Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
the debond opening initially increases slowly with increasing load, but then increases rapidly as the maximum load is approached. At the maximum load, which corresponds to the onset of propagation, the load decreases due to the displacement controlled loading and debond propagation resulting in increased compliance, while the out-of-plane displacement of the debonded face rapidly increases. The load reduction is shown only for the experimental results, as only initiation of debond propagation is modelled numerically (no crack propagation algorithms are implemented in the finite element model). It is seen that the initial imperfection magnitude does not influence the out-of-plane deflection of the columns very much. A bifurcation instability of the debonded face sheet is not observed until the propagation point. Evidently, the presence of initial imperfection transforms the behaviour of the debonded face sheet into compression loading of a curved column. The failure load is found from fracture mechanics analysis, when the crack tip loading reaches the fracture toughness. Because of the imperfection present in the debonded face sheet, the critical instability load is extracted from both experimental and finite element results applying the Southwell method (Southwell, 1932). The Southwell method is a graphical method which estimates the instability load of imperfect structural columns. Southwell showed that the deflection, , at the centre of an imperfect column, loaded by a load P, is given by where Pcr is the instability load, and is proportional to the initial imperfection ( ). By plotting vs. /P, Pcr,, the instability load, can be determined by the slope of the line (the so-called Southwell plot method). Figure 2.18: Deformed shape of a column with H100 core containing a 50.8 mm face/core debond after local buckling of the debonded face sheet. 32 (2.8)
Out-of-plane displacement (mm) 4 3 2 1 0 Column1 FEA, IMP=0.1 mm FEA, IMP=0.2 mm FEA, IMP=0.4 mm Debond= 25.4 mm 0 4 8 12 16 Load (kN) Out-of-plane displacement (mm) 4 3 2 1 0 (a) Figure 2.19: Finite element and experimental results for out-of-plane vs. load diagram for columns with H100 core and (a) 25.4 mm debond (b) 38.1 mm debond (c) 50.8 mm debond. The average initial imperfection magnitude in the tested columns is 0.2 mm. Numerical and experimental results are compared in terms of instability load values listed in Table 2.4. For the finite element analysis results, a 0.2 mm initial imperfection was selected, which is consistent with experimental values. From the results listed in Table 2.4, it is seen that experimental and numerical instability loads are in good agreement. Further, it is seen that the instability load drops significantly as the debond length increases, which is well-known for any buckling problem. 33 Out-of-plane displacement (mm) Column1 Column2 Column3 FEA, IMP=0.1 FEA, IMP=0.2 FEA, IMP=0.4 Debond= 50.8 mm 4 3 2 1 0 Column1 Column2 Column3 FEA, IMP=0.1 FEA, IMP=0.2 FEA, IMP=0.4 Debond= 38.1 mm 0 2 4 6 8 10 Load (kN) 0 4 8 12 (c) Load (kN) (b)
- Page 4 and 5: Published in Denmark by Technical U
- Page 6 and 7: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 8 and 9: method to accelerate the simulation
- Page 10 and 11: Synopsis Sandwich kompositter er i
- Page 12 and 13: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 14 and 15: Contents Preface Executive Summary
- Page 16 and 17: 5 Face/core Interface Fatigue Crack
- Page 18 and 19: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 20 and 21: H11 bimaterial constant H22 bimater
- Page 22 and 23: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 24 and 25: These peculiar damage modes often r
- Page 26 and 27: 1.2 Overview of the Thesis In this
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 1.3: Fracture modes, from Be
- Page 30 and 31: In Equations (1.5) and (1.6) H11, H
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 1.6: Schematic illustration
- Page 34 and 35: The compact tension specimen (CT) i
- Page 36 and 37: A Figure 1.10: CSB, DCB, TSD, DCB-U
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 2 Buckling Driven Face/Core
- Page 40 and 41: (DIC) measurement system (ARAMIS 2M
- Page 42 and 43: corresponds to the onset of debond
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2.7: Crack kinking into the
- Page 46 and 47: (2.2) where and for plane str
- Page 48 and 49: A modified version of the tilted sa
- Page 50 and 51: previous observations of crack path
- Page 52 and 53: of contact elements (CONTACT173 and
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2.4: Instability loads determ
- Page 58 and 59: G (J/m2) 600 400 200 0 H100 IMP=0.1
- Page 60 and 61: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 62 and 63: Hayman (2007) has described a damag
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3.1: Panel test specimens. La
- Page 66 and 67: sheet and the core thickness, respe
- Page 68 and 69: Load (N) 250 200 150 100 50 0 H130
- Page 70 and 71: Table 3.4: Parameters in the face/c
- Page 72 and 73: was used to monitor 3D surface disp
- Page 74 and 75: arising due to the junction between
- Page 76 and 77: (a) Debonded face sheet Figure 3.16
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 3.19 shows the determined en
- Page 80 and 81: H130 MMB H130 Panel H250 MMB Interf
- Page 82 and 83: 3.6 Conclusion In this chapter the
- Page 84 and 85: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 86 and 87: composite laminates under thermal c
- Page 88 and 89: S S y( t ) y( t ) ( t ) 2 1 12 2
- Page 90 and 91: listed in Table 4.1. The length and
- Page 92 and 93: The strain energy release rate, G,
- Page 94 and 95: high growth rate of G (see Figure 4
- Page 96 and 97: 4.4 Face/Core Fatigue Crack Growth
- Page 98 and 99: Debond 310 mm Symmetry B. C. a Figu
- Page 100 and 101: B 2 1/ 2 ( S44 S55 S45) (4.17) wh
- Page 102 and 103: 75), which illustrates possible ina
the debond opening initially increases slowly with increasing load, but then increases rapidly as<br />
the maximum load is approached. At the maximum load, which corresponds to the onset <strong>of</strong><br />
propagation, the load decreases due to the displacement controlled loading <strong>and</strong> debond<br />
propagation resulting in increased compliance, while the out-<strong>of</strong>-plane displacement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
debonded face rapidly increases. The load reduction is shown only for the experimental results,<br />
as only initiation <strong>of</strong> debond propagation is modelled numerically (no crack propagation<br />
algorithms are implemented in the finite element model). It is seen that the initial imperfection<br />
magnitude does not influence the out-<strong>of</strong>-plane deflection <strong>of</strong> the columns very much. A<br />
bifurcation instability <strong>of</strong> the debonded face sheet is not observed until the propagation point.<br />
Evidently, the presence <strong>of</strong> initial imperfection transforms the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the debonded face<br />
sheet into compression loading <strong>of</strong> a curved column. The failure load is found from fracture<br />
mechanics analysis, when the crack tip loading reaches the fracture toughness. Because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
imperfection present in the debonded face sheet, the critical instability load is extracted from<br />
both experimental <strong>and</strong> finite element results applying the Southwell method (Southwell, 1932).<br />
The Southwell method is a graphical method which estimates the instability load <strong>of</strong> imperfect<br />
structural columns. Southwell showed that the deflection, , at the centre <strong>of</strong> an imperfect<br />
column, loaded by a load P, is given by<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
where Pcr is the instability load, <strong>and</strong> is proportional to the initial imperfection ( ). By plotting<br />
vs. /P, Pcr,, the instability load, can be determined by the slope <strong>of</strong> the line (the so-called<br />
Southwell plot method).<br />
Figure 2.18: Deformed shape <strong>of</strong> a column with H100 core containing a 50.8 mm face/core<br />
debond after local buckling <strong>of</strong> the debonded face sheet.<br />
32<br />
(2.8)