30.08.2013 Views

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

as follows:<br />

Ωz,R = ΩR ∩ Sz<br />

= {x ∈ Sz | x − ˇx 2 Qâ ≤ µx − ˇx2 2 Qâ , 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />

= {x ∈ Sz | x − ˇx 2 Qâ ≤ µx − u2Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \ {ˇx}, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />

= {x ∈ Sz | x − z 2 Qâ ≤ µx − u2 Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \ {z}, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />

= {x ∈ R n | x − z 2 Qâ ≤ µx − u2 Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \ {z}, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />

= {x ∈ R n | y 2 Qâ ≤ µy − v2 Qâ , ∀v ∈ Zn \ {0}, x = y + z, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />

= ΩR ∩ S0 + z<br />

= Ω0,R + z<br />

<strong>The</strong> first two equalities follow from the definition of the ratio test, <strong>and</strong> the third from<br />

ˆx− ˇx2 Qâ ≤ ˆx− ˇx2 2 Qˆx ≤ ˆx−u2Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \{ˇx}. <strong>The</strong> fourth equality follows since<br />

ˇx = z is equivalent to x ∈ Sz, <strong>and</strong> the fifth equality from the fact that 0 < µ ≤ 1. <strong>The</strong><br />

last equalities follow from a change of variables <strong>and</strong> the definition of Ω0,R = ΩR ∩ S0.<br />

Finally note that<br />

<br />

Ωz,R = <br />

(ΩR ∩ Sz) = ΩR ∩ ( <br />

Sz) = ΩR<br />

z∈Z n<br />

z∈Z n<br />

This ends the proof of (5.14).<br />

z∈Z n<br />

It has thus been shown that the acceptance region of the ratio test consists of an infinite<br />

number of regions, each one is an <strong>integer</strong> translated copy of Ω0,R ⊂ S0. <strong>The</strong> acceptance<br />

region plays the role of the aperture space, <strong>and</strong> µ plays the role of an aperture parameter.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratio test will be referred to as the RTIA estimator.<br />

It can now be shown how the aperture pull-in regions for the ratio test are ’constructed’,<br />

cf. (Verhagen <strong>and</strong> Teunissen 2004a). From the definition of Ω0 the following can be<br />

derived:<br />

Ω0,R : x 2 Qâ ≤ µx − z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0}, 0 < µ ≤ 1<br />

1 − µ<br />

⇐⇒ <br />

µ x + z2 1<br />

Qâ ≤<br />

⇐⇒ x + µ<br />

1 − µ z2 Qâ ≤<br />

µ z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0}<br />

µ<br />

(1 − µ) 2 z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0} (5.15)<br />

This shows that the aperture pull-in region is equal to the intersection of all ellipsoids<br />

with centers − µ<br />

1−µ z <strong>and</strong> size governed by √ µ<br />

zQâ 1−µ . In fact, the intersection region is<br />

only determined by the adjacent <strong>integer</strong>s, since ∀u ∈ Z n that are not adjacent, (5.15)<br />

is always fulfilled ∀x ∈ S0. It follows namely from equations (5.13) <strong>and</strong> (5.14) that for<br />

all x ∈ S0 on the boundary of Ω0:<br />

x 2 Qâ = µx − c2Qâ , c = arg min<br />

z∈Zn \{0} x − z2Qâ So, c is the second-closest <strong>integer</strong> <strong>and</strong> must be adjacent. <strong>The</strong>refore the following is<br />

always true:<br />

x 2 Qâ = µx − c2 Qâ ≤ µx − z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0, c}<br />

Ratio test, difference test <strong>and</strong> projector test 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!