Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
(a) Debonded face sheet Figure 3.16: Finite element model of a panel with a debond diameter of 100 mm. (a) Submodel min. element length 0.02mm (b) global mode min. element length 0.25 mm. Figure 3.17 shows load vs. out-of-plane deflection of the centre of the dobond for panels with 200 mm debond and PMI, H130 and H250 cores determined from experiments and finite element analysis. In Figure 3.17 the point where the crack starts to propagate in the tested panels is marked with an open circle (“”). The load reduction at the onset of propagation is shown only for the experimental results, as only initiation of debond propagation is modelled numerically (no crack propagation algorithms are implemented in the finite element model). (a) (b) (c) 3.17: Finite element and experimental results for out-of-plane displacement vs. load diagram for panels with 200 mm debond and (a) H130 (b) H250 and (c) PMI core. Experimental buckling load of the debonded panels and numerical buckling loads determined by linear eigenbuckling analysis as well as non-linear finite element analysis are given in Table 3.6. It is seen that the buckling loads of the panels with 100 mm debond diameter increase significantly with increasing core stiffness, but for the larger debonds the increase is smaller. The numerical and experimental buckling loads show fair agreement. 54 200 200 200 200 (b)
3.6: Numerical and experimental buckling loads. Buckling loads (kN) Core type Debond diameter (mm) Experiment Non-linear FE eigenbuckling FE H130 100 200 106.5±4.5 27±1 100 26 94.5 26.9 300 15 12 12.9 H250 100 200 121±9 24±1 104 28 100 28 300 16 13 12.5 PMI 100 200 85.5±3.5 28.5±3.5 94 28 109 33.8 300 11.5±4.5 14 15.9 In order to estimate the crack propagation load of the panels, the energy release rate and phase angle were determined along the debond front. The energy release rate (G) was determined from relative nodal pair displacements along the crack flanks obtained from the finite element analysis. The energy release rate and mode-mixity phase angle are given by Equation (1.18) and (1.19) in the Introduction of this thesis. h, which is the characteristic length of the crack problem, is chosen as the face sheet thickness. In Figure 3.18 the normalised energy release rate and phase angle with respect to the maximum determined energy release rate and phase angle along the debond front are plotted in polar diagrams for the H130 panels with 100 mm, 200 mm and 300 mm debond diameter in a load level close to the experimental debond propagation load. Maximum energy release rate and minimum phase angle occur in the 0-degree debond front, implying the onset of debond propagation in this location, which is similar to experimental observations, see Figure 3.12. The same conclusion may be drawn for the panels with PMI and H250 core. 90 1 120 135 0.8 150 0.6 0.4 165 0.2 180 0 105 195 210 225 240 255 75 60 15 0 345 330 315 300 285 120 1 90 75 60 45 30 135 150 0.5 45 30 105 (a) (b) 270 270 100 mm 200 mm 300 mm 100 mm 200 mm 300 mm 3.18:(a) Normalised energy release rate (G/Gmax) and (b) normalised phase angle (/max) for H130 panels with debond diameters of 100 mm, 200 mm and 300 mm. 55 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 0 -0.5 15 0 345 330 315 300 285
- Page 26 and 27: 1.2 Overview of the Thesis In this
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 1.3: Fracture modes, from Be
- Page 30 and 31: In Equations (1.5) and (1.6) H11, H
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 1.6: Schematic illustration
- Page 34 and 35: The compact tension specimen (CT) i
- Page 36 and 37: A Figure 1.10: CSB, DCB, TSD, DCB-U
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 2 Buckling Driven Face/Core
- Page 40 and 41: (DIC) measurement system (ARAMIS 2M
- Page 42 and 43: corresponds to the onset of debond
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2.7: Crack kinking into the
- Page 46 and 47: (2.2) where and for plane str
- Page 48 and 49: A modified version of the tilted sa
- Page 50 and 51: previous observations of crack path
- Page 52 and 53: of contact elements (CONTACT173 and
- Page 54 and 55: the debond opening initially increa
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2.4: Instability loads determ
- Page 58 and 59: G (J/m2) 600 400 200 0 H100 IMP=0.1
- Page 60 and 61: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 62 and 63: Hayman (2007) has described a damag
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3.1: Panel test specimens. La
- Page 66 and 67: sheet and the core thickness, respe
- Page 68 and 69: Load (N) 250 200 150 100 50 0 H130
- Page 70 and 71: Table 3.4: Parameters in the face/c
- Page 72 and 73: was used to monitor 3D surface disp
- Page 74 and 75: arising due to the junction between
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 3.19 shows the determined en
- Page 80 and 81: H130 MMB H130 Panel H250 MMB Interf
- Page 82 and 83: 3.6 Conclusion In this chapter the
- Page 84 and 85: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 86 and 87: composite laminates under thermal c
- Page 88 and 89: S S y( t ) y( t ) ( t ) 2 1 12 2
- Page 90 and 91: listed in Table 4.1. The length and
- Page 92 and 93: The strain energy release rate, G,
- Page 94 and 95: high growth rate of G (see Figure 4
- Page 96 and 97: 4.4 Face/Core Fatigue Crack Growth
- Page 98 and 99: Debond 310 mm Symmetry B. C. a Figu
- Page 100 and 101: B 2 1/ 2 ( S44 S55 S45) (4.17) wh
- Page 102 and 103: 75), which illustrates possible ina
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 4.18 (a) presents the deflec
- Page 106 and 107: Debond radius (mm) 100 90 80 70 60
- Page 108 and 109: using the cycle jump method, more t
- Page 110 and 111: Chapter 5 Face/Core Interface Fatig
- Page 112 and 113: of this chapter, sandwich panels wi
- Page 114 and 115: H250 Specimen H100 Specimen H45 Spe
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 5.5: Test setup. Initially,
- Page 118 and 119: H100 Specimen Fibre bridging Figure
- Page 120 and 121: propagation, the crack continues to
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 5.14: Kinking of the crack i
- Page 124 and 125: Crack length [mm] Crack length [mm]
3.6: Numerical <strong>and</strong> experimental buckling loads.<br />
Buckling loads (kN)<br />
Core type Debond diameter (mm)<br />
Experiment Non-linear FE eigenbuckling FE<br />
H130<br />
100<br />
200<br />
106.5±4.5<br />
27±1<br />
100<br />
26<br />
94.5<br />
26.9<br />
300 15 12 12.9<br />
H250<br />
100<br />
200<br />
121±9<br />
24±1<br />
104<br />
28<br />
100<br />
28<br />
300 16 13 12.5<br />
PMI<br />
100<br />
200<br />
85.5±3.5<br />
28.5±3.5<br />
94<br />
28<br />
109<br />
33.8<br />
300 11.5±4.5 14 15.9<br />
In order to estimate the crack propagation load <strong>of</strong> the panels, the energy release rate <strong>and</strong> phase<br />
angle were determined along the debond front. The energy release rate (G) was determined from<br />
relative nodal pair displacements along the crack flanks obtained from the finite element<br />
analysis. The energy release rate <strong>and</strong> mode-mixity phase angle are given by Equation (1.18) <strong>and</strong><br />
(1.19) in the Introduction <strong>of</strong> this thesis. h, which is the characteristic length <strong>of</strong> the crack problem,<br />
is chosen as the face sheet thickness. In Figure 3.18 the normalised energy release rate <strong>and</strong> phase<br />
angle with respect to the maximum determined energy release rate <strong>and</strong> phase angle along the<br />
debond front are plotted in polar diagrams for the H130 panels with 100 mm, 200 mm <strong>and</strong> 300<br />
mm debond diameter in a load level close to the experimental debond propagation load.<br />
Maximum energy release rate <strong>and</strong> minimum phase angle occur in the 0-degree debond front,<br />
implying the onset <strong>of</strong> debond propagation in this location, which is similar to experimental<br />
observations, see Figure 3.12. The same conclusion may be drawn for the panels with PMI <strong>and</strong><br />
H250 core.<br />
90<br />
1<br />
120<br />
135<br />
0.8<br />
150<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
165<br />
0.2<br />
180<br />
0<br />
105<br />
195<br />
210<br />
225<br />
240<br />
255<br />
75 60<br />
15<br />
0<br />
345<br />
330<br />
315<br />
300<br />
285<br />
120<br />
1<br />
90<br />
75<br />
60<br />
45<br />
30<br />
135<br />
150<br />
0.5<br />
45<br />
30<br />
105<br />
(a) (b)<br />
270<br />
270<br />
100 mm 200 mm 300 mm<br />
100 mm 200 mm 300 mm<br />
3.18:(a) Normalised energy release rate (G/Gmax) <strong>and</strong> (b) normalised phase angle (/max)<br />
for H130 panels with debond diameters <strong>of</strong> 100 mm, 200 mm <strong>and</strong> 300 mm.<br />
55<br />
165<br />
180<br />
195<br />
210<br />
225<br />
240<br />
255<br />
0<br />
-0.5<br />
15<br />
0<br />
345<br />
330<br />
315<br />
300<br />
285