRAIL rece
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3 of amplification of the t
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3 P38 and JNK have opposing
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3 Figure 2 (continued). (e)
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3 previously established H4
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3 effect on TRAIL‐induced
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3 induced apoptosis in H460
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3 Reference List 1. Jemal A
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 3 40. Domina AM, Vrana JA,
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 4 ABSTRACT Tumor necrosis f
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 4 role in the activation of
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 4 the tip with a diameter o
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 4 RESULTS TRAIL induces a s
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 4 vehicle control or with 5
- Page 71: Chapter 4 Non‐canonical TRAIL res
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 4 Figure 7. Inhibition of S
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 4 DISCUSSION The TRAIL rece
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 4 Src‐independent mechani
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4 variants. Cell Death Dis
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4 ‐ 82 ‐
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 5 ABSTRACT TRAIL is an inte
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 5 targets and subsequent pr
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 5 RESULTS Synergistic activ
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 5 ng/ml TRAIL (Fig. 3B). Ap
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 5 by sub‐G1 levels in the
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 5 DISCUSSION In the present
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 5 Reference List 1. Jemal A
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 5 ‐ 98 ‐
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 6 ABSTRACT TRAIL is a tumor
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 6 various stress stimuli [1
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 6 Subsequently, the membran
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 6 B H460 A549 Figure 1. Rep
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 6 TRAIL‐dependent cell de
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 6 B H460 A549 C Figure 4 (c
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 6 Figure 5 (continued). Mec
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 6 regulation and checkpoint
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 6 mechanism of immune evasi
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 7 ABSTRACT Thymidine phosph
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 7 Figure 1. Schematic overv
Chapter 4<br />
A549‐shRIP1 cells clearly showed a decrease in TRAIL‐dependent migration in wound<br />
healing assays (Fig. 5B). The invasive effect of TRAIL was also abrogated in the absence of<br />
RIP1 (Fig. 5C). In contrast, there were no differences in TRAIL‐dependent migration and<br />
invasion in H460‐shRIP1 cells compared to control cells. RIP1 knockdown in A549 cells did<br />
not result in a detectable increase in TRAIL sensitivity (Fig. 5D).<br />
The involvement of RIP1 in TRAIL‐induced kinases activation was examined in more<br />
detail. As depicted in Fig. 5E, TRAIL‐induced Src and STAT3 phosphorylation is abrogated<br />
in A549‐shRIP1 cells. However, RIP1 depletion did not affect the phosphorylaton of Akt,<br />
ERK, and FAK following TRAIL treatment. In H460 cells phosphorylation of Src, Akt and<br />
ERK was not significantly altered (Fig. 5F). The abrogation of TRAIL‐induced migration/<br />
invasion in A549‐shRIP1 cells together with a lack of Src and STAT3 activation is<br />
suggestive of a role of these kinases in controlling the metastasis‐prone events.<br />
TRAIL‐dependent activation of a RIP1‐Src‐STAT3 cascade mediates invasive behavior<br />
To further investigate the role of Src in mediating TRAIL‐induced migration/invasion, Src<br />
expression was silenced with shRNA in A549 cells. In these cells TRAIL‐induced migration<br />
and invasion was completely inhibited (Fig. 6A and 6B). Knockdown of Src did not result<br />
in an increase in cell <strong>death</strong> after TRAIL treatment when compared to the empty vector<br />
control (Fig. 6C). Thus, the observed decrease in migration and invasion was not a<br />
consequence of apoptosis induction. Furthermore, three different Src inhibitors, PP2,<br />
dasatinib, and saracatinib were employed at concentrations reported to be optimal <strong>for</strong><br />
selective inhibition of Src as described previously by others [25;26]. As shown in Fig. 6D<br />
and E, migration and invasion by TRAIL was completely repressed with each of the Src<br />
inhibitors. In addition, these inhibitors particularly when applied at a higher<br />
concentration did to some extent enhance TRAIL‐induced apoptosis in A549 cells, most<br />
notably dasatinib (Fig. 6F). In SW1573 cells, Src inhibition by PP2 also repressed the<br />
migratory and invasive effects of TRAIL without significantly affecting apoptosis (Fig. 6G,<br />
H and I).<br />
‐ 72 ‐