30.08.2013 Views

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> single difference models can now be presented as follows. <strong>The</strong> full-rank geometryfree<br />

model is given by:<br />

⎛⎡<br />

⎤ ⎞<br />

µ<br />

e2f<br />

E{y} = ⊗ Im ρ + ⎝⎣−µ<br />

⎦ ⊗ Im⎠<br />

I<br />

0<br />

1<br />

⎛⎡<br />

⎤<br />

0 <br />

I2f<br />

+ ⊗ em dtqr + ⎝⎣Λ⎦<br />

0<br />

⊗<br />

0<br />

Im−1<br />

0<br />

⎞<br />

(2.45)<br />

⎠ a<br />

<strong>The</strong> observation vector is given by (2.44), the range vector ρ by (2.40), <strong>and</strong> the parameter<br />

vectors I, dtqr, <strong>and</strong> a by equations (2.32), (2.42) <strong>and</strong> (2.43) respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ionosphere-weighted, troposphere-float, geometry-based model is obtained as:<br />

⎛⎡<br />

⎤ ⎞<br />

µ<br />

e2f<br />

e2f<br />

E{y} = ⊗ G ∆rqr + ⊗ Ψ T + ⎝⎣−µ<br />

⎦ ⊗ Im⎠<br />

I<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

⎛⎡<br />

⎤<br />

0 <br />

I2f<br />

+ ⊗ em dtqr + ⎝⎣Λ⎦<br />

0<br />

⊗<br />

0<br />

Im−1<br />

0<br />

⎞<br />

(2.46)<br />

⎠ a<br />

2.3.3 Double difference models<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of parameters in the observation equations can be even further reduced<br />

by also taking differences between observations of different satellites. In this double<br />

difference (DD) approach, one reference satellite t is chosen <strong>and</strong> the single difference<br />

observations of this satellite are subtracted from the corresponding single difference<br />

observations of all other satellites. For one satellite-pair the geometry-free observation<br />

equations become then:<br />

p ts<br />

qr,j = p s qr,j − p t qr,j = ρ ts<br />

qr + T ts<br />

qr + µjI ts<br />

qr + e s qr,j<br />

φ ts<br />

qr,j = φ s qr,j − φ t qr,j = ρ ts<br />

qr + T ts<br />

qr − µjI ts<br />

qr + λjN ts<br />

qr,j + ε ts<br />

qr,j<br />

(2.47)<br />

<strong>The</strong> instrumental delays <strong>and</strong> clock errors of the receivers have now also cancelled from<br />

the observation equations, as well as the initial phases in the receivers. This leaves only<br />

the <strong>integer</strong> carrier phase ambiguity as extra parameter in the phase observations. Only<br />

if this ambiguity is resolved, the phase observations can be considered as very precise<br />

pseudorange measurements, so that high precision positioning solutions can be obtained.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the <strong>integer</strong> nature of the <strong>ambiguities</strong> must be exploited. Integer parameter<br />

resolution is, however, a non-trivial problem, which will be the topic of the remaining<br />

chapters.<br />

If the first satellite is chosen as the reference satellite, the following transformation matrix<br />

can be used to arrive at the double difference geometry-free model:<br />

D T = <br />

−em−1 Im−1<br />

(2.48)<br />

18 <strong>GNSS</strong> observation model <strong>and</strong> quality control

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!