The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IE<br />
IA<br />
I<br />
Figure 6.1: <strong>The</strong> set of relationships between <strong>integer</strong> estimators (I), <strong>integer</strong> aperture estimators<br />
(IA), <strong>and</strong> <strong>integer</strong> equivariant estimators (IE): I⊂IA⊂IE.<br />
Admissible <strong>integer</strong> <strong>estimation</strong> <strong>and</strong> BIE <strong>estimation</strong> both cannot provide us with satisfactory<br />
measures to evaluate the probabilistic properties of the final solution. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />
the third class of <strong>integer</strong> estimators was introduced: the class of <strong>integer</strong> aperture (IA)<br />
estimators.<br />
IA <strong>estimation</strong> is an overall approach of <strong>integer</strong> <strong>estimation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>validation</strong>. This is the<br />
case because three a priori probabilities are distinguished: the success rate, the fail<br />
rate, <strong>and</strong> the undecided rate. Around each <strong>integer</strong> an identically shaped acceptance<br />
region, referred to as the aperture pull-in region, is defined, with the size determined by<br />
the choice of a maximum allowed fail rate. With respect to the shape of the regions<br />
different choices are possible. Some ’simple’ choices are using ellipsoidal regions, or the<br />
down-scaled pull-in regions of <strong>integer</strong> bootstrapping or <strong>integer</strong> least-squares. But other<br />
choices are possible. <strong>The</strong> Optimal IA estimator is defined such that the success rate is<br />
maximized for a given fixed fail rate.<br />
Advantages of IA <strong>estimation</strong> with a fixed fail rate are:<br />
• It is an overall approach: <strong>estimation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>validation</strong> are not considered as separate<br />
problems.<br />
• An exact <strong>and</strong> overall probabilistic evaluation of the final solution is possible.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> user only needs to choose the maximum allowable fail rate, which is exactly<br />
the parameter on which a user wants to put restrictions. Moreover, this means that<br />
the size of the acceptance region is really based on the model at h<strong>and</strong>. Choosing<br />
a fixed critical value or a critical value based on incorrect assumptions on the<br />
distribution of the test statistic, as is common practice, will only work when the<br />
precision is high, <strong>and</strong> may even then result in a test that is either too conservative<br />
or too optimistic.<br />
140 Conclusions <strong>and</strong> recommendations