30.08.2013 Views

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where y ∈ R m with mean E{y} = Aa + Bb <strong>and</strong> PDF fy(y), <strong>and</strong> ˜ θ is the BIE estimator<br />

of θ = l T a a + l T b b.<br />

<strong>The</strong> BIE estimator can also be written as:<br />

˜θ = l T a ã + l T b ˜ b (4.5)<br />

with<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ ã =<br />

⎪⎩<br />

<br />

z∈Zn zwz(y), <br />

z∈Zn wz(y) = 1<br />

<br />

˜b = ζwζ(y)dζ,<br />

<br />

wζ(y)dζ = 1<br />

R p<br />

R p<br />

(4.6)<br />

where the weighting functions wz(y) <strong>and</strong> wζ(y) follow from equation (4.4). This shows<br />

that the BIE estimator of the <strong>integer</strong> parameter vector a is also a weighted sum of all<br />

<strong>integer</strong> vectors in Zn , just like the admissible <strong>integer</strong> estimators of (3.6). However, in<br />

this case the weights are not binary (1 or 0); their values are determined by y <strong>and</strong> its<br />

PDF, so that the BIE weights are real-valued <strong>and</strong> nonzero for all <strong>integer</strong> vectors. This<br />

implies that the estimator ã is real-valued, instead of <strong>integer</strong>-valued. Furthermore, it<br />

implies that there is no need to apply a discrimination test.<br />

In Teunissen (2003f) it was shown that the BIE estimator is unbiased <strong>and</strong> has minimum<br />

variance, i.e. it has better precision than the best linear unbiased estimator. This result<br />

applied to the baseline estimator gives:<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ D{<br />

⎪⎩<br />

˜b} ≤ D{ ˇb} <strong>and</strong> E{ ˜b} = E{ ˇb} = b<br />

D{ ˜b} ≤ D{ ˆb} <strong>and</strong> E{ ˜b} = E{ ˆ (4.7)<br />

b} = b<br />

Hence, the BIE baseline precision is always better than or as good as the precision of its<br />

float <strong>and</strong> fixed counterparts.<br />

In <strong>GNSS</strong> applications it is assumed that the data are normally distributed as mentioned<br />

in section 3.1.3. It can be shown that in this case the BIE estimator is given by equation<br />

(4.5) with the following estimators for the <strong>ambiguities</strong> <strong>and</strong> the baseline parameters:<br />

⎧ P<br />

⎪⎨ ã =<br />

⎪⎩<br />

z∈Zn z exp{− 1<br />

2 â−z2Q<br />

}<br />

â<br />

P<br />

exp{− 1<br />

2 â−z2 Q }<br />

â<br />

z∈Z n<br />

˜ b = ˆ b − Qˆ bâ Q −1<br />

â<br />

See appendix C.<br />

(â − ã)<br />

<br />

= zwz(â)<br />

z∈Z n<br />

(4.8)<br />

Note that the formal expressions in (4.8) are identical to their Bayesian counterparts as<br />

presented in section 3.6, but that the distributional properties of the BIE estimator <strong>and</strong><br />

its Bayesian counterpart of course differ. Since the functional form of the non-Bayesian<br />

estimator is identical to the Bayesian solution in the special case of normally distributed<br />

data, the theory of BIE <strong>estimation</strong> has provided the link with the Bayesian approach of<br />

ambiguity resolution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> BIE estimator 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!