30.08.2013 Views

Severs skada – paradigmskifte gällande diagnostik och behandling?

Severs skada – paradigmskifte gällande diagnostik och behandling?

Severs skada – paradigmskifte gällande diagnostik och behandling?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>paradigmskifte</strong> <strong>gällande</strong><br />

<strong>diagnostik</strong> <strong>och</strong> <strong>behandling</strong>?<br />

Ett planerat avhandlingsarbete av dr Stefan Perhamre<br />

[ Lat. söka ]<br />

Rapport 1• 2013<br />

Centrum för klinisk forskning<br />

Landstinget i Värmland


<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>paradigmskifte</strong><br />

<strong>gällande</strong> <strong>diagnostik</strong> <strong>och</strong> <strong>behandling</strong>?<br />

Ett planerat avhandlingsarbete av dr Stefan Perhamre<br />

Maria Klässbo 1 , Rolf Norlin 2<br />

1 medicine doktor, sjukgymnast, forskningsledare,<br />

Centrum för klinisk forskning<br />

Landstinget i Värmland, maria.klassbo@liv.se<br />

2 professor i ortopedi, Institutionen för hälsovetenskap <strong>och</strong> medicin<br />

Örebro universitet, rolf.norlin@orebroll.se<br />

Vår forskargrupp:<br />

Stefan Perhamre, leg läk, doktorand, Karlstad†.<br />

Maria Klässbo, med dr, Karlstad.<br />

Dagmara Lazowska, leg läk, Karlstad.<br />

Sofia Papageorgiou, leg läk, Karlstad.<br />

Fredrik Lundin, tekn dr, Karlstad.<br />

Staffan Janson, professor, Karlstad.<br />

Anders Lundin, med dr, Örebro.<br />

Rolf Norlin, professor, Örebro.<br />

Nyckelord:<br />

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>, apofysit, calcaneus, inlägg, hälkopp<br />

Karlstad 2013


Rapporten kan beställas från<br />

Centrum för klinisk forskning<br />

Gamla Spinneriet - Älvgatan 49<br />

651 85 Karlstad<br />

054-61 70 75<br />

pia.tekin@liv.se<br />

Tryckt hos: Arkitektkopia, Karlstad 2013<br />

ISSN 1652-9324


Till Ola Wessmark, mister Idrottsmedicin i Värmland<br />

”Teorier vi tror på kallar vi fakta,<br />

fakta vi misstror kallar vi teorier.”<br />

okänd<br />

5


Innehåll<br />

SAMMANFATTNING ....................................................................................7<br />

ARTIKLAR .......................................................................................................8<br />

Definitioner <strong>och</strong> förkortningar .......................................................................9<br />

INLEDNING .................................................................................................10<br />

BAKGRUND .................................................................................................12<br />

SYFTE ............................................................................................................14<br />

MATERIAL ....................................................................................................15<br />

Deltagare delarbete I, IV <strong>och</strong> V ....................................................................16<br />

Deltagare delarbete II ...................................................................................17<br />

Deltagare delarbete III .................................................................................17<br />

METOD OCH RESULTAT ...........................................................................18<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete I ......................................................................18<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete II ....................................................................19<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete III ...................................................................23<br />

Hård hälkopp är bättre än kilklack .............................................................24<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete IV ...................................................................24<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete V ....................................................................26<br />

SLUTSATS .....................................................................................................27<br />

TACK .............................................................................................................28<br />

STEFAN PERHAMRES EGNA TACK I HANS<br />

PLANERADE AVHANDLING .....................................................................29<br />

REFERENSER ...............................................................................................32<br />

BILAGOR ......................................................................................................33<br />

Bilaga 1 ........................................................................................................33<br />

Bilaga 2 ........................................................................................................34<br />

Bilaga 3 ........................................................................................................35<br />

Bilaga 4 ........................................................................................................36<br />

Bilaga 5 ........................................................................................................41<br />

Bilaga 6 ........................................................................................................47


Sammanfattning<br />

Stefan Perhamre, idrottsläkare i Karlstad samarbetade tidigare med dr<br />

Ola Wessmark, <strong>och</strong> ortopedtekniker Ingemar Hansson vid Idrottshälsan,<br />

Landstinget i Värmland. Till Idrottshälsan sökte sig många barn <strong>och</strong> ungdomar<br />

med hälsmärta <strong>och</strong> de tyckte att en hård hälkopp fungerade påfallande<br />

bra som smärtlindring.<br />

Stefan Perhamre startade ett forskningsprojekt, tillsammans med Maria<br />

Klässbo, för att utvärdera hur bra hälkoppen verkligen var. När det blev<br />

klart att Stefan ville skriva en doktorsavhandling bildades vår forskargrupp<br />

kring hans avhandlingsprojekt.<br />

Med Stefans arbeten som grund har vi kunnat visa att diagnosen <strong>Severs</strong><br />

<strong>skada</strong> (hälsmärta hos unga) kan fastställas med vanliga kliniska test.<br />

Slätröntgen har inget diagnostiskt värde. Studierna har visat att den hälkopp<br />

Ola Wessmark tidigare designat, fungerar mycket bra som <strong>behandling</strong><br />

vid <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> <strong>och</strong> att orsaken till besvären rimligen är en överbelastningsreaktion<br />

i hälbenet. Vi har vidare kunnat visa att hälkoppen bidrar till<br />

att hälkudden trycks ihop från sidorna <strong>och</strong> blir lite tjockare under hälbenet<br />

<strong>och</strong> att toppbelastningen på hälen minskar.<br />

Stefan avled 2010, efter en tids sjukdom, men forskargruppen har kunnat<br />

gå vidare med Stefans artiklar så att de har publicerats.<br />

7


Artiklar<br />

Denna rapport är baserad på följande artiklar:<br />

I. Perhamre S, Lazowska D, Papageorgiou S, Lundin F, Klässbo M, Norlin<br />

R. Sever’s injury; a clinical diagnosis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, accepterad<br />

II. Perhamre S, Janson S, Norlin R, Klässbo M. Sever's injury: treatment<br />

with insoles provides effective pain relief. Scand J Med Sci Sports.<br />

2011;21(6):819-23<br />

III. Perhamre S, Lundin F, Norlin R, Klässbo M. Sever's injury; treat it<br />

with a heel cup: a randomized, crossover study with two insole alternatives.<br />

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e42-7<br />

IV. Perhamre S, Lundin F, Klässbo M, Norlin R. A heel cup improves the<br />

function of the heel pad in Sever's injury: effects on heel pad thickness,<br />

peak pressure and pain. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(4):516-22<br />

V. Norlin R, Perhamre S, Lazowska D, Papageorgiou S, Klässbo M.<br />

Lundin A. MRI-findings in Sever’s injury are reduced during treatment:<br />

A randomised case-control study. Manuskript.<br />

Norlin R. <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> - lättbehandlad hälsmärta hos ungdomar. Svensk<br />

Idrottsforskning 2011;4:43-6.<br />

<strong>och</strong> Stefan Perhamres eget utkast till sin planerade avhandling.<br />

8


Definitioner <strong>och</strong> förkortningar<br />

VAS Visuell analog skala 0-10.<br />

Borg CR-10 VAS 0-10 med tillagda verbala ankare.<br />

IQR Kvartilsavstånd (Interquartile range), skillnaden mellan den<br />

tredje <strong>och</strong> första kvartilen. Kvartilavståndet anger inom vil<br />

k-et avstånd de 50% mittersta observationerna ligger (Q3-<br />

Q1).<br />

MRI/MRT Magnet Resonance Image/Tomography <strong>och</strong> kallas på sven-<br />

s ka för magnetkameraundersökning. Radiologisk metod<br />

som ger en avbildning av både skelett <strong>och</strong> mjukdelar.<br />

Diafys Skaftet, den mellersta delen, av ett rörben.<br />

Metafys Den del av ett långt rörben där övergången sker mellan<br />

skaft et <strong>och</strong> den förtjockade änden av benet.<br />

Fysen Den zon av änden på ett ben där längdtillväxten sker <strong>och</strong><br />

som ligger mellan metafys <strong>och</strong> epifys/apofys.<br />

Epifys De förtjockade ändarna av ett rörben, klädda med led-<br />

brosk, som ligger i anslutning till en led.<br />

Apofys De förtjockade ändarna av ett rörben som inte ligger i an-<br />

slutning till en led, exempelvis hälbenets bakersta del.<br />

9


Inledning<br />

Idrottshälsan startade år 1986 <strong>och</strong> var från 1989 organiserad i Friskvården i<br />

Värmland, men finansierad direkt av Landstinget i Värmland. År 2003 tog<br />

landstinget över ansvaret för Idrottshälsan. Idrottshälsan bemannades inledningsvis<br />

med idrottsläkare, sekreterare <strong>och</strong> assistent. År 2009 anställdes<br />

också en sjukgymnast. Till Idrottshälsan kan den som drabbats av skador i<br />

leder <strong>och</strong> muskler, som har aktiva motionsvanor eller är aktiv inom idrotten,<br />

vända sig utan remiss för att få hjälp med bedömning, <strong>behandling</strong>,<br />

träning <strong>och</strong> förslag på förebyggande åtgärder. Man kan också söka om man<br />

har allmänna medicinska frågeställningar, om det har relevans för den fysiska<br />

aktiviteten, t ex luftrörsbesvär, hjärt-, allergi- eller infektionsproblem.<br />

Barn <strong>och</strong> ungdomar som har hälsohinder som påverkar deras förmåga att<br />

vara fysiskt aktiva i skolan eller inom sina idrotter är en stor målgrupp för<br />

Idrottshälsan.<br />

Ola Wessmark, specialist i ortopedi, var den förste idrottsläkaren på<br />

Idrottshälsan. Många barn <strong>och</strong> ungdomar sökte Idrottshälsan för ömmande<br />

hälar. Ola beskriver själv att han ”av en slump” 1979 kom på att göra<br />

en avlastning av en ömmande häl i Ortoplastmaterial för att hjälpa en<br />

fotbollsspelande son, bilaga 1 1 . Resultatet var sensationellt skriver Ola vidare.<br />

Sonen kunde följande dag återuppta sin träning <strong>och</strong> behövde sen<br />

aldrig avstå träning eller match på grund av besvär från hälen. Wessmark<br />

gick sen vidare <strong>och</strong> gjorde, med hjälp av Ingemar Hansson som också<br />

var anställd på Idrottshälsan, många inlägg som kom att kallas hälkoppar.<br />

Något år senare gjorde Wessmark en telefonuppföljning av 46 barn, varav<br />

sju flickor. Medianåldern för flickorna var 11,6 år <strong>och</strong> för pojkarna 12,6<br />

år. Hela 39/46 hade kunnat återgå till träning/tävling utan fortsatta besvär<br />

då inläggen användes. Sex kunde delta i aktiviteter trots besvär, men med<br />

besvär i mindre grad. Endast en hade så stora besvär att han inte kunde<br />

delta i fysisk aktivitet.<br />

10


Idrottsläkarna vid Idrottshälsan, Landstinget i Värmland, Ola Wessmark <strong>och</strong> Stefan Perhamre.<br />

År 1993 började Stefan Perhamre arbeta på Idrottshälsan. Perhamre var<br />

specialist i allmänmedicin <strong>och</strong> hade ett mycket stort intresse för idrottsmedicin.<br />

Också Stefan slogs av den goda effekten av de hårda individgjutna<br />

hälkopparna. År 2000 gjorde Stefan en enklare utvärdering då han skickade<br />

en enkät med fem frågor <strong>och</strong> fick in svar från 83/115 barn (tabell 1).<br />

Tabell 1:<br />

Utvärdering av <strong>behandling</strong> med hälkopp hos barn med hälsmärta år 2000 (n=83).<br />

11


Bakgrund<br />

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>, smärta i hälen som känns vid varje hälisättning <strong>och</strong> ökar med<br />

högre aktivitetsnivå, drabbar växande ungdomar, vanligen i åldern 8 <strong>–</strong> 15<br />

år. <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> är vanligast bland dem som är aktiva inom löpning <strong>och</strong><br />

fotboll.<br />

Redan 1907 beskrev den svenske röntgenläkaren Patrik Haglund hälsmärta<br />

av liknande karaktär 2 . Numera är tillståndet namngivet efter amerikanen<br />

James W Sever 3 .<br />

Genom åren har många teorier framförts både kring smärtorsak <strong>och</strong><br />

kring bästa <strong>behandling</strong>. Inflammation i hälbenets tillväxtzon (apophysitis<br />

calcanei) är en spridd förklaring 3 , men också ökat drag i hälsenan. Felställning<br />

i fot <strong>och</strong> underben har framförts som möjliga förklaringar. Ogden har<br />

lanserat synsättet att tillståndet är en överbelastnings<strong>skada</strong> i apofysen i det<br />

icke mogna hälen, därav benämningen <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> 4 .<br />

Smärta vid vissa aktiviteter är symptomet vid <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>. Ett tioårigt<br />

barn har oftast begränsad erfarenhet av smärta <strong>och</strong> att tänka abstrakt.<br />

Smärta hos barn har framför allt studerats när det gäller kroniska sjukdomar<br />

5,6,7 . Man har funnit att redan vid femårs ålder kan barn kvantifiera<br />

smärta <strong>och</strong> vid åtta års ålder värdera dessa kvaliteter. Eftersom det hos barn<br />

<strong>och</strong> ungdom kan finnas könsskillnader <strong>gällande</strong> smärta kan det vara enklare<br />

att välja att i studier inkludera enbart ett kön. Om man ska mäta smärta<br />

med hjälp av en enkät är det avgörande om mätmetoden har god validitet,<br />

mäter rätt sak. Visuell analog skala (VAS) anses vara ”gold standard” att<br />

använda för barn <strong>och</strong> ungdom. Borgs CR-10 skala är en vidareutveckling<br />

av VAS skalan med verbala ankare där noll representerar ingen smärta <strong>och</strong><br />

10 extrem smärta (bilaga 2) 8 . Den kliniska erfarenheten är att barn <strong>och</strong><br />

ungdomar med hälsmärta inte har några som helst svårigheter att använda<br />

VAS-skalan för att visa hur ont de har vid en viss aktivitet.<br />

Många olika <strong>behandling</strong>ar har förespråkats <strong>och</strong> använts genom åren.<br />

Då man misstänkt inflammation som grundorsak till besvären har allt från<br />

olika fysikaliska <strong>behandling</strong>ar till läkemedel <strong>och</strong> till <strong>och</strong> med gipsning använts.<br />

Man har även spekulerat i att felställning i foten kan utlösa besvären<br />

varför olika korrigerande inlägg har använts som <strong>behandling</strong>. Inte sällan<br />

behandlas <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> på samma sätt som man tidigare behandlat hälsenesmärta<br />

hos vuxna, till exempel med allt från töjningar till avlastande<br />

kilinlägg.<br />

12


Vila <strong>och</strong> olika sjukgymnastiska <strong>behandling</strong>ar har testats genom åren. För<br />

fysiskt aktiva barn <strong>och</strong> ungdomar kan rekommendationen vila <strong>och</strong> uppehåll<br />

med fysisk aktivitet upplevas mycket negativ.<br />

Åldern nio till 15 år anses vara den viktigaste åldern när det gäller att<br />

bygga upp skelett <strong>och</strong> neuromuskulär funktion med betydelse för resten<br />

av livet. Sportaktiviteter är också en källa till livsglädje <strong>och</strong> en kulturform<br />

med speciella traditioner <strong>och</strong> normer. Att förlora ett år eller mer på grund<br />

av hälsmärta kan ödelägga senare sportande. Lars-Magnus Engström har<br />

utvecklat ett aktivitetsindex för att kunna följa barn <strong>och</strong> ungdomars fysiska<br />

aktivitet (se bilaga 3) 9 .<br />

Om inte förr så försvinner problemet med <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> när hälbenets<br />

tillväxtzon växer samman med resten av hälbenet, alltså när längdtillväxten<br />

avstannar. Därför är ibland effekten av <strong>behandling</strong> svår att bedöma, särskilt<br />

hos de äldre barnen som är nära att avsluta sin längdtillväxt.<br />

Det finns ingen konsensus i litteraturen när det gäller <strong>diagnostik</strong> av<br />

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> vid hälsmärta, inte hur man behandlar eller vad som orsakar<br />

smärtan.<br />

13


Syfte<br />

Syftet med studierna var att ge förslag på hur <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> kan diagnosticeras<br />

med kliniska test (delarbete I), behandlas med skoinlägg (delarbete<br />

II, III <strong>och</strong> bilagorna 4,5) <strong>och</strong> att ge tänkbara förklaringar till varför det ena<br />

alternativet, hälkoppen, hade överlägsna smärtlindrande effekter jämfört<br />

med hälkil (delarbete IV, V <strong>och</strong> bilaga 6).<br />

14


Material<br />

Delarbetena I, IV <strong>och</strong> V är baserade på studie 2 med datainsamling åren<br />

2008-2009 <strong>och</strong> delarbetena II <strong>och</strong> III är baserade på studie 1 med datainsamling<br />

2004-2005.<br />

Deltagare<br />

Tabell 2: Översikt över deltagarna i de olika delarbetena.<br />

15


Deltagare delarbete I, IV <strong>och</strong> V<br />

Deltagarna i studie 2, delarbetena I, IV <strong>och</strong> V, (n=45 sammanlagt) var dels<br />

barn med hälsmärta som randomiserades till <strong>behandling</strong>ar med två olika<br />

inlägg (n=30) <strong>och</strong> femton smärtfria matchade kontroller (tabell 2). De<br />

femton matchade kontrollerna hade samma kön, ålder, fysisk aktivitetsnivå<br />

<strong>och</strong> var aktiva i samma idrottsklubb som de med hälsmärta. Inga deltagare<br />

föll bort.<br />

Inklusionskriterier för alla 45 deltagare var:<br />

- pojkar eller flickor 9-15 år<br />

- nivå D eller E på Engströms aktivitetsindex (se bilaga 3) 9<br />

- kan göra sig förstådd på <strong>och</strong> förstår själv svenska utan problem<br />

- har förälders/föräldrars skriftliga samtycke till att delta<br />

För de 30 barn som skulle prova inlägg krävdes också att<br />

- de hade haft hälsmärta i distala delen av hälen i mer än två veckor<br />

- den mest smärtsamma aktiviteten måste vara bollsport i någon form (fotboll,<br />

innebandy, handboll eller liknande) med en smärtnivå på fyra eller<br />

mer, den senaste veckan, registrerat med Borgs CR-10 skala 8<br />

- de blivit medicinskt undersökta <strong>och</strong> konstaterats ha aktuellt problem<br />

Exklusionskriterier var:<br />

- smärta lokaliserad till Akillessenan eller hälbenet som helhet<br />

- smärta på natten<br />

- intermittent smärta<br />

- spridd smärta eller svullnad<br />

- annan specificerad sjukdom som kunde interferera med hälsmärtan<br />

- tidigare frakturer i området<br />

- svårdefinierad värk i nedre extremitet<br />

- medverkan i annan studie som innefattade någon typ av smärt<strong>behandling</strong><br />

Deltagarna rekryterades från olika idrottsklubbar dit information om studien<br />

skickades ut.<br />

I delarbete IV deltog, förutom de ovan nämnda 45 barnen, också en<br />

pilotgrupp av barn med hälsmärta (n=5), där man testade den röntgenologiska<br />

undersökningsmetodiken.<br />

16


Deltagare delarbete II<br />

Trettioåtta pojkar med hälsmärta uppfyllde inklusionskriternan, men tre<br />

ville inte delta i studien. I denna prospektiva randomiserade studie accepterade<br />

inledningsvis 35 pojkar (två fullföljde inte (n= 33)), med en medianålder<br />

på 12 år (range 9-14) med <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>, att delta (tabell 2). Arton<br />

randomiserades till att använda hälkil <strong>och</strong> 17 till hälkopp. Fem pojkar,<br />

medianålder 12 år (range 10-13 år), rekryterades konsekutivt till en kontrollgrupp<br />

som inte fick några inlägg. Alla deltagare var höggradigt fysiskt<br />

aktiva i olika idrotter.<br />

Inklusionskriterier var:<br />

- pojkar 9-15 år<br />

- hälsmärta i mer än två veckor <strong>och</strong>


Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat<br />

Alla barn som ingick i studierna fick inledningsvis ange ålder, längd, vikt<br />

<strong>och</strong> registrera sin fysiska aktivitetsnivå från A-E med Engströms aktivitetsindex<br />

(se bilaga 3) 9 . Den fysiska aktivitetsnivån registrerades sedan vid<br />

varje datainsamlingstillfälle.<br />

Studierna har godkänts av etikprövningsnämnden i Uppsala, dnr 2004<br />

M-377 <strong>och</strong> 2008/094. Alla deltagare gav sitt informerade samtyckte till<br />

att delta i studierna. I delarbete IV användes radiologi för att analysera<br />

hälkuddens tjocklek. Av etiska skäl undersöktes först en pilotgrupp (n=5)<br />

för att tillse att undersökningsmetodiken var tillfredställande.<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete I<br />

Syftet med delarbete I var att undersöka diagnostisk precision av olika<br />

kliniska test <strong>gällande</strong> hälsmärta vid <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>. Barnen i delarbete I, 30<br />

ungdomar med symtom <strong>och</strong> 15 symtomfria, fick svara på frågor om ålder,<br />

längd, vikt, vilken sport de utövade <strong>och</strong> fysisk aktivitetsnivå från A-E med<br />

Engströms aktivitetsindex (se bilaga 3) 9 . Barnen med hälsmärta fick ange<br />

hur länge de haft hälsmärta <strong>och</strong> smärta i höger/vänster/bilteralt.<br />

Tre kliniska test utfördes av Stefan Perhamre på alla barn (n=45). I de<br />

fall smärtan var bilateral fick barnet själva avgöra vilken häl som var mest<br />

smärtande <strong>och</strong> på den utfördes testerna. Test ett (A) var barfota hälstående,<br />

test två (B) tuberkelpalpation (tryck på hälbenets bakersta topp) <strong>och</strong> test<br />

tre (C) sidokompression (eng. squeeze test), figur 1. Upplevd smärta vid<br />

testerna registrerades på Borgs CR-10 skala 8 . Testaren (SP) tränade trycket<br />

vid sidokompression (test C) på en tryckkänslig gummiblåsa (vigorimeter)<br />

för att standardisera tryckets storlek.<br />

Figur 1: De tre kliniska testen som användes för att diagnosticera <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>.<br />

18


En slätröntgenbild med lateral projektion togs på alla barn (n=45). För<br />

barnen med hälsmärta avbildades den mest smärtande hälen. Två röntgenologer<br />

analyserade, oberoende av varandra <strong>och</strong> blindade för hälsmärta<br />

eller ej, graden av skleros (ökad täthet) på en fyrgradig-skala; ingen skleros,<br />

lätt, måttlig <strong>och</strong> höggradig skleros. De bedömde också graden av fragmentering<br />

av tillväxtzonen (apofysen) också det på en fyrgradig-skala; ingen<br />

fragmentering, två, tre eller minst fyra fragment. Förekomst av distala fragment<br />

eller inte noterades också.<br />

De matchade kontrollbarnen testades på samma sätt både med de kliniska<br />

testen <strong>och</strong> med slätröntgenundersökning.<br />

I delarbete I beräknades såväl sensitivitet (testets förmåga att skilja ut<br />

de sjuka individerna), specificitet (testets förmåga att skilja ut de friska<br />

individerna), negativt <strong>och</strong> positivt prediktivt värde för de tre kliniska testen<br />

<strong>och</strong> för de röntgenologiska (skleros, fragmentering <strong>och</strong> förekomst av<br />

distala fragment). För de röntgenologiska testerna beräknades sensitivitet<br />

<strong>och</strong> specificitet med olika cut-off värden där den kombination som gav<br />

bäst värden för båda valdes, där sensitivitet ansågs vara viktigare än specificitet.<br />

Inledningsvisa skillnader mellan grupperna analyserades med Fishers<br />

exakta test för data på nominal- <strong>och</strong> ordinalskalenivå <strong>och</strong> med Students<br />

t-test för övriga.<br />

Tre bra kliniska test vid <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> medan röntgenförändringar är<br />

svårtolkade<br />

Alla tre testen; barfota hälstående, tuberpalpation <strong>och</strong> sidokompression<br />

(eng. squeeze test) (figur 1) uppvisade 100 procents specificitet vilket<br />

innebär att alla tre testen kunde identifiera alla de friska ungdomarna som<br />

friska. När det gäller sensitivitet hade hälstående 100 procent, tuberpalpation<br />

80 procent <strong>och</strong> sidokompression 97 procents träffsäkerhet.<br />

Röntgen av hälen påvisade att skleros fanns hos alla ungdomar, både<br />

symtomatiska <strong>och</strong> asymtomatiska i kontrollgruppen. Även vid gradering<br />

av sklerosen noterades samma mönster i båda grupperna. Fragmentering<br />

var vanligare i gruppen med besvär (87 procent) jämfört med kontrollgruppen<br />

(53 procent). Denna skillnad var signifikant (p=0,01). Samstämmighet<br />

mellan de båda radiologernas bedömning (reliabilitet) var 100 procent<br />

för både skleros <strong>och</strong> fragmentering.<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete II<br />

Syftet med delarbete II var att undersöka om hälinlägg, hälkopp <strong>och</strong><br />

hälkil, kunde minska smärtan hos pojkar med hälsmärta, <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong><br />

(bilaga 4) 12 . Trettioåtta pojkar uppfyllde inklusionskriterierna. Tre föll bort<br />

av olika skäl. Resterande 35 pojkar, mellan 9 <strong>och</strong> 14 år, fick slumpmässigt<br />

19


ehandling med antingen hälkopp (n=17) eller en avlastande hälkil (n=18)<br />

(figur 2). De slumpandes genom att ta en lapp i en låda försedd med lock.<br />

Deltagarna fick välja två fysiska aktiviteter; aktivitet A <strong>och</strong> B, där hälen<br />

smärtade <strong>och</strong> som de utövade minst 3 gånger per vecka. Aktivitet A skulle<br />

vara den som gav mest smärta. Under de två första veckorna efter randomisering<br />

gavs ingen <strong>behandling</strong>. Ungdomarna registrerade själva smärta<br />

vid aktivitet A <strong>och</strong> B (Borgs CR-10 skala) <strong>och</strong> aktivitetsnivå (Engströms<br />

aktivitetsindex), se bilaga 3 <strong>och</strong> figur 3. Därefter använde hälften av ungdomarna<br />

hälkopp <strong>och</strong> hälften hälkil under 4 veckor. Slutligen följde en ny<br />

två-veckorsperiod utan <strong>behandling</strong>.<br />

För att få en uppfattning om naturalförloppet rekryterades konsekutivt<br />

fem patienter med <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> som inte fick några inlägg. De fick registrera<br />

smärta <strong>och</strong> aktivitetsnivå vid två tillfällen vid start <strong>och</strong> efter två månader.<br />

Figur 2: Hälkopp eller hälkil som ska användas i en stadig <strong>och</strong> knuten idrottssko.<br />

20


Figur 3. Studiedesign för delarbete II.<br />

21


I delarbete II beräknades mediansmärta för varje pojke i alla tre faser av<br />

studien, före, under <strong>och</strong> efter <strong>behandling</strong>, <strong>och</strong> separat för aktivitet A <strong>och</strong><br />

B. Mediansmärta <strong>och</strong> kvartilsavvikelse för hela gruppen (n=33) beräknades<br />

sen för varje fas <strong>och</strong> aktivitet. Wilcoxons signed-rank test användes för att<br />

räkna ut förändring över tid separat för aktivitet A <strong>och</strong> B, med jämförelser<br />

mellan faserna, se figur 5. Holms sekventiella Bonferroni test användes för<br />

att korrigera för massignifikans.<br />

Figur 5: Staplar som visar smärta (median) i faserna före, under <strong>och</strong> efter <strong>behandling</strong> för de två självvalda<br />

smärtande fysiska aktiviteterna i studiegruppen (n=33) där A är den mest smärtande, delarbete II. Jämförelser<br />

mellan mediansmärta i faserna presenteras med p-värden.<br />

Inlägg reducerar smärtan påtagligt<br />

Resultatet blev att, trots att alla ungdomar bibehöll en hög fysisk aktivitetsnivå<br />

(Engströms aktivitetsnivå D <strong>och</strong> E), besvären reducerades signifikant<br />

under den period de använde något av inläggen. Mätt med Borgs CR-10<br />

skala (visuell analog skala mellan 0 <strong>och</strong> 10) sjönk smärtan från cirka 4,5 till<br />

2. Efter <strong>behandling</strong>sperioden återkom smärtan, om än på en något lägre<br />

nivå än före <strong>behandling</strong>en, cirka 3,5.<br />

I den obehandlade kontrollgruppen skedde ingen påtaglig förändring<br />

av smärtnivån under de 8 veckornas observation. En eventuell skillnad i<br />

<strong>behandling</strong>seffekt mellan inläggen kunde inte säkert bedömas.<br />

22


Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete III<br />

Syftet med delarbete III var att analysera vilket inlägg, hälkil eller hälkopp,<br />

som gav mest smärtlindring hos ungdomar med hälsmärta, <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong><br />

(bilaga 5) 13 .<br />

Fyrtiofyra ungdomar med typiska hälsmärtor randomiserades till två<br />

olika <strong>behandling</strong>sgrupper. Ungdomarna följdes under totalt 26 veckor.<br />

Efter en två veckor lång basal bedömningsperiod utan <strong>behandling</strong> (B1)<br />

randomiserades de antingen att få hälkopp (n=20) eller hälkil (n=24) att<br />

använda i fyra veckor i sina sportskor (vecka 3-6). Därefter följde en två<br />

veckor lång basperiod utan <strong>behandling</strong> (B2), varefter de fick använda den<br />

andra typen av inlägget under fyra veckor (vecka 9-12) i en cross-over design.<br />

Slutligen fick de efter en tredje basperiod (B3) utan <strong>behandling</strong>, fritt<br />

välja det inlägg de tyckte var bäst eller välja att vara utan inlägg. Denna<br />

tredje, valfria <strong>behandling</strong>speriod var 12 veckor lång (figur 4). Efter ett år<br />

fick deltagarna svara på frågor om grad av smärtlindring under studiens<br />

26 veckor, typ av inlägg de använt <strong>och</strong> smärtlindringsgrad under året. Tre<br />

pojkar svarade inte (n=41).<br />

Figur 4: Design av jämförande studie mellan hälkopp <strong>och</strong> hälkil, delarbete III.<br />

En ordinal mixad regression, där den initiala smärtan modellerades med<br />

tid <strong>och</strong> <strong>behandling</strong> som förklarande variabler, utfördes. Effekten av varje<br />

förklarande variabel var en oddskvot (OR), som representerade den multiplicerade<br />

effekten av förändring i varje variabel. Självrapporterad smärta<br />

(Borgs CR-10, 0-10) kategoriserades till fem nivåer (0-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8<br />

<strong>och</strong> 9-10) <strong>och</strong> smärtnivån vid varje mättillfälle modellerades genom att<br />

använda initial smärta <strong>och</strong> <strong>behandling</strong> som fixed effekt, antal dagar sedan<br />

baslinje 1-3 som en fixed <strong>och</strong> random effekt <strong>och</strong> patient som en random<br />

intercept. Låga oddskvoter tranformerades till mindre smärta <strong>och</strong> höga<br />

oddskvoter till mer smärta.<br />

23


Som ett beskrivande komplement till regressionsanalyserna konstruerades<br />

ett diagram med smärta (median med kvartilsavstånd) för varje fas<br />

(figur 6). Smärtlindringen för hälkil <strong>och</strong> hälkopp jämfördes inkluderande<br />

båda de valda fysiska aktiviteterna.<br />

Figur 6: Separerade resultat, median <strong>och</strong> kvartilsavstånd, för grupperna som randomiserats till att använda<br />

hälkopp <strong>och</strong> hälkil i delarbete III. Figuren visar de tre baslinjefaserna före <strong>behandling</strong>, efter första randomiserade<br />

alternativet <strong>och</strong> efter det andra då inlägg byttes (cross-over). Grupp I (vita staplar) startade med hälkopp<br />

<strong>och</strong> bytte sen till hälkil. Grupp II (gråa staplar) startade med hälkil. Resultatet innefattar smärtskattningar<br />

från både den mest smärtande aktiviteten, A, <strong>och</strong> den näst mest smärtande aktiviteten, B.<br />

Hård hälkopp är bättre än kilklack<br />

Utvärdering visade att de som använde hälkopp upplevde signifikant mindre<br />

smärta än de som använde kil. Detta visades också i att 77 procent av<br />

ungdomarna valde att fortsätta med hälkoppen. Ingen valde, vid det fria<br />

valet, att avstå från <strong>behandling</strong>.<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete IV<br />

Syftet med delarbete IV var att studera två tänkbara orsaker till varför<br />

hälkoppen ger så bra smärtlindring omedelbart när ungdomarna börjar<br />

använda den 14 . Vi ville studera om hälkudden ökade i tjocklek när man använde<br />

hälkoppen, vilket borde reducera de direkta tryckkrafterna på hälbenet<br />

vid belastning med kroppsvikten. Dessutom ville vi mäta fördelningen<br />

av tryckkrafterna under foten vid löpning. Bland 30 ungdomar med <strong>Severs</strong><br />

24


<strong>skada</strong> randomiserades 15 till <strong>behandling</strong> med hälkopp <strong>och</strong> 15 fick ingen<br />

<strong>behandling</strong>. Ytterligare 15 ungdomar utan hälsmärta var kontrollgrupp.<br />

Hälkuddens tjocklek mättes på en röntgenbild (sidobild tagen stående<br />

på ett ben, hälstående, på den mest smärtande hälen på de med hälsmärta<br />

(n=30) <strong>och</strong> på samma häl för de matchade kontrollerna de utan hälsmärta<br />

(n=15)). Tre bilder togs; barfota (alla 45 ungdomar), med idrottssko (alla<br />

45 ungdomar)<strong>och</strong> med hälkopp i idrottssko (enbart <strong>behandling</strong>sgruppen,<br />

n=30).<br />

Med mätutrustning (F-Scan från Tek scan) för tryckmätning kunde av<br />

ekonomiska skäl endast 10 ungdomars belastningsmönster under foten<br />

analyseras. Dessa 10 valdes ur <strong>behandling</strong>sgruppen. En tryckkänslig film<br />

registrerade trycket inom varje kvadratcentimeter under hela foten. Tre<br />

mätningar gjorde under hälstående. Dessutom mättes belastningsmönstret<br />

under foten under nio löpsteg med löphastighet 100 (metronom). Dessa<br />

mätningar gjordes både med enbart idrottssko <strong>och</strong> med hälkopp i idrottsskon.<br />

Maximal belastning noterades under häl, framtrampet <strong>och</strong> under<br />

stortån.<br />

De röntgenologiska mätningarna, tjocklek i millimeter (medelvärde),<br />

konfidensintervall <strong>och</strong> p-värden, analyserades med Students t-test. En linjär<br />

mixad regressionsmodell användes för att analysera toppbelastning som<br />

utfallsvariabel, där varje barn användes som random effekt <strong>och</strong> löpning 1,<br />

2, 3 <strong>och</strong> hälkopp eller ej som fixed effekt. I båda fallen användes de logaritmerade<br />

värdena av toppbelastning.<br />

Hälkoppen ger tjockare hälkudde <strong>och</strong> lägre maximal tryck under foten<br />

I stående skiljde inte hälkuddens tjocklek mellan symtomatiska ungdomar<br />

<strong>och</strong> de i den symtomfria kontrollgruppen. Hälkuddens tjocklek ligger i<br />

denna grupp ungdomar mellan cirka 6,5 <strong>och</strong> 8 millimeter. Med enbart<br />

idrottssko på foten ökade hälkuddens tjocklek med drygt 2 millimeter,<br />

vilket kan förklara att många ungdomar upplever mindre besvär när de<br />

använder bra skor. Med hälkopp i idrottsskon ökade hälkuddens tjocklek<br />

ytterligare drygt 1,5 millimeter vilket kan förklara varför ungdomarna<br />

upplever ännu mindre smärta när de också har hälkoppen på plats (Tabell<br />

3).<br />

Tabell 3: Hälkuddens tjocklek vid stående på ett ben, hälstående, delarbete IV.<br />

25


Dataanalys visade att maximal tryckbelastning under hälstående minskade<br />

med 25% när hälkopp användes, jämfört med tryckvärdet när enbart<br />

idrottssko användes. Under löpning minskade maximal belastning med<br />

21% om hälkopp användes. Även denna signifikanta minskning av det<br />

maximala trycket kan förklara den minskning av belastningssmärta som<br />

ungdomarna noterar när de använder hälkoppen.<br />

Metod <strong>och</strong> resultat delarbete V<br />

Syftet med delarbete V var att, med magnetkamera (MR), undersöka hälarna<br />

på ungdomar med <strong>och</strong> utan hälsmärta <strong>och</strong> även undersöka de med<br />

hälsmärta efter att de behandlats med hälkopp. Samma 45 ungdomar<br />

som i studie I <strong>och</strong> IV, där trettio av dem hade hälsmärta, ingick i studien.<br />

Femton av de 30 med besvär hade fått <strong>behandling</strong> med hälkopp <strong>och</strong> 15<br />

hade varit utan <strong>behandling</strong>. Alla genomgick undersökning med MR både<br />

före <strong>behandling</strong>sstart <strong>och</strong> en månad senare. Även kontrollgruppen (n=15)<br />

genomgick MR.<br />

Icke parametriska metoder, Wilcoxons rank sum test <strong>och</strong> Kruskal-Wallis<br />

test användes för att jämföra MR fynden mellan patienter <strong>och</strong> kontroller<br />

<strong>och</strong> före <strong>och</strong> efter <strong>behandling</strong> med hälkopp.<br />

Magnetkameraundersökning (MR) påvisar tecken på skaderelaterad skelettpåverkan<br />

Preliminära data, från denna ännu ej publicerad studie, visar att alla<br />

ungdomar, alltså även symtomfria, hade viss grad av ödem i hälbenet. Dock<br />

har de med <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> signifikant mer ödem. Detta ödem reduceras signifikant<br />

efter en månads <strong>behandling</strong> (figur 7) då också belastningssmärtan<br />

minskat påtagligt.<br />

Figur 7: Magnetkamerabilder, delarbete V.<br />

26


Slutsats<br />

Diagnosen <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> kan fastställas vid ett vanligt besök hos läkare eller<br />

sjukgymnast där belastningssmärta strikt lokaliserad till hälen, tydlig smärta<br />

vid hälstående, smärta vid sidokompression av hälen <strong>och</strong> vanligen också<br />

tryckömhet över tuber (mitt bak på hälknölen) är typiska fynd. Dessa tre<br />

test kan mycket väl skilja sjuka från friska ungdomar när det gäller <strong>Severs</strong><br />

<strong>skada</strong>. Trots skillnader i graden av fragmentering av hälbenet är det inte<br />

särskilt meningsfullt att använda vanlig röntgen för att säkerställa diagnosen<br />

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong>.<br />

Inläggs<strong>behandling</strong>, hälkil eller hälkopp, reducerar hälsmärta påtagligt<br />

så att en hög fysisk aktivitetsnivå kan bibehållas. Behandling med styv hälkopp,<br />

som formas direkt på hälen, ger snabb symtomlindring <strong>och</strong> bättre<br />

smärtlindring för de flesta jämfört med hälkil.<br />

Hälkoppen ökar hälkuddens tjocklek <strong>och</strong> minskar det maximala trycket<br />

på hälen. Besvären försvinner alltid när hälbenets tillväxt avstannar, men<br />

med <strong>behandling</strong> med hälkopp minskar eller försvinner besvären mycket<br />

snabbare utan att begränsa barnens fysiska aktivitet.<br />

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> kan mycket väl vara en ren belastningsutlöst <strong>skada</strong> på hälbenet<br />

hos växande ungdomar som idrottar. Magnetkameraundersökning<br />

visar ett klart ökat ödem i hälbenet <strong>och</strong> detta ödem minskar under <strong>behandling</strong>,<br />

parallellt med att smärtan minskar.<br />

27


Tack<br />

Tack för finansiellt stöd till:<br />

Landstinget i Värmland; Primärvårdens FoU-enhet, Division hälsa, habilitering<br />

<strong>och</strong> rehabilitering, Centrum för klinisk forskning <strong>och</strong> Fonden för<br />

ortopedtekniska hjälpmedel. Tack också till Karlstad universitet, Örebro<br />

universitet <strong>och</strong> Centrum för idrottsforskning.<br />

28


Stefan Perhamres egna tack i<br />

hans planerade avhandling<br />

I would like to express my sincere and warm gratitude to:<br />

Rolf Norlin, my tutor and co-author who accepted me as a doctoral student<br />

when he started as professor at Örebro University. Thank you for<br />

guiding me through the project with lots of wisdom, support and patience.<br />

Maria Klässbo, my co-tutor and co-author who alone had to carry the<br />

burden guiding a scientific blueberry in the beginning of my scientific<br />

journey. Your work capacity, patience and accuracy will take you far.<br />

Staffan Janson, my co-author in the first paper, professor in two disciplines,<br />

and the visionary humanist who started up the local scientific and progressive<br />

group in Värmland County Council, where I later was included.<br />

You showed me the way.<br />

Fredrik Lundin, the appreciated statistician and co-author, who has been<br />

the guarantee for correct data analyses.<br />

Ingemar Hansson, who has produced all the heel cups in the studies. We<br />

have had a close relationship through all these years. Your loyalty has been<br />

unbeatable.<br />

Christer Carlmark, art responsible at the Centre for Public Health Research,<br />

Värmland County Council and Klara Perhamre, my daughter, for<br />

help with the lay-out of some figures.<br />

Ola Wessmark, the former chief doctor at our clinic, who was an intelligent<br />

clinical model for me during our first years together at the clinic. You<br />

made the first moulded Orfit heel cup. Without this prototype there would<br />

have been no scientific work by me on this item.<br />

Dagmara Makowska (Lazowska) and Sofia Papageorgiou, radiologists<br />

at the Central Hospital Karlstad, who did a professional job examining the<br />

radiograph pictures in Paper IV.<br />

29


Lars Hynsjö, M. Sc at the department of Chemistry, Sahlgrenska University<br />

Hospital for his stimulating input with multi-variat analyses of the<br />

topics.<br />

Freddy Gustavsen, former chief of the company Adapt AB, who has been<br />

an important enthusiast and discussion partner. Your great network and<br />

generosity has been much worth.<br />

Carola Dimitrov¸ product manager CA Mätsystem AB for initiated support<br />

in the peak pressure measurements and analyses.<br />

Mikael Hasselgren, medical chief of the Centre for Clinical Science, for<br />

his faith in this project and decisions of financial support from Värmland<br />

County Council.<br />

Eva Stjernström, divisional chief of the Värmland County Council for<br />

her faith in this project and financial support despite a difficult economic<br />

situation in the Division of Health, Habilitation and Rehabilitation,<br />

Värmland County Council .<br />

Göran Ejlertsson, professor in Public Human Science, who helped me in<br />

my academic statistical studies.<br />

Ulf Tidefelt and Gunilla Ahlsén, prefect and study headmistress of Örebro<br />

University, for solid support all the way through.<br />

Kerstin Granström and Margaretha Warnqvist, two excellent secretaries<br />

at the Sports Clinic and the Scientific Unit for friendship, help and support.<br />

We have been “tight-knit families” at work.<br />

Gordon Riemersma, GP in Karlstad and the examiner of our English.<br />

Håkan Alfredson, professor in Sports Medicine Umeå University for a<br />

solid friendship and active support in this project.<br />

Peter Nilsson, chief of the Orthopaedic device Company in association<br />

with Värmland County Council for your interest in developing science in<br />

this field.<br />

30


Lars Magnus Engström, former professor Dep. of Social and Cultural<br />

Studies in Education, Stockholm Institute of Education for support with<br />

the questionnaires.<br />

Volunteers and patients who participated in this study.<br />

My family, Anneli, Klara, Axel and Maja, for everything.<br />

31


Referenser<br />

1 Wessmark O. Apofysitis calcanei, Haglund-<strong>Severs</strong> sjukdom. Idrottsme-<br />

dicin 1987;3:10<br />

2 Haglund P. Archiv für klinische Chirurgie 1907;82:922-30<br />

3 Sever JW. Apophysitis of the os calcis. New York Medical Journal<br />

1912;95:1025-9<br />

4 Ogden JA, Ganey TM, Hill JD, Jaakkola JI. Sever’s injury: A stress fracture<br />

of the immature calcaneal metaphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2004;24:488<strong>–</strong>92<br />

5 McGrath P, Finley GA. Measurement of Pain in Infants and Children.<br />

Seattle: IASP Press 1998: 210<br />

6 McGrath P, Finley GA. Chronic and Recurrent Pain in Children and<br />

Adolescents. Seattle: IASP Press 1999: 288<br />

7 O´Rourke D. The measurement of pain in infants, children, and adolescents:<br />

From policy to practice. Phys Ther. 2004:84:560-70<br />

8 Neely G, Ljunggren G, Sylén C, Borg G. Comparison between the<br />

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) for<br />

evaluation of leg exertion. Int J Sports Med 1992;13:133-6<br />

9 Engström LM. Barns <strong>och</strong> ungdomars idrottsvanor i förändring. Svensk<br />

Idrottsforskning 2004;4:1-6<br />

10 Perhamre S, Lazowska D, Papageorgiou S, Lundin F, Klässbo M, Norlin<br />

R. Sever’s injury; a clinical diagnosis. Accepted J Am Podiatr Med Assoc<br />

11 Perhamre S, Janson S, Norlin R, Klässbo M. Sever's injury: treatment<br />

with insoles provides effective pain relief. Scand J Med Sci Sports<br />

2011;21(6):819-23<br />

12 Perhamre S, Lundin F, Norlin R, Klässbo M. Sever's injury; treat it with a<br />

heel cup: a randomized, crossover study with two insole alternatives. Scand<br />

J Med Sci Sports 2011;21(6):e42-7<br />

13 Perhamre S, Lundin F, Klässbo M, Norlin R. A heel cup improves the<br />

function of the heel pad in Sever's injury: effects on heel pad thickness,<br />

peak pressure and pain. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2012;22(4):516-22<br />

14 Norlin R, Perhamre S, Lazowska D, Papageorgiou S, Klässbo M, Lundin<br />

A. MRI-findings in Sever’s injury are reduced during treatment: A randomised<br />

case-control study. Submitted<br />

32


Bilagor<br />

Att göra en hälkopp <strong>–</strong><br />

Bilaga 1<br />

bästa <strong>behandling</strong>en vid <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> (apofysit i calcaneus).<br />

Plastmaterialet ORFIT Classic Soft 3,2 mm tjock (ej perforerat) används. En skiva (60 x 90<br />

cm) brukar räcka till 10 inlägg <strong>och</strong> köps i Sverige via Össur (art.nr. 671 48 88).<br />

Barnet får ställa foten på plattan <strong>och</strong> lämpligt område ritas ut. Därefter klipps detta ut. Plattan<br />

läggs i varmt vattenbad (45 grader) under 1 minut (t.ex. Hydrokollator, Össur), varefter den<br />

direkt läggs på den obelastade foten. Plasten formas manuellt med särskild tillklämning kring<br />

hälen för att hålla hälkudden på plats. När plasten är modellerad fixeras den med elastisk linda<br />

mot foten <strong>och</strong> barnet får sitta stilla med obelastad fot i 6 minuter. Därefter klipps inlägget till<br />

så att det passar foten.<br />

Efter detta är inlägget färdigt att användas. Barnet får gå med inlägget för att kontrollera att<br />

det inte skaver. Inlägg görs alltid till båda fötter, även vid ensidiga besvär.<br />

Total tillverkningstid cirka 30 min/par.<br />

Särskilda synpunkter:<br />

Undvik det perforerade materialet eftersom dessa ofta spricker.<br />

För tunga personer kan detta material vara för tunt <strong>och</strong> spricka.<br />

Inlägget kan även användas vid hälsporre.<br />

Ingemar Hansson lär gärna ut hur detta går till i praktiken.<br />

Hans kontaktuppgifter är:<br />

Idrottshalsan.karlstad@liv.se<br />

070-340 94 07<br />

Ingemar Hansson/Rolf Norlin<br />

28<br />

33


Bilaga 2<br />

34<br />

Namn: Testnummer: v 1<br />

Dessa frågor skall du besvara för de aktiviteter du valt varje vecka under hela undersökningen. Du tar med det<br />

ifyllda protokollet när du kommer till Idrottshälsan <strong>och</strong> behåller det sedan för nästa period. Två siffror för smärta<br />

<strong>och</strong> två siffror för hur foten fungerar skall fyllas i varje vecka. ( Fyll i dina två valda aktiviteter på de streckade<br />

raderna).<br />

Hur ont gör det?<br />

För att kunna beskriva smärtan för aktivitet 1 För att kunna beskriva smärtan för aktivitet 2<br />

......................................................skall du ......................................................skall du<br />

ange en siffra från 0 till 10 eller om det är ange en siffra från 0 till 10 eller om det är<br />

maximalt anges det med ett +. Ringa in en maximalt anges det med ett +. Ringa in en<br />

siffra som passar bäst för aktiviteten denna vecka. siffra som passar bäst för aktiviteten denna<br />

vecka.<br />

0 Ingen alls 0 Ingen alls<br />

0.5 Extremt svag (knappt kännbar) 0.5 Extremt svag (knappt kännbar)<br />

1 Mycket svag 1 Mycket svag<br />

2 Svag (lätt) 2 Svag (lätt)<br />

3 Måttlig 3 Måttlig<br />

4 4<br />

5 Stark (kraftig) 5 Stark (kraftig)<br />

6 6<br />

7 Mycket stark 7 Mycket stark<br />

8 8<br />

9 9<br />

10 Extremt stark ( nästan maximal) 10 Extremt stark ( nästan maximal)<br />

+ Maximal + Maximal<br />

Hur stora problem har du?<br />

Om foten / fötterna fungerar utan problem Om foten / fötterna fungerar utan problem<br />

betyder det 100 poäng. Hur många poäng betyder det 100 poäng. Hur många poäng<br />

får din fot / dina fötter på en skala från får din fot / dina fötter på en skala från<br />

0 till 100 för aktivitet 1............................... 0 till 100 för aktivitet 2...............................<br />

denna vecka ? denna vecka ?<br />

...................................poäng ...................................poäng<br />

29


Namn: Testnummer:<br />

Hur fysiskt aktiv är du? (v 0 )<br />

Bilaga 3<br />

Vilken person stämmer bäst in på dig?<br />

Person A: Rör sig ganska lite.<br />

Person B: Rör sig en hel del men aldrig så att han/hon blir andfådd <strong>och</strong><br />

svettig.<br />

Person C: Rör sig en hel del <strong>och</strong> blir svettig <strong>och</strong> andfådd någon gång ibland.<br />

Person D: Rör sig så att han/hon blir svettig <strong>och</strong> andfådd flera gånger i<br />

veckan.<br />

Person E: Rör sig så att han/hon blir svettig <strong>och</strong> andfådd varje dag eller<br />

nästan varje dag.<br />

Hur länge har besvären funnits?<br />

Hur lång tid har du haft ont i hälen/hälarna i sådan omfattning att det begränsat<br />

dig fysiskt?<br />

I ...................veckor<br />

30<br />

35


Bilaga 4<br />

Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011: 21: 819<strong>–</strong>823<br />

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01051.x<br />

Sever’s injury: treatment with insoles provides effective pain relief<br />

S. Perhamre 1 , S. Janson 2,3 , R. Norlin 4 , M. Kla¨ ssbo 5<br />

1 Centre of Sports Medicine in Va¨rmland, Va¨rmland County Council, Karlstad, Sweden, 2 Department of Paediatrics, Va¨rmland<br />

County Council, Karlstad, Sweden, 3 Department of Public Health, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden, 4 Department of<br />

Orthopaedics, University Hospital, O¨rebro University, O¨rebro, Sweden, 5 Centre for Clinical Research, Va¨rmland County Council,<br />

Karlstad, Sweden<br />

Corresponding author: Stefan Perhamre, Idrottsha¨lsan i Va¨rmland, Kolvgatan 1 B, S-653 41 Karlstad, Sweden. Tel: 146 54 15 34 12,<br />

Fax: 146 54 15 58 98, E-mail: stefan.perhamre@liv.se<br />

Accepted for publication 7 October 2009<br />

Sever’s injury (apophysitis calcanei) is considered to be the<br />

dominant cause of heel pain among children between 8 and<br />

15 years. The traditional advice is to reduce and modify the<br />

level of physical activity. Recommended treatment in general<br />

is the same as for adults with Achilles tendon pain. The<br />

purpose of the study was to find out if insoles, of two<br />

different types, were effective in relieving heel pain in a<br />

group of boys (n 5 38) attending a Sports Medicine Clinic<br />

for heel pain diagnosed as Sever’s injury. The type of insole<br />

was randomized, and self-assessed pain during physical<br />

activity in the treatment phase with insoles was compared<br />

Sever’s injury (apophysitis calcanei, Sever’s disease)<br />

is considered to be the dominant cause of heel pain<br />

among growing children between 8 and 15 years of<br />

age, but epidemiologic data on its incidence are still<br />

lacking (McKenzie et al., 1981; Orava & Virtanen,<br />

1982; Staheli, 1998; Ogden et al., 2004; Hendrix,<br />

2005). The complaint is benign, and disappears without<br />

exception after puberty when the apophyseal<br />

growth plate is closed. The natural course is poorly<br />

studied, but the condition appears to settle within 6<strong>–</strong><br />

12 months. Occasionally, symptoms will persist for 2<br />

years (Cyriax, 1982; Brukner & Khan, 2007).<br />

The condition includes a spectrum of pain from<br />

recurrent light pain to strong pain. Boys constitute<br />

two-thirds of the patients, probably due to different<br />

physical activity preferences compared with girls of<br />

the same age (Lutter, 1992). The physical activity<br />

that appears to produce the highest levels of pain<br />

includes frequent running and jumping, and the sport<br />

that tends to dominate is soccer (Micheli et al., 1987;<br />

Madden & Mellion, 1996). Winter sports are only<br />

represented in low frequencies (Orava & Virtanen,<br />

1982; Micheli et al., 1987). The average age at onset is<br />

11<strong>–</strong>12 years (Micheli et al., 1987; Lutter, 1992).<br />

Modern literature describes Sever’s injury in terms<br />

of mechanical overuse with repetitive microtrauma<br />

36<br />

& 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S<br />

with pain in the corresponding pre- and post-treatment<br />

phases without insoles. There were no other treatments<br />

added and the recommendations were to stay on the same<br />

activity level. All patients maintained their high level of<br />

physical activity throughout the study period. Significant<br />

pain reduction during physical activity when using insoles<br />

was found. Application of two different types of insoles<br />

without any immobilization, other treatment, or modification<br />

of sport activities results in significant pain relief in boys<br />

with Sever’s injury.<br />

to the calcaneal apophysis and its growth plate. Some<br />

authors relate the injury to forces from the Achilles<br />

tendon and the calf muscle complex, causing shear<br />

stress that compromises the apophysis (Adams &<br />

Hamblen, 1990; Volpon & de Carvalho Filho, 2002;<br />

Hendrix, 2005). Others suggest the repetitive impact<br />

force at heel strike as an alternative or complementary<br />

explanation (McKenzie et al., 1981; Orava &<br />

Virtanen, 1982; Ogden et al., 2004).<br />

The clinical findings are tenderness over the calcaneal<br />

tubercle and a positive calcaneus compression test<br />

(Micheli et al., 1987; Adams & Hamblen, 1990; Madden<br />

& Mellion, 1996; Kasser, 2006). In 40% of the<br />

cases, only one heel is affected (Micheli et al., 1987).<br />

The traditional advice is to diminish or eliminate<br />

provoking activities for a period of time. This is<br />

similar to the recommendations for treating Mb<br />

Osgood Schlatter (Hendrix, 2005). In addition, patients<br />

are recommended treatment similar to that<br />

for adults with Achilles tendon pain, most frequently<br />

including stretching, strengthening exercises for<br />

calf and extensor muscles and also NSAID treatment<br />

(Micheli et al., 1987; Lutter, 1992; Ishikawa,<br />

2005; Kasser, 2006). The importance of correcting<br />

malalignment, dominated by pronation, is stressed<br />

by some authors (Szames et al., 1990; Madden &<br />

819


Perhamre et al.<br />

Mellion, 1996). Insoles of a molded plastizote orthosis,<br />

a heel cup to align pronation, or a heel wedge to<br />

reduce shear stress to the apophysis, are included in<br />

most recommendations (Micheli et al., 1987; Lutter,<br />

1992; Peck, 1995; Staheli, 1998; Kasser, 2006). Nonweightbearing<br />

with the lower limb immobilized in a<br />

short leg cast or a removable ankle orthosis worn<br />

during daytime is sometimes recommended (Lutter,<br />

1992; Ogden et al., 2004; Kasser, 2006). All studies<br />

are, without exception, observational studies.<br />

The purpose of this study was to find out if insoles,<br />

of two different types, without any other treatments<br />

or recommendations were effective in relieving heel<br />

pain in a group of 35 boys, 9<strong>–</strong>15 years of age,<br />

attending a Sports Medicine Clinic.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The design in this experimental study was an intervention phase<br />

(4 weeks) with two randomized insoles, heel cup or heel wedge,<br />

and two non-treatment phases without insoles, one before and<br />

one after treatment, of 2 weeks, respectively (Fig. 1). Thirty-five<br />

boys were consecutively included with a median age of 12<br />

Intervention group, n=33<br />

Inclusion<br />

Nonintervention group, n=5<br />

Inclusion<br />

2 w<br />

4 w<br />

Heel cup<br />

Heel wedge<br />

2 w<br />

Randomisation End of<br />

study<br />

7-8 w<br />

Fig. 1. An experimental study in a group of boys with heel<br />

pain (n 5 33), with randomized types of insoles (heel wedge<br />

n 5 18, heel cup n 5 17). The cohort was followed for 2<br />

weeks in a pre-treatment phase, for 4 weeks in an intervention<br />

phase with insoles and for 2 weeks in a post-treatment<br />

phase, with no insoles. A separate consecutive series of<br />

patients in a ‘‘natural course group’’ was followed in 7<strong>–</strong>8<br />

weeks without insoles (n 5 5).<br />

820<br />

years (range 9<strong>–</strong>14 years). The patients were examined at the<br />

Sports Medicine Clinic for heel pain and were recruited during<br />

10 months. All the examinations were performed by the first<br />

author.<br />

Inclusion criteria were male gender, age 9<strong>–</strong>15 years, and a<br />

diagnosis of Sever’s injury. Findings confirming the diagnosis<br />

were tenderness over the calcaneal tuberosity and a positive<br />

compression test. Additional negative test results from the<br />

Achilles tendon and other parts of the hind foot were<br />

compulsory. Heel pain had to be present for more than 2<br />

weeks, but o26 weeks when examined. All participants were<br />

high-level athletes. Each patient had to specify two physical<br />

activities giving heel pain (here, named activity A and activity<br />

B), where the most painful activity was A. These two activities<br />

must be performed at least three times a week during the study<br />

period. Soccer was the dominating sports activity (n 5 28) in<br />

which the boys registered their pain, followed by running<br />

(n 5 22). In all cases where soccer was one of the choices, it<br />

was reported as the most painful activity. The median duration<br />

of pain on examination was 10 weeks (range 4<strong>–</strong>20 weeks).<br />

Eighteen of the boys were diagnosed with unilateral Sever’s<br />

injury, and 17 with bilateral. No previous treatment was given.<br />

Three boys fulfilling the inclusion criteria were not willing<br />

to participate in the study. Two boys dropped out of the study,<br />

one of them because he missed filling in the questionnaire, and<br />

the other because of a calf muscle strain (n 5 38).<br />

Borg’s CR-10 scale was used for measuring pain during<br />

activity A and B (Neely et al., 1992). Borg’s CR-10 scale is a<br />

self-assessment visual analog scale (VAS) with anchors of<br />

verbal explanations added to the numbers of the pain scale.<br />

Zero represents absence of pain and 10 represent maximal<br />

pain.<br />

Activity level was measured with Engstrom’s activity index<br />

(Engstrom, 2004) with five levels of activity, A<strong>–</strong>E. When<br />

included in the study, eight boys reported the second highest<br />

level D (strained to shortness of breath and sweating many<br />

times a week) and 27 boys reported the highest level of<br />

activity, E, (strained to shortness of breath and sweating every<br />

day or most days of the week) (Fig. 4).<br />

To study the natural course, we added a second inclusion<br />

period of 2 months with a consecutive series of patients with<br />

Sever’s injury, not using insoles, with the same inclusion and<br />

exclusion criteria (Fig. 1). The patients were examined at the<br />

Clinic, by the same person, in the same way as those in the<br />

cohort. Self-assessed pain recordings and activity levels were<br />

collected twice, at the start and at the end of the period. This<br />

group included five boys (median age 12 years, range 10<strong>–</strong>13<br />

years). One boy fulfilling the inclusion criteria was not willing<br />

to participate. Four of the boys were diagnosed with unilateral,<br />

and one with bilateral pain. The median time with<br />

symptoms was 14 weeks (range 6<strong>–</strong>26 weeks).<br />

In the experimental study, two alternative insoles, a heel<br />

wedge and heel cup, were used (Fig. 2). The heel wedge was a<br />

5-mm-cork wedge covered with a thin elastic surface. The<br />

purpose of the heel wedge was to lift the heel in the loading<br />

phase and thereby limit the shear stresses of the apophysis.<br />

The heel cup was a rigid plastic cup applied directly on the<br />

bare heel, with a moulded long arch support. It encloses the<br />

heel with a 2<strong>–</strong>3 cm brim. The purpose of the heel cup was to fix<br />

the heel pad directly below the calcaneal tuberosity during heel<br />

strike. Bilateral insoles were always used.<br />

After inclusion in the study, the boys were randomized by<br />

picking one ticket from a concealed box. Randomization<br />

resulted in a heel wedge group (n 5 18) and a heel cup group<br />

(n 5 17). During 2 weeks of pre-treatment, the pain questionnaire<br />

for pain related to the chosen sport activity was filled in<br />

six times for the two chosen activities A and B. No insoles<br />

were used. In the treatment phase of 4 weeks, when the insoles<br />

37


Fig. 2. The heel cup, the foot (in the study always supported<br />

by a sports shoe) and the heel wedge.<br />

were used, the questionnaire was filled in eight times per<br />

person for each activity. A post-treatment phase of 2 weeks<br />

finally followed, without any insoles, when again the pain<br />

questionnaire for pain related to the chosen sport activity was<br />

filled in six times each for the two chosen activities A and B<br />

(Fig. 1). Activity levels were assessed at the start of the study<br />

and in the two phase shifts, three times in total (Fig. 4).<br />

Measurement for the non-treatment group (n 5 5) was<br />

activity level, median and range for the self-assessed pain at<br />

the start and end.<br />

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Board of<br />

Uppsala (dnr 2004 M-377).<br />

Statistics<br />

Median pain for each boy was calculated for each of the three<br />

phases, pre-treatment, treatment and post-treatment, separately<br />

for activities A and B, and termed the pain variable.<br />

Median pain for the whole study group (n 5 33) was thereafter<br />

calculated from these pain variables, for each phase and<br />

activity. Interquartile range (IQR) (i.e. the numerical difference<br />

between the 25th and 75th centiles) was also calculated.<br />

To analyze the change over time between the different<br />

phases, for activity A and activity B separately, Wilcoxon’s<br />

signed-rank test was used. The pain variables for the group for<br />

activity A and activity B in the pre-treatment phase were<br />

compared with the pain variables in the treatment phase. The<br />

pain variables in the treatment phase were also compared with<br />

the pain variables in the post-treatment phase, and finally the<br />

pain variables in the pre-treatment phase were compared with<br />

the variables in the post-treatment phase (Fig. 3).<br />

To correct for mass significance, Holm’s sequential Bonferroni’ssss<br />

test was used.<br />

Results<br />

There was a significant reduction in pain level during<br />

activity with insoles, when comparing pain levels in<br />

the pre-treatment and treatment phase, for both<br />

activities A and B (Po0.001) (Fig. 3). Median pain<br />

level in the pre-treatment phase was 4.5 in activity A<br />

(IQR 2.5) and 4.0 in activity B (IQR 2.5). During<br />

treatment, pain was reduced to 2.0 (IQR 3.50) in<br />

both activities A and B. After discontinuation of the<br />

38<br />

Median pain values (VAS)<br />

10.00<br />

9.00<br />

8.00<br />

7.00<br />

6.00<br />

5.00<br />

4.00<br />

3.00<br />

2.00<br />

1.00<br />

Sever’s injury: insole treatment<br />

p


Perhamre et al.<br />

Number of patients<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Activity level<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Pre-treatment Treatment<br />

Phase<br />

Fig. 4. Level of activity measured with Engstrom’s activity<br />

index (n 5 33) in the pre-treatment and treatment phase. One<br />

person changed from level D (strained to shortness of breath<br />

and sweating many times a week) to E (strained to shortness<br />

of breath and sweating every day or most days of the week)<br />

during treatment, and the others were on the same activity<br />

level in both phases.<br />

beneficial in the CNS forever (Hanrahan & Carlson,<br />

2006). This period is also crucial to build up the<br />

skeleton (Schwinghandl et al., 1999; Linde´n et al.,<br />

2006, 2007). Sport activities in general, before and<br />

during puberty, are also very important from mental<br />

aspects. The joy of being an athlete is of great value<br />

(Engstrom, 1999). To lose 1 year or more because of<br />

heel pain can be devastating for participation in<br />

sports later on.<br />

Ogden et al. (2004) challenges the view on this<br />

disease as a concept of apophysitis. Instead, he found<br />

a traumatic stress fracture of the immature calcaneal<br />

trabecular bone, visualized with MRI. Ogden therefore<br />

singled out the repeated and intense impact forces<br />

as being responsible for the damage of the trabecular<br />

bone. Our findings with excellent pain relief during the<br />

use of insoles support this concept. The wedge lifting<br />

the heel 5 mm probably reduces shear forces on the<br />

apophysis and the cup probably reduces heel strike<br />

impact forces on the calcaneus due to its effect of<br />

fixing the heel pad under the calcaneal tuberosity.<br />

The results in this study are valid for several<br />

reasons. It is a consecutive study, which includes<br />

more than 90% of all boys seeking help for Sever’s<br />

injury at our department during the study period.<br />

The study design focuses on a single treatment and<br />

uses an internal control with a pre- and post-treatment<br />

phase. None of the boys used any other type of<br />

treatment during the study period, neither drugs, nor<br />

physiotherapy, or other orthoses. Pain was possible<br />

to quantify from time to time during defined, often<br />

822<br />

performed activities, which excluded recall bias. The<br />

self-assessed questionnaire was filled in at home, with<br />

no influence from the investigators.<br />

There were two dropouts during the study period<br />

because of two specific reasons, with no relation to<br />

the study design. Because of this, we have analyzed<br />

those who completed the study, instead of using the<br />

intention-to-treat analysis.<br />

From pre-treatment to treatment phase, there was<br />

significant pain relief in both activities. After removing<br />

the insole, pain returned. This proves that pain<br />

reduction is an effect of the treatment and not due to<br />

spontaneous healing, as part of the natural course.<br />

The results in the non-treatment group also indicate<br />

this. The natural course in Sever’s injury, among<br />

physically active boys in general, lasts for longer than<br />

8 weeks (Cyriax, 1982; Brukner & Khan, 2007).<br />

Recurrence rate is estimated to be 20% (Kvist et<br />

al., 1984). Our non-treatment group is small and is<br />

not a strict control group because the boys were<br />

included separately during a stipulated period. On a<br />

group level, they had some characteristics that were<br />

different compared with the studied cohorts. The pain<br />

at start was worse than in the treatment group (VAS 7<br />

vs VAS 4<strong>–</strong>4.5), the duration of pain was longer (14 vs<br />

10 weeks) and there were unilateral symptoms in 4/5<br />

of the cases, compared with less than half in the<br />

cohort groups, where bilateral pain dominated.<br />

It might be considered a weakness that the study<br />

has no ‘‘proper’’ control group. From an ethical<br />

point of view, we found it questionable to leave a<br />

group without any treatment, as a third study group,<br />

and have them continue at the same high activity<br />

level, with considerable pain. It had also been more<br />

troublesome to recruit study patients with this design.<br />

Another weakness in the study is that we do not<br />

compare the benefit of the two insole alternatives.<br />

The number of patients was too small to obtain<br />

enough statistical power to answer this question.<br />

Treatments suggested previously in Sever’s injury<br />

often include a reduction of activity level and physiotherapy<br />

(Micheli et al., 1987; Lutter, 1992; Madden<br />

& Mellion, 1996; Ishikawa, 2005; Kasser, 2006).<br />

Limitation in activity is the dominating recommendation.<br />

However, the scientific support for these<br />

treatment regimens is lacking. Our study is designed<br />

as a single treatment study without any other therapies<br />

included. In literature, in general (except in those<br />

studies that treat patients with a cast for a stipulated<br />

time), there is a number of treatments offered as a<br />

mix. This study has therefore no opportunity to<br />

discuss whether, for instance, physical therapy provides<br />

additional benefit in Sever’s injury or not.<br />

The present study shows that two insoles provided<br />

significant pain relief in highly active boys with<br />

Sever’s injury. This treatment is effective without<br />

reducing their level of activity. Further studies are<br />

39


equired to determine the etiology of the pain and<br />

which insole is the better one.<br />

Perspectives<br />

Treating Sever’s injury with insoles makes it possible<br />

for the boys studied, 9<strong>–</strong>15 years old, to be active in<br />

sports at a high level, instead of being passive,<br />

waiting for the symptoms to fade away. Sever’s<br />

injury is common in this age, and for many reasons<br />

it is important to develop adequate treatments.<br />

References<br />

Adams JC, Hamblen DL. The leg, ankle<br />

and foot. Outline of orthopaedics, 11th<br />

edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone,<br />

1990, 433pp.<br />

Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports<br />

medicine, 3rd edn. North Ryde NWT:<br />

McGraw-Hill, 2007, xxxix, 737pp.<br />

Cyriax J. The foot. In: Cyriax J, ed.<br />

Textbook of orthopaedic medicine vol<br />

1, diagnosis of soft tissue lesions, 8th<br />

edn. London: Baillie´ re Tindall, 1982:<br />

435pp.<br />

Engstrom L-M. Sports as a social marker<br />

[in Swedish]. Stockholm: HLS, 1999,<br />

143pp.<br />

Engstrom L-M. School <strong>–</strong> sports <strong>–</strong> health:<br />

studies of the subject sports and health,<br />

and young people’s physical activity,<br />

physical capacity and health condition:<br />

basis, purposes and methods [in<br />

Swedish]. Stockholm:<br />

Idrottshogskolan, 2004.<br />

Falk B, Tenenbaum G. The effectiveness<br />

of resistance training in children. A<br />

meta-analysis. Sports Med 1996: 22:<br />

176<strong>–</strong>186.<br />

Hanrahan SJ, Carlson TB. Game skills: a<br />

fun approach to learning sport skills.<br />

Champaign 2006: 175.<br />

Hendrix CL. Calcaneal apophysitis (Sever<br />

disease). Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2005:<br />

22: 55<strong>–</strong>62.<br />

Ishikawa SN. Conditions of the calcaneus<br />

in skeletally immature patients. Foot<br />

Ankle Clin 2005: 10: 503<strong>–</strong>513.<br />

Kasser JR. The foot <strong>–</strong> acquired<br />

conditions. In: Weinstein SL, Lovell<br />

WW, Winter RB, Morrissy RT, eds.<br />

Lovell and winter’s pediatric<br />

orthopaedics 2, 6th edn. Philadelphia:<br />

40<br />

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:<br />

1257<strong>–</strong>1329.<br />

Kvist M, Kujala U, Heinonen O, Kolu T.<br />

Osgood Schlatter and Sever’s disease in<br />

young athletes. Duodecim. 1984: 100:<br />

142<strong>–</strong>150. [in Finnish].<br />

Linde´ n C, Ahlborg H, Besjakov J,<br />

Gardsell P, Karlsson M. A school<br />

curriculum-based exercise program<br />

increases bone mineral accrual and<br />

bone size in prepubertal girls: two-year<br />

prospective data from the Pediatric<br />

Osteoporosis Prevention (POP) study.<br />

J Bone Miner Res 2006: 21: 829<strong>–</strong>835.<br />

Linde´ n C, Alwis G, Ahlborg H, Gardsell<br />

P, Valdimarsson Ö, Stenevi-Lundgren<br />

S, Besjakov J, Karlsson M. Exercise,<br />

bone mass and bone size in prepubertal<br />

boys: one-year data from the pediatric<br />

osteoporosis prevention study. Scand J<br />

Med Sci Sports 2007: 17: 340<strong>–</strong>347.<br />

Lutter LD. Sports related injuries. In:<br />

Drennan JC, ed. The child’s foot and<br />

ankle. New York: Raven Press, 1992:<br />

407<strong>–</strong>416.<br />

Madden CC, Mellion MB. Sever’s disease<br />

and other causes of heel pain in<br />

adolescents. Am Fam Physician 1996:<br />

54: 1995<strong>–</strong>2000.<br />

McKenzie DC, Taunton JE, Clement DB,<br />

Smart GW, McNicol KL. Calcaneal<br />

epiphysitis in adolescent athletes. Can J<br />

Appl Sport Sci 1981: 6: 123<strong>–</strong>125.<br />

Micheli LJ, Ireland ML, Micheli LJ,<br />

Ireland ML. Prevention and<br />

management of calcaneal apophysitis<br />

in children: an overuse syndrome. J<br />

Pediatr Orthop 1987: 7: 34<strong>–</strong>38.<br />

Neely G, Ljunggren G, Sylén C, Borg G.<br />

Comparison between the Visual<br />

Sever’s injury: insole treatment<br />

Key words: calcaneus, sever’s injury, apophysitis calcanei,<br />

insoles, heel cup, heel wedge.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Thanks to Mikael Hasselgren Ph.D. from the Primary Care<br />

Research Unit and statistician Katarina Wiberg Hedman and<br />

Fredrik Lundin, Centre for Clinical Research, Va¨ rmland<br />

County Council, for support. Financial support was provided<br />

by the Primary Care Research Unit and by the foundation for<br />

Orthopaedic Devices, Va¨ rmland County Council.<br />

Analogue Scale (VAS) and the<br />

Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) for<br />

evaluation of leg exertion. Int J Sports<br />

Med 1992: 13: 133<strong>–</strong>136.<br />

Ogden JA, Ganey TM, Hill JD, Jaakkola<br />

JI. Sever’s injury: a stress fracture of<br />

the immature calcaneal metaphysis. J<br />

Pediatr Orthop 2004: 24: 488<strong>–</strong>492.<br />

Orava S, Virtanen K. Oste<strong>och</strong>ondroses in<br />

athletes. Br J Sports Med 1982: 16:<br />

161<strong>–</strong>168.<br />

Ozmun JC, Mikesky AE, Surburg PR.<br />

Neuromuscular adaptations following<br />

prepubescent strength training. Med<br />

Sci Sports Exerc 1994: 26: 510<strong>–</strong>514.<br />

Peck DM. Apophyseal injuries in the<br />

young athlete. Am Fam Physician<br />

1995: 51: 1891<strong>–</strong>1895.<br />

Schwinghandl JK, Sudi B, Eibl B,<br />

Wallner S, Borkenstein M. Effects of<br />

an individualised training program<br />

during weight reduction on body<br />

composition. A randomised trial. Arch<br />

Dis Child 1999: 81: 426<strong>–</strong>428.<br />

Staheli LT. Sports/foot and ankle.<br />

Fundamentals of pediatric orthopedics,<br />

2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-<br />

Raven, 1998: 111<strong>–</strong>128.<br />

Szames SE, Forman WM, Oster J, Eleff<br />

JC, Woodward P. Sever’s disease and<br />

its relationship to equinus: a statistical<br />

analysis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1990:<br />

7: 377<strong>–</strong>384.<br />

Volpon JB, de Carvalho Filho G.<br />

Calcaneal apophysitis: a quantitative<br />

radiographic evaluation of the<br />

secondary ossification center. Arch<br />

Orthop Trauma Surg 2002: 122: 338<strong>–</strong><br />

341.<br />

823


Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011: 21: e42<strong>–</strong>e47<br />

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01140.x<br />

Sever’s injury; treat it with a heel cup: a randomized, crossover study<br />

with two insole alternatives<br />

S. Perhamre 1{ , F. Lundin 2 , R. Norlin 3 , M. Kla¨ ssbo 2<br />

1 2 3<br />

Centre of Sports Medicine in Va¨rmland, Karlstad, Sweden, Centre for Clinical Research, Karlstad, Sweden, Department of<br />

Orthopaedics, University Hospital, O¨rebro University, O¨rebro, Sweden<br />

Corresponding author: Rolf Norlin MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, 70185 O¨rebro, Sweden.<br />

Tel: 146 19 60 25 366, Fax: 146 19 60 25 337 E-mail: rolf.norlin@orebroll.se<br />

{<br />

Deceased.<br />

Accepted for publication 24 March 2010<br />

Sever’s injury (apophysitis calcanei) is considered to be the<br />

dominant cause of heel pain among children. Common<br />

advice is to reduce physical activity. However, our previous<br />

study showed that application of insoles reduced pain in<br />

Sever’s injury without having to reduce physical activity.<br />

The purpose of this study was to test which of the two<br />

insoles, the heel wedge or the heel cup, provided best pain<br />

relief during sport activity in boys with Sever’s injury<br />

(n 5 51). There was a crossover design in the first rando-<br />

Sever’s injury (apophysitis calcanei, Sever’s disease)<br />

is considered to be the dominant cause of heel pain<br />

among growing children between 8 and 15 years of<br />

age (Staheli, 1998; Ogden et al., 2004; Hendrix,<br />

2005). The heel complaint is benign, but includes a<br />

wide spectrum of pain intensity, and duration. It<br />

disappears without exception after puberty (Cyriax,<br />

1982; Brukner & Khan, 2007).<br />

Boys constitute two-thirds of the patients, probably<br />

due to different physical activity preferences<br />

compared with girls at the same age (Lutter, 1992).<br />

The physical activity that produces the highest levels<br />

of pain includes frequent running and jumping, and<br />

the sport that tends to dominate is soccer (Madden &<br />

Mellion, 1996). Outdoor winter sports are represented<br />

at a low frequency (Orava & Virtanen, 1982;<br />

Micheli & Ireland, 1987). The average age at onset is<br />

11<strong>–</strong>12 years (Lutter, 1992). In 35<strong>–</strong>40% of the cases,<br />

only one heel is affected (Micheli & Ireland, 1987;<br />

Perhamre et al., 2009)<br />

Sever’s injury is in modern literature described as<br />

induced by mechanical overuse with repetitive microtrauma<br />

to the calcaneal apophysis and its growth<br />

plate <strong>–</strong> the physis. The injury is reported to be related<br />

to forces from the Achilles tendon and calf complex<br />

due to shear stresses that compromise the apophysis<br />

(Peck, 1995; Volpon & de Carvalho Filho, 2002).<br />

Some authors suggest the repetitive impact forces at<br />

e42<br />

Bilaga 5<br />

& 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S<br />

mized part of the study. In the second part, the boys, 9<strong>–</strong>14<br />

years, chose which insole they preferred. There was a<br />

reduction in odds score for pain to a fifth (a reduction of<br />

80%) for the cup compared with the wedge (Po0.001).<br />

When an active choice was made, the heel cup was preferred<br />

by 475% of the boys. All boys maintained their high level<br />

of physical activity throughout. At 1-year follow-up, 22 boys<br />

still used an insole and 19 of them reported its effect on pain<br />

as excellent or good (n 5 41).<br />

heel strike as an alternative or a complementary<br />

explanation (McKenzie et al., 1981; Orava & Virtanen,<br />

1982), including a microtraumatically induced<br />

calcaneal stress fracture of trabecular bone in refractory<br />

cases (Ogden et al., 2004).<br />

The clinical findings include tenderness over the<br />

lower part of the tubercle of calcanei and a positive<br />

calcaneal compression test, the squeeze test (Adams<br />

& Hamblen, 1990; Madden & Mellion, 1996; Kasser,<br />

2006).<br />

The traditional advice is to diminish or eliminate<br />

provoking activities for a prescribed period of time.<br />

This is similar to the recommendations for Mb<br />

Osgood Schlatter (Hendrix, 2005). The proposed<br />

treatment consists of a traditional concept for adults<br />

with Achilles tendon pain, most frequently including<br />

stretching, strengthening exercises for calf and extensor<br />

muscles, ice and NSAID treatment (Ishikawa,<br />

2005; Kasser, 2006). The importance of correcting<br />

malalignment, dominated by pronation, is stressed<br />

(Madden & Mellion, 1996) as well as the relation<br />

between pain and a tight heel cord (Szames et al.,<br />

1990). Insoles, either a molded plastizote orthosis to<br />

align pronation, or a heel wedge to directly reduce<br />

shear stresses to the apophysis, are the major insole<br />

proposals (Staheli, 1998; Kasser, 2006). Non-weightbearing<br />

with the lower limb immobilized in a short<br />

leg cast or a removable ankle orthosis worn during<br />

41


daytime is sometimes recommended (Ogden et al.,<br />

2004; Kasser, 2006). Our previous study showed that<br />

two specific types of insoles, with different approaches<br />

to microtraumatic stress, were effective in<br />

relieving pain among physically active boys (Perhamre<br />

et al., 2009). By lifting the heel 5 mm with<br />

the wedge, the tension forces are expected to be<br />

reduced in mid stance and in push off. The heel cup<br />

is thought to act as an internal tight box in the shoe,<br />

fixating the heel pad in order to reduce the direct<br />

impact force in heel strike.<br />

The purpose of this study was to test which of the<br />

two insoles, the heel wedge or the heel cup provided<br />

best pain relief in boys with Sever’s injury, without<br />

reducing their level of physical activity.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The study was a prospective crossover designed, with alternation<br />

between baseline phases and intervention phases with the<br />

two different insole alternatives (Fig. 1). The first randomized<br />

part of the study period included 12 weeks. In the second nonrandomized<br />

part of the study (14 weeks), each boy chose one<br />

treatment alternative (Fig. 2).<br />

Inclusion criteria were male between 9 and 15 years with a<br />

history of Sever’s injury, and heel pain present for 42 weeks,<br />

but o26 weeks when examined. Findings confirming the<br />

diagnosis were tenderness over the calcaneal tubercle, and a<br />

positive compression test (Kasser, 2006). Additional negative<br />

test results from the Achilles tendon were compulsory. The<br />

level of physical activity must be high, at least the second<br />

highest level of sport activity (D 5 strained to shortness of<br />

breath and sweating many times a week or E 5 strained to<br />

Fig. 1. The heel wedge used in the study, lifting the heel<br />

5 mm and the heel cup (of 3 mm. thickness) fixating the heel<br />

pad. The cup offers no wedge effect, due to equal lift of the<br />

rear and fore foot.<br />

42<br />

shortness of breath and sweating every day or most days of the<br />

week) according to Engstro¨ m’s activity index (Engstro¨ m,<br />

2004).<br />

Two alternative insoles, the heel wedge and the heel cup,<br />

were used (Fig. 1). Bilateral treatment was always performed.<br />

The heel wedge was a 5 mm cork wedge covered with a thin<br />

elastic surface. It lifted the heel 5 mm in mid stance and push<br />

off. The heel cup was a rigid thermoplastic cup (of 3 mm height<br />

but with no wedge effect) molded directly on the bare heel with<br />

a three-fourth length arch support. It enclosed the heel with a<br />

2<strong>–</strong>3 cm high brim in order to stop the heel pad from excessive<br />

deformation. The high brim made it different from earlier<br />

described molded heel insoles with their purpose to align the<br />

foot in running. There are some similar rigid alternatives, like<br />

the prefabricated Whitman<strong>–</strong>Roberts and the semi-molded<br />

Lange insoles in hard plaster.<br />

All boys were examined by the first author at the Sports<br />

Medicine Clinic for heel pain and recruited during February<strong>–</strong><br />

June during 3 following years, totally 15 months. A total of 51<br />

boys were invited of which four did not accept. During the<br />

study, three boys dropped out, one due to social complications,<br />

one due to difficulties filling in the questionnaire and one<br />

due to a calf muscle strain injury, leaving 44 boys. The<br />

analyses below were performed on data supplied by these 44<br />

boys who completed the study. Nineteen (43%) of the boys<br />

were diagnosed with unilateral Sever’s injury (10 right foot,<br />

nine left foot) and 25 with bilateral.<br />

After inclusion, the boys were randomized into two groups<br />

with tickets concealed in a box. No stratification was made.<br />

Thereafter, the pain questionnaire was filled in for the chosen<br />

activities during the baseline phase (weeks 1<strong>–</strong>2) preceding the<br />

interventions, including six registrations for each of the two<br />

activities. During the first intervention phase (weeks 3<strong>–</strong>6), the<br />

boys were using either heel cup (n 5 20, group I) or heel wedge<br />

(n 5 24, group II) including eight pain registrations for each of<br />

the two activities A and B. A second baseline phase (wash-out)<br />

followed (weeks 7<strong>–</strong>8) without any treatment. During the<br />

second intervention phase (weeks 9<strong>–</strong>12), there was a shift<br />

between insoles (crossover). In the second and final part of the<br />

study (after 12 weeks), the boys started with another baseline<br />

phase (wash-out) of 2 weeks without insoles followed by a last<br />

intervention period of 12 weeks. Here every boy, instead of<br />

being randomized, chose a treatment alternative with respect<br />

to his overall preferences, and was asked to focus on pain<br />

relief. He could also stay active without the insole. The<br />

intervention phases were concluded after 26 weeks (Fig. 2).<br />

There was a follow-up questionnaire added 1 year later<br />

concerning pain relief during the study period. The continuing<br />

need of insoles and pain relief with their used insoles the<br />

Following<br />

Randomisation Cross-over<br />

Choice<br />

choice:<br />

Group 1<br />

n=20<br />

Cup Cup<br />

19<br />

Cup<br />

n=34<br />

Group 2<br />

n=24<br />

Wedge Wedge Wedge<br />

5<br />

Time line: 0w 2w 6w 8w 12w 14w<br />

Period: B1 I1 B2 I2 B3<br />

Sever’s injury; treat it with heel cup<br />

Fig. 2. Study design with alternating periods of baseline ( 5 no treatment, B1, B2 and B3) and intervention phases<br />

( 5 treatment with insoles, I1, I2 and I3). The first part, including intervention phases (I1 and I2) were randomized with a<br />

crossover design, and the second part (I3) represented each boy’s personal choice (n 5 44).<br />

I3<br />

26w<br />

n=10<br />

e43


Perhamre et al.<br />

following year were also asked about. Three boys did not<br />

answer, leaving n 5 41.<br />

Pain was assessed with Borg’s CR-10 scale (Neely et al.,<br />

1992). It is a VAS scale with anchors of verbal explanations<br />

added to the numbers in the pain scale, and was used for<br />

measuring pain associated with the two sports activities<br />

chosen by each boy. Zero was absence of pain and 10 was<br />

maximal pain. These self-assessed pain recordings were<br />

made in direct relation to training and sport events, and<br />

were answered with no influence from the investigators.<br />

Activity level was measured with Engstro¨ m’s activity index<br />

(Engstro¨ m, 2004), which includes five levels of physical<br />

activity, A<strong>–</strong>E and assessed at start, at phase shifts and at the<br />

end of week 26.<br />

When soccer was one of the chosen activities (n 5 33), it was<br />

always chosen as the first activity A, producing the highest<br />

levels of heel pain. Running was the dominating activity<br />

chosen as activity B (n 5 29). A majority of the boys (n 5 26)<br />

had soccer as activity A, and running as activity B.<br />

The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Board<br />

of Uppsala, Sweden (dnr 2004 M-377).<br />

Neither the Public Sports Medicine Clinic nor the authors<br />

have any relation to, profit or other benefits from the<br />

companies that manufacture the products in this study.<br />

Table 1. Baseline characteristics for the primary heel wedge group and<br />

the primary heel cup group at study start<br />

Primary heel Primary heel<br />

wedge cohort cup cohort<br />

Patients, numbers 24 20<br />

Median age, years (range) 12 (10<strong>–</strong>14) 12 (9<strong>–</strong>14) P 5 0.844*<br />

Median pain level (IQR) 4 (2.75) 5 (3.75) P 5 0.149*<br />

Pain history, weeks (range) 8 (4<strong>–</strong>25) 12 (4<strong>–</strong>24) P 5 0.102*<br />

*P-values computed using the two-tailed asymptotic Mann<strong>–</strong>Whitney<br />

U-test.<br />

IQR, interquartile range.<br />

Table 2. The results of the first randomized 12 weeks of the study, using<br />

a mixed ordinal logistic regression model to accommodate the longitudinal<br />

design of the study (n 5 44)<br />

Variable Odds ratio P-value 95% confidence interval<br />

Activity A<br />

Time 0.93 0.001 [0.89, 0.97]<br />

Wedge 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong><br />

No treatment 2.32 o0.001 [1.69, 3.19]<br />

Cup 0.22 o0.001 [0.15, 0.34]<br />

Initial pain 1.75 o0.001 [1.37, 2.23]<br />

Activity B<br />

Time 0.93 0.002 [0.89, 0.97]<br />

Wedge 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong><br />

No treatment 2.29 o0.001 [1.67, 3.16]<br />

Cup 0.18 o0.001 [0.12, 0.27]<br />

Initial pain 1.81 o0.001 [1.51, 2.17]<br />

The wedge was chosen as base category (OR 1) for the treatment<br />

variable, because our primary target was the comparison between the<br />

wedge and the cup. The hypothesis was that the heel cup provided<br />

significant better pain relief than the heel wedge. This regression analysis<br />

included all measured data, and was corrected for time.<br />

e44<br />

Pain value (median), IQR<br />

10.00<br />

Borg CR-10<br />

7.50<br />

5.00<br />

2.50<br />

0.00<br />

Cup<br />

Wedge<br />

Wedge<br />

B1 I1 B2<br />

Phase<br />

I2 B3<br />

Fig. 3. Separated cup and wedge group showing median<br />

pain values and interquartile range (IQR) for the randomized<br />

first part of the study and the corresponding two<br />

baseline phases. Group I (white boxes) started with heel cup<br />

(with crossover to heel wedge in the second part 9 group II<br />

(gray boxes) started with heel wedge. The statistics includes<br />

both activity A and B.<br />

Statistics<br />

In an ordinal mixed regression, the estimated pain was<br />

modeled using initial pain, time and treatment as explanatory<br />

variables. The effect of each explanatory variable was an odds<br />

ratio (OR) representing the multiplicative effect of a change in<br />

this variable. We categorized the self-reported pain (VAS,<br />

score 0<strong>–</strong>10) into five levels (0<strong>–</strong>2, 3<strong>–</strong>4, 5<strong>–</strong>6, 7<strong>–</strong>8 and 9<strong>–</strong>10) and<br />

modeled the pain level at each occasion using initial pain and<br />

treatment as fixed effects, number of days since baseline 1<strong>–</strong>3 as<br />

a fixed and random effect and patient as a random intercept.<br />

Low odds scores translated into less pain and large odds into<br />

more pain.<br />

Modeling time since baseline 1<strong>–</strong>3 as both random and fixed<br />

effect takes into account a possible healing effect over time<br />

because this is a known property of the etiology of Sever’s<br />

injury. The regression analyses were based on baseline phase 1,<br />

intervention 1, baseline phase 2 and intervention 2 as these<br />

were the phases included in the randomized part of the study.<br />

The treatment variable had three levels where the wedge was<br />

chosen as the base category as our primary target was the<br />

comparison between the wedge and the cup. We analyzed the<br />

two activities A and B separately. All regression analyses were<br />

made using the statistical package gllamm (Rabe-Hesketh et<br />

al., 2002; Stata, 2007) with adaptive quadrature in STATA/IC<br />

10.0 (Stata Corp. LP, College Station, Texas, USA), (Table 2).<br />

As a descriptive supplement to these regression analyses, a<br />

diagram was added with pain medians and interquartile<br />

ranges (IQR) for each phase. The pain relief for the wedge<br />

and the cup was compared including both activities (Fig. 3).<br />

Results<br />

A total of 44 boys completed the study. There were<br />

no significant differences in age, median pain level<br />

Cup<br />

43


and pain history in weeks before the randomization<br />

between the two groups, starting with either heel<br />

wedges or heel cups (Table 1). All boys continued<br />

their high levels of physical activity during the study<br />

(Engstro¨ m’s activity index level E n 5 38, and D<br />

n 5 6).<br />

Pain was significantly lower in the heel cup group<br />

compared with the wedge group. For activity A and<br />

B, the effect of the cup was OR 5 0.22 (Po0.001<br />

[0.15, 0.34]) and OR 5 0.18 (Po0.001 [0.12, 0.27]),<br />

respectively, thus reducing the odds score for pain to<br />

a fifth compared with the wedge (ordinal data). There<br />

was also a significant effect of time for activity A<br />

OR 5 0.93 (P 5 0.001) and for activity B OR 5 0.93<br />

(P 5 0.002), which means that pain was reduced with<br />

time as an independent variable (Table 2). We did<br />

check duration of pain at baseline and age as<br />

explanatory variables, but none of them had any<br />

significant effect in the model.<br />

When able to freely choose in the final second part<br />

(intervention 3), 34 boys (77%) chose the heel cup<br />

and 10 (23%) chose the heel wedge (Fig. 2). No one<br />

preferred to stop using insoles.<br />

There was a continuous reduction of pain between<br />

the three intervention phases for both groups. After<br />

each intervention phase, the pain reoccurred in the<br />

next baseline phase (Fig. 3). During the prolonged<br />

phase with the free choice of insole (8 weeks compared<br />

with 4 weeks), the median pain was 0.5. After<br />

26 weeks when the study was concluded, the median<br />

value for pain was 0 (IQR 1).<br />

The 1-year follow-up questionnaire showed that<br />

pain relief during the study period was good or<br />

excellent in 40 answers (n 5 41) for the chosen insole,<br />

and in 14 (n 5 40) for the non-chosen alternative.<br />

During the following year, 14 were pain free throughout,<br />

12 still had pain when being active on their level<br />

and 14 had pain that disappeared in 3 months<br />

(median), where six boys had relapses thereafter<br />

(n 5 40). The number of boys that used insoles after<br />

1 year was 22. Nineteen of the boys assessed its effect<br />

on pain as excellent or good. Five boys found the<br />

insoles (all cups) inconvenient in the post-study<br />

phase.<br />

Discussion<br />

This study shows that treatment with heel cup was<br />

superior to treatment with heel wedge for relieving<br />

pain during sport activities in Sever’s injury without<br />

reducing physical activity, indicating that the reduction<br />

of repetitive impact forces in heel strike is the<br />

most important factor for pain relief.<br />

The result is valid for several reasons. Our randomized<br />

study was focused on a single treatment regime<br />

for heel pain: insole treatment (Figs 1 and 2). There<br />

44<br />

Sever’s injury; treat it with heel cup<br />

was no advertisement or active recruitment made and<br />

the boys were included in the same season during 3<br />

following years. There were two parallel groups with<br />

the same overall experiences during the randomized<br />

first half of the study with baseline phases and<br />

crossover treatment (Fig. 2). All pain recordings<br />

were self<strong>–</strong>assessed with no influence from the investigators.<br />

All boys continued being physically active at<br />

the same high level throughout the study period. The<br />

studied group appears to be typical for physically<br />

active boys, 9<strong>–</strong>15 years old, seeking Health Care for<br />

heel pain (Table 1). We put the upper inclusion limit<br />

in pain history before start to 26 weeks to avoid the<br />

most refractory cases, where 14% had a pain history<br />

between 4 and 6 months at start. No one had a pain<br />

history shorter than 4 weeks (mean 11 weeks). At the<br />

end of phase B2, 39 boys still had pain (n 5 44) (Fig.<br />

3). Less than 10% (n 5 3) of all the boys fulfilling the<br />

inclusion criteria at our clinic did not want to<br />

participate. Hence, missing cases were few and the<br />

reasons for dropping out were not related to the<br />

study design.<br />

We chose to include only boys with Sever’s injury,<br />

because boys totally have dominated in frequency,<br />

probably due to different gender preferences and<br />

training patterns (Lutter, 1992).<br />

Previous guidelines for treating Sever’s injury are<br />

built on principles for adults suffering from heel pain<br />

(Micheli & Ireland, 1987; Ishikawa, 2005; Kasser,<br />

2006). Scientific evidence for the effect of these<br />

treatment regimens are lacking. Insole treatment<br />

together with limitations in activity are the most<br />

frequent advice, and the wedge is the most frequent<br />

insole advice in the literature (Peck, 1995; Staheli,<br />

1998; Kasser, 2006). The approach is to limit the<br />

stress to the apophysis <strong>–</strong> Achilles tendon complex by<br />

placing the foot in slight equinus. It points out the<br />

apophysis and its growth plate, the physis, as the<br />

morphologic origin of pain. The second proposed<br />

alternative in the literature is to correct malalignment<br />

particularly pronation or flat-footed running, by a<br />

molded plastizote orthosis or a heel cup (Micheli &<br />

Ireland, 1987; Madden & Mellion, 1996).<br />

Ogden et al. (2004) questioned the concept of<br />

apophysitis. Instead, he found a traumatic stress<br />

fracture of the immature calcaneal trabecular bone,<br />

visualized with MRI. Ogden therefore singled out the<br />

repeated and intense impact forces as responsible for<br />

the damage of the trabecular bone close to the physis,<br />

the metaphysis and not to the apophysis. His arguments<br />

are supported by the fact that sports like ice<br />

hockey and cross country skiing, with very little<br />

impact forces compared with soccer and running,<br />

but with great shear stresses to the apophysis in pull<br />

off, are very uncommon as exacerbating sports for<br />

heel pain (Orava & Virtanen, 1982; Micheli & Ireland,<br />

1987). The thesis by Jo¨ rgensen (1989) (includ-<br />

e45


Perhamre et al.<br />

ing adults), found that a tight heel box in the sports<br />

shoe in order to minimize the deformation of the heel<br />

pad, gave less overuse injuries from foot, lower leg<br />

and knee compared with optimal external shockabsorbing<br />

material that was put under the heel<br />

without the box support. The rigid heel cup with its<br />

brim, produced unloaded, directly on the bare heel<br />

that was used in our study, appears to be optimal to<br />

minimize the deformation of the heel pad. This cup is<br />

different from the other insoles that are described as<br />

heel cups, where the ‘‘cups’’ are made like spoons<br />

without the brim, often in flexible material.<br />

The present study showed that the heel cup fixating<br />

the heel pad provided better pain relief in young boys<br />

with Sever’s injury compared with the traditional<br />

heel wedge. This indicates that the reduction of<br />

impact forces, rather than reduction of shear stresses,<br />

is crucial for optimal pain relief. We agree with the<br />

demand to change the terminology from Sever’s<br />

disease and apophysitis calcanei to Sever’s injury,<br />

as proposed by Ogden et al. (2004). This is supported<br />

by a histological analysis of the region that corroborates<br />

a primary compression, rather than a tension<br />

cytoarchitecture (Ogden, 2000). Cortical bone (80%<br />

of the total bone mass) is primarily found in the<br />

diaphyses of the long bones. Trabecular bone is<br />

mainly found in the metaphyseal regions, the vertebral<br />

bones and pelvic bones (Alfredson, 1997). In<br />

adulthood, 95% of calcaneus is built up with trabecular<br />

bone, the biggest part among all body bones<br />

(Apurva et al., 1997).<br />

There was an 80% reduction of the odds score for<br />

pain when using a heel cup compared with a wedge.<br />

The cup was also preferred by 475% in the second<br />

part of the study. It although appears obvious that<br />

both insoles offered pain relief, supported by the pain<br />

relapses when the insoles were removed in every<br />

following baseline phase for both activities (Table<br />

2, Fig. 3). After 26 weeks, when the intervention was<br />

concluded the pain level in general was very low<br />

(median 5 0), but at 1-year follow-up half of the boys<br />

still used insoles in their physical activities where half<br />

of the group used it for pain relief (n 5 12) and half of<br />

the group for prevention (n 5 10). The chosen insole<br />

still offered adequate pain relief, and appeared to<br />

protect the heel from repetitive traumatic stress, but<br />

did not in all cases appear to improve healing of the<br />

injury. The inconvenience with the cup (n 5 5) that<br />

first occurred after the study, can possibly be ex-<br />

References<br />

Adams JC, Hamblen DL, eds. The leg,<br />

ankle and foot. In: Outline of<br />

orthopaedics, 11th edn. Edinburgh:<br />

Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 359<strong>–</strong>402.<br />

e46<br />

Alfredson H. Exercise and bone<br />

in females and in athletes with<br />

chronic Achilles tendinosis. Umea˚ :<br />

Umea˚ University, 1997.<br />

plained by the fact that they can be grown out within<br />

a period of 18 months. The small group (n 5 10) who<br />

preferred the wedge had as good effect on pain with<br />

their choice, during the study period and at followup,<br />

as the cup group. A hypothesis is that there can<br />

be more than one morphologic origin in Sever’s<br />

injury.<br />

Another interesting finding was that 43% of the<br />

boys in the study had only unilateral pain, and were<br />

symptom free in the other foot. This big number of<br />

boys with unilateral pain is also earlier presented<br />

(Micheli & Ireland, 1987; Perhamre et al., 2009). This<br />

indicates that there may be internal unknown factors<br />

involved.<br />

Perspectives<br />

Heel pain is a common condition in an important<br />

period of development, between 8 and 15 years of<br />

age, and should be named Sever’s injury, not Sever’s<br />

disease. An individually made molded rigid heel cup<br />

with a fixating brim should primarily be offered in<br />

Sever’s injury, in order to protect the heel from a<br />

continuing overload with repetitive stress. If this does<br />

not work the next offer, with respect to the minor<br />

group in this study, can be a pair of 5 mm wedges.<br />

Sport activities in general, before and during puberty,<br />

are very important especially from physiological,<br />

neuromuscular and mental aspects. To lose a<br />

long period of time because of heel pain can be<br />

devastating for participation in sports later on, and<br />

is according to the results in this study, not necessary.<br />

Key words: calcaneus, Sever’s injury, apophysitis calcanei,<br />

insoles, heel cup, heel wedge.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Thanks to Ingemar Hansson, who made the insoles, Mikael<br />

Hasselgren PhD medical chief Centre for Clinical Science, Eva<br />

Stjernstro¨ m RPT, division chief Va¨ rmland County Council<br />

and Staffan Janson professor, Department of Paediatrics,<br />

University of O¨ rebro, and professor Department of Public<br />

Health, Karlstad University, for support. Financial support<br />

was provided by the Primary Care Research Unit, by the<br />

division Health, Habilitation and Rehabilitation and by the<br />

foundation for Orthopaedic Devices, Va¨ rmland County<br />

Council.<br />

Apurva S, Vliet E, Lewiecki M, Maricic M,<br />

Abdelmalek A, Gluck O, Baylink D.<br />

Bone density measurement <strong>–</strong> a systematic<br />

review. JIM 1997: 241: 12<strong>–</strong>22.<br />

45


Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports<br />

medicine, 3rd edn. North Ryde:<br />

McGraw-Hill, 2007, p. 737.<br />

Cyriax J. The foot. In: Cyriax J, ed.<br />

Textbook of orthopaedic medicine Vol<br />

1, Diagnosis of soft tissue lesions, 8th<br />

edn. London: Baillie´ re Tindall, 1982:<br />

435.<br />

Engstro¨ m L-M. School <strong>–</strong> sports <strong>–</strong> health:<br />

studies of the subject Sports and<br />

Health, and young people’s physical<br />

activity, physical capacity and health<br />

condition: basis, purposes and methods<br />

[in Swedish]. Stockholm:<br />

Idrottsho¨ gskolan, 2004: 142.<br />

Hendrix CL. Calcaneal apophysitis (Sever<br />

disease). Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2005:<br />

22: 55<strong>–</strong>62.<br />

Ishikawa SN. Conditions of the calcaneus<br />

in skeletally immature patients. Foot<br />

Ankle Clin 2005: 10: 503<strong>–</strong>513.<br />

Jo¨ rgensen U. Implication of heel strike:<br />

an anatomical, biomechanical,<br />

physiological and clinical study with<br />

focus on the heel pad. Link o¨ ping:<br />

Linko¨ ping University, 1989.<br />

Kasser JR. The Foot <strong>–</strong> Aquired<br />

conditions. In: Weinstein SL, Lovell<br />

WW, Winter RB, Morrissy RT, eds.<br />

Lovell and winter’s pediatric<br />

orthopaedics 2, 6th edn. Philadelphia:<br />

46<br />

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:<br />

1257<strong>–</strong>1329.<br />

Lutter LD. Sports related injuries. In:<br />

Drennan JC, ed. The child’s foot and<br />

ankle. New York: Raven Press, 1992:<br />

407<strong>–</strong>416.<br />

Madden CC, Mellion MB. Sever’s disease<br />

and other causes of heel pain in<br />

adolescents. Am Fam Physician 1996:<br />

54: 1995<strong>–</strong>2000.<br />

McKenzie DC, Taunton JE, Clement DB,<br />

Smart GW, McNicol KL. Calcaneal<br />

epiphysitis in adolescent athletes. Can<br />

J Appl Sport Sci 1981: 6: 123<strong>–</strong>125.<br />

Micheli LJ, Ireland ML. Prevention and<br />

management of calcaneal apophysitis<br />

in children: an overuse syndrome.<br />

J Pediatr Orthop 1987: 7: 34<strong>–</strong>38.<br />

Neely GL, Sylén G, Borg CG.<br />

Comparison between the Visual<br />

Analogue Scale (VAS) and the<br />

Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) for<br />

evaluation of leg exertion. Int J Sports<br />

Med 1992: 13: 133<strong>–</strong>136.<br />

Ogden JA. Foot. In: Ogden JA, ed.<br />

Skeletal injury in the child, 3rd edn.<br />

New York: Springer, 2000: 1091<strong>–</strong>1159.<br />

Ogden JA, Ganey TM, Hill JD, Jaakkola<br />

JI. Sever’s injury: a stress fracture of<br />

the immature calcaneal metaphysis.<br />

J Pediatr Orthop 2004: 24: 488<strong>–</strong>492.<br />

Sever’s injury; treat it with heel cup<br />

Orava S, Virtanen K. Oste<strong>och</strong>ondroses in<br />

athletes. Br J Sports Med 1982: 16:<br />

161<strong>–</strong>168.<br />

Peck DM. Apophyseal injuries in the<br />

young athlete. Am Fam Physician<br />

1995: 51: 1891<strong>–</strong>1895.<br />

Perhamre S, Janson S, Norlin R, Klässbo<br />

M. Sever’s injury: treatment with<br />

insoles provides effective pain relief.<br />

Scand J Med Sci Sports 2009, in press.<br />

Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A.<br />

Reliable estimation of generalized linear<br />

mixed models using adaptive quadrature.<br />

The Stata Journal 2002: 2: 1<strong>–</strong>21.<br />

Staheli LT, ed. Sports/Foot and ankle. In:<br />

Fundamentals of pediatric orthopedics,<br />

2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-<br />

Raven, 1998: 111<strong>–</strong>128.<br />

Stata P. STATA/IC release 10 user<br />

manual [XT] <strong>–</strong> longitudinal/panel data.<br />

College Station: Stata Press, 2007.<br />

Szames SE, Forman WM, Oster J, Eleff<br />

JC, Woodward P. Sever’s disease and<br />

its relationship to equinus: a statistical<br />

analysis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1990:<br />

7: 377<strong>–</strong>384.<br />

Volpon JB, de Carvalho Filho G. Calcaneal<br />

apophysitis: a quantitative radiographic<br />

evaluation of the secondary ossification<br />

center. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg<br />

2002: 122: 338<strong>–</strong>341.<br />

e47


Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011<br />

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01266.x<br />

A heel cup improves the function of the heel pad in Sever’s injury:<br />

effects on heel pad thickness, peak pressure and pain<br />

S. Perhamre 1 , F. Lundin 2 , M. Kla¨ ssbo 2 , R. Norlin 3<br />

1 2<br />

Centre of Sports Medicine in Va¨rmland, Va¨rmland County Council, Karlstad, Sweden, Centre for Clinical Research, Va¨rmland<br />

County Council, Karlstad, Sweden, 3 Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital, O¨rebro University, O¨rebro, Sweden<br />

Corresponding author: Rolf Norlin, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital, 70185 O¨rebro, Sweden. E-mail:<br />

rolf.norlin@orebroll.se<br />

Accepted for publication 9 November 2010<br />

Sever’s injury (apophysitis calcanei) is considered to be the<br />

dominant cause of heel pain among children between 8 and<br />

15 years. Treating Sever’s injury with insoles is often<br />

proposed as a part of a traditional mix of recommendations.<br />

Using a custom-molded rigid heel cup with a brim enclosing<br />

the heel pad resulted in effective pain relief without reducing<br />

the physical activity level in our previous two studies. The<br />

purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the heel<br />

cup on heel pad thickness and heel peak pressure (n 5 50).<br />

The difference in heel pad thickness and in heel peak<br />

Sever’s injury (apophysitis calcanei, Sever’s disease)<br />

is considered to be the dominant cause of heel pain<br />

among children between 8 and 15 years of age<br />

(Staheli, 1998; Ogden et al., 2004; Hendrix, 2005).<br />

The condition was described by Haglund 1907 and<br />

named by Sever (1912) as a disease, later described as<br />

an oste<strong>och</strong>ondrosis. Focus has thereafter been concentrated<br />

on the apophysis. The dominating theory<br />

at present suggests that the cause of heel pain in<br />

Sever’s injury is a mechanical overuse due to repetitive<br />

impact pressure and shear stresses, most noticeable<br />

in activities including much running and<br />

jumping (Micheli & Ireland, 1987; Madden & Mellion,<br />

1996). Ogden et al.(2004) therefore proposed a<br />

change in terminology from disease to injury.<br />

The heel pad with its sum of cooperating compartments<br />

provides cushioning, and thereby reduces the<br />

peak force at the instance of heel strike. Weight<br />

bearing activities strongly stimulate its development<br />

and function. The heel pad develops from birth to<br />

adulthood and is composed of defined fat vesicles<br />

rich in elastic fibers and encapsulated with a thick<br />

fibrous outer coat, with a capability to resist the<br />

compressive and shear forces of ambulation. A<br />

healthy heel pad is highly resilient, returning about<br />

70% of the energy used for deformation in its elastic<br />

recoil. Atrophy due to inactivity results in fragmen-<br />

Bilaga 6<br />

& 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S<br />

pressure using a sports shoe without and with a heel cup<br />

was compared. With the heel cup the heel pad thickness<br />

improved significantly and the heel peak pressure was<br />

significantly reduced. These effects correlated with a significant<br />

reduction in pain when using the heel cup in a sports<br />

shoe, compared with using a sports shoe without the heel<br />

cup. A heel cup, providing an effective heel pad support in the<br />

sports shoe, improved the heel pad thickness and reduced<br />

heel peak pressure in Sever’s injury with corresponding pain<br />

relief.<br />

tation of the elastic components, affecting the cellular<br />

biomechanics (Ogden, 2000). About 60% of the<br />

weight-bearing load is carried in the rear foot in<br />

static standing. This pressure is approximately 30%<br />

of the peak pressure produced in walking and 16% of<br />

that in running (Cavanagh et al., 1987; Donatelli,<br />

1990).<br />

Treating Sever’s injury with insoles is often a part<br />

of a traditional mix of recommendations. Different<br />

etiological theories result in two different main insole<br />

strategies. The dominating advice in literature is to<br />

choose a heel wedge, in order to unload the Achilles<br />

tendon and thereby reduce shear stresses to the<br />

apophysis/physis (Staheli, 1998; Brukner & Khan,<br />

2007). The importance of correcting malalignment,<br />

dominated by pronation, and a short heel cord, is<br />

stressed by other authors as the other main strategy<br />

(Szames et al., 1990; Madden & Mellion, 1996).<br />

In a recent study by our group we compared<br />

treatment with insoles of two different types (a cup<br />

with a brim and a heel wedge of 5 mm), with pre- and<br />

posttreatment phases without insoles. Both insoles<br />

effectively relieved heel pain in Sever’s injury (Perhamre<br />

et al., 2010a). The pain returned swiftly when<br />

the insoles were removed. In a following study, we<br />

found that the heel cup was significantly better than<br />

the heel wedge in relieving pain (Perhamre et al.,<br />

1<br />

47


Perhamre et al.<br />

2010b). More than 75% of the boys preferred the<br />

heel cup (Fig. 1).<br />

The purpose of this study was to analyze if thickness<br />

and function of the heel pad was affected by the<br />

use of a heel cup. Our two main research questions:<br />

Does the thickness of the heel pad differ between<br />

standing bare feet, in the sport shoe, and in the same<br />

sport shoe but with the heel cup?<br />

Is there a difference in local peak pressure in standing<br />

and running with vs without the heel cup in the shoe?<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Design<br />

The study included a pilot study (n 5 5) and a prospective<br />

intervention study (n 5 30). Children attending our clinic and<br />

diagnosed with Sever’s injury were randomized to either group<br />

I, heel cup treatment or to group II, without heel cup or other<br />

insole treatment during the study period of 4 weeks (Fig. 2). A<br />

third matched group of painless children (n 5 15) were included<br />

as a control group.<br />

Sample<br />

A total of 53 children fulfilling the inclusion criteria were<br />

offered to participate in the study. Three children (all girls) did<br />

not accept. No one dropped out of the study, leaving 50 who<br />

finished the study. Forty were boys and 10 were girls. Thirtyfive<br />

children with Sever’s injury were consecutively included,<br />

seeking for heel pain at a Sports Medicine Clinic. The median<br />

Fig. 1. The individually made molded rigid ‘‘Wessmark’’<br />

cup, which was used in the study.<br />

48<br />

Pilot group<br />

n = 5<br />

Untreated patients<br />

n = 15<br />

Randomised group<br />

n = 30<br />

Heel cup treated patients<br />

n = 15<br />

age was 11 years (range 9<strong>–</strong>14 years). Twenty-four children had<br />

bilateral pain and 11 children had unilateral heel pain (eight<br />

boys, three girls, five with pain in the right and six in the left<br />

foot). The painless children (n 5 15) were individually matched<br />

(same gender, age, activity level and playing in the same sports<br />

team) as the children in group I (Fig. 2). The children were<br />

recruited during a 6-month period.<br />

Inclusion and exclusion criteria<br />

Inclusion criteria were both gender, age 9<strong>–</strong>15 years, and the<br />

diagnosis of Sever’s injury, except for the children without<br />

symptoms who did not suffer from Sever’s injury. Findings<br />

confirming the diagnosis were tenderness over the lower onethird<br />

of the posterior calcaneus and a positive calcaneus<br />

compression test, the squeeze test, where all participants<br />

were examined by the first author. Heel pain had to be present<br />

for more than 2 weeks when examined. The most painful<br />

activity had to be a ball sport of some kind (soccer, floor ball,<br />

handball, etc.) with a pain level of 4 or more on the Borg CR-<br />

10 scale during the last week activities. The Borg scale is a self<br />

assessment VAS scale with anchors of verbal explanations<br />

added to the numbers in the pain scale (Neely et al., 1992).<br />

Zero represents absence of pain and 10 represents maximal<br />

pain. All participants had to be high-level athletes, measured<br />

with Engstrom’s five level activity score index (Engstro¨ m,<br />

2004). They had to master Swedish, and together with their<br />

parents they had to agree to participate.<br />

Exclusion criteria were intermittent pain, specified disease<br />

that could interfere with the heel pain, dominant pain from the<br />

Achilles tendon, earlier fracture in the area, a poorly defined<br />

ache in the lower extremities and participation in another<br />

study including any kind of treatment for pain.<br />

Radiographic examination <strong>–</strong> heel pad thickness<br />

The pilot group was only recruited to test the radiographic<br />

examination. In the true radiographic examination the thickness<br />

of the heel pad was measured (n 5 45) not including the<br />

pilot group, and the examinations were analyzed by the last<br />

author. The lower vertex of calcaneus was the bone reference<br />

mark, and a steel band fixated on the skin under the center<br />

portion of the heel was the skin reference mark. A 5 mm steel<br />

bullet marker was fixed on the medial side of the ankle as a<br />

reference, in order to calibrate each radiograph for each child.<br />

The heel pad thickness is defined as the distance between the<br />

lower vertex of the calcaneus and the steel band fixed under<br />

the heel. The measured error within the computer analysis was<br />

estimated to 0.2 mm. The radiographic investigator was partly<br />

blinded. The reliability test for heel pad thickness measure-<br />

Matched control group<br />

n = 15<br />

Fig. 2. Study design with two randomized groups with Sever’s injury. There was a 4 weeks intervention with heel cup in the<br />

treated group (group I). The untreated randomized control group (group II) is supposed to represent the natural course.<br />

2


ments on radiographs (n 5 30) had a difference between the<br />

two series of 1.8%, (mean error 0.15 mm, SD 0.31). In the<br />

reliability test the investigator was blinded, analyzing single<br />

radiographs.<br />

The thickness of the heel pad in the child’s most painful heel<br />

was estimated on a lateral view, with the matched painless<br />

child’s same heel as a control.<br />

In all three groups two radiographs were taken as follows:<br />

Barefoot standing on one heel.<br />

In the sports shoe standing on one heel.<br />

In the treatment group one additional radiograph was taken<br />

as follows:<br />

In the sports shoe standing on one heel with the heel cup in<br />

the shoe.<br />

Peak pressure measurements<br />

Ten study subjects were included, randomized from the<br />

intervention group with insoles, group I. Each participant<br />

used a pair of indoor sports shoes. The test included three<br />

measurements standing with shoes alone and three with heel<br />

cups in the sports shoes, nine-step measurements of running<br />

with shoes alone and finally nine step measurements with heel<br />

cups in the sports shoes.<br />

A plantar pressure measuring system was used (F-Scan;<br />

Tekscan, Boston, Massachusetts, USA), which is a system<br />

tested for validity and reliability, recommended for relative<br />

comparisons of plantar pressure distribution (Ahroni et al.,<br />

1998; Randolph et al., 2000; Tsung et al., 2004). The F-Scan<br />

sensor consisted of two thin, flexible polyester sheets that had<br />

electrically conductive electrodes deposited in stripes perpendicular<br />

to the stripes on the other sheet. By measuring the<br />

changes in current flow at each intersection point (sampling<br />

frequency 100 Hz), the applied pressure distribution could be<br />

measured by a computer and displayed as an image with a<br />

resolution of 10 10 mm (see Fig. 4). The peak pressure is<br />

defined as the maximum pressure measurement within a<br />

defined area under the heel (the area surrounded by a green<br />

line in Fig. 4). The area and location of maximum pressure<br />

and the measured value is automatically determined by the<br />

software. The F-Scan sensor was calibrated according to the<br />

procedure proposed by the manufacturer.<br />

The first part of the test was standing on their heels, in the<br />

same way as in the radiographic examination. Three snap shot<br />

measurements were made in each trial. The second part was<br />

in-door running at a modest tempo. The children did three<br />

short trials with shoe and three with shoe with heel cup each.<br />

Peak pressure for the three steps in the middle of each trial<br />

were measured.<br />

To estimate the reliability there was a test made for the peak<br />

pressure tests using the mixed regression analysis Cronbach’s<br />

a. The coefficient varies over the interval [0,1] where 0 means<br />

that the included variables have no reliability at all and 1<br />

means perfect reliability. All four coefficients showed significant<br />

reliability ( 0.97).<br />

Questionnaire<br />

All children answered questionnaires at the study start<br />

(n 5 45). Everyone answered specific questions about heel<br />

pain in their chosen ball sport (Borg CR-10) during the last<br />

week before study start (week 0). The insole groups filled in the<br />

same questions immediately after treatment. All randomized<br />

A heel cup improves the function of the heel pad<br />

children (n 5 30) answered the same questions at the end of the<br />

study.<br />

Statistics<br />

Radiographic measurements were analyzed with Student’s ttest<br />

with registration of millimeter thickness (mean), confidence<br />

interval and P-value. From the questionnaire measurement<br />

of pain level at start and follow-up with Borg CR-10 was<br />

performed.<br />

A linear mixed regression model was used for the analysis<br />

of peak pressure as response variable, using the child as a<br />

random effect and step 1, 2, 3 in running and treatment (heel<br />

cup yes/no) as fixed effects. In both cases the logarithm of the<br />

peak pressure was used resulting in a multiplicative model.<br />

The effect of the heel cup was given as the peak pressure ratio<br />

with values o1 meaning decrement and values 41 meaning<br />

increment. All analyses were made using the xtreg procedure<br />

(Stata, 2007). The normal distribution approximation fitted<br />

well for the logarithm of the running peak pressure. The<br />

approximation for the logarithm of the standing peak pressure<br />

showed over-dispersion. To remedy this we tried a model<br />

based fitted with procedure gllamm (Skrondal & Rabe-Hesketh,<br />

2004) using adaptive quadrature (Rabe-Hesketh &<br />

Skrondal, 2008) on pressure levels (six levels each 200 mmHg<br />

wide) of peak pressure yielding approximately the same fit for<br />

the predicted levels as we did using the previously described<br />

normal error model. Using this extra analysis we addressed the<br />

potential problem of the poor normal approximation.<br />

All data were calculated in commercially available software<br />

(SPSS, Stata Corp.).<br />

The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Board<br />

of Uppsala, Sweden (dnr 2008/094).<br />

Neither the Public Sports Medicine Clinic nor the authors<br />

have any relation to, profit or other benefits from the<br />

companies that manufacture the products in this study.<br />

Results<br />

Activity level<br />

All children in the two symptomatic groups continued<br />

their high levels of physical activity during the<br />

study period. Three children, two from the intervention<br />

group and one from the control group, increased<br />

their activity level from D to E from start of the study<br />

to follow-up. There was no decrease to a lower<br />

activity level.<br />

Heel pad thickness<br />

Heel pad thickness was significantly increased by<br />

2.19 mm (mean) when using sports shoe without<br />

heel cup compared with standing barefoot<br />

(Po0.001). Adding the heel cup in the shoe again<br />

significantly increased the heel pad thickness by a<br />

further 1.43 mm (P 5 0.002). Hence, heel pad thickness<br />

was increased by 3.57 mm (mean) when using a<br />

sports shoe with heel cup compared with barefoot<br />

standing (Po0.001), Table 1. An example of the<br />

assessment is shown in Fig. 3. One radiograph in the<br />

treatment group with heel cup in the shoe was<br />

missing, because of a mistake by the staff. Age and<br />

3<br />

49


Perhamre et al.<br />

Table 1. Analysis of heel pad thickness during standing bare foot vs in shoe, and without heel cup in shoe vs with heel cup<br />

body weight did not seem to affect the thickness of<br />

the heel pad standing barefoot or in shoes with or<br />

without a heel cup, even though there was a total age<br />

range of 4 years of age and a weight range of 32 kg<br />

(Table 2). There was no difference in heel pad<br />

thickness when comparing studied soccer shoes<br />

with indoor sports shoes. Comparing the heel cup<br />

group with pain with their matched controls without<br />

pain, the heel cup group showed a non-significant<br />

tendency toward thinner heel pads both bare foot<br />

and in shoe, Table 2.<br />

Peak pressure<br />

Maximal peak pressure comparing sports shoe with<br />

and without heel cup was reduced during running<br />

and standing in favor of the sports shoe with heel<br />

cup. In the statistical analysis during running the<br />

effect of heel cup treatment was significant. The<br />

multiplicative effect of heel cup was 0.79 [0.75,<br />

0.83], resulting in a reduction of heel pad peak<br />

pressure with 21% compared with the shoe without<br />

insole. Data from one child was missing, because of<br />

damage to the F-Scan sensor (n 5 9), and the last<br />

trial running including heel cup treatment was deleted<br />

due to sensor errors for one child. In the<br />

corresponding analysis of standing peak pressure,<br />

the effect of the heel cup was significant, with a<br />

multiplicative effect of 0.75 [0.72, 0.78], resulting in<br />

a reduction with 25%. There were no data missing.<br />

50<br />

n Increase in heel pad<br />

thickness, mean (mm)<br />

95 % confidence interval P-value<br />

Bare foot vs Shoe only 45 2.19 1.69<strong>–</strong>2.69 o0.001<br />

Bare foot vs Shoe with cup* 15 3.57 2.56<strong>–</strong>4.29 o0.001<br />

Shoe only vs Shoe with cup* 15 1.53 0.63<strong>–</strong>2.23 5 0.002<br />

*Treatment group only.<br />

Fig. 3. Radiographic assessment of heel pad thickness when standing on heel in shoe without cup (left) and with heel cup<br />

(right). The most painful heel was investigated and the distance from vertex calcanei and the skin reference mark was measured.<br />

Note how the cup restores soft tissue thickness. The difference in heel pad thickness was in this case 1.95 mm.<br />

4<br />

Table 2. Heel pad thickness in different subgroups<br />

Heel pad thickness during standing,<br />

mean (mm)<br />

Bare<br />

foot<br />

Sports<br />

shoe<br />

Shoe with<br />

cup*<br />

Age<br />

9<strong>–</strong>10 years (n 5 10) 6.86 8.55 10.66<br />

11<strong>–</strong>12 years (n 5 29) 6.35 8.47 9.77<br />

13<strong>–</strong>14 years (n 5 2) 8.02 11.52 11.94<br />

Body weight<br />

30<strong>–</strong>37 kg (n 5 15) 6.30 8.31 9.43<br />

38<strong>–</strong>47 kg (n 5 15) 6.82 8.88 11.09<br />

48<strong>–</strong>62 kg (n 5 15) 6.85 9.47 10.4<br />

Type of sports shoe<br />

Soccer shoes (n 5 23) 6.66 8.93 10.12<br />

Indoor shoes (n 5 22) 6.79 8.90 10.18<br />

Cup treated (group I) 6.51 8.83 10.37<br />

No treatment (group II) 7.13 9.22 <strong>–</strong><br />

Controls (group III) 7.00 9.42 <strong>–</strong><br />

*Treatment group only.<br />

Table 3 shows the mean values in mmHg in running<br />

and standing. Figure 4 shows one typical example of<br />

maximal peak pressure measurement.<br />

Pain relief<br />

Table 4 shows a significant pain reduction in sport<br />

activities in the treated group during the study<br />

period. There was an immediate reduction of pain


Table 3. Peak pressure during standing and running in tested subgroup<br />

Peak pressure, mean (mmHg)<br />

n Shoe<br />

only<br />

Shoe with<br />

cup<br />

Difference<br />

(%)<br />

Standing on heel 10 1407 1056 25<br />

Running 9 1412 1109 21<br />

Fig. 4. Maximal peak pressure during running (three steps)<br />

without cup (upper row) and with cup (lower row) for one<br />

child. Square show area of maximal pressure under forefoot<br />

and hindfoot, respectively. Red color represents the highest<br />

pressure (41385 mmHg).<br />

when using heel cup, with further improvement at<br />

follow-up. The persisting pain with the cup was close<br />

to 0 ( 5 0.5). The reduction in pain level in the non-<br />

A heel cup improves the function of the heel pad<br />

treatment group is thought to reflect the natural<br />

course.<br />

Discussion<br />

This study showed that the use of a heel cup resulted<br />

in increased heel pad thickness and decreased heel<br />

pad peak pressure with corresponding pain relief.<br />

The findings indicate improved heel pad function,<br />

that probably protects the injured heel from further<br />

micro trauma. The very low level of persisting pain<br />

after 4-week treatment with the cup was close to 0<br />

( 5 0.5). These results confirm our results in previous<br />

studies.<br />

The importance of a functional heel box to avoid<br />

overuse injuries in adults was presented by Jo¨ rgensen(1989).<br />

Inspired by the thesis by Jo¨ rgensen, the<br />

former chief at our clinic, Dr. Wessmark, designed<br />

and produced a thermoplastic rigid heel cup with a<br />

2<strong>–</strong>3 cm brim, instead of the traditional cup with its<br />

spoon shape. The ‘‘Wessmark cup’’ has thereafter<br />

been used on this indication. There is no need to<br />

change shoe size because of the added heel cup.<br />

Earlier studies proposing insoles have focused on<br />

the relationship between Sever’s injury, pes equinus<br />

and malalignment. Szames pointed out that equinus<br />

had a definite impact on predisposing a child to<br />

Sever’s disease (Szames et al., 1990). In a retrospective<br />

analysis from his clinic, 482% with Sever’s<br />

injury also had equinus. The primary ambition has<br />

been to normalize the gait/running pattern (Madden<br />

& Mellion, 1996). An excessive pronating foot type is<br />

thought to be associated with poor shock absorption<br />

and therefore contributes to micro trauma of the<br />

heel. This malalignment also may contribute to overactivity<br />

of the calf muscle complex, because of the<br />

necessity to stabilize the talocrural joint and/or to<br />

substitute the eversion of calcaneus. A heel wedge, a<br />

molded plastizote orthosis or a spoon-shaped heel<br />

cup to align the running cycle, have been recommended<br />

from these points of view (Micheli & Ireland<br />

1987; Staheli, 1998; Kasser, 2006). All our children<br />

have been able to walk and stand on their heels with<br />

dorsiflected feet and do not seem to have tight<br />

Achilles tendons, defined as having o101 of dorsiflexion<br />

in the ankle joint, with the knee fully extended.<br />

In an often cited retrospective study by Micheli<br />

and Ireland (1987), the frequency of pronation (without<br />

definition) in a group of 85 patients was 27%.<br />

Almost everyone (98%) was treated with insoles<br />

despite malalignment or not. The insoles used were<br />

soft plastizote orthotic 75%, viscoelastic heel cup<br />

18%, or heel wedge 5%. Approximately 30% in our<br />

studies had unilateral pain. The fact that unilateral<br />

pronation and unilateral short calf muscle seem to be<br />

5<br />

51


Perhamre et al.<br />

Table 4. Pain level measured with Borgs CR-10 scale<br />

unusual, are two reasons to question these treatment<br />

strategies in Sever’s injury. The golden age of tissue<br />

development peaks at 11<strong>–</strong>12 years. The physiological<br />

remodelling to develop strong and lasting tissues<br />

with enough capacity to resist injuries (Wolff’s law)<br />

requires physical activity with repeated impact force<br />

to the hind foot. This relation between stimulating<br />

load and developing capacity seems to be disturbed<br />

in Sever’s injury. Histological analysis of the region<br />

shows a primary compression, rather than a tension<br />

cytoarchitecture (Ogden, 2000). The heel pad with its<br />

sum of cooperating compartments provides cushioning,<br />

and thereby reduces the impact force on calcaneus<br />

in heel strike (Ogden, 2000). An effective<br />

support to the heel pad therefore seems to be crucial,<br />

and this is supported by the findings in our previous<br />

study were the heel cup was shown to be superior to<br />

the wedge in giving pain relief (Perhamre et al.,<br />

2010a).<br />

Soccer is the predominating sport among our<br />

patients. Walter & Ng(2002) showed that the studded<br />

soccer shoe placed the foot in a dorsiflexed position,<br />

increasing the amount of pull from the Achilles<br />

tendon, exceeding the pressure placed upon the<br />

calcaneal apophysis. The conclusions from our previous<br />

studies are that pain in Sever’s injury primarily<br />

is an effect of impact, not shear forces. The reason<br />

why soccer dominates is probably simply because it is<br />

the dominating sport in this age, including both<br />

genders. It includes much running and jumping and<br />

the shoes offer little heel support.<br />

Our two previous studies have shown immediate<br />

and lasting pain relief with the heel cup, confirmed in<br />

the present study (Perhamre et al., 2010a, b). The<br />

purpose with this study was to assess the possible<br />

mechanisms behind the rapid and impressive pain<br />

relief. There was a significant increase of heel cup<br />

thickness from barefoot to shoe and from shoe to<br />

heel cup (Table 1, Fig. 3). There was also a significant<br />

reduction of the heel peak pressure using heel cups<br />

(Fig. 4). We believe that both these effects strongly<br />

support Ogden’s theory that Sever’s injury is a<br />

traumatic condition due to repetitive impact forces<br />

during heel strike with corresponding pathology in<br />

52<br />

Pain at start (median values) Pain at 4 weeks (median values)<br />

Shoes only With cup Shoes only With cup<br />

Group I (treatment) 7.0 2.0 3.0 0.5<br />

Group II (no treatment) 7.0 <strong>–</strong> 5.0 <strong>–</strong><br />

6<br />

the rear foot (Ogden et al., 2004). An effective<br />

treatment seems to reduce these forces. The cup<br />

seems to protect the heel, significantly reducing<br />

pain, compared with our non-treatment group (Table<br />

3). The sample in the peak pressure test was small<br />

(n 5 10) with one child missing in the running trials.<br />

This reduces the power of our conclusions. An<br />

interesting finding was that children with Sever’s<br />

injury show a tendency toward thinner heel pads<br />

compared with the painless control group (Table 2).<br />

This could possibly be a predisposing factor to<br />

Sever’s injury.<br />

Perspectives<br />

Sever’s injury seems to be a result of high impact<br />

forces during an intense puberty period with an<br />

immature heel. The traditional recommendation to<br />

stop or diminish the sports activity for an unspecified<br />

period of time seems inappropriate and we suggest<br />

that this should be replaced by the general advice to<br />

use heel cups and continue with the activities. The<br />

effect of using the rigid heel cup can be explained<br />

both by less deformation, preserving the heel pad<br />

thickness when loaded, and by the reduction of heel<br />

pad peak pressure during heel strike.<br />

Key words: Sever’s injury, apophysitis calcanei, insoles,<br />

heel cup, heel pad thickness, heel peak pressure.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Thanks to Ingemar Hansson, who made the heel cups, Klara<br />

Perhamre for help with the figure layout, Mikael Hasselgren,<br />

PhD, medical chief Centre for Clinical Science, Eva Stjernstro¨<br />

m RPT, division chief Va¨ rmland County Council for<br />

support and Ola Wessmark, former chief doctor at our Clinic,<br />

who made the prototype of this heel cup.<br />

Financial support was provided by the Primary Care<br />

Research Unit, by the division Health, Habilitation and<br />

Rehabilitation, the foundation for Orthopaedic Devices,<br />

Va¨ rmland County Council, O¨ rebro University Hospital Research<br />

Committee and Swedish National Centre for Research<br />

in Sports.


References<br />

Ahroni JH, Boyko EJ, Forsberg R.<br />

Reliability of F-scan in-shoe<br />

measurements of plantar pressure.<br />

Foot Ankle Int 1998: 19: 668<strong>–</strong>673.<br />

Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports<br />

medicine, 3rd edn. New York:<br />

McGraw-Hill, 2007: 737pp.<br />

Cavanagh P, Rogers MM, Iiboshi A.<br />

Pressure distribution under symptomfree<br />

feet during barefoot standing. Foot<br />

Ankle 1987: 7: 262<strong>–</strong>276.<br />

Donatelli R. The biomehanics of the foot<br />

and ankle. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis<br />

Company, 1990: 284pp.<br />

Engstro¨ m LM. School<strong>–</strong>sports<strong>–</strong>health:<br />

studies of the subject Sports and<br />

Health, and young people’s physical<br />

activity, physical capacity and health<br />

condition: basis, purposes and methods<br />

[in Swedish]. Stockholm:<br />

Idrottsho¨ gskolan, 2004: 142pp.<br />

Hendrix CL. Calcaneal apophysitis (Sever<br />

disease). Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2005:<br />

22: 55<strong>–</strong>62.<br />

Jo¨ rgensen U. Implication of heel strike:<br />

an anatomical, biomechanical,<br />

physiological and clinical study with<br />

focus on the heel pad. Link o¨ ping:<br />

Linko¨ ping University, 1989.<br />

Kasser JR The foot-aquired conditions.<br />

In: Weinstein SL, Lovell WW, Winter<br />

RB, Morrissy RT, eds. Lovell and<br />

Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics 2, 6th<br />

edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams<br />

& Wilkins, 2006: 1257<strong>–</strong>1329.<br />

Madden CC, Mellion MB. Sever’s disease<br />

and other causes of heel pain in<br />

adolescents. Am Fam Physician 1996:<br />

54: 1995<strong>–</strong>2000.<br />

Micheli LJ, Ireland ML. Prevention and<br />

management of calcaneal apophysitis<br />

in children: an overuse syndrome. J<br />

Pediatr Orthop 1987: 7: 34<strong>–</strong>38.<br />

Neely GLG., Syle´ n C, Borg G.<br />

Comparison between the visual<br />

analogue scale (VAS) and the category<br />

ratio scale (CR-10) for evaluation of leg<br />

exertion. Int J Sports Med 1992: 13:<br />

133<strong>–</strong>136.<br />

Ogden JA. Foot. In: Ogden JA, ed.<br />

Skeletal injury in the child, 3rd edn.<br />

New York: Springer, 2000: 1091<strong>–</strong>1159.<br />

Ogden JA, Ganey TM, Hill JD, Jaakkola<br />

JI. Sever’s injury: a stress fracture of<br />

the immature calcaneal metaphysis. J<br />

Pediatr Orthop 2004: 24: 488<strong>–</strong>492.<br />

Perhamre S, Janson S, Norlin R, Kla¨ ssbo<br />

M. Sever’s injury: treatment with<br />

insoles provides effective pain relief.<br />

Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010a May<br />

(Epub ahead of print).<br />

Perhamre S, Lundin F, Norlin R, Kla¨ ssbo<br />

M. Sever’s injury; treat it with heel cup <strong>–</strong><br />

a randomised, crossover study with two<br />

insole alternatives. Scand J Med Sci<br />

Sports 2010b , (Epub ahead of print).<br />

Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel<br />

and longitudinal modeling using stata,<br />

2nd edn. College Station: Stata Press,<br />

2008.<br />

A heel cup improves the function of the heel pad<br />

Randolph AL, Nelson M, Akkapeddi S,<br />

Levin A, Alexandrescu R. Reliability<br />

of measurements of pressures applied<br />

on the foot during walking by a<br />

computerized insole sensor system.<br />

Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000: 81: 573<strong>–</strong><br />

578.<br />

Sever JW. Apophysitis of the os calcis.<br />

NY State J Med 1912: 95: 1025<strong>–</strong>1029.<br />

Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S.<br />

Generalized latent variable modeling,<br />

1st edn. Boca Raton: Chapman and<br />

Hall/CRC, 2004: 508pp.<br />

Staheli LT. Sports/foot and ankle. In:<br />

Staheli LT, ed. Fundamentals of<br />

pediatric orthopedics, 2nd edn.<br />

Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998:<br />

111<strong>–</strong>128.<br />

Stata P. STATA/IC release 10 user<br />

manual [XT] <strong>–</strong> longitudinal/panel<br />

data. College Station: Stata Press,<br />

2007.<br />

Szames SE, Forman WM, Oster J, Eleff<br />

JC, Woodward P. Sever’s disease and<br />

its relationship to equinus: a statistical<br />

analysis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1990:<br />

7: 377<strong>–</strong>384.<br />

Tsung BYS, Zhang M, Mak AFT, Wong<br />

MWN. Effectiveness of insoles on<br />

plantar pressure redistribution. JRRD<br />

2004: 41: 767<strong>–</strong>774.<br />

Walter JH, Ng GK. The evaluation of<br />

cleated shoes with the adolescent<br />

athlete in soccer. The Foot 2002: 12:<br />

158<strong>–</strong>165.<br />

7<br />

53


Stefan Perhamre, specialist i allmänmedicin arbetade sen 1993 på Idrottshälsan i Karlstad.<br />

<strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>paradigmskifte</strong> <strong>gällande</strong><br />

<strong>diagnostik</strong> <strong>och</strong> <strong>behandling</strong>?<br />

Stefan Perhamre, idrottsläkare i Karlstad samarbetade tidigare med dr Ola Wessmark,<br />

<strong>och</strong> ortopedtekniker Ingemar Hansson vid Idrottshälsan, Landstinget i Värmland. Till<br />

Idrottshälsan sökte sig många barn <strong>och</strong> ungdomar med hälsmärta <strong>och</strong> de tyckte att en<br />

hård hälkopp fungerade påfallande bra som smärtlindring.<br />

Stefan Perhamre startade ett forskningsprojekt, tillsammans med Maria Klässbo, för att<br />

utvärdera hur bra hälkoppen verkligen var. När det blev klart att Stefan ville skriva en<br />

doktorsavhandling bildades en forskargrupp kring hans avhandlingsprojekt.<br />

Med Stefans arbeten som grund har vi kunnat visa att diagnosen <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> (hälsmärta<br />

hos unga) kan fastställas med vanliga kliniska test. Slätröntgen har inget diagnostiskt värde.<br />

Studierna har visat att den hälkopp Ola Wessmark tidigare designat, fungerar mycket<br />

bra som <strong>behandling</strong> vid <strong>Severs</strong> <strong>skada</strong> <strong>och</strong> att orsaken till besvären rimligen är en överbelastningsreaktion<br />

i hälbenet. Vi har vidare kunnat visa att hälkoppen bidrar till att hälkudden<br />

trycks ihop från sidorna <strong>och</strong> blir lite tjockare under hälbenet <strong>och</strong> att toppbelastningen<br />

på hälen minskar.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!