The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
as follows:<br />
Ωz,R = ΩR ∩ Sz<br />
= {x ∈ Sz | x − ˇx 2 Qâ ≤ µx − ˇx2 2 Qâ , 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />
= {x ∈ Sz | x − ˇx 2 Qâ ≤ µx − u2Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \ {ˇx}, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />
= {x ∈ Sz | x − z 2 Qâ ≤ µx − u2 Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \ {z}, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />
= {x ∈ R n | x − z 2 Qâ ≤ µx − u2 Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \ {z}, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />
= {x ∈ R n | y 2 Qâ ≤ µy − v2 Qâ , ∀v ∈ Zn \ {0}, x = y + z, 0 < µ ≤ 1}<br />
= ΩR ∩ S0 + z<br />
= Ω0,R + z<br />
<strong>The</strong> first two equalities follow from the definition of the ratio test, <strong>and</strong> the third from<br />
ˆx− ˇx2 Qâ ≤ ˆx− ˇx2 2 Qˆx ≤ ˆx−u2Qâ , ∀u ∈ Zn \{ˇx}. <strong>The</strong> fourth equality follows since<br />
ˇx = z is equivalent to x ∈ Sz, <strong>and</strong> the fifth equality from the fact that 0 < µ ≤ 1. <strong>The</strong><br />
last equalities follow from a change of variables <strong>and</strong> the definition of Ω0,R = ΩR ∩ S0.<br />
Finally note that<br />
<br />
Ωz,R = <br />
(ΩR ∩ Sz) = ΩR ∩ ( <br />
Sz) = ΩR<br />
z∈Z n<br />
z∈Z n<br />
This ends the proof of (5.14).<br />
z∈Z n<br />
It has thus been shown that the acceptance region of the ratio test consists of an infinite<br />
number of regions, each one is an <strong>integer</strong> translated copy of Ω0,R ⊂ S0. <strong>The</strong> acceptance<br />
region plays the role of the aperture space, <strong>and</strong> µ plays the role of an aperture parameter.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ratio test will be referred to as the RTIA estimator.<br />
It can now be shown how the aperture pull-in regions for the ratio test are ’constructed’,<br />
cf. (Verhagen <strong>and</strong> Teunissen 2004a). From the definition of Ω0 the following can be<br />
derived:<br />
Ω0,R : x 2 Qâ ≤ µx − z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0}, 0 < µ ≤ 1<br />
1 − µ<br />
⇐⇒ <br />
µ x + z2 1<br />
Qâ ≤<br />
⇐⇒ x + µ<br />
1 − µ z2 Qâ ≤<br />
µ z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0}<br />
µ<br />
(1 − µ) 2 z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0} (5.15)<br />
This shows that the aperture pull-in region is equal to the intersection of all ellipsoids<br />
with centers − µ<br />
1−µ z <strong>and</strong> size governed by √ µ<br />
zQâ 1−µ . In fact, the intersection region is<br />
only determined by the adjacent <strong>integer</strong>s, since ∀u ∈ Z n that are not adjacent, (5.15)<br />
is always fulfilled ∀x ∈ S0. It follows namely from equations (5.13) <strong>and</strong> (5.14) that for<br />
all x ∈ S0 on the boundary of Ω0:<br />
x 2 Qâ = µx − c2Qâ , c = arg min<br />
z∈Zn \{0} x − z2Qâ So, c is the second-closest <strong>integer</strong> <strong>and</strong> must be adjacent. <strong>The</strong>refore the following is<br />
always true:<br />
x 2 Qâ = µx − c2 Qâ ≤ µx − z2 Qâ , ∀z ∈ Zn \ {0, c}<br />
Ratio test, difference test <strong>and</strong> projector test 95