28.08.2013 Views

Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S23(<br />

t3<br />

)<br />

t y,<br />

jump q yt<br />

cyc<br />

(4.5)<br />

S ( t ) S ( t )<br />

23<br />

3<br />

12<br />

2<br />

Since the cycle jump is determined for a set <strong>of</strong> state variables, the allowed jump t jump is chosen<br />

as the minimum <strong>of</strong> the computed allowed jump times for each variable:<br />

jump<br />

t t <br />

t t<br />

/ <br />

cyc min y,<br />

jump cyc<br />

(4.6)<br />

To extrapolate the state variables after each jump the Heun integrator is used :<br />

S23( t3<br />

) S jump ( t t<br />

jump t jump<br />

1<br />

y <br />

2<br />

( t3<br />

t<br />

jump ) y(<br />

t3<br />

) <br />

3 )<br />

(4.7)<br />

By substituting Equation (4.4) into Equation (4.7):<br />

y(<br />

t<br />

2<br />

jump<br />

3 t<br />

jump ) y(<br />

t3<br />

) S23(<br />

t3<br />

) t<br />

jump S23( t3<br />

) S12(<br />

t2<br />

) <br />

(4.8)<br />

2tcyc<br />

The above extrapolation scheme is most suitable for structures with slowly evolving properties,<br />

in a quasi-linear manner. In case <strong>of</strong> more non-linear behaviour, higher order integrators could be<br />

implemented. However, the extrapolation scheme is able to capture highly non-linear behaviour<br />

by conducting shorter or no jumps. This, <strong>of</strong> course, does not save so much computational time,<br />

but ensures at least an acceptable solution.<br />

After having introduced the controlled cycle jump procedure, it is now <strong>of</strong> interest to investigate<br />

the extrapolation accuracy <strong>and</strong> the computational efficiency <strong>of</strong> the cycle jump method<br />

implemented in a finite element fatigue crack growth routine. Two different finite element<br />

routines incorporating the cycle jump method have been developed in this chapter. The first<br />

routine is based on a 2D finite element model suitable for 2D <strong>and</strong> axisymmetric fatigue crack<br />

growth, <strong>and</strong> the second is based on a 3D finite element model which can be used in any 3D<br />

fatigue crack growth simulation.<br />

4.3 Face/Core <strong>Fatigue</strong> Crack Growth in S<strong>and</strong>wich Beams<br />

The cycle jump method described before will now be implemented in a FE-based numerical<br />

routine for investigating fatigue crack propagation in the face/core interface <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>and</strong>wich beam.<br />

Interface fatigue crack growth in a s<strong>and</strong>wich beam consisting <strong>of</strong> 2.8 mm thick plain-woven Eglass/epoxy<br />

face sheets over a 50 mm thick Divinycell H130 PVC foam core is simulated by a<br />

commercial finite element code, ANSYS version 11. Face sheet <strong>and</strong> core material properties are<br />

67<br />

( t<br />

)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!