30.08.2013 Views

Mesoscopic models of lipid bilayers and bilayers with embedded ...

Mesoscopic models of lipid bilayers and bilayers with embedded ...

Mesoscopic models of lipid bilayers and bilayers with embedded ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion 113<br />

retical predictions discussed here. If the coherence length associated to the proteininduced<br />

perturbation is dependent on protein size, one would expect that bilayer<br />

activities affected by changes <strong>of</strong> the coherence length, might be thus be affected by<br />

protein sizes. This is indeed the case for the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> flip-flop <strong>of</strong> phospho<strong>lipid</strong>s<br />

in <strong>bilayers</strong>. In fact, experimental data on flip-flop suggest that the larger the<br />

protein size (hence the smaller its curvature at the interface <strong>with</strong> the <strong>lipid</strong> chains) the<br />

more reduced is the ability <strong>of</strong> the protein to cause flip-flop [184].<br />

It is worth mentioning that the larger the protein size is, the more the behavior<br />

<strong>of</strong> dL(r) obtained from our DPD simulations differs from the one <strong>of</strong> the exponential<br />

function used for the best fitting. This could already be seen by looking at figure 7.4f<br />

(at a temperature well above the main-transition temperature) for NP=43 <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> negative mismatch. Figure 7.7 illustrates more in details the non-exponential<br />

dependence <strong>of</strong> the <strong>lipid</strong> bilayer thickness pr<strong>of</strong>ile on r. The figure shows the calculated<br />

values <strong>of</strong> dL(r) (open circles) <strong>and</strong> the fitting ones using expression 7.3 (solid line). The<br />

30.0<br />

d L (r) [Å]<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

eff<br />

dP dP ∆d0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

r [Å]<br />

(b)<br />

o<br />

dL dL dL fit<br />

Figure 7.7: The calculated values <strong>of</strong> dL(r) (open circles) <strong>and</strong> the fitting ones using expression<br />

7.3 (solid line) as a function <strong>of</strong> the distance r from the protein surface. The data refer to a protein<br />

size NP=43, <strong>and</strong> to the following cases: (a) ∆d=-12 ˚A (˜dP=14 ˚A) <strong>and</strong> T ∗ =0.5, <strong>and</strong> (b) ∆d=19<br />

˚A (˜dP=41 ˚A) <strong>and</strong> T ∗ =1.0, where in both cases the temperature is above the melting temperature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pure system. The dashed line indicates the value <strong>of</strong> the pure <strong>lipid</strong> bilayer hydrophobic<br />

thickness d o L at the considered temperature. Also shown are the calculated protein hydropho-<br />

bic length dP (gray area), <strong>and</strong> the effective protein hydrophobic length d eff<br />

P (white area), which<br />

is defined as the projection <strong>of</strong> dP onto the normal to the bilayer plane.<br />

data refer to a protein size NP=43, <strong>and</strong> to the following two cases: (a) ∆d=-12 ˚A (˜dP=14<br />

˚A) <strong>and</strong> T∗ =0.5, <strong>and</strong> (b) ∆d=19 ˚A (˜dP=41 ˚A) <strong>and</strong> T∗ =1.0. In the case <strong>of</strong> positive <strong>and</strong> large<br />

mismatch (dP > do L ) (but low enough to avoid protein tilting), figure 7.7(b) indicates<br />

that the <strong>lipid</strong>s in the layers closest to the protein surface are characterized by gellike<br />

chain in order to minimize the hydrophobic mismatch; surprisingly, next to this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!