pdf - Nyenrode Business Universiteit

More documents

Recommendations

Info

26. Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J.A. 2006. ‘Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration.’ British Journal of Management, 17, 263-82. 27. Dillman, D.A. 2000. ‘Mail and internet surveys; the tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 28. Dunk, A.S. 1993. ‘The effect of budget emphasis and information asymmetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack.’ The Accounting Review, 68, 400-10. 29. Dwyer, F.R. & Oh, S. 1987. ‘Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels.’ Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 347- 58. 30. Echambadi, R., Campbell, B. & Agerwal, R. 2006. ‘Encouraging best practice in quantitative management research: an incomplete list of opportunities.’ Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1801-20. 31. Echambadi, R. & Hess, J.D. 2007. ‘Mean-centering does not alleviate collinearity problems in moderated multiple regression models.’ Marketing Science, 26, 438-45. 32. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. ‘Agency theory: an assessment and review.’ The Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74. 33. Etzioni, A. 1961. ‘A comparative analysis of complex organizations.’ New York: Free Press. 34. Farh, J.-L., Earley P. C. & S.-C., Lin. 1997. ‘Impetus for action: a cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in chinese society.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421-44. 35. Fisher, J.G., Frederickson, J.R. & Peffer, S.A. 2002. ‘The effect of information asymmetry on negotiated budgets: an empirical investigation.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 27-43. 36. Fisher, J.G., Maines, L.A., Peffer, S.A. & Sprinkle, G.B. 2002. ‘Using budgets for performance evaluation: effects of resource allocation and horizontal information asymmetry on budget proposals, budget slack, and performance.’ The Accounting Review, 77, 847-65. 37. Frederickson, J.R. 1992. ‘Relative performance information: the effects of common uncertainty and contract type on agent effort.’ The Accounting Review, 67, 647-69. 38. Garvey, G. & Milbourn, T. 2003. ‘Incentive compensation when executives can hedge the market: evidence of relative performance evaluation in the cross section.’ The Journal of Finance, 58, 1557-85 141
142 39. Garvey, G. & Milbourn, T. 2006. ‘Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for bad.’ Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 197-225 40. Gerdin, J. & Greve, J. 2004. ‘Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research - a critical review.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 303-26. 41. Gerdin, J. & Greve, J. 2008. ‘The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in management accounting research.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 995-1009. 42. Gibbons, R. 1998. ‘Incentives in organizations.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12:4, 115-32. 43. Gibbons, R. & Murphy, K.J. 1990. ‘Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers.’ Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43, 30-S-51-S. 44. Gong, G., Li, L.Y. & Shin, J.Y. 2011. ‘Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts.’ The Accounting Review, 86, 1007- 43. 45. Gordon, L. A. & Narayanan, V.K. 1984. ‘Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: an empirical investigation.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 33-47. 46. Gundlach, G.T., Achrol, R.S. & Mentzer, J.T. 1995. ‘The structure of commitment in exchange.’ Journal of Marketing, 59:1, 78-92. 47. Hak, T., Veer, C.G. van der & Jansen, H. 2008. ‘The three-step test-interview (TSTI): an observational instrument for pretesting self-completion questionnaires.’ Survey Research Methods, 2, 143-50. 48. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson R.E., 2010. ‘Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective.’ (7th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. 49. Hannan, R.L., Rankin, F.W. & Towry, K.L. 2006. ‘The effect of information systems on honesty in managerial reporting: a behavioral perspective.’ Contemporary Accounting Research, 23, 885-918. 50. Hartmann, F.G.H. 1997. ‘Accounting for performance evaluation: effects of uncertainty on the appropriateness of accounting performance measures.’ Maastricht: Maastricht University. 51. Hartmann, F.G.H. & Moers, F. 1999. ‘Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 291-315.
Page 2 and 3:
Relative Performance Evaluation in
Page 4 and 5:
NYENRODE BUSINESS UNIVERSITEIT Rela
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Preface 1 General
Page 8:
Preface Why do people make things h
Page 11 and 12:
2 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION I
Page 13 and 14:
4 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION o
Page 15 and 16:
6 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION T
Page 17 and 18:
8 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION F
Page 19 and 20:
10 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 2 The Use of Relative Perfo
Page 24 and 25:
2.1. INTRODUCTION 15 is not a promi
Page 26 and 27:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 17 The
Page 28 and 29:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 19 Sinc
Page 30 and 31:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 21 who
Page 32 and 33:
2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 23 suff
Page 34 and 35:
2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 25 2.2.
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 29 can
Page 40 and 41:
2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 31 Comp
Page 42 and 43:
2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 33 this
Page 44 and 45:
2.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 35 Emph
Page 46 and 47:
2.4. ANALYSES 37 2.4 Analyses This
Page 48 and 49:
2.4. ANALYSES 39 Table 2.8: RPE use
Page 50 and 51:
2.4. ANALYSES 41 2.4.2 Correlations
Page 52 and 53:
2.4. ANALYSES 43 Concerning the con
Page 54 and 55:
2.4. ANALYSES 45 Table 2.13: Result
Page 56 and 57:
2.4. ANALYSES 47 Table 2.15: Summar
Page 58 and 59:
2.5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 49
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
2.6. CONTRACTIBILITY MIMIC MODEL (A
Page 64 and 65:
2.6. CONTRACTIBILITY MIMIC MODEL (A
Page 66 and 67:
2.7. ANALYSES FOR FOR-PROFIT BUS (A
Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 3 Does Relative Performance
Page 70 and 71:
3.1. INTRODUCTION 61 Holmstrom’s
Page 72 and 73:
3.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 63 3.
Page 74 and 75:
3.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 65 RP
Page 76 and 77:
3.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 67 3.3
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
3.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 71 Tabl
Page 82 and 83:
3.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 73 Tabl
Page 84 and 85:
3.4. ANALYSES 75 3.4 Analyses This
Page 86 and 87:
3.4. ANALYSES 77 Table 3.9: Pearson
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
3.4. ANALYSES 83 Larcker & Rusticus
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Chapter 4 Does Relative Performance
Page 98 and 99:
4.1. INTRODUCTION 89 Moreover, chap
Page 100 and 101: 4.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 91 is
Page 102 and 103: 4.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODEL 93 Sp
Page 104 and 105: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 95 4.3
Page 106 and 107: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 97 To i
Page 108 and 109: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 99 of R
Page 110 and 111: 4.3. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT 101 Tab
Page 112 and 113: 4.4. ANALYSES 103 Table 4.8: Items
Page 114 and 115: 4.4. ANALYSES 105 RPE use ✻ Posit
Page 116 and 117: 4.4. ANALYSES 107 The model does sh
Page 118 and 119: 4.4. ANALYSES 109 RPE and RFMO. Mor
Page 120 and 121: 4.4. ANALYSES 111 room for manageri
Page 122 and 123: 4.5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 113
Page 124 and 125: 4.5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 115
Page 126 and 127: Chapter 5 Conclusion 5.1 Summary, C
Page 128 and 129: 5.1. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND DISCU
Page 134 and 135: 5.2. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE 125
Page 136 and 137: 5.3. LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FO
Page 138 and 139: Appendix Overview of Questionnaire
Page 140 and 141: Q5 How often do the following thing
Page 142 and 143: Q14 When serving your clients, how
Page 144 and 145: Q23 Please indicate whether you agr
Page 146 and 147: Noise Q34 NOISE (primary measure) P
Page 148 and 149: References 1. Abernethy, M.A., Bouw
Page 152 and 153: 52. Himmelberg, C.P. & Hubbard R.G.
Page 154: 83. Towry, K. 2003. ‘Control in a
Page 157 and 158: 148 beïnvloeden, veroorzaken ruis
Page 160 and 161: Biography Hilco van Elten (1979) ho
show all

pdf - Nyenrode Business Universiteit

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?