The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 5.3: Comparison of IAB <strong>and</strong> IALS <strong>estimation</strong>.<br />
IAB IALS<br />
µ 0.5322 0.5322 0.5500<br />
06 01 Pf 0.0010 0.0008 0.0010<br />
Ps 0.1336 0.1458 0.1657<br />
µ 0.7867 0.7867 0.8000<br />
10 01 Pf 0.0012 0.0010 0.0012<br />
Ps 0.8456 0.9023 0.9137<br />
concluded that the DTIA, RTIA, <strong>and</strong> the IALS estimators perform almost as well as the<br />
OIA estimator. With the implementation as described in section 5.7.3 the DTIA <strong>and</strong><br />
RTIA estimators have the advantage to be computationally simple <strong>and</strong> less dem<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
than the other two estimators. OIA <strong>estimation</strong> requires the approximation of fˇɛ(x)<br />
which may involve the determination of <strong>and</strong> summation over a very large <strong>integer</strong> set, see<br />
section 3.3. IALS <strong>estimation</strong> involves applying ILS <strong>estimation</strong> twice for each generated<br />
sample.<br />
In this section, examples are worked out which illustrate the benefits of IA <strong>estimation</strong><br />
with a fixed fail rate for practical use. Besides the OIA estimator only the RTIA estimator<br />
will be considered, because of its attractive properties described above, <strong>and</strong> because it is<br />
well-known <strong>and</strong> already often used in practice, albeit based on other acceptance criteria.<br />
<strong>The</strong> vc-matrices of examples 06 02 <strong>and</strong> 10 03 are used. <strong>The</strong>se vc-matrices correspond<br />
to a single epoch model. For the following epochs it is simply assumed that<br />
Qk = 1<br />
k Q1,<br />
with k the epoch number. This relation is valid when the satellite geometry is not<br />
changed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> aperture parameters, success rates <strong>and</strong> fail rates as function of the number of epochs<br />
are determined using simulations. <strong>The</strong> following approaches are considered:<br />
• Optimal IA <strong>estimation</strong>, fixed fail rate Pf = 0.005;<br />
• Ratio Test IA <strong>estimation</strong>, fixed fail rate Pf = 0.005;<br />
• Ratio Test, fixed critical value µ = 1<br />
3 ;<br />
• Ratio Test, fixed critical value µ = 1<br />
2 <strong>and</strong><br />
fixed solution is only accepted if Ps,LS ≥ 0.99;<br />
• fixed solution is only accepted if Ps,LS ≥ 0.995.<br />
If the ILS fail rate is smaller than 0.005, all solutions are accepted with the first two IA<br />
estimators, i.e. Ω0 = S0. Note that the last approach also guarantees that the fail rate<br />
will never exceed 0.005.<br />
Performance of IA <strong>estimation</strong> 133