28.08.2013 Views

Spring/Summer 2010 - Robert M. Kerr Food & Agricultural Products ...

Spring/Summer 2010 - Robert M. Kerr Food & Agricultural Products ...

Spring/Summer 2010 - Robert M. Kerr Food & Agricultural Products ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

processed at a loss of only fifty cents<br />

per unit. If the loss per unit is cut in<br />

half, and the savings are passed on to<br />

the customer, even more units can be<br />

sold.<br />

The result was increased production,<br />

but margins continued to be thin,<br />

missing, or minus. By today’s standards,<br />

this is not a sustainable marketing<br />

strategy.<br />

According to the American Marketing<br />

Association, “Marketing is the<br />

activity, set of institutions, and processes<br />

for creating, communicating,<br />

delivering, and exchanging offerings<br />

valuable to customers, clients, partners,<br />

and society at large.”<br />

Thus, it is a system to add value<br />

by increasing customer awareness and<br />

delivering differentiated products and<br />

services. Having a marketing plan can<br />

lead to increased margins for small<br />

and large producers and can be a winwin<br />

for processors and end users.<br />

It is not unusual that about 80<br />

percent of the margins result from sale<br />

of about 20 percent of the products.<br />

Remember the “80/20 rule?”<br />

In the example above, volume and<br />

low price did not result in significant<br />

margins. Therefore, the business-marketing<br />

strategy shifted toward reducing<br />

the commodity side (80 percent) of the<br />

business and increasing the processed<br />

side (20 percent), or to shift product<br />

mix from commodities to consumer<br />

branded products. To shift away from<br />

commodity products, marketing gurus<br />

were hired and given the assignment<br />

to “work their magic.”<br />

The marketing gurus began by<br />

hosting a series of endless meetings to<br />

plan, develop, and sell the new strategy.<br />

The result was a plan to expand<br />

existing brands with new products,<br />

create new brands, and phase out commodity<br />

products, where possible.<br />

My role was to keep a steady<br />

stream of new or redesigned products<br />

in the pipeline to meet marketing objectives<br />

and help keep the gurus employed.<br />

The marketing gurus expected<br />

new products to fit a customer need<br />

(perceived or real) and meet specific<br />

financial targets.<br />

In most cases, actual product development<br />

did not take place until a<br />

financial analysis was conducted. Market<br />

research became<br />

part of the package<br />

and was used to<br />

determine what consumers<br />

would like<br />

and if specific features<br />

were of interest.<br />

Focus groups<br />

were conducted to<br />

test proposed concepts,<br />

product acceptance,<br />

and interest in purchasing.<br />

Information learned through market<br />

research was used to support new<br />

product development and presentations<br />

to buyers. It provided reasons<br />

why buyers should stock the new and/<br />

or revised products.<br />

During time, a paradigm shift took<br />

place within the sales force as marketing<br />

plans expanded beyond volume<br />

and price.<br />

The customer now became part of<br />

the equation. Sales personnel relied on<br />

features and benefits including “price”<br />

as a factor, but not the only factor to<br />

consider when selling product.<br />

On time delivery, accurate invoicing,<br />

credits, product support, and marketing<br />

allowance were non-product<br />

features used to differentiate products<br />

from the competition and support<br />

buyer satisfaction.<br />

Operating according to Dilbert, “If<br />

you lower the price, you can sell more<br />

food processing<br />

By David Moe<br />

FAPC Pilot Plant Manager<br />

david.moe@okstate.edu<br />

units, or if you increase the price, you<br />

will sell fewer units” slowly became<br />

a concept of the past. The new strategy<br />

of adding value to products and<br />

services continued after the marketing<br />

gurus moved on.<br />

Marketing is a way of offering<br />

“something,” a competitive product<br />

not offered in another market. This<br />

brings to mind the story of a new store<br />

opening next door to compete with an<br />

existing store.<br />

The new store put up a sign saying,<br />

“best deals.” When another new<br />

store opened on the other side of the<br />

original store, they put up a sign saying,<br />

“lowest prices.” When sales at the<br />

original store dropped, they put a sign<br />

over its door saying, “main entrance.”<br />

Of course, this is not a true story,<br />

but shows how a “marketing plan” can<br />

deliver the customer to your product,<br />

at least short range.<br />

When customers expect only low<br />

price, they move on if price does not<br />

meet their target. However, if price,<br />

quality, and service all exceed their<br />

expectations, they will soon learn the<br />

“best price” is not always the lowest.<br />

Having a well thought out brand<br />

and marketing strategy, is part of a<br />

system to identify, keep, and satisfy<br />

the customer. Another part of the system<br />

is to provide consistent products<br />

and services.<br />

In a nutshell, “why marketing?”<br />

<strong>Spring</strong>/<strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2010</strong> | 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!