29.08.2013 Views

Part 2 (Obituaries) - King's College - University of Cambridge

Part 2 (Obituaries) - King's College - University of Cambridge

Part 2 (Obituaries) - King's College - University of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Peter returned to England and to <strong>Cambridge</strong> in 1991 as an Assistant Lecturer<br />

in the Department <strong>of</strong> History and Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Science. He joined a<br />

Department which was divided to the point <strong>of</strong> dysfunction. Not only did he<br />

rise to be Head <strong>of</strong> Department (1996) and Pr<strong>of</strong>essor (1997) with<br />

extraordinary rapidity, but he also turned the Department with similar speed<br />

into one <strong>of</strong> the best run and most intellectually stimulating in the <strong>University</strong><br />

– and world-renowned.To the amazement <strong>of</strong> other arguing departments, he<br />

successfully held faculty retreats every year – a whole day at his house,<br />

compulsory for all academic staff; set up reading groups; insisted on<br />

properly organised and run meetings; insisted on a decent espresso<br />

machine; employed fine staff from secretary to lecturer and nourished the<br />

abilities <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> them. He led by example, in his teaching and care, and led<br />

too in fundraising, administrative order and intellectual standards. He<br />

managed to be a dominant leader and to promote the Department in<br />

competition with others in the <strong>University</strong> without alienating or appearing<br />

Machiavellian. There was no trickiness here: Peter was patently honest,<br />

hardworking and seeking after the best, however much Cornford’s theory <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> politics would dismiss such behaviour as destined to fail. When<br />

Peter died, the Department was stricken. His <strong>of</strong>fice was left untouched for<br />

months, as no one could bear to go in.<br />

Peter’s own work focused on science and epistemology. His book Inference to<br />

the Best Explanation (1991; 2nd edition 2004) is a now-standard work on how<br />

we try to explain things by making inferences from evidence. He was also<br />

fascinated by medical ethics. He chaired a working party on ethical issues <strong>of</strong><br />

pharmacogenetics as a member <strong>of</strong> the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, and<br />

was a Fellow <strong>of</strong> the Academy <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences. In 2004, he was the<br />

Medawar Prize Lecturer at the Royal Society. Peter worked, that is, at the<br />

highest level <strong>of</strong> philosophy, and developed its engagement with medicine<br />

and public life.<br />

But what made Peter remarkable was his ability to bring his work to a wide<br />

audience. Typically, he gave his inaugural lecture as part <strong>of</strong> Science Week. He<br />

enthralled a packed audience in Lady Mitchell Hall, speaking without a note,<br />

and starting with the announcement that his lecture was designed to be<br />

65<br />

OBITUARIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!