30.08.2013 Views

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> single difference approach can be seen as a kind of compromise. <strong>The</strong> amount of<br />

observations is reduced with respect to the undifferenced approach, but not as much as<br />

with the double difference approach. <strong>The</strong> same holds for the unknown parameters. An<br />

advantage of the single difference approach is that in the case of a single baseline model<br />

(two receivers) no correlation between the observations is introduced, see section 2.4.<br />

As explained before, for high-precision applications it is important that the carrier phase<br />

<strong>ambiguities</strong> are resolved as <strong>integer</strong>s. It has been shown that the parameterization of<br />

the unknown <strong>ambiguities</strong> is such that these parameters are known to be <strong>integer</strong>s in the<br />

single difference <strong>and</strong> double difference approach.<br />

2.4 <strong>GNSS</strong> stochastic model<br />

<strong>The</strong> stochastic model describes the precision of the observations. As a starting point<br />

the following assumptions are made:<br />

E{e s r,j(t)e s r,j(t)} = σ 2 p,j no satellite dependent weighting<br />

E{e s r,i (t)esr,j (t)} = 0 no frequency dependent correlation (2.56)<br />

E{e s r,j (t1)e s r,j (t2)} = 0 no time correlation<br />

Often, the code st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation is chosen identical for all frequencies, σp,j = σp ∀j.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same assumptions are made for the undifferenced phase observations, with the phase<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation denoted as σφ.<br />

<strong>The</strong> vc-matrix of the undifferenced observations of one satellite <strong>and</strong> one receiver becomes<br />

then:<br />

Cpφ = diag(σ 2 p,1, . . . , σ 2 p,f , σ 2 φ,1, . . . , σ 2 φ,f , σ 2 I ) (2.57)<br />

where σ2 I is the variance of the ionospheric pseudo-observation, which has to be included<br />

if the ionosphere-weighted model is considered.<br />

For the single differenced observations, the vc-matrices of the observations of both<br />

receivers must be added according to the propagation law of variances, see appendix<br />

A.2.1:<br />

C sd<br />

pφ = Cpφ,q + Cpφ,r<br />

(2.58)<br />

If the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations are assumed equal for both receivers, all variances must simply<br />

be multiplied by 2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> single difference vc-matrix corresponding to the functional models in equations<br />

(2.45) <strong>and</strong> (2.46) becomes:<br />

Qy = C sd<br />

pφ ⊗ Im<br />

(2.59)<br />

<strong>The</strong> vc-matrix of the double difference models in equations (2.54) <strong>and</strong> (2.55) is obtained<br />

again with the propagation law of variances <strong>and</strong> the properties of the Kronecker product<br />

20 <strong>GNSS</strong> observation model <strong>and</strong> quality control

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!