Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Table 3.4: Parameters in the face/core interface fracture toughness function, Equation (3.14). Core GIC (J/m 2 ) Average fit GIC (J/m 2 ) Lower bound GIC (J/m 2 ) Upper bound k H130 450 280 620 0.45 H250 500 350 660 0.55 PMI 115 80 150 0.55 Figure 3.6 illustrates the typical crack path observed in the MMB specimens with PMI core. As it is seen, the crack grows below resin-rich cells in the core for all measured mode-mixities. Figure 3.6: Crack path for an MMB specimen with PMI core. For specimens with H130 core and mode-mixity phase angle of 0° >> -20°, the crack path was located below the face/core interface, see Figure 3.7. However, for the mode-mixity phase angle of -25° >> -65°, as shown in Figure 3.8, the crack path was in the actual face/core interface. As mentioned earlier, a toughening mechanism due to the increased negative mode-mixity is observed in this core material as well. This trend in the fracture toughness vs. mode-mixity was previously reported for other debonded sandwich materials tested at controlled mode-mixities, see Berggreen et al. (2005). Figure 3.7: Crack path for an MMB specimen with H130 core below the face/ core interface. 48
Figure 3.8: Crack path for an MMB specimen with H130 core in the face/core interface. For specimens with H250 core, the crack propagated in the interface for all measured modemixities as shown in Figure 3.9. In these specimens the fracture toughness increased with increasing magnitude of the negative mode-mixity phase angle at the crack tip similar to the specimens with PMI and H130 cores. Additionally, it was observed that in longer crack lengths (4mm), fibre bridging started to emerge, which can be attributed to the CSM layer placed in the face/core interface during the manufacturing process of the MMB specimens. The fibre bridging enhances the fracture toughness by creating a large fracture process zone and, thus, the modemixity might lose its validity. Since the fracture experiments are focused on fracture initiation and not propagation, no analysis for fibre bridging is presented in this study. 3.4 Panel Tests Figure 3.9: Crack path for an MMB specimen with H250 core. Figure 3.10 shows the test rig designed to introduce a uniform in-plane compressive load to the edges of either plane or singly curved sandwich panels. The test rig was inserted into a four- column Instron 8508 servo-hydraulic testing machine with a maximum capacity of 5 MN. However, a 1 kN Instron load cell was used for the tests to increase the accuracy of the load measurements. A 4 Mpix Digital Image Correlation (DIC) measurement system (ARAMIS 4M) 49
- Page 20 and 21: H11 bimaterial constant H22 bimater
- Page 22 and 23: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 24 and 25: These peculiar damage modes often r
- Page 26 and 27: 1.2 Overview of the Thesis In this
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 1.3: Fracture modes, from Be
- Page 30 and 31: In Equations (1.5) and (1.6) H11, H
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 1.6: Schematic illustration
- Page 34 and 35: The compact tension specimen (CT) i
- Page 36 and 37: A Figure 1.10: CSB, DCB, TSD, DCB-U
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 2 Buckling Driven Face/Core
- Page 40 and 41: (DIC) measurement system (ARAMIS 2M
- Page 42 and 43: corresponds to the onset of debond
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2.7: Crack kinking into the
- Page 46 and 47: (2.2) where and for plane str
- Page 48 and 49: A modified version of the tilted sa
- Page 50 and 51: previous observations of crack path
- Page 52 and 53: of contact elements (CONTACT173 and
- Page 54 and 55: the debond opening initially increa
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2.4: Instability loads determ
- Page 58 and 59: G (J/m2) 600 400 200 0 H100 IMP=0.1
- Page 60 and 61: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 62 and 63: Hayman (2007) has described a damag
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3.1: Panel test specimens. La
- Page 66 and 67: sheet and the core thickness, respe
- Page 68 and 69: Load (N) 250 200 150 100 50 0 H130
- Page 72 and 73: was used to monitor 3D surface disp
- Page 74 and 75: arising due to the junction between
- Page 76 and 77: (a) Debonded face sheet Figure 3.16
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 3.19 shows the determined en
- Page 80 and 81: H130 MMB H130 Panel H250 MMB Interf
- Page 82 and 83: 3.6 Conclusion In this chapter the
- Page 84 and 85: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 86 and 87: composite laminates under thermal c
- Page 88 and 89: S S y( t ) y( t ) ( t ) 2 1 12 2
- Page 90 and 91: listed in Table 4.1. The length and
- Page 92 and 93: The strain energy release rate, G,
- Page 94 and 95: high growth rate of G (see Figure 4
- Page 96 and 97: 4.4 Face/Core Fatigue Crack Growth
- Page 98 and 99: Debond 310 mm Symmetry B. C. a Figu
- Page 100 and 101: B 2 1/ 2 ( S44 S55 S45) (4.17) wh
- Page 102 and 103: 75), which illustrates possible ina
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 4.18 (a) presents the deflec
- Page 106 and 107: Debond radius (mm) 100 90 80 70 60
- Page 108 and 109: using the cycle jump method, more t
- Page 110 and 111: Chapter 5 Face/Core Interface Fatig
- Page 112 and 113: of this chapter, sandwich panels wi
- Page 114 and 115: H250 Specimen H100 Specimen H45 Spe
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 5.5: Test setup. Initially,
- Page 118 and 119: H100 Specimen Fibre bridging Figure
Table 3.4: Parameters in the face/core interface fracture toughness function, Equation (3.14).<br />
Core<br />
GIC (J/m 2 )<br />
Average fit<br />
GIC (J/m 2 )<br />
Lower bound<br />
GIC (J/m 2 )<br />
Upper bound<br />
k<br />
H130 450 280 620 0.45<br />
H250 500 350 660 0.55<br />
PMI 115 80 150 0.55<br />
Figure 3.6 illustrates the typical crack path observed in the MMB specimens with PMI core. As it<br />
is seen, the crack grows below resin-rich cells in the core for all measured mode-mixities.<br />
Figure 3.6: Crack path for an MMB specimen with PMI core.<br />
For specimens with H130 core <strong>and</strong> mode-mixity phase angle <strong>of</strong> 0° >> -20°, the crack path was<br />
located below the face/core interface, see Figure 3.7. However, for the mode-mixity phase angle<br />
<strong>of</strong> -25° >> -65°, as shown in Figure 3.8, the crack path was in the actual face/core interface. As<br />
mentioned earlier, a toughening mechanism due to the increased negative mode-mixity is<br />
observed in this core material as well. This trend in the fracture toughness vs. mode-mixity was<br />
previously reported for other debonded s<strong>and</strong>wich materials tested at controlled mode-mixities,<br />
see Berggreen et al. (2005).<br />
Figure 3.7: Crack path for an MMB specimen with H130 core below the face/ core interface.<br />
48