The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
estimator is given by:<br />
n<br />
<br />
Sz,B = x ∈ R n | |c T i L −1 (x − z)| ≤ 1<br />
<br />
, ∀z ∈ Zn<br />
2<br />
i=1<br />
(3.12)<br />
with ci the canonical vector having a one as its ith entry. Note that the bootstrapped<br />
<strong>and</strong> rounded solution become identical if the ambiguity vc-matrix, Qâ, is diagonal.<br />
<strong>The</strong> shape of the pull-in region in the two-dimensional case is a parallelogram, see figure<br />
3.4. For more dimensions it will be the multivariate version of a parallelogram.<br />
3.1.3 Integer least-squares<br />
Optimizing on the <strong>integer</strong> nature of the ambiguity parameters, cf.(Teunissen 1999a),<br />
involves solving a non-st<strong>and</strong>ard least-squares problem, referred to as <strong>integer</strong> least-squares<br />
(ILS) in Teunissen (1993). <strong>The</strong> solution is obtained by solving the following minimization<br />
problem:<br />
min<br />
z,ζ y − Az − Bζ2 Qy , z ∈ Zn , ζ ∈ R p<br />
<strong>The</strong> following orthogonal decomposition can be used:<br />
y − Az − Bζ 2 Qy = ê2Qy + â − z<br />
<br />
(3.2)<br />
2 Qâ + <br />
<br />
(3.3)<br />
ˆb(z) − ζ 2 Qˆb|â <br />
(3.4)<br />
(3.13)<br />
(3.14)<br />
with the residuals of the float solution ê = y − Aâ − Bˆb, <strong>and</strong> the conditional baseline<br />
estimator ˆb(z) = ˆb − Qˆbâ Q −1<br />
â (â − z).<br />
It follows from equation (3.14) that the solution of the minimization problem in equation<br />
(3.13) is solved using the three step procedure described in section 3.1. <strong>The</strong> first term<br />
on the right-h<strong>and</strong> side follows from the float solution (3.2). Taking into account the<br />
<strong>integer</strong> nature of the <strong>ambiguities</strong> means that the second term on the right-h<strong>and</strong> side of<br />
equation (3.14) needs to be minimized, conditioned on z ∈ Z n . This corresponds to<br />
the ambiguity resolution step in (3.3), so that z = ǎ. Finally, solving for the last term<br />
corresponds to fixing the baseline as in equation (3.4). <strong>The</strong>n the last term in equation<br />
(3.14) becomes equal to zero, so that indeed the minimization problem is solved.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>integer</strong> least-squares problem focuses on the second step <strong>and</strong> can now be defined<br />
as:<br />
ǎLS = arg min<br />
z∈Z nâ − z2 Qâ<br />
(3.15)<br />
where ǎLS ∈ Z n is the fixed ILS ambiguity solution. This solution cannot be ’computed’<br />
as with <strong>integer</strong> rounding <strong>and</strong> <strong>integer</strong> bootstrapping. Instead an <strong>integer</strong> search is required<br />
to obtain the solution.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ILS pull-in region Sz,LS is defined as the collection of all x ∈ R n that are closer<br />
to z than to any other <strong>integer</strong> grid point in R n , where the distance is measured in the<br />
32 Integer ambiguity resolution