pdf - Nyenrode Business Universiteit

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3.4. ANALYSES 75 3.4 Analyses This section presents the analyses. I analyse the noise-reducing effect of RPE with structural equation modelling (SEM). I use the structural model estimation of SEM to be able to estimate the indirect relation between environmental uncertainty and noise in the performance evaluation, via RPE use. In addition to the aforementioned noise-reducing effect of RPE use and the effect of environmental uncertainty, via RPE use, on noise, I include the noise-drivers and control variables for size and industry. The result is the statistical model shown in figure 3.3. 3.4.1 Correlations Table 3.9 presents the correlation matrix of all of the included variables. The table shows three significant correlations between the dependent and independent variables. Noise is negatively correlated with RPE-Use. Additionally, the correlations among noise and goal ambiguity, and noise and measurability of outputs are significant. The latter two correlations are consistent with the hypothesized directions. Furthermore, several significant correlations among the independent variables exist. RPE-Use is positively correlated with environmental uncertainty, and measurability of outputs. Additionally, I find significant correlations between the measures of goal ambiguity and measurability of outputs, as well as between the measures for business unit size and firm size. However, these correlations are not strong. 3.4.2 Multivariate Analyses To test the noise-reducing effect of RPE, I analyse the model that is presented in figure 3.3. In addition to the expected paths, as presented in the causal model (figure 3.2 on page 66), I also include the control variables for size and business unit sector in the model. I use maximum likelihood estimation in AMOS 18 to estimate the structural model. Due to sample size limitations and to reduce the model complexity, I do not estimate the measurement model and the structural model simultaneously. The measurement is determined outside the model, using principal component analysis and scale reliability analysis, as presented in section 3.3.3. I run two analyses. First, the model is tested with the RPE-Use measure. This model is referred to as the base model. Second, an alternative measure for RPE use is used as a robustness check. Both models fit the data and support the noise-reduction hypothesis (i.e., RPE use reduces the amount of noise in the performance evaluation). The results of these analyses are discussed in section 3.4.2.1. ‘Analyses with RPE-Use Measure’ and section 3.4.2.2. ‘Analyses with RPE-based-Targets Measure’.
76 CHAPTER 3. NOISE REDUCTION EFFECTIVENESS RPE use ✻ Positive Environmental Uncertainty - Goal Ambiguity - Measurability of Outputs - Emphasis on Personal Level Performance Measures - Emphasis on Disaggregate Performance Measures Size & Sector Figure 3.3: Statistical Model Negative (H1) Positive Noise in the Performance Evaluation ✻ ❄ ✻ ✻
Page 2 and 3:
Relative Performance Evaluation in
Page 4 and 5:
NYENRODE BUSINESS UNIVERSITEIT Rela
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Preface 1 General
Page 8:
Preface Why do people make things h
Page 11 and 12:
2 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION I
Page 13 and 14:
4 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION o
Page 15 and 16:
6 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION T
Page 17 and 18:
8 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION F
Page 19 and 20:
10 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 2 The Use of Relative Perfo
Page 24 and 25:
2.1. INTRODUCTION 15 is not a promi
Page 26 and 27:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 17 The
Page 28 and 29:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 19 Sinc
Page 30 and 31:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 21 who
Page 32 and 33:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 23 suff
Page 34 and 35: 2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 25 2.2.
Page 38 and 39: 2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 29 can
Page 40 and 41: 2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 31 Comp
Page 42 and 43: 2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 33 this
Page 44 and 45: 2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 35 Emph
Page 46 and 47: 2.4. ANALYSES 37 2.4 Analyses This
Page 48 and 49: 2.4. ANALYSES 39 Table 2.8: RPE use
Page 50 and 51: 2.4. ANALYSES 41 2.4.2 Correlations
Page 52 and 53: 2.4. ANALYSES 43 Concerning the con
Page 54 and 55: 2.4. ANALYSES 45 Table 2.13: Result
Page 56 and 57: 2.4. ANALYSES 47 Table 2.15: Summar
Page 58 and 59: 2.5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 49
Page 62 and 63: 2.6. CONTRACTIBILITY MIMIC MODEL (A
Page 64 and 65: 2.6. CONTRACTIBILITY MIMIC MODEL (A
Page 66 and 67: 2.7. ANALYSES FOR FOR-PROFIT BUS (A
Page 68 and 69: Chapter 3 Does Relative Performance
Page 70 and 71: 3.1. INTRODUCTION 61 Holmstrom’s
Page 72 and 73: 3.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 63 3.
Page 74 and 75: 3.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 65 RP
Page 76 and 77: 3.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 67 3.3
Page 80 and 81: 3.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 71 Tabl
Page 82 and 83: 3.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 73 Tabl
Page 86 and 87: 3.4. ANALYSES 77 Table 3.9: Pearson
Page 92 and 93: 3.4. ANALYSES 83 Larcker & Rusticus
Page 96 and 97: Chapter 4 Does Relative Performance
Page 98 and 99: 4.1. INTRODUCTION 89 Moreover, chap
Page 100 and 101: 4.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 91 is
Page 102 and 103: 4.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 93 Sp
Page 104 and 105: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 95 4.3
Page 106 and 107: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 97 To i
Page 108 and 109: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 99 of R
Page 110 and 111: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 101 Tab
Page 112 and 113: 4.4. ANALYSES 103 Table 4.8: Items
Page 114 and 115: 4.4. ANALYSES 105 RPE use ✻ Posit
Page 116 and 117: 4.4. ANALYSES 107 The model does sh
Page 118 and 119: 4.4. ANALYSES 109 RPE and RFMO. Mor
Page 120 and 121: 4.4. ANALYSES 111 room for manageri
Page 126 and 127: Chapter 5 Conclusion 5.1 Summary, C
Page 128 and 129: 5.1. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND DISCU
Page 134 and 135:
5.2. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE 125
Page 136 and 137:
5.3. LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FO
Page 138 and 139:
Appendix Overview of Questionnaire
Page 140 and 141:
Q5 How often do the following thing
Page 142 and 143:
Q14 When serving your clients, how
Page 144 and 145:
Q23 Please indicate whether you agr
Page 146 and 147:
Noise Q34 NOISE (primary measure) P
Page 148 and 149:
References 1. Abernethy, M.A., Bouw
Page 150 and 151:
26. Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J.
Page 152 and 153:
52. Himmelberg, C.P. & Hubbard R.G.
Page 154:
83. Towry, K. 2003. ‘Control in a
Page 157 and 158:
148 beïnvloeden, veroorzaken ruis
Page 160 and 161:
Biography Hilco van Elten (1979) ho
show all

pdf - Nyenrode Business Universiteit

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?