30.08.2013 Views

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2.6 Multipath<br />

Ideally, a <strong>GNSS</strong> signal should arrive at the receiver antenna only via the direct path from<br />

satellite to receiver. In practice, however, the signal often arrives at the antenna via<br />

two or more paths because the signal is reflected on nearby constructions or the ground.<br />

This effect is called multipath. It affects the phase <strong>and</strong> code measurements differently.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resulting measurement error depends on the strength of the direct <strong>and</strong> the reflected<br />

signals, <strong>and</strong> on the delay of the reflected signal.<br />

Typically, the error induced by multipath on the code measurements varies between 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> 5 meters. <strong>The</strong> effect on the phase measurements is 1-5 cm, <strong>and</strong> it will never be<br />

more than a quarter of a cycle provided that the amplitude of the direct signal is larger<br />

than the amplitude of the reflected signal.<br />

Multipath is a systematic error <strong>and</strong> is very difficult to model. Although it is acknowledged<br />

that it is one of the most important issues in the field of high precision <strong>GNSS</strong> positioning,<br />

the multipath effect will be ignored here, i.e.<br />

dm s r,j = δm s r,j = 0 (2.17)<br />

2.2.7 R<strong>and</strong>om errors or noise<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>GNSS</strong> code <strong>and</strong> phase observations are of a stochastic nature, so that r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

errors or observation noise must be taken into account in the observation equations.<br />

In equations (2.7) <strong>and</strong> (2.12) the noise was denoted as e <strong>and</strong> ε for code <strong>and</strong> phase<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om errors are assumed to be zero-mean:<br />

E{e s r,j(t)} = 0<br />

E{ε s r,j(t)} = 0<br />

2.2.8 <strong>The</strong> geometry-free observation equations<br />

(2.18)<br />

<strong>The</strong> observation equations (2.7) <strong>and</strong> (2.12) are parameterized in terms of the satellitereceiver<br />

ranges ρ s r <strong>and</strong> are therefore referred to as non-positioning or geometry-free<br />

observation equations. <strong>The</strong> final non-positioning observation equations are obtained by<br />

inserting equations (2.13), (2.16), (2.17) into equations (2.7) <strong>and</strong> (2.12):<br />

p s r,j(t) = ρ s r(t) + T s r (t) + µjI s r (t) + cdtr,j(t) − cdt s ,j(t) + e s r,j(t)<br />

φ s r,j(t) = ρ s r(t) + T s r (t) − µjI s r (t) + cδtr,j(t) − cδt s ,j(t) + λjM s r,j + ε s r,j(t)<br />

(2.19)<br />

For notational convenience the receiver-satellite range is denoted as ρ s r(t) instead of<br />

ρ s r(t, t − τ s r ). Furthermore, the initial phases of the signal are lumped with the <strong>integer</strong><br />

phase ambiguity, since these parameters are not separable. <strong>The</strong> resulting parameters in<br />

M s r are real-valued, i.e. non-<strong>integer</strong>:<br />

M s r,j = φr,j(t0) + φ s ,j(t0) + N s r,j<br />

Here, they will still be referred to as <strong>ambiguities</strong>.<br />

(2.20)<br />

12 <strong>GNSS</strong> observation model <strong>and</strong> quality control

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!