The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction 1<br />
1.1 Background<br />
In the past decade the Global Positioning System (GPS) has found widespread use<br />
in different fields such as surveying, navigation <strong>and</strong> geophysics. <strong>The</strong> requirements on<br />
precision, reliability <strong>and</strong> availability of the navigation system for these applications have<br />
become higher <strong>and</strong> higher. Moreover, the positioning information often needs to be<br />
obtained in (near) real-time. Without the development of <strong>integer</strong> ambiguity resolution<br />
algorithms, it would never have been possible to meet these requirements with GPS.<br />
Fast <strong>and</strong> high precision relative positioning with a Global Navigations Satellite System<br />
(<strong>GNSS</strong>) is namely only possible by using the very precise carrier phase measurements.<br />
However, these carrier phases are ambiguous by an unknown number of cycles. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>ambiguities</strong> are known to be <strong>integer</strong>-valued, <strong>and</strong> this knowledge has been exploited for<br />
the development of <strong>integer</strong> ambiguity resolution algorithms. Once the <strong>ambiguities</strong> are<br />
fixed on their <strong>integer</strong> values, the carrier phase measurements start to act as if they were<br />
very precise pseudorange measurements.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>estimation</strong> process consists then of three steps. First a st<strong>and</strong>ard least-squares<br />
adjustment is applied in order to arrive at the so-called float solution. All unknown<br />
parameters are estimated as real-valued. In the second step, the <strong>integer</strong> constraint on<br />
the <strong>ambiguities</strong> is considered. This means that the float <strong>ambiguities</strong> are mapped to<br />
<strong>integer</strong> values. Different choices of the map are possible. <strong>The</strong> float <strong>ambiguities</strong> can<br />
simply be rounded to the nearest <strong>integer</strong> values, or conditionally rounded so that the<br />
correlation between the <strong>ambiguities</strong> is taken into account. <strong>The</strong> optimal choice is to use<br />
the <strong>integer</strong> least-squares estimator, which maximizes the probability of correct <strong>integer</strong><br />
<strong>estimation</strong>. Finally, after fixing the <strong>ambiguities</strong> to their <strong>integer</strong> values, the remaining<br />
unknown parameters are adjusted by virtue of their correlation with the <strong>ambiguities</strong>.<br />
Nowadays, the non-trivial problem of <strong>integer</strong> ambiguity <strong>estimation</strong> can be considered<br />
solved. However, a parameter <strong>estimation</strong> theory is not complete without the appropriate<br />
measures to validate the solution. So, fixing the <strong>ambiguities</strong> should only be applied<br />
if there is enough confidence in their correctness. <strong>The</strong> probability of correct <strong>integer</strong><br />
<strong>estimation</strong> can be computed a priori – without the need for actual observations – <strong>and</strong> is<br />
called the success rate. Only if this success rate is very close to one, the fixed ambiguity<br />
estimator may be considered deterministic. In that case it is possible to define test<br />
statistics in order to validate the fixed solution. If the success rate is not close to one,<br />
1