30.08.2013 Views

Mesoscopic models of lipid bilayers and bilayers with embedded ...

Mesoscopic models of lipid bilayers and bilayers with embedded ...

Mesoscopic models of lipid bilayers and bilayers with embedded ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3 Computational details 41<br />

<strong>lipid</strong> tail(s):<br />

Lee = 〈|rtn − rt1 |〉 (4.4)<br />

<strong>and</strong> its projection, L n ee, onto the normal to the bilayer plane:<br />

L n ee = 〈|ztn<br />

− zt1 |〉 (4.5)<br />

where the bilayer is taken parallel to the xy-plane.<br />

If the bilayer consists <strong>of</strong> two opposing monolayers which are in contact by the<br />

terminal carbons in the tails, the area per <strong>lipid</strong> <strong>and</strong> bilayer thickness are related by<br />

VL = ALDc/2, where VL is the volume <strong>of</strong> one <strong>lipid</strong>; <strong>and</strong> the thickness <strong>and</strong> the (projected)<br />

end-to-end distance are related by Dc = 2L n ee. However, if the two monolayers<br />

are interdigitated, the above relations do not hold [86]. For example, for partially interdigitated<br />

<strong>bilayers</strong> it will be Dc < 2L n ee <strong>and</strong> for fully interdigitated <strong>bilayers</strong> Dc = L n ee.<br />

To investigate the presence <strong>of</strong> an interdigitated phase we define a measure for the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> interpenetration <strong>of</strong> the hydrophobic cores (tails) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>lipid</strong>s on opposite<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> the bilayer by defining the chain overlap D overlap, as<br />

Doverlap = 2Lnee − Dc<br />

Ln . (4.6)<br />

ee<br />

where Dc <strong>and</strong> L n ee are defined in equations 4.3 <strong>and</strong> 4.4, respectively.<br />

4.3 Computational details<br />

We first study the structural properties <strong>of</strong> single-tail <strong>lipid</strong>s, in which we vary the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the hydrophobic tail, the chain stiffness, <strong>and</strong> the headgroup interaction<br />

parameter.<br />

All the studied <strong>bilayers</strong> consist <strong>of</strong> 400 <strong>lipid</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> approximately 5000 water beads,<br />

<strong>with</strong> a total bead density <strong>of</strong> ρ = 3. The non-bonded interactions between the beads<br />

are represented by the s<strong>of</strong>t repulsion <strong>of</strong> equation 2.2, <strong>with</strong> the parameter set derived<br />

by Groot in [46] <strong>and</strong> reported in table 4.3. The reduced temperature was T ∗ = 1, <strong>and</strong><br />

at this temperature all the considered <strong>bilayers</strong> are in the fluid phase. All the <strong>bilayers</strong><br />

aij w h t<br />

w 25 15 80<br />

h 15 35 (15) 80<br />

t 80 80 25<br />

Table 4.1: Repulsion parameters aij (see equation 2.2) used in our simulations. Water beads<br />

are indicated as w, hydrophilic head beads as h <strong>and</strong> hydrophobic tail beads as t. The parameters<br />

are in units <strong>of</strong> kBT. The value in parenthesis corresponds to a repulsion parameter between<br />

the headgroups which results in a non interdigitated bilayer (see text).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!