towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
towards improved death receptor targeted therapy for ... - TI Pharma
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DISCUSSION<br />
p38 and JNK induction by TRAIL<br />
Tumor cells, including NSCLC cells, display variable sensitivity to TRAIL <strong>receptor</strong>‐<strong>targeted</strong><br />
agents ranging from highly sensitive, intermediate sensitive to highly resistant [31;32]. In<br />
this study, we aimed to examine the role of MAPK p38 and JNK in modulating the<br />
apoptotic response in NSCLC cells and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. JNK and<br />
p38 were phosphorylated within a few hours in sensitive H460 cells, but not in resistant<br />
A549 cells (Fig. 1). In H460 cells, co‐exposure of TRAIL with chemical inhibitors of JNK and<br />
p38 or siRNAs against these kinases identified a proapoptotic function of p38, contrasting<br />
a prosurvival effect of JNK (Fig. 2). In a broader NSCLC cell panel with varying TRAIL<br />
sensitivity, JNK inhibition enhanced apoptosis particularly in the TRAIL intermediate<br />
sensitive H1975 and H322 cells, confirming antiapoptotic activity of this kinase (Fig. 6).<br />
Inhibition of p38 did not significantly affect TRAIL sensitivity.<br />
The mechanism by which JNK and p38 affect apoptosis by TRAIL in H460 cells was studied<br />
in more detail. We found that TRAIL‐induced p38 phosphorylation<br />
preceded JNK<br />
phosphorylation (Fig. 1). Interestingly, JNK activation occurred when RIP1 cleavage was<br />
evident. Furthermore, comparison of caspase cleavage patterns in TRAIL and TRAIL/ p38<br />
inhibitor‐treated H460 cells indicated a stimulatory effect of p38 on caspase‐9 and ‐3 and<br />
PARP cleavage (Fig. 2e). Similar experiments with the JNK inhibitor revealed a suppressive<br />
effect of JNK on the cleavage of caspase‐8, Bid, caspase‐9, ‐3 and PARP, and also RIP1<br />
cleavage. These findings suggest a role of both p38 and JNK in affecting mitochondrial/<br />
caspase‐9‐dependent apoptosis, whereas JNK inhibition has additive effects on the<br />
activation of the DISC compounds RIP1 and caspase‐8, and subsequent engagement of the<br />
mitochondrial route via Bid cleavage. Part of the prosurvival effect of JNK may be the<br />
suppression of RIP1 cleavage, and RIP1 on its turn being able to prevent TRAIL‐dependent<br />
JNK activation in some sort of feedback loop. However, thus far RIP1 is not a known<br />
substrate of JNK [33] and the effect of JNK on RIP1 cleavage may be indirect requiring<br />
another protein.<br />
RIP kinases constitute a family of seven members, namely RIP1‐7. They are serine<br />
threonine kinases being crucial regulators of cell survival and cell <strong>death</strong>. Depending on the<br />
cellular context, RIP1 is implicated in the activation of NF‐κB, MAPKs, apoptosis or necrosis<br />
[34]. RIP1 can be cleaved by caspase‐8, abrogating NF‐κB activation and together with the<br />
cleaved product, RIPc, interacts with TRADD and FADD, leading to an increase of <strong>death</strong><br />
<strong>receptor</strong>‐induced apoptosis [35;36]. We found that reduction of RIP1 expression by a<br />
specific shRNA or inhibition of its kinase activity with necrostatin‐1 enhanced TRAIL‐<br />
induced apoptosis in H460 cells that could be augmented by JNK inhibition. This indicates<br />
that the anti‐apoptotic activity of JNK was maintained in the absence of RIP1 activity (Fig.<br />
3). Indeed, TRAIL‐induced phosphorylation of JNK remained detectable in RIP1 knockdown<br />
cells. Interestingly, phosphorylation of p38 was enhanced but did not have pro‐apoptotic<br />
activity under these conditions, since p38 inhibition did not alter the level of TRAIL‐<br />
‐ 53 ‐