Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
S23(<br />
t3<br />
)<br />
t y,<br />
jump q yt<br />
cyc<br />
(4.5)<br />
S ( t ) S ( t )<br />
23<br />
3<br />
12<br />
2<br />
Since the cycle jump is determined for a set <strong>of</strong> state variables, the allowed jump t jump is chosen<br />
as the minimum <strong>of</strong> the computed allowed jump times for each variable:<br />
jump<br />
t t <br />
t t<br />
/ <br />
cyc min y,<br />
jump cyc<br />
(4.6)<br />
To extrapolate the state variables after each jump the Heun integrator is used :<br />
S23( t3<br />
) S jump ( t t<br />
jump t jump<br />
1<br />
y <br />
2<br />
( t3<br />
t<br />
jump ) y(<br />
t3<br />
) <br />
3 )<br />
(4.7)<br />
By substituting Equation (4.4) into Equation (4.7):<br />
y(<br />
t<br />
2<br />
jump<br />
3 t<br />
jump ) y(<br />
t3<br />
) S23(<br />
t3<br />
) t<br />
jump S23( t3<br />
) S12(<br />
t2<br />
) <br />
(4.8)<br />
2tcyc<br />
The above extrapolation scheme is most suitable for structures with slowly evolving properties,<br />
in a quasi-linear manner. In case <strong>of</strong> more non-linear behaviour, higher order integrators could be<br />
implemented. However, the extrapolation scheme is able to capture highly non-linear behaviour<br />
by conducting shorter or no jumps. This, <strong>of</strong> course, does not save so much computational time,<br />
but ensures at least an acceptable solution.<br />
After having introduced the controlled cycle jump procedure, it is now <strong>of</strong> interest to investigate<br />
the extrapolation accuracy <strong>and</strong> the computational efficiency <strong>of</strong> the cycle jump method<br />
implemented in a finite element fatigue crack growth routine. Two different finite element<br />
routines incorporating the cycle jump method have been developed in this chapter. The first<br />
routine is based on a 2D finite element model suitable for 2D <strong>and</strong> axisymmetric fatigue crack<br />
growth, <strong>and</strong> the second is based on a 3D finite element model which can be used in any 3D<br />
fatigue crack growth simulation.<br />
4.3 Face/Core <strong>Fatigue</strong> Crack Growth in S<strong>and</strong>wich Beams<br />
The cycle jump method described before will now be implemented in a FE-based numerical<br />
routine for investigating fatigue crack propagation in the face/core interface <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>and</strong>wich beam.<br />
Interface fatigue crack growth in a s<strong>and</strong>wich beam consisting <strong>of</strong> 2.8 mm thick plain-woven Eglass/epoxy<br />
face sheets over a 50 mm thick Divinycell H130 PVC foam core is simulated by a<br />
commercial finite element code, ANSYS version 11. Face sheet <strong>and</strong> core material properties are<br />
67<br />
( t<br />
)