Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
(2.2) where and for plane stress and plane strain, respectively. E and are Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio, respectively. Normal force and moment in the TSD specimen can be determined from the vertical force P and the tilt angle by (2.3) (2.4) For the reduced formulation where ==0 Finally, the energy release rate can be calculated by Regarding the mode-mixity it was revealed that the mode-mixity for a conventional TSD specimen remains quite unaffected by the tilt angle (Li and Carlsson, 2001). Furthermore, it was discovered that the unreinforced TSD specimens display positive mode-mixity phase angles for tilt angles up to around 80 for all analysed PVC core materials, thus provoking the crack to kink into the core (Berggreen and Carlsson, 2010). To increase the range of achieved mode-mixities by the TSD specimen, two modified designs of the TSD specimen were proposed by Berggreen and Carlsson (2010). In the first modified design the upper face sheet of the TSD specimen is reinforced by a thick stiff steel plate to increase the stiffness of the loaded face sheet as shown in Figure 2.10. It was shown that by reinforcing the upper face sheet with a stiff steel plate the range of phase angles is expanded because of increasing shear loading and crack tip root rotation in the specimen. 24 (2.5) (2.6) (2.7)
Figure 2.10: Schematic presentation of the first modified TSD specimen. Further modifications were made by reducing the global shear deformation of the core by reinforcing the left edge of the TSD specimen by placing a metal block, see Figure 2.11. To avoid compression failure of the core at the right end of the reinforced TSD specimen due to rotation of the reinforced face sheet, a short link is pin-attached between the rigid base of the test rig and the centre of the steel reinforcement bar on both sides of the TSD specimen, see Figure 2.11. Figure 2.11: Schematic presentation of the second modified TSD specimen. 25
- Page 1: Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifet
- Page 4 and 5: Published in Denmark by Technical U
- Page 6 and 7: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 8 and 9: method to accelerate the simulation
- Page 10 and 11: Synopsis Sandwich kompositter er i
- Page 12 and 13: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 14 and 15: Contents Preface Executive Summary
- Page 16 and 17: 5 Face/core Interface Fatigue Crack
- Page 18 and 19: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 20 and 21: H11 bimaterial constant H22 bimater
- Page 22 and 23: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 24 and 25: These peculiar damage modes often r
- Page 26 and 27: 1.2 Overview of the Thesis In this
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 1.3: Fracture modes, from Be
- Page 30 and 31: In Equations (1.5) and (1.6) H11, H
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 1.6: Schematic illustration
- Page 34 and 35: The compact tension specimen (CT) i
- Page 36 and 37: A Figure 1.10: CSB, DCB, TSD, DCB-U
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 2 Buckling Driven Face/Core
- Page 40 and 41: (DIC) measurement system (ARAMIS 2M
- Page 42 and 43: corresponds to the onset of debond
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2.7: Crack kinking into the
- Page 48 and 49: A modified version of the tilted sa
- Page 50 and 51: previous observations of crack path
- Page 52 and 53: of contact elements (CONTACT173 and
- Page 54 and 55: the debond opening initially increa
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2.4: Instability loads determ
- Page 58 and 59: G (J/m2) 600 400 200 0 H100 IMP=0.1
- Page 60 and 61: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 62 and 63: Hayman (2007) has described a damag
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3.1: Panel test specimens. La
- Page 66 and 67: sheet and the core thickness, respe
- Page 68 and 69: Load (N) 250 200 150 100 50 0 H130
- Page 70 and 71: Table 3.4: Parameters in the face/c
- Page 72 and 73: was used to monitor 3D surface disp
- Page 74 and 75: arising due to the junction between
- Page 76 and 77: (a) Debonded face sheet Figure 3.16
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 3.19 shows the determined en
- Page 80 and 81: H130 MMB H130 Panel H250 MMB Interf
- Page 82 and 83: 3.6 Conclusion In this chapter the
- Page 84 and 85: This page is intentionally left bla
- Page 86 and 87: composite laminates under thermal c
- Page 88 and 89: S S y( t ) y( t ) ( t ) 2 1 12 2
- Page 90 and 91: listed in Table 4.1. The length and
- Page 92 and 93: The strain energy release rate, G,
- Page 94 and 95: high growth rate of G (see Figure 4
(2.2)<br />
where <strong>and</strong> for plane stress <strong>and</strong> plane strain, respectively. E <strong>and</strong> are<br />
Young’s modulus <strong>and</strong> Poisson’s ratio, respectively. Normal force <strong>and</strong> moment in the TSD<br />
specimen can be determined from the vertical force P <strong>and</strong> the tilt angle by<br />
(2.3)<br />
(2.4)<br />
For the reduced formulation where ==0<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Finally, the energy release rate can be calculated by<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Regarding the mode-mixity it was revealed that the mode-mixity for a conventional TSD<br />
specimen remains quite unaffected by the tilt angle (Li <strong>and</strong> Carlsson, 2001). Furthermore, it was<br />
discovered that the unreinforced TSD specimens display positive mode-mixity phase angles for<br />
tilt angles up to around 80 for all analysed PVC core materials, thus provoking the crack to kink<br />
into the core (Berggreen <strong>and</strong> Carlsson, 2010). To increase the range <strong>of</strong> achieved mode-mixities<br />
by the TSD specimen, two modified designs <strong>of</strong> the TSD specimen were proposed by Berggreen<br />
<strong>and</strong> Carlsson (2010). In the first modified design the upper face sheet <strong>of</strong> the TSD specimen is<br />
reinforced by a thick stiff steel plate to increase the stiffness <strong>of</strong> the loaded face sheet as shown in<br />
Figure 2.10. It was shown that by reinforcing the upper face sheet with a stiff steel plate the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> phase angles is exp<strong>and</strong>ed because <strong>of</strong> increasing shear loading <strong>and</strong> crack tip root rotation<br />
in the specimen.<br />
24<br />
(2.5)<br />
(2.6)<br />
(2.7)