Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Residual Strength and Fatigue Lifetime of ... - Solid Mechanics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
s<strong>and</strong>wich Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) (Prasad <strong>and</strong> Carlsson, 1994), the modified Tilted<br />
S<strong>and</strong>wich Debond specimen (TSD) (Berggreen <strong>and</strong> Carlsson, 2010), the Single Cantilever Beam<br />
(SCB) (Cantwell <strong>and</strong> Davies, 1994, 1996), the Three-Point S<strong>and</strong>wich Beam (TPSB) (Cantwell<br />
<strong>and</strong> co-authors, 1999, 2001), the s<strong>and</strong>wich DCB subjected to Uneven Bending Moment named<br />
DCB-UBM (Lundsgaard et al., 2008) <strong>and</strong> the s<strong>and</strong>wich Mixed Mode Bending (Quispitupa et al.,<br />
2009) have been proposed for interface fracture toughness characterisation <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>wich<br />
structures. Many <strong>of</strong> these specimens can be applied to fatigue crack propagation testing as well,<br />
see Figure 1.10.<br />
Among these test specimens, Shipsha et al. (1999) used DCB <strong>and</strong> CSB specimens to measure<br />
face/core interface fatigue crack growth rates in foam cored s<strong>and</strong>wich beams under pure mode I<br />
<strong>and</strong> II loading. The disadvantage <strong>of</strong> utilising the CSB, DCB, TPSB <strong>and</strong> SCB specimens is the<br />
impossibility <strong>of</strong> mode-mixity variation for a fixed specimen geometry <strong>and</strong> material<br />
configuration. Utilising the CSB specimen, only mode II dominated crack growth rates <strong>and</strong><br />
fracture toughness can be measured while with the DCB <strong>and</strong> TPSB only mode I dominant<br />
loading <strong>of</strong> the crack tip is possible. The TSD specimen may be used to measure the fracture<br />
toughness in a wide range <strong>of</strong> mode-mixities. However, since the mode-mixity is a function <strong>of</strong><br />
crack length in this specimen, it is not directly suitable for st<strong>and</strong>ard interface fatigue<br />
characterisation at a specific mode-mixity. As to the DCB-UBM <strong>and</strong> MMB specimens, apart<br />
from being able to load the crack at different mode-mixities, the mode-mixity also remains<br />
constant as the crack grows, which makes these specimens ideal c<strong>and</strong>idates for the measurement<br />
<strong>of</strong> interface fatigue crack growth rates. The DCB-UBM specimen has not been used for fatigue<br />
tests yet. However, Quispitupa et al. (2008) used the s<strong>and</strong>wich Mixed Mode Bending (MMB)<br />
specimen to measure face/core interface crack growth rates for a range <strong>of</strong> mode-mixities. The<br />
MMB test rig allows for adjustment <strong>of</strong> the mixed-mode ratio simply by changing the location <strong>of</strong><br />
the support at point A, see Figure 1.10. The MMB test rig is used in this thesis to measure<br />
fracture toughness in Chapter 3 <strong>and</strong> crack growth rates in Chapter 5. In Chapter 2 as an<br />
alternative method, the TSD specimen is used to measure the face/core fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
s<strong>and</strong>wich configurations.<br />
13