The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> single difference models can now be presented as follows. <strong>The</strong> full-rank geometryfree<br />
model is given by:<br />
⎛⎡<br />
⎤ ⎞<br />
µ<br />
e2f<br />
E{y} = ⊗ Im ρ + ⎝⎣−µ<br />
⎦ ⊗ Im⎠<br />
I<br />
0<br />
1<br />
⎛⎡<br />
⎤<br />
0 <br />
I2f<br />
+ ⊗ em dtqr + ⎝⎣Λ⎦<br />
0<br />
⊗<br />
0<br />
Im−1<br />
0<br />
⎞<br />
(2.45)<br />
⎠ a<br />
<strong>The</strong> observation vector is given by (2.44), the range vector ρ by (2.40), <strong>and</strong> the parameter<br />
vectors I, dtqr, <strong>and</strong> a by equations (2.32), (2.42) <strong>and</strong> (2.43) respectively.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ionosphere-weighted, troposphere-float, geometry-based model is obtained as:<br />
⎛⎡<br />
⎤ ⎞<br />
µ<br />
e2f<br />
e2f<br />
E{y} = ⊗ G ∆rqr + ⊗ Ψ T + ⎝⎣−µ<br />
⎦ ⊗ Im⎠<br />
I<br />
0<br />
0<br />
1<br />
⎛⎡<br />
⎤<br />
0 <br />
I2f<br />
+ ⊗ em dtqr + ⎝⎣Λ⎦<br />
0<br />
⊗<br />
0<br />
Im−1<br />
0<br />
⎞<br />
(2.46)<br />
⎠ a<br />
2.3.3 Double difference models<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of parameters in the observation equations can be even further reduced<br />
by also taking differences between observations of different satellites. In this double<br />
difference (DD) approach, one reference satellite t is chosen <strong>and</strong> the single difference<br />
observations of this satellite are subtracted from the corresponding single difference<br />
observations of all other satellites. For one satellite-pair the geometry-free observation<br />
equations become then:<br />
p ts<br />
qr,j = p s qr,j − p t qr,j = ρ ts<br />
qr + T ts<br />
qr + µjI ts<br />
qr + e s qr,j<br />
φ ts<br />
qr,j = φ s qr,j − φ t qr,j = ρ ts<br />
qr + T ts<br />
qr − µjI ts<br />
qr + λjN ts<br />
qr,j + ε ts<br />
qr,j<br />
(2.47)<br />
<strong>The</strong> instrumental delays <strong>and</strong> clock errors of the receivers have now also cancelled from<br />
the observation equations, as well as the initial phases in the receivers. This leaves only<br />
the <strong>integer</strong> carrier phase ambiguity as extra parameter in the phase observations. Only<br />
if this ambiguity is resolved, the phase observations can be considered as very precise<br />
pseudorange measurements, so that high precision positioning solutions can be obtained.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, the <strong>integer</strong> nature of the <strong>ambiguities</strong> must be exploited. Integer parameter<br />
resolution is, however, a non-trivial problem, which will be the topic of the remaining<br />
chapters.<br />
If the first satellite is chosen as the reference satellite, the following transformation matrix<br />
can be used to arrive at the double difference geometry-free model:<br />
D T = <br />
−em−1 Im−1<br />
(2.48)<br />
18 <strong>GNSS</strong> observation model <strong>and</strong> quality control